Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 29/09/2026@semble.so Is there a way to update the title of a card? Or even edit it arbitrarily? 110
Reposted by Konrad HinsenMelanie Mitchell @melaniemitchell.bsky.social · 28/09/2026👀 Florida attorney general to OpenAI: (www.myfloridalegal.com/sites/defaul...) 1139466
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 25/09/2026New blog post: "Knowledge refinement in the digital era" 🧪 How can computational knowledge move from research into education and general culture? blog.khinsen.net/posts/2026/0...blog.khinsen.netKonrad Hinsen's blog 010
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 25/09/2026Lecture notes on "The Source Code of Science" 🧪, by Roberto di Cosmo. hal.science/hal-05734828 Its source code: github.com/rdicosmo/sou...hal.scienceMaking sure you're not a bot! 000
Reposted by Konrad HinsenMarcin J. Suskiewicz @msuskiewicz.eurosky.social · 15/09/2026Today, the day of the 100th anniversary symposium for Jean-Pierre Serre in Paris, I'm thinking of this quote from another mathematician, A. Connes. I do think it's important we foster confidence in our own expertise - as a nonsense filter and departure point for creativity. 063
Reposted by Konrad HinsenMelanie Mitchell @melaniemitchell.bsky.social · 10/09/2026I wrote down my thoughts about the last several weeks of AI hell. aiguide.substack.com/p/misleading...aiguide.substack.comMisleading Metaphors, Real RisksWhat To Fear from AI Agents and How to Reclaim Our Human Agency 1019881
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 10/09/2026Both MOOCs are free, thanks to the generous support by the Inria Learning Lab. 010
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 10/09/2026Want to learn good practices for reproducible research? There's a MOOC for that! 🧪 First level, for anyone doing research using computers: www.fun-mooc.fr/en/courses/r... Second level, for those who do computational research: www.fun-mooc.fr/en/courses/r...fun-mooc.frReproducible research: methodological principles for transparent…This Mooc proposes methodological principles for open and transparent science. It deals in a practical way with note-taking, computational documentation, replicability of analyses. 130
Reposted by Konrad HinsenMelanie Mitchell @melaniemitchell.bsky.social · 08/09/2026Hey @ericlipton.nytimes.com 👋 AI is not “evolving” on its own. *People* are choosing how to build it. *People* are choosing how to train it. *People* are choosing how to run it. Maybe the problem is that they are the *wrong people* to make these choices. 28635174
Reposted by Konrad HinsenMetaROR @metaror.bsky.social · 07/09/2026Here is the evaluation for "an empirical assessment of the inferential reproducibility of linear regression analyses in health and biomedical research". It demonstrates "substantial violations of key modelling assumptions" that often went unnoticed by authors and reviewers. 👇 Read it on MetaRORmetaror.orgAn empirical assessment of inferential reproducibility of linear regression in health and biomedical research papers - MetaROR 112
Reposted by Konrad HinsenJoseph Cox @josephcox.bsky.social · 17/08/2026New from 404 Media: we solved which AI company is buying massive shipments of rare books, scanning and destroying them to train AI. We put an Apple AirTag in a rare book, followed it. It ended up at an Amazon facility. Its logo is a dinosaur ripping through a book www.404media.co/we-tracked-a...404media.coWe Tracked a Shipment of Rare Books. It Ended at an Amazon AI Training FacilityWe placed a tracking device in a shipment of rare books to see which AI company was buying it, and found an Amazon facility where Amazon scans and destroys books. 12537932368
Reposted by Konrad HinsenOlivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 16/07/2026> Young people [...] coined this term ‘AI slop’ … There’s a sort of disdain for things AI. Where are all those who claimed the problem with AI adoption was because every new tech that young people use old people hate? Oh, did that parallel collapse because it's actually the kids who hate it? 8929
Reposted by Konrad HinsenOlivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 09/08/2026Chess is a formal system. Language isn't. There's a huge difference between the rules of chess and language, which doesn't have a set of rules in the same way. 3628
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 05/08/2026Yes, clustering with adjustable resolution would be great! Zooming into a topic sound promising! 010
Reposted by Konrad Hinsen𝕮 @chrisshank.com · 13/07/2026Just released an early preview of Zemble, a @zotero.org plugin for @semble.so! - Augment you Zotero library with all of the activity happening on Semble/Atmosphere. - Easily save and view items in Zotero on Semble. - Publish Zotero collections as Semble collections. 511919
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 05/08/2026This looks great! But... where do the 28 topics come from? Derived from the graph? If so, how do you define a topic? 28 looks like a pretty small number, given the number of links. 120
Reposted by Konrad HinsenDavid Gasquez @davidgasquez.com · 31/07/2026Wanted to take a peek at @semble.so and didn't knew where to start. I built this as a static explorer of all the links in there. sites.wisp.place/davidgasquez... Love AT Protocol for letting me build the UI I want! 😍 5627
Reposted by Konrad HinsenGordon @gordon.bsky.social · 04/08/2026Copying manuscripts by hand must have been an incredibly deep learning experience. Working through the ideas of Plato or Aristotle or Augustine line by line. Swimming in author’s head for months. 1462
Reposted by Konrad HinsenFastmail @fastmail.com · 03/08/2026Fastmail data can now live primarily in the EU, on servers our own engineers set up in Amsterdam. Current customers can switch in settings; new accounts pick a region at signup. Our CEO Bron's post walks through exactly what lives where. www.fastmail.com/blog/fastmai... #Fastmail #Emailfastmail.comFastmail offers EU data regionChoose if you want to make the European Union the primary home for your Fastmail data, on our own secure servers in Amsterdam. 58022
Reposted by Konrad HinsenMelanie Mitchell @melaniemitchell.bsky.social · 01/08/2026I recommend this article about AI reasoning, where the author lets us in on his struggles w/ AI cognitive dissonance. Plus some priceless quotes from @rao2z.bsky.social. (My recommendation has *nothing* to do with the fact that I'm quoted in it too 😇) www.quantamagazine.org/is-ai-reason...quantamagazine.orgIs AI Reasoning Right for the Wrong Reasons? | Quanta MagazineThe idea that artificial intelligence can “reason” is more intuitive than ever. But intuitions can be wrong, and the science is far from settled. 511134
Reposted by Konrad HinsenSabina Leonelli @sabinaleonelli.bsky.social · 26/07/2026See below for a preview of our Munich Manifesto for Equitable Open Research - if you care about #openscience for all, please consider signing too! We are gathering support for a formal launch in September #philsci #research #policy #equality #sts Thanks so much @alelazic.bsky.social for your insight 0143
Reposted by Konrad Hinsentom larkworthy @larkworthy.bsky.social · 27/07/2026OK one of the greatest things IA've ever built. Bi-directional SVG source code editing. Drawing as programming with programmable drawings. *this* is how I want computers to collaborate with me. Ordinary SVG with a plurality of editable views. tomlarkworthy.github.io/lopebooks/no... 28516
Reposted by Konrad HinsenBerna Devezer @devezer.bsky.social · 22/07/2026normally, as a metascientist, I should be elated to read about "establishing metascience units to institutionalize continuous improvement" as a government science priority but in this case it fills me with dread 2537
Reposted by Konrad HinsenOlivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 13/07/2026This problem by the way with industry actors destroying open source projects and taking advantage of people who pour their hearts into things has been well-known for ages and their entryism is reaching new heights bsky.app/profile/khin... 3193
Reposted by Konrad HinsenOlivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 12/07/2026Things like: Cooper, R. P., & Guest, O. (2014). Implementations are not specifications: Specification, replication and experimentation in computational cognitive modeling. Cognitive Systems Research, 27, 42-49. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.05.001. PDF: pure.mpg.de/rest/items/i...pure.mpg.de 153
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 07/07/2026I suppose it's this thread (from 2017!): github.com/ReScience/Re...github.comPost-publication maintenance · Issue #43 · ReScience/ReScienceI have tried to reproduce the results of some of the papers published in ReScience, with the goal of using them as examples in a course on reproducible research. The idea is to let students re-run ... 141
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 07/07/2026My experience from my Fortran days is that sticking strictly to the Fortran 77 standard yielded very portable programs. Prospero Fortran for the Atari ST had a strict F77 mode, which made this easy for me. 110
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 07/07/2026A reproducible container, e.g. built from a Debian snapshot, will do fine as a baseline. My personal preference would be Guix instead, but that's a detail. My main point is that a non-reproducible container (built from "latest Ubuntu", for example) is not a good choice. 140
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 07/07/2026Yes, stone tablets! I have always wanted to do an April fool's message announcing a cuneiform clay tablet backend for LLVM. 160
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 07/07/2026Digital archivists use virtual machines. But they preserve unique executable artifacts, not building blocks that need to be assembled for a specific research project. 120
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 07/07/2026Time scales are really important and a huge cause of misunderstandings. In my field (biophysics), a joint theoretical-experimental research project can easily run over ten years. For someone in machine learning, that's all of known history. 050
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 07/07/2026There is indeed a one-time complexity cost for having C libraries. But I haven't seen any case of Python software collapse caused by a C library so far. Nor of the C build system, unless it's CMake. 130
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 07/07/2026The only form of software distribution that is really OK for science is source code with build instructions, for all parts of the software stack that are not stable over years to decades. 3123
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 07/07/2026Containers are OK (if you don't mind their size) for sharing and archiving binaries. But research requires not only running compiled code. You have to be able to modify the source code and recompile. You cannot do that if all you have is a container. And then, as you say, there are hardware issues. 271
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 07/07/2026I definitely simplify the past, but I don't think I idealize it. There have always been more and less rigorous people in science (which is good!). What has changed is that being rigorous is no longer a possibility in many contexts. 051
Reposted by Konrad Hinsenville hautakangas @vhautaka.milfmessenger.app · 06/07/2026"Conviviality can only happen if a majority of a community adopts it as a value. What small groups of people can do, however, is develop and use convivial tools at their modest scale, to demonstrate that it is possible, and to provide a model that others can learn from if they want to." 011
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 07/07/2026Yes, I have seen this, and I have talked to people who were involved in the various processes. It's much more complicated than the article suggests. Have a look at the thesis itself if you want to know more - its scientific quality is... well... questionable. 030
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 07/07/2026There's an issue thread somewhere on GitHub about this. I tried to reproduce results from published ReScience C papers. They were all "confirmed reproducible" by two reviewers at publication time. A few years later, I couldn't run the code any more. 240
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 07/07/2026If all versions are given AND you manage to reconstruct an environment from that list, your chances are much better. For full reproducibility, you need the versions of everything, down to compilers, system libraries, and the operating system itself. There are real-life examples where this matters. 2152
Reposted by Konrad HinsenOlivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 06/07/2026oh that's very related to @khinsen.net and co's rescience.github.iorescience.github.ioReScience CReproducible Science is good.<br/> Replicated Science is better. 131
Reposted by Konrad HinsenOlivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 06/07/2026anyway read the paper @khinsen.net links to as well: doi.org/10.4000/16954doi.orgConviviality for Digital Degrowth1 Introduction In Tools for Conviviality [1973], Ivan Illich laid down a strikingly prescient analysis of the woes that can plague a technological society and destroy what he called conviviality, t... 0153
Reposted by Konrad HinsenOlivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 06/07/2026> Conviviality can only happen if a majority of a community adopts it as a value. What small groups of people can do, however, is develop and use convivial tools at their modest scale, to [...] provide a model that others can learn from if they want to. — @khinsen.net 17114
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 06/07/2026New blog post: "Conviviality in computational science" blog.khinsen.net/posts/2026/0... "Conviviality matters for science ... if you want to derive knowledge from your work, you need to know exactly what you are doing, and that includes a detailed understanding of your tools." 🧪 #metascienceblog.khinsen.netKonrad Hinsen's blog 34416
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 26/06/2026Your account your PDS (Personal Data Store). It's much like a Web site, but for structured data rather than pages. Apps read data from PDS (it's all public), and given your authentication they can modify data in your PDS. One account for any number of apps. Which can all read each other's data. 120
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 25/06/2026What exactly do you verify? What can I deduce from the fact that an account was verified by you? I can't find anything about this on your Web site. 141
Reposted by Konrad HinsenDanielle Beckman @daniellebeckman.bsky.social · 24/06/2026Nothing says "we should probably do something about this" quite like an extreme heat conference being canceled because it's too hot. 🫠🌡️ 116269
Reposted by Konrad HinsenMark Rubin @markrubin.bsky.social · 22/06/2026"Open science is increasingly losing its liberating and democratizing potential, as it becomes entangled with the interconnected and mutually reinforcing logics of commercialization, political instrumentalization, and media-driven visibility of science." 1106
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 21/06/2026I just tried again, and now it only asked me if I am 18 or above. Different computer, different browser, a few days later. 110
Konrad Hinsen @khinsen.net · 21/06/2026BlueSky only asked me if I am 18 or above. Mu asked me for my birth date. But apparently, others only get asked if they are 18 or above (e.g. bsky.app/profile/fger...). 210