Sign in

Ketan Joshi

@ketanjoshi.co
65K followers 4.2K following 30K posts

Hey, I'm a climate and energy writer / data analyst who focuses on corporate + govt accountability Creator + curator of the Greensky feed: ketanjoshi.co/greensky Based in Oslo but write about US, Europe, Aus too - ketan.joshi85@gmail.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
jae holzman @jael.bsky.social · 8h
i hate digger and i love how much i hate digger. i am going to see the movie again in two days with more friends. it is climate change freddy got fingered
'Digger' review
The first 20 minutes of the film set up a brilliant comedy that skewers our modern lives today. And then it spends about 2 hours making us feel awful for thinking the first 20 minutes were good, on purpose, over and over again. It is a joyless, colorless film that poorly parodies Citizen Kane and Dr.
Strangelove intentionally, making a mockery of essentially all modern American liberal political commentary and comedy. And a parody of a parody is interesting but uncomfortable and challenging to watch.A parody of Donald Trump today is neither funny nor poignant and the movie knows that. By the film's conclusion, you're left wondering whether spending big budgets to make climate films at all makes any sense. It
would be reductive as well to say the film inspires you to take on the actual
catastrophe outside, because its so confident in its future of doom that really, you're only left with a wordless unease about the idea of apocalypse fiction itself. To watch "Digger" is to experience a deeply miserable punk rock waste of more than one hundred million dollars, à la Freddy Got Fingered - but you will not laugh, unless you're laughing at yourself for being in the theater at all.I enjoyed Digger, and then I hated Digger, and then I enjoyed hate-watching Digger, and then I felt weird because the movie flat out told me to feel disgusting for enjoying hate-watching Digger, and to like hating myself, and I didn't want to listen to that part, and that's the point. Andy Kaufman couldn't have done it better. The Wolf of Wall Street tried to pull this trick and failed. Vice and Don't Look Up both tried to pull this trick and failed. So many other meta-media films have tried to do this recently and they're boring because they are entertaining. Digger is so boring, and frustrating, and uncomfortable, and that's why it works, and I hate that, too, which I also love.Digger will be a massive commercial flop and then go to streaming where it'll be remembered as a cult classic forever. I will watch this movie again and again, and I will find new things to hate to love and love to hate. I couldn't recommend it more highly to anyone who wants to see a piece of ridiculous high-budget avant garde mistakenly promoted as a mass appeal "dark comedy" because it stars Tom Cruise. And yet even the inaccurate PR is part of the point of Digger, to reel you in with precisely the bait it wants to chide you for taking.
2019332
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
Felix Hamer • electricfelix @electricfelix.eurosky.social · 7h
There's only one Fickling "Nowadays, LNG is failing on all three. It’s never been clean,these days it’s not cheap, either: Just buying gas for an existing plant can cost more than building a brand-new solar-plus-storage system from scratch" Bloomberg's very best🌞🔋 www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
16925
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 7h
I am so excited to go watch Digger. I keep seeing intensely negative reviews and they're all probably pretty correct but I am still excited because it's such a rare treat to get a specifically fossil fuel themed movie and they're not all going to be Daniel Day Lewis with his milky shakes
8621
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 7h
In a situation of massive demand growth, you can have lots of renewable energy but still also see rising emissions on the power grid So this permitting bill could do everything promised: enable huge amounts of renewables but the broader question of how that actually impacts US emissions isn't clear
360
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 7h
There has been a huge exodus from an overarching project of fossil fuel phase-out for the power grid, and a massive flip in the US energy industry (clean and dirty) towards presenting their efforts as meeting data centre demand Not hard to find examples but Fervo is a good one
fervoenergy.com
Scaling 24/7 Power for the AI Era: The Enhanced Geothermal Data Center Corridor - Fervo Energy
Enhanced Geothermal Energy is Poised to Power the Future of AI
3228
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 7h
Something I haven't really seen touched on very much is that, compared to previous permitting reform debates in the US, a much higher %'age of new clean power is servicing data centre growth rather than fossil fuel elimination. www.woodmac.com/blogs/energy...
There are also sections designed to help development in specific energy sectors, including electricity transmission, solar and geothermal power. Another key provision would compel data centre developers to cover the cost of any transmission investment needed to support their facilities.

The political impetus behind the bill has been a bipartisan recognition that the current permitting system makes it too difficult to develop both fossil fuel and low-carbon energy infrastructure in the US. Surging electricity demand from new data centres for AI has made the case for reform more urgent.

“America is entering a new era of energy demand,” said Senator Martin Heinrich of New Mexico, one of the Democratic sponsors of the bill. “It should not take decades to build the infrastructure our country needs.”
1345
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
Mél Hogan / The Data Fix @melhogan.bsky.social · 7h
If you’re in Regina at this time, consider coming to my talk “Data Refineries” about AI data centres in Canada. Open to all and free.
poster for nov 18 talk at u regina
1156
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
Jaap Burger @jaapburger.eu · 17h
The diesel car is not only harmful to our lungs, but is now also considered toxic to its owner. Dutch motorists looking to sell their diesel cars are finding it difficult; the second-hand car market for diesels has collapsed, and even exports of second-hand diesel cars are falling.
nos.nl
Auto op dure diesel amper nog verkocht: 'Dieselrijder is een uitstervend ras'
Sinds de oorlog tussen de VS en Iran zijn de brandstofprijzen enorm gestegen. Diesel is de laatste tijd vaak duurder dan benzine.
66725
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
George Monbiot @georgemonbiot.bsky.social · 17h
Flying is officially on course to account for *almost all* the UK's carbon dioxide emissions by 2050. Heathrow expansion alone would cause more carbon emissions by 2054 than *any other sector of the economy*. So why is it being contemplated? My column. www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
theguardian.com
The expansion of Heathrow would be an expensive disaster for Britain and the world. Burnham needs to block it | George Monbiot
A third runway would fly in the face of reason. If we are to prioritise human life over short-term ‘growth’, we need to use planes less, not more, says Guardian columnist George Monbiot
32610257
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
Richard Waite @waiterich.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
It’s worth a read. Agricultural systems are full of tradeoffs and just labeling something “sustainable” or “regenerative” does not necessarily make it so. Data are needed to understand what’s going on and get a full picture of costs and benefits of different practices and technologies.
2254
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
Richard Waite @waiterich.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Helpful new paper: “Regenerative agriculture should not be viewed as universally beneficial. Rather, its environmental performance depends on the balance between changes in productivity, production emissions, and land-use consequences across interconnected food systems…”
iopscience.iop.org
Regenerative agriculture: we need better evidence to inform policy
Regenerative agriculture: we need better evidence to inform policy, Copping, Joshua P, Balmford, Andrew, Bradbury, Richard B, Dicks, Lynn V, Field, Rob H, Wade, Ruth, Finch, Tom
27016
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 19h
I'm sorry I'm so bad at reading mentions! But Ty for sending it. I hope they publish it somewhere
000
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
Andrew B. Watkins @windjunky.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Mount Hotham October 3 2025 (snow) vs October 2 2026 (wet grass).
1267
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
Andrew B. Watkins @windjunky.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
ICYMI: Australian ski resorts had originally planned to close this weekend - in fact they closed a month ago, at the end of the High Country's warmest winter on record, a season where warm rain dominated snow.
54714
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
J. L. Westover @mrlovenstein.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
So grateful I get to include this comic in my book as a way of saying thanks ❤️ kickstarter.com/projects/mrlovenstein/mr-lovenstein-presents-fun
2095021386
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
Willem Huiskamp @willemh.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
This has been an open secret in Australia for some time, with the federal government going to great lengths to *appear* as if they have effective climate policy, while rubber stamping mine after mine. It's disgraceful, and they are not held to account for it.
19048
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
Kevin J. Kircher @kevinjkircher.com · 02/10/2026
From what I've read so far, the federal permitting bill does not increase fines or impose new penalties (e.g. jail time) for data centers that violate local pollution laws by running "backup" fossil generators way more than permitted, an increasingly common practice that harms nearby communities.
04312
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
Kevin J. Kircher @kevinjkircher.com · 02/10/2026
Bluesky locals discuss some underappreciated aspects of the global fossil-fueled data center boom. Good conversation!
03513
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
The fossil industry has simple motives: maximising fossil fuel combustion (more that = more $) Climate is simple too: the more combustion, the worse it gets (more so for each new tonne burned) so...the fossil industry supports the things that make climate change (and our lives) worse, consistently
410936
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
How on Earth did I not read this yet? really interesting and honestly kind of brazen modelling of the entire lifecycle - downstream, data centres, upstream use - of AI. Puts AI industry at 1.1% of total global energy, about the same for global emissions. More than 10x previously stated estimates
Final Results and Concluding Thoughts
Adding it all up, we estimate that the AI sector is responsible for almost 1,900 TWh of global energy consumption in 2026. And after accounting for additional factors that we did not explicitly analyze, like the construction of new electrical substations, robotic-centric warehouses, water reclamation facilities, and other infrastructure specifically designed to support the data center buildout, it’s likely that total AI-driven global energy demand is already closer to 2,000 TWh. Even at 1,900 TWh, the AI share of total global energy use in 2026 would be roughly 1.1%. We also estimate, after adding up all the sectoral numbers and landing at roughly 650 million metric tons of AI-driven CO2 emissions, that the AI share of global GHG emissions in 2026 stands at about 1.2%, with total annual global emissions sitting at roughly 55 gigatons of CO2-eq, albeit with a wide range of figures from EDGAR to UNEP (anywhere from 53 gigatons to 58 gigatons depending on a broad array of different assumptions). As we’ve discussed already, these numbers are much higher than many others in the media and academia have guessed on the basis of simplistic calculations and naïve assumptions.

The projections up to 2030 are obviously far worse and imply a catastrophic impact to global ecological stability. ChatGPT alone “processes approximately 2.5 billion prompts per day worldwide.”122 The scale of AI growth and diffusion globally is truly astounding, and the industry’s corresponding ecological footprint will soon rival that of major countries like India. It's not farfetched at all to think that the AI share of total global energy demand could rise to something like 5% by 2030, rivaling and in some cases surpassing the footprint of established dominant industries. The potential consequences of this extra resource pressure on biodiversity, global warming, freshwater scarcity, and biogeochemical cycles could be absolutely staggering and devastating for the…
311152
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
As I suspected!!! bsky.app/profile/oilc...
Building behind the fence, or off the grid, means the data centers will not be subject to the transmission cost reforms proposed in the bill, which are intended to ensure data centers pay the full cost of the transmission line upgrades they require. But if interstate gas pipelines are needed to bring the massive increases in gas consumption that these facilities will require, they will benefit from the bill provisions that gut environmental and community protections.

Take, for example, the planned Desert Southwest Expansion project, a $5 billion, 520-mile, 48-inch gas pipeline proposed to run from Texas through New Mexico to Arizona, where several large data centers are planned. The project is meeting resistance along its route. This bill would take away communities’ ability to participate in the permitting process, including the crucial Clean Water Act 401 permit that states use to protect their water resources, a vital issue in the arid Southwest, and to challenge the project in court. It will all but ensure that another 2.3 billion cubic feet per day of gas, an amount similar to the entire gas consumption of the Netherlands, will be extracted from the Permian Basin and burned to generate power for AI.

Across the country, pipeline developers are planning expansions to supply gas to new data centers. Some of these projects will cross state lines and require federal certificates and permits, which this bill will only make easier and faster by removing states’ ability to protect their water resources, land, and communities. 

If the current slate of data centers and associated gas power plants goes ahead, data center gas demand will rise by over 15 billion cubic feet per day by 2035, according to an analysis by Bloomberg New Energy Finance. This is more than 40% of the power sector’s gas consumption in 2025 and equals Central and South America’s total gas consumption in that year.
0185
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
Tim Guinee @timguinee.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Gas stove companies have known about dangerous emissions for decades. Here's hoping @governor.ny.gov signs the S1280b into law. New Yorkers deserve to know about dangerous emissions. #IndoorAirQualityAwarenessMonth @lizkrueger.bsky.social @solagesny.bsky.social grist.org/accountabili...
grist.org
The hazards of gas stoves were flagged by the industry — and hidden — 50 years ago
Utilities knew about the danger of indoor air pollution in 1972 and downplayed it, a DeSmog investigation found.
34715
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
Right - I mean, you can see the fundamental tone of the broader movement in the post that was being quoted 'I don't care' I think speaks to the values of the broader centre-right 'abundance' movement a fair bit. I think it's true and genuine, they really don't care.

Jeremiah Johnson 🌐
@JeremiahDJohns
·
4h
The problem with wreckers like Guenther is

* They see fossil fuels as ontologically evil rather than useful but with a harmful byproduct
* They reject the idea of tradeoffs or compromise
* They exist to wreck feasible solutions in favor of some future, perfect, impossible plan
Quote
Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) 🪬
@DoctorVive
·
6h
Replying to @mattyglesias
Why? Because climate change is real, Matt. And unfortunately to halt global heating we need to phase out fossil fuels. And we should do that before the planet gets much hotter & tipping points tip, etc. And we have the solutions: we can replace oil with heat pumps. And and and...
Jeremiah Johnson 🌐
@JeremiahDJohns
"this bill will let fossil fuels..." I don't care, it's going to lead to a net reduction in emissions. It will make the green energy transition faster and it's better than whatever your imagined utopian alternative is.

The climate groups are explicitly saying they don't care bout the emissions analysis, they just want to wreck the bill anyways. 

Please just eject them from the party, these are wreckers and nothing else.
4:45 PM · Oct 2, 2026
·
2,537
 Views
110
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
It didn't seem relevant but sure, in case it somehow buttresses your claim there's certainty behind the bill's climate impacts, here it is for anyone who wants to see it
@haustath
Actual climate scientist here- The permitting reform bill was introduced
by Senate climate champions like@SenWhitehouse. It will reduce US
emissions.
We don't have the luxury to make the perfect the enemy Of the good —
which time and time again has led to doing nothing at all.
Dr. Genevieve Guerther (she/they)
@DoctorVive • 4h
The problem with invectiæ-spewing Abundance bros like Johnson is that they
disrniss the science of clirnate change — which rnakes assessing trade-offs in
policymaking so much easier, of course.
Jcrcmiah Johnson @JeremiahDJohns 4t-,
The problem with wre&rs (h•enther is
030
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
Right - and actually even in the opposite direction, higher demand can make renewables more expensive, more so in a scenario when the learning curve has been mostly fully learned bsky.app/profile/dyla...
240
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
I am not an Actual Climate Scientist Here but I think this is an irresponsibly strongly worded statement from @zekehausfather.com, implying that there's some sort of scientific consensus or authoritative certainty this reform or types of reforms always lead to a good climate outcome.
Actual clirnate scientist here. The permitting reform bill was introduced
by Senate climate champions like @SenWhitehouse. It will reduce US
emissions.
We don't have the luxury to make the perfect the enemy of the good —
which time and time again has led to doing nothing at all.
3130
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
I was on Twitter for a bunch of permitting reform debates but poking my head in there and all the usual players are just soaking with rage and animosity and acidity more than before Maybe it's just the times we're in now but I reckon also partly just the design choices of the website
3272
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
We tried our best in Vampires but.....it's an ongoing process, haha
two charts showing the impact of additional demand
150
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
I saw that! I thought it was really good too. Anything to just show that load growth will *fundamentally* make things harder, not easier, and that's the hard reality, inarguable - not a subjective opinion. Described here www.greenpeace.org.au/greenpeace-r... And here ketanjoshi.co/2026/08/14/p...
greenpeace.org.au
Energy Vampires: the AI data centres draining Australia - Greenpeace Australia Pacific
The frenzied rollout of AI data centres in Australia is rushing through massive new projects, which will derail Australia’s energy transition unless the government urgently intervenes.
252
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
This has pretty much been the single most difficult thing to communicate on this whole issue, and I haven't really cracked why. I try to explain it with a metaphor of the finish line for the energy transition race being moved backwards with every new data centre.....
460
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
We have known for an extremely long time that enabling the growth of transmission infrastructure enables more emissions reductions from renewable energy! www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/s...
4.5.1. Energy Systems
Rapid and deep reductions in GHG emissions require major
energy system transitions (high confidence). Adaptation options
can help reduce climate-related risks to the energy system
(very high confidence). Net zero CO2 energy systems entail: a
substantial reduction in overall fossil fuel use, minimal use of
unabated fossil fuels153, and use of Carbon Capture and Storage in
the remaining fossil fuel systems; electricity systems that emit no
net CO2; widespread electrification; alternative energy carriers in
applications less amenable to electrification; energy conservation
and efficiency; and greater integration across the energy system
(high confidence). Large contributions to emissions reductions can
come from options costing less than USD 20 tCO2-eq–1, including
solar and wind energy, energy efficiency improvements, and CH4
(methane) emissions reductions (from coal mining, oil and gas, and
waste) (medium confidence).
154 Many of these response options are
technically viable and are supported by the public (high confidence).
Maintaining emission-intensive systems may, in some regions and
sectors, be more expensive than transitioning to low emission
systems (high confidence). {WGII SPM C.2.10; WGIII SPM C.4.1,
WGIII SPM C.4.2, WGIII SPM C.12.1, WGIII SPM E.1.1, WGIII TS.5.1}
Climate change and related extreme events will affect future energy
systems, including hydropower production, bioenergy yields, thermal
power plant efficiencies, and demands for heating and cooling (high
153 In this context, ‘unabated fossil fuels’ refers to fossil fuels produced and used without interventions that substantially reduce the amount of GHG emitted throughout the life
cycle; for example, capturing 90% or more CO2 from power plants, or 50–80% of fugitive methane emissions from energy supply. {WGIII SPM footnote 54}
154 The mitigation potentials and mitigation costs of individual technologies in a specific context or region may differ greatly from the provided esti…
1192
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
Also an analysis that explicitly excludes the climate-worsening impacts of more-easily-permitted fossil fuel projects is always going to give a big old thumbs up as a result? www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
One new analysis published this week offers a sense of the potential climate payoff from an important piece of the legislation: transmission reform. Streamlined rules making it faster to connect energy projects to the grid and expand energy connection, or transmission, between regions could cut carbon dioxide emissions by 71 million metric tons, or 9%, in 2035 compared to a non-reform scenario.

The modeling, conducted by the nonprofit Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) and consulting company Greenline Insights, does not comprehensively address the bill’s laundry list of proposed reforms. It’s only focused on the transmission piece and on how changes would affect four regions of the country that account for about half of US electricity demand.

Despite those limitations, C2ES president Nathaniel Keohane told Bloomberg News he’s confident the bill “on net is good for the economy, it’s good for consumers, and it’s good for climate.” The estimated impact on power-sector emissions is particularly notable, he added: “We’re talking gigaton-scale emissions reductions over time.”
3243
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
If data centres have an easier time connecting to the grid rather than using off-grid gas, that doesn't make their climate impacts immediately zero or even beneficial somehow? Increasing grid demand still predominantly leads to worse climate impacts in the US.... www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
Rob Gramlich, president of the consulting firm Grid Strategies LLC, said that although the package is technology neutral — meaning it doesn’t favor specific types of energy generation — it “enables a clean energy future” that’s “just going to be very hard to get” otherwise.

Consider data centers. One way to power them quickly is to build gas infrastructure on site. “This bill would open up a lot more options,” Gramlich said, adding that there are many states, utilities and technology companies looking to clean up their power supply.
24811
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
Jason Koebler @jasonkoebler.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
am thankful dishwashers but i'm not like: wow, i have saved several minutes handwashing dishes let me take advantage of this time. loading/unloading a dishwasher still sucks. transcription tools / high speed internet / faster computer .. all makes me more efficient, doesn't materially change my life
72158
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
Le Ca-ghoul @lecagle.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
PUT IT DIRECTLY INTO MY EARHOLES
151
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
Sure, I just don't think "is the fastest we’ve ever seen a technology be adopted in human history" is right, and also worry a bit that it can make it seem like user demand for the product is abnormally huge
130
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
Basically all of these comparisons you see trying to make the same point are profoundly ahistorical and wildly misleading
2202
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
Not that Google Trends is actually a meaningful indicator of adoption, but if we take it to be, there have been many cloud-based services that been adopted fast in the past few decades. trends.google.com/explore?q=fa...
a chart showing a huge burst of interest in my space and facebook, compared to relatively low indexed interest in chatgpt and AI
4244
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeeeeeeessssssssssssssssssss
0232
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
Andrea Reyes E (she/her) @altibel.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
It's insane how many ppl even entertain the idea of data fabrication as being good for research.
311240
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
back in my day intentionally fabricating data for use in scientific inquiry was sternly frowned upon
18728
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
Hisham Zerriffi @hishamzerriffi.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Pew tested AI synthetic surveys against actual survey data. Conclusion: “This experiment taught us that, at this time, AI models are not an adequate replacement for traditional polling on topics of broad public importance.” This is an all time bad idea. No need to hedge with “at this time.”
pewresearch.org
Can AI Stand In for Human Survey-Takers? Not Really
Synthetic surveys using digital twins do a poor job estimating the public mood and are especially error-prone for some subgroups, including Republicans and Black adults.
1023479
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
One other complication to add into the mix - there are a whole bunch of gas pipelines that are being built to service data centres that are switching from grid to gas, partly to avoid accusations of rising energy bills 🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠
fortune.com
Data centers and gas demand make boring pipelines great again | Fortune
Williams is the “poster child” for gas pipeline and power growth amid the new construction boom.
2287
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
Harbinger Media Network @harbingermedia.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
On a new 💾 @techwontsave.us 💾 @ketanjoshi.co joins @parismarx.com to discuss how the data center buildout is driving a surge in fossil fuel investment. www.techwontsave.us/episode/348_...
techwontsave.us
The AI Buildout is a Boon for the Fossil Fuel Industry w/ Ketan Joshi - Tech Won’t Save Us
0249
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
This is a v subjective statement from me, but I would argue that data centre growth is both (a) abnormal and (b) centred on private profit not public good (compared to grid upgrades needed for wind, solar, electrification, heating/cooling). So it feels fair and 'normal' they'd be made to pay this?
142
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
This is a good @billmckibben.bsky.social post - and this specific part is extremely important and touches on a tension right deep at the heart of all this It is worth repeating this point persistently, because it has been forgotten in so many spaces billmckibben.substack.com/p/reform-or-...
The first thing to remember is, the real goal for people who care about the climate above all is not to build more renewables, it’s to drive down the amount of carbon flowing into the atmosphere. Building more renewables is a key way of doing that—but only if they displace fossil fuel.

And here is an important divergence: for many people working in the clean energy industry, victory looks like doubling or tripling their output, even if fossil fuel is growing fast at the same time. Even if they got into this fight for the right reasons, their commitment is—because, capitalism—to their bottom line. It’s important not to confuse the two motivations, because physics only cares about the carbon. If transmission corridors are matched by new gas pipelines, we haven’t made much progress.
33215
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
Yes fair point, I think I misunderstood some of the wording on that re the new proposed bill
040
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò @olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Specifically: global investment in solar estimated at 450 billion USD over 2025. Full writeup here: www.iea.org/reports/worl...
iea.org
2727
Reposted by Ketan Joshi
Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò @olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
According to the International Energy Agency, total global investment in solar energy (including both rooftop solar and utility-scale projects) was less than half of this figure, despite our dire ecological situation
5413136
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
2nd place was seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeb
2nd place

@sSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeebbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb (???)
0180