Sign in

Kate Nave

@kathrynnave.eurosky.social
2.1K followers 2.7K following 131 posts

° Visiting Scientist, The University of Göttingen ° Book: A Drive to Survive bit.ly/3CQP9EZ ° Purposiveness, autonomy, agency ° CogSci, Philosophy, and Theoretical Biology ° Former science & technology journalist

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Kate Nave
Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science @mcps-philsci.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Happening today at 1215 Central Time. Please join us in discussion with @oscarw.bsky.social
161
Reposted by Kate Nave
Aidan McGlynn @aidanmcglynn.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
Also just published in the recent flurry is Suilin's musing on trying to decolonise her philosophy of mind & cogsci syllabus (I of course recused myself with respect to any handling or decision making here)
cambridge.org
What I learned in my attempt to decolonise my syllabus | Hypatia | Cambridge Core
What I learned in my attempt to decolonise my syllabus
1146
Reposted by Kate Nave
Vera Straetmanns @yavannakemi.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
New semester, new reading group content! We've decided to follow the stream of process philosophy and read "Everyone flows" by John Dupré in this semester. And, as the book is not that long, we will actually read the whole thing 🤩 Looking forward to stimulating discussions! 🤓 #PhDSky #PhilSci #HPBio
Poster for this semester's reading group. We will read John Dupré's "Everyone flows: A process philosophy of human life" (2025). The reading group meets every first Wednesday of the month at 16:00 CET in room NDEF04/346 at Ruhr University Bochum as well as online via Zoom. If you're interested just join our moodle group at: https://moodle.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/enrol/index.php?id=47287, password: theory. Or just write me an e-mail: vera.straetmanns[at]rub.de
1123
Kate Nave @kathrynnave.eurosky.social · 23/09/2026
Excellent survey of the variety of views on artificial consciousness My contribution draws on the importance of unity for conscious experience & suggests this depends on the metabolic unity of an organism: leaflet.pub/p/did:plc:ct... Thanks to @anilseth.bsky.social for such a rich target article!
leaflet.pub
Absolute Units: The metabolic basis of the experiential self
Commentary on Seth (2025): Unity is intrinsic to being both an experiencing and an embodied subject. Computational accounts of consciousness, being observer-relative, cannot account for this unity. The thermodynamics of life can but, contra Seth’s suggestion, the free energy principle fails to capture the distinctive metabolic interdependencies by virtue of which a living system constitutes itself as a unified perspective on the world.
0298
Reposted by Kate Nave
Dialectical Systems @dialecticalsys.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
A collaboration between Dialetical Systems and @braininspired.bsky.social Andrea Gambarotto speaks to Paul Middlebrooks on the relation between life and mind, and the role dialectics can play in making sense of that relation www.dialecticalsystems.eu/contribution...
dialecticalsystems.eu
Cognition Requires Agency - Dialectical Systems
A collaboration between Dialetical Systems and Brain Inspired: Andrea Gambarotto speaks to Paul Middlebrooks on the relaton between life and mind, and the role dialectics can play in making sense of t...
0124
Reposted by Kate Nave
Manlio De Domenico @manlius.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
A while ago I started an interesting discussion with @pessoabrain.bsky.social about the role of networks in modeling and describing biological systems. It triggered a sequence of talks and papers, and it's still ongoing. Science at its best. My latest comment: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
2165
Reposted by Kate Nave
Kevin Mitchell @wiringthebrain.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
"Consciousness Needs a Subject" - commentary with @cdj.bsky.social on target article by @anilseth.bsky.social. Now published, along with all (50!) commentaries and Anil's responses! 😊 cup.org/4h0wRmg
cup.org
Consciousness needs a subject | Behavioral and Brain Sciences | Cambridge Core
Consciousness needs a subject - Volume 49
74215
Reposted by Kate Nave
Anna Alexandrova @annaalexandrova.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
This is a big deal. For the first time (I believe) the Lakatos Award goes to a book not published by one of the big commercial presses but by BSPS Open, an idealistic project to issue diamond access monographs. Small budget, top notch philosophy. Congratulations to John Norton and BSPS open!
0458
Reposted by Kate Nave
Many Minds podcast @manymindspod.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
News!! 🎉🎉🎉 We've officially re-launched our newsletter! Our first post is a "starter pack"—a brief orientation for newcomers to the show, with suggested episodes on different themes. Feel free to make alternate suggestions in the comments! manymindspodcast.substack.com/p/many-minds...
manymindspodcast.substack.com
Many Minds podcast: A starter pack
A guide for new listeners
13913
Reposted by Kate Nave
Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 16/09/2026
It should be: > I think not being clear about this, that formal modelling is not less vague across the board (and maybe not all) to verbal theory. I see many imply this and it upsets me.
152
Reposted by Kate Nave
Frances Egan @francesegan.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
Mind and Language has published a symposium on my book Deflating Mental Representation (MIT Press, open access) with excellent commentary by Ken Aizawa kenaizawa.bsky.social, Angela Mendelovici braininavat4eva.bsky.social, and Adam Toon adamtoonphilos.bsky.social, and a reply by me, all open access.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Mind & Language
Click on the title to browse this journal
28022
Reposted by Kate Nave
Orit Halpern @ohalpern.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
New article on agentic AI and governance: www.e-flux.com/architecture...
e-flux.com
Simulation - Orit Halpern - A Government of Agents: The Experimental Logics of Artificial Intelligence
Across climate science, logistics, pandemic response, and military operations, a new class of AI platforms is emerging that treats the planet as a laboratory and politics as a matter of automated bure...
052
Reposted by Kate Nave
Ambrose @ambrosia-engine.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
Super excited to be presenting my paper today on Knowledge Neglect in Agent Interactions at Human and Artificial Rationality Conference in Paris. Come say hi, if you're interested in my work.
Knowledge Neglect in Agent Interactions (with
Chatbots)
Ambrose Brown1[0009−0009−2726−8238], Andrew Hoskins1[0000−0002−1207−2728],
and Vaishak Belle1[0000−0001−5573−8465]
The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
s2599421@ed.ac.uk
Abstract. In 2014, Elizabeth J. Marsh and Sharda Umananth formalized the term ‘Knowledge Neglect’ in a book chapter on processing inaccurate information. The phenomenon describes the human tendency to fail to retrieve and apply stored knowledge within a given context. This effect occurs even when reading short fictional narratives that are coherent and plausible. Our primary objective is contextualizing existing literature on knowledge neglect and the acquisition and persistence
of false beliefs within the context of interactions with chatbots. While
human knowledge neglect largely stems from cognitive biases, Large Language Model (LLM) based chatbots exhibit analogous content effects on reasoning tasks, while prioritizing semantic fluency over factual verification. Knowledge neglect may occur as an intermittent failure of individual monitoring (e.g., missing an error in a short story), but here we
conceptualize it as a structural feature within agent interactions. LLM based chatbots optimize for the very conditions that facilitate knowledge neglect, while the act of "offloading" memory to the bot reduces the reader’s motivation to engage the costly "unbelieving" process. We
provide a framework for analyzing knowledge neglect in human-chatbot
interactions, positing that this mechanism risks a dangerous feedback loop where knowledge neglect is amplified in the interaction between agents. This conceptual model is intended for researchers and designers of chatbots, as individuals increasingly rely on them for information
amid growing calls for building epistemic resilience.

Keywords: Chatbots · Knowledge-Neglect · Cognitive Science · Human-
Computer Interaction · Confabulation
1124
Reposted by Kate Nave
New-Cleckit Dominie @ncdominie.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
Whether it's legal or not, HR doctrine in universities these days appears to be that an employment contract is binding only for one party, and that party is not the employer. (Below is the list of agreements that the University of Brighton have unilaterally decided to cancel.)
34621
Reposted by Kate Nave
Alejandro Fábregas-Tejeda @alejandrofabregastejeda.com · 14/09/2026
My 📗 is #openaccess thanks to the D2O program of @mitpress.bsky.social: direct.mit.edu/books/oa-mon... This initiative for equitable access to scholarship has just opened its new funding cycle: mitpress.mit.edu/the-mit-pres... 🙏 help spread the word & if you represent a library, do consider joining!
Promotional image of the Direct to Open (D2O) initiative of the MIT Press that allows academic books to be read open access. Promotional graphic on a beige background for the book "The Organism–Environment Pairing: A Historical and Philosophical Reappraisal" (MIT Press, 2026) by Alejandro Fábregas-Tejeda. The book cover appears in the center of the image and has a green gradient background. The book series label “The Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology” appears at the top. The title is set in large, bold lettering using three colors: white (“The” and “Pairing”), warm yellow (“Organism–”), and bright green (“Environment”). The subtitle appears below in smaller white text, and the author’s name is printed at the bottom. In the lower right, a monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) rests on clusters of pink milkweed flowers. Behind it, a large pale-green butterfly silhouette fills the background; its outline follows the shape of a red lacewing butterfly (Cethosia biblis).
14521
Reposted by Kate Nave
Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 11/09/2026
I'm excited to share this preprint by my wonderful MSc student Yihsin who's thought deeply about how psychological & neurocognitive theories relate to different types of evidence. Beyond Empirical Success: Evaluating Theoretical Virtue Across the Computational Modeling Chain doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

Beyond Empirical Success: Evaluating Theoretical Virtue Across the Computational Modeling Chain
Authors/Creators

    Chuang, Yihsin
    ORCID icon
    Guest, Olivia1
    ORCID icon

Description

Computational models in psychology are typically judged by a single standard: empirical fit. Unfortunately, fit is insufficient, even misleading as a sole criterion, as the same result can arise from fundamentally different situations: theoretically faithful models, mathematically flexible ones, miscalibrated operationalizations, or implementations that compute something other than intended. Distinguishing between these is vital. Our evaluative metatheoretical account recognises that models stand in three distinct relations: a) toward the theory whose causal commitments it purports to capture, b) toward the specification and implementation it purports to compute, and c) toward the phenomenon it purports to explain. Each relation can succeed or fail independently, governed by criteria local to that stage. Importantly, relations are ordered such that theoretical content is transmitted or lost, and losses at earlier transitions are irrecoverable downstream. What a model's empirical success implicates about its theoretical commitments, therefore, depends on whether transitions are secured. Some success or failure profiles support explanatory claims; others only prediction; others establish theoretical coherence without empirical contact. Our account diagnoses what a given model shows, replacing the implicit assumption that empirical success transfers automatically to theoretical understanding with an explicit conditional rendition of what models can and cannot establish.
a figure that looks like a cloud that stays "cognitive capacity" with an arrow pointing to a lozenge with "theory" which points to a lozenge with "specification" which points to the same with "data" which is pointed to by a cloud that says "phenomenon"
616241
Reposted by Kate Nave
Jake Quilty-Dunn @quiltydunn.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
New paper, co-authored with Justin Wood, in @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social: The Nativist-Empiricist Debate Is Broken We argue that radical nativism and radical empiricism are compatible and, in some cases, both plausibly true. So something is wrong. 🧵 Author share link here, valid til Oct 31:
authors.elsevier.com
Please wait whilst we redirect you
All content on this site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier B.V., its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
17430
Reposted by Kate Nave
Chris Krupenye @chriskrupenye.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
🚨 PhD position in human, nonhuman primate, and/or dog cognition! I am thrilled to be reviewing applicants this year for a new PhD student to join the Social & Cognitive Origins Group in the Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences at Johns Hopkins @jhu.edu @jhuartssciences.bsky.social 1/
18272
Reposted by Kate Nave
Adrian Currie @adrian-currie.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
Methods in the Philosophy of Science: A User's Guide, edited by the inestimable @phieveigl.bsky.social (and me!), has 27 chapters from super-cool philosophers of science explaining how they do their thing, and is now open access! Our baby is free! #philsci direct.mit.edu/books/oa-edi...
direct.mit.edu
Methods in the Philosophy of Science: A User's Guide
A guidebook to methods and methodology, encouraging deeper engagement across the philosophy of science and beyond.The last twenty years have seen multiple
414773
Reposted by Kate Nave
Melanie Mitchell @melaniemitchell.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
I wrote down my thoughts about the last several weeks of AI hell. aiguide.substack.com/p/misleading...
aiguide.substack.com
Misleading Metaphors, Real Risks
What To Fear from AI Agents and How to Reclaim Our Human Agency
1019881
Reposted by Kate Nave
Alejandro Fábregas-Tejeda @alejandrofabregastejeda.com · 08/09/2026
Interesting 📰 @theguardian.com by @samanthsubramanian.bsky.social on non-neural cognition: www.theguardian.com/news/ng-inte... Confronted with this polarizing debate, @philosobio.bsky.social & I wrote a balanced take on basal #cognition from an #evobio lens 👇 link.springer.com/article/10.1... #HPS
theguardian.com
‘This is dangerous’: slime moulds and the bitter debate over the nature of intelligence
The long read: Scientists are battling over whether supposedly simple organisms should be considered ‘intelligent’. The outcome could reshape our understanding of the natural world – and our own place...
45023
Reposted by Kate Nave
Alejandro Fábregas-Tejeda @alejandrofabregastejeda.com · 08/09/2026
And if you are interested in slime molds, Matt's Cambridge Element is essential reading for learning more about their life cycle, unique physiology, morphology, and behavior, and why this organism is so fascinating for philosophers too! 👇📕 www.cambridge.org/core/element...
Book cover of “Slime Mould and Philosophy” by Matthew Sims in the Cambridge Elements: The Philosophy of Biology series. Against a black background, the title is surrounded by Ernst Haeckel’s illustrations of marine organisms—radial, symmetrical forms in vivid blues, oranges, reds, and greens.
04111
Reposted by Kate Nave
Melanie Mitchell @melaniemitchell.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
What, an Anthropic researcher states (without evidence) that there is a 10% chance that AI will cause human extinction? Incredible, we have never before heard such a claim!
2027390
Reposted by Kate Nave
The Dissenter @thedissenteryt.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
How can intentions, thoughts, and beliefs cause anything? Learn about it in my interview with Dr. Alicia Juarrero about her phenomenal book, Context Changes Everything: How Constraints Create Coherence. #Philosophy #Science Full interview: youtu.be/XKamoQkahxw
youtu.be
#840 Alicia Juarrero - Context Changes Everything: How Constraints Create Coherence
YouTube video by The Dissenter
011
Reposted by Kate Nave
Miguel Segundo Ortin @segundo-ortin.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
Hey! Do you know anyone interested in pursuing a Ph.D. about ecological validity in comparative cognitive science? If so, @susanamonso.com and I are looking for them! Please, share and distribute!
065
Kate Nave @kathrynnave.eurosky.social · 04/09/2026
www-journals-uchicago-edu.eux.idm.oclc.org/doi/10.1093/...
141
Reposted by Kate Nave
Aidan McGlynn @aidanmcglynn.bsky.social · 26/03/2025
Revisiting Amia Srinivasan on Arif Ahmed's appointment as ‘Free Speech Tsar’ at the Office for Students:
“When Peterson was disinvited by Cambridge, Ahmed led the charge to reinvite him. This wasn’t a case of Ahmed disapproving of what Peterson says but defending his right to say it. Ahmed is clearly a fan. After Peterson’s lecture at Lady Mitchell Hall in 2021 – during which he quipped that ‘educated women’ were ‘very annoying’ – Ahmed described it as ‘a brilliant talk from which we’ve all learned so much’, and presented Peterson with a first edition of Darwin’s Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. (I wrote to Ahmed to ask who paid for the book, a similar copy of which was recently auctioned at Sotheby’s for £5670; he said he didn’t know, but that he believed it was the event’s hosts. I then wrote to Orr, who had extended the formal invitation to Peterson, but didn’t receive a reply.) In a piece for Spiked called ‘How we uncancelled Jordan Peterson’, Ahmed says that Peterson – who has linked feminism to school shootings, approvingly cited ‘The Bell Curve’ and been denounced by scientists for giving succour to climate deniers – espouses a ‘moderate conservativism’ and is ‘no right-wing firebrand’. Writing in 2021 on the proposed higher education bill, with its provision for a newly empowered Office for Students, Ahmed commented: ‘Of course in practice everything will depend on whether the regulator will use these powers impartially and with vigour.’ He is now the person on whom this ‘everything’ depends.”
65022
Reposted by Kate Nave
Leigh Jones @leighsus.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
OK, when is James Orr going to leave his role with Cambridge University? Are we still doing that?
235291
Reposted by Kate Nave
Nature @nature.com · 03/09/2026
Top artificial-intelligence models failed to predict the biological consequences of rewriting a virus's entire DNA code. go.nature.com/4rbHdmN
go.nature.com
Mutating every DNA letter of a genome shows surprising effects — and the limits of AI
Top artificial-intelligence models failed to predict the biological consequences of rewriting a virus's entire DNA code.
14824
Reposted by Kate Nave
Pilar Lopez-Cantero @lopezcantero.bsky.social · 02/09/2026
To mark the start of the academic year, I’m resposting this brief summary of my current research project on affect, justice & cities. I also run an online working group for Europe-based philosophers interested in local normative theory (think ethics/politics of the city) so if that’s you, email me!
082
Reposted by Kate Nave
John Tuthill @tuthill.bsky.social · 02/09/2026
longtime reader, first time writer to @lrb.co.uk www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...
Letter to the LRB correcting James Wood's account of his father's 1957 PhD thesis, which was on stick insect legs rather than wings.
2163
Reposted by Kate Nave
Diverse Intelligences Summer Institute #DISI @divintelligence.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
Featuring DISI alum, @damianblasi.bsky.social!
073
Reposted by Kate Nave
Erin J. Wamsley 🧠📈😴 @wamsleylab.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
Oh. my. god. The biggest scientific publishers are collecting nearly $4 BILLION A YEAR in author fees. This is absurd. We've got to break free of this system. If everyone would just agree to it, we could just post all our new papers on bsky and it wouldn't cost anything. Or something. But not this.
24319
Reposted by Kate Nave
Eric Schares @eschares.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
🚨Update: Our analysis of global APC expenditure has now been expanded to cover more publishers (7 -> 14) and more years (2019-2025). We estimate $15B in APCs paid over seven years, $3.7B in 2025 alone. Elsevier crosses the $1B threshold by itself in 2025. arxiv.org/abs/2608.16322 #ScholComm
Line chart showing 5 biggest publishers from 2019-2025
6179148
Reposted by Kate Nave
🐭 Danielle Williams 🐹 @okaydaniellle.bsky.social · 30/08/2026
My history of AI poster's updated! It now features notable prehistory, the 1930s, + about 40 additional nodes in the 40s-2020s (including a new McCarthy quote from 2005). you can download it from my website and if you find any typos I don't want to know www.daniellejwilliams.com/posters
29432
Reposted by Kate Nave
Fernando Rosas @frosas.bsky.social · 29/08/2026
What is information, really? Instead of arguing for a single valid interpretation, we propose a pluralistic view where rigorous alternatives coexist — each with affordances and limits Finally published: “Four faces of information in natural systems” 🧵
210528
Reposted by Kate Nave
Alison Gopnik @alisongopnik.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
Good piece on why kids beat AI at learning, with Mike Frank and me. Behind a paywall but available elsewhere. www.technologyreview.com/2026/08/24/1...
technologyreview.com
Kids outlearn AI—and we still don’t know why
LLMs need vastly more data than children to learn language. Understanding why could help us create more efficient models—and reveal more about developing minds.
3379
Reposted by Kate Nave
Alejandro Fábregas-Tejeda @alejandrofabregastejeda.com · 26/08/2026
Know anyone who would be interested in reviewing The Organism-Environment Pairing (@mitpress.bsky.social) or other recent books on the environment? @farsouthhistory.bsky.social is looking for reviewers, so you can get in touch with her! 📗🔗 mitpress.mit.edu/978026205282... #histSTM #philsci #envhum
Promotional graphic on a beige background for the book "The Organism–Environment Pairing: A Historical and Philosophical Reappraisal" (MIT Press, 2026) by Alejandro Fábregas-Tejeda. The book cover appears in the center of the image and has a green gradient background. The book series label “The Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology” appears at the top. The title is set in large, bold lettering using three colors: white (“The” and “Pairing”), warm yellow (“Organism–”), and bright green (“Environment”). The subtitle appears below in smaller white text, and the author’s name is printed at the bottom. In the lower right, a monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) rests on clusters of pink milkweed flowers. Behind it, a large pale-green butterfly silhouette fills the background; its outline follows the shape of a red lacewing butterfly (Cethosia biblis).
02612
Reposted by Kate Nave
Tuomas Pernu @tuomaspernu.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
I think this is crucial: Cofnas appears to be making, in his role as an academic (i.e. intramurally), scientifically controversial and ethically/politically/socially concerning claims that lack all evidential and argumentative basis. Pseudoscience is not protected by academic freedom. Anywhere.
383
Reposted by Kate Nave
Dundee UCU @ducuuo.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
Some colleagues received 5 minutes notice for their online at risk meeting and had not yet received their letter informing them they were at risk. Executive staff did not bother to turn up to the meeting. This is the true face of executive leadership at the University of Dundee.
17339
Reposted by Kate Nave
wanjawiese.bsky.social @wanjawiese.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
Listen to Anil: 👇 There is still time to register: amcs-community.org/events/moc7-...
amcs-community.org
Models of Consciousness 2026 – AMCS
062
Reposted by Kate Nave
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Its a pleasure to contribute in making this Models of Consciousness conference the biggest edition yet!
2151
Reposted by Kate Nave
Stephen Bush @stephenkb.bsky.social · 23/08/2026
“It’s impossible that Jason Arday could have got his post without DEI,” say people about an industry which can find 200 academics willing to sign a letter in support of David Miller and another 200 academics willing to support Nathan Cofnas.
231592315
Reposted by Kate Nave
Adam Rutherford @adamrutherford.bsky.social · 23/08/2026
I had not some across this before, but if you want an example Nathan Cofnas’ scholarship, this is a doozy. Again I say, being sacked is not the problem; being recruited in the first place is what deserves scrutiny.
34650631118
Reposted by Kate Nave
Dundee UCU @ducuuo.bsky.social · 22/08/2026
The Courier doesn’t think this story is worth of being its top story today. It is instead a story about a new cleaning business. Please like, share and comment to show how much interest there is in protecting jobs at the University of Dundee. www.thecourier.co.uk/fp/politics/...
thecourier.co.uk
EXCLUSIVE: SNP education chief urged to ‘urgently intervene’ in Dundee University cuts row
Dundee SNP MSP Heather Anderson has asked Education Secretary Mairi McAllan to step in after unions accused the university of ending consultation prematurely.
02316
Reposted by Kate Nave
Alexander Douglas @axdouglas.bsky.social · 20/08/2026
axdouglas.substack.com/p/an-embarra...
axdouglas.substack.com
An Embarrassing Defence of the Humanities
It's all about our social status, but it could be worse.
293
Reposted by Kate Nave
Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò @olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social · 20/08/2026
I am *extremely insistently* tapping the sign to remind you all to support independent, worker run, billionaire free news how and where you are able to
182253744
Reposted by Kate Nave
Mark Rubin @markrubin.bsky.social · 20/08/2026
From @lisafeldmanbarrett.com and @jtheriault.bsky.social’s (2025) chapter in the Handbook of Social Psychology: “What's Real? A Philosophy of Science for Social Psychology.” doi.org/10.70400/BPQ... #SocialPsyc #PhilSci
All scientists are philosophers. That is, they hold fundamental assumptions about the nature of reality and how best to develop “true” (i.e., justified) knowledge about it. The way a scientist goes about building justifi ed knowledge reveals what they take reality to be. Their assumptions guide their scientific practices and products — their choices of topics to study, their formulation and testing of hypotheses, and ultimately, the inferences they offer as claims of knowledge. Other scientists, guided by their own philosophical assumptions, turn those claims into bona-fide knowledge by using them and citing them. Or not.
071
Reposted by Kate Nave
Louise Amoore @amoorelouise.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
Please join us for the @leverhulmecal.bsky.social inaugural annual lecture with the incomparable Prof. N. Katherine Hayles. Kate’s work is foundational (& not in a foundation model kind of way…) #LLMs #AI #fiction
0115
Reposted by Kate Nave
ispsm @ispsm.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
Great episode of Brain Inspired (@braininspired.bsky.social) with ISPSM president Marco Facchin (@marcofacchin.bsky.social) - check it out: youtu.be/lucgpEguCQo?... 🤩✨
youtu.be
BI 244 Marco Facchin: Philosophy and Science of Biological Brains
YouTube video by Brain Inspired
0126