Sign in

Moritz Kriegleder

@mokriegleder.bsky.social
1.3K followers 1.2K following 230 posts

msc in physics & cognitive science, consciousness & neuroscience, PhD student at @univie.ac.at, my band: distrokid.com/hyperfollow/momoandde…

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Moritz Kriegleder
Zefan Zheng @zefanzheng.bsky.social · 14/08/2026
🚨 new paper alert Most consciousness theories are just a specific type of recurrent theory, from the implementation perspective. Out in Physics of Life Reviews: doi.org/10.1016/j.pl... Email me for interests in contributing commentaries (zefan.zheng@rub.de)!!! A 🧵
doi.org
Redirecting
1155
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Its a pleasure to contribute in making this Models of Consciousness conference the biggest edition yet!
2151
Reposted by Moritz Kriegleder
Models of Consciousness @moc7.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Let us introduce ourselves! @wanjawiese.bsky.social, Jonathan Mason, and @mokriegleder.bsky.social make up the Communication Team behind this year's Models of Consciousness conference. By managing the website, social media, emails, and much more, we ensure that #MoC7 will be a success!
181
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
@timbayne.bsky.social on point in the Claude Global Workspace debate:
130
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 10/07/2026
How to write a philosophy of neuroscience paper: 1. choose a narrow neuroscience definition 2. argue why the concept is much more complex 3. profit #neuroscience #neuroskyence #consci #philsci 🧪
2246
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 23/06/2026
i think its crucial to understand that any concept can be both underrated and overrated while not making it properly rated. Or as Tomas Nagel (1986) puts it:
020
Reposted by Moritz Kriegleder
Models of Consciousness @moc7.bsky.social · 16/06/2026
Due to many requests, we have decided to extend the abstract submission deadline for #MoC7 to July 5th! This is shaping up to be our biggest conference yet, so submit your work and join us this year in Copenhagen. amcs-community.org/moc7-talk-ap... #neuroscience #neuroskyence #consci #philsci 🧪
Models of Consciousness Conference Overview
0104
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 09/06/2026
If you are in or around Vienna have a look at this amazing interdisciplinary student conference we are organizing this year for the 11th time! thinkcommunity.network/application-...
thinkcommunity.network
Applications 2026: THINK XI – THINK Conference
030
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 09/05/2026
"The dualism between a first-person description of experience and a third-person (or scientific) account of the same is a normal perspectival difference: the same brain phenomenon as experienced by that same brain itself, or by another." @rovelli.bsky.social www.noemamag.com/there-is-no-...
noemamag.com
There Is No ‘Hard Problem Of Consciousness’ | NOEMA
Consciousness is not separate from the physical world — our “soul” is of the same nature as our body and any other phenomenon of the world.
091
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
listen to anil!
0121
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 02/04/2026
cant wait to discuss conscious experience in such a stimulating space as the @louisianamuseum.bsky.social!
060
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 20/03/2026
Excited to co-organize the next edition of @moc7.bsky.social in Denmark!
062
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 18/03/2026
Interesting lineup for the next ECogS conference in Okinawa! www.oist.jp/conference/e...
oist.jp
ECogS 2026
What does embodied cognitive science have to say about recent developments in AI, and what might these developments reveal about the nature and limits of embodied cognition? Under the theme “From Embo...
010
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 09/03/2026
taking the simulation hypothesis seriously is just creationism for tech people.
0103
Reposted by Moritz Kriegleder
Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 04/10/2025
Third, the peculiar idea that somehow we don't need to read, write, or perform literature reviews anymore; popping up like a satanic mushroom in almost all so-called OK uses of LLMs. Companies writing our papers via their chatbots is not scientific at all. See section 5: doi.org/10.31234/osf... 7/
table 1 extract from Guest, O., & van Rooij, I. (2025, October 4). Critical Artificial Intelligence Literacy for Psychologists. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dkrgj_v15 Ghostwriter in the Machine
A unique selling point of these systems is conversing and writing in a human-like way. This is imminently understandable, although wrong-headed, when one realises these are systems that
essentially function as lossy2
content-addressable memory: when
input is given, the output generated by the model is text that
stochastically matches the input text. The reason text at the output looks novel is because by design the AI product performs
an automated version of what is known as mosaic or patchwork
plagiarism (Baždarić, 2013) — due to the nature of input masking and next token prediction, the output essentially uses similar words in similar orders to what it has been exposed to. This
makes the automated flagging of plagiarism unlikely, which is
also true when students or colleagues perform this type of copypaste and then thesaurus trick, and true when so-called AI plagiarism detectors falsely claim to detect AI-produced text (Edwards, 2023a). This aspect of LLM-based AI products can be
seen as an automation of plagiarism and especially of the research paper mill (Guest, 2025; Guest, Suarez, et al., 2025; van
Rooij, 2022): the “churn[ing] out [of] fake or poor-quality journal papers” (Sanderson, 2024; Committee on Publication Ethics,In addition, who is held accountable if nobody with intent
authored the text? Because while the original data fed into the
system is certainly written with goals, messages, and audiences in
mind jumbling this into ad-libbed word salad removes authorial
intent (Bender et al., 2021). So do the companies who own the
chatbot own the text or do the original authors? These questions
denote legal battles, which are being currently fought in the public eye and which affect all of us in all roles, not just as academics
(Creamer, 2025; Knibbs, 2024; Reuters, 2025). Either way, even if
the courts decide in the favour of companies, we should not allow
these companies with vested interests to write our papers (Fisher
et al., 2025), or to filter what we include in our papers. Because
it is not the case that we only operate based on legal precedents,
but also on our own ethical values and scientific integrity codes
(ALLEA, 2023; KNAW et al., 2018), and we have a direct duty to
protect, as with previous crises and in general, the literature from
pollution. In other words, the same issues as in previous sections
play out here, where essentially now every paper produced using
chatbot output must declare a conflict of interest, since the output text can be biased in subtle or direct ways by the company
who owns the bot (see Table 2).
Seen in the right light — AI products understood as contentaddressable systems — we see that framing the user, the academic
in this case, as the creator of the bot’s output is misplaced. The
input does not cause the output in an authorial sense, much like
input to a library search engine does not cause relevant articles
and books to be written (Guest, 2025). The respective authors
wrote those, not the search query!
213837
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 13/01/2026
"The more important issue [...] is not that physics is more ‘mature’ but that it deals with inherently simpler objects. [...] the brain and nervous system are exquisitely sensitive to surroundings – as they must be, for without this we could not perceive and respond to the world around us."
172
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 13/01/2026
i love reading open peer review of papers. its like getting a deep dive into methodological issues in the format of academia gossip.
020
Reposted by Moritz Kriegleder
Complexity Cat 🐱 @amahury.bsky.social · 22/12/2025
Happy to share my new paper w/ @cgershen.bsky.social, just published at @royalsocietypublishing.org Interface! Open Access🔓: royalsocietypublishing.org/rsif/article... Instead of proposing a new theory, we offer a synthesis in theoretical biology. Want to know more? Read the full thread./1 👇🧵
royalsocietypublishing.org
Closing the loop: how semantic closure enables open-ended evolution?
Abstract. This study explores the evolutionary emergence of semantic closure—the self-referential mechanism through which symbols actively construct and in
12512
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 15/12/2025
new commentary on embodiment in information systems with Tom Froese! we discuss Pitti et al.'s framework to formalise the embodied mind with information theory and sketch a way to cover the complementary perspective of the lived body and subjective experience as well
2111
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
I started my PhD on the philosophy and neuroscience of consciousness in 2022. Even though people advised against it, I think it was good timing.
3191
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 25/11/2025
imagine there would be a way to experimentally study subjective qualities 🤔
020
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 06/11/2025
giving a talk at 2 am my time at the @philsci.bsky.social around the world online conference. japan time is the best...
140
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 31/10/2025
new evidence for phenomenal consciousness just dropped! very interesting study by Makaela Natker, @chazfirestone.bsky.social, Howard Egeth, @ianbphillips.bsky.social
paper: sensitivity to visual features in inattentional blindness
0112
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 30/10/2025
just did the computational functionalism about consciousness quiz by chris percy and I am surprised by how much cf leanings I apparently have!
quiz results about how computational functionalist I am
230
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 27/10/2025
i am not gonna make it because of the Japan timeshift, but you should join the discussion!
020
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 24/10/2025
these AI generated product brochures for neurotech are getting pretty unhinged
AI generated students playing around with random neurotech
130
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 21/10/2025
I think the most obvious but also most consequential take of embodied cognition is viewing the brain itself as part of the living body rather than as merely abstract neuronal signaling
050
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 30/09/2025
get yourself a supervisor who attends your concerts
1101
Reposted by Moritz Kriegleder
Trends in Cognitive Sciences @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social · 20/09/2025
Online Now: Testing circuit-level theories of consciousness in humans
dlvr.it
Testing circuit-level theories of consciousness in humans
Our understanding of the neural basis of consciousness is mostly restricted to large-scale brain activity patterns as measured by methods such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magneto/electro-encephalography (M/EEG). In contrast, we lack even basic understanding of circuit-level mechanisms supporting consciousness – particularly in humans – despite the fundamental role that such mechanisms likely play in instantiating larger-scale brain activity patterns supporting conscious states and contents. Here, we review what progress has been made on circuit-level theories of consciousness (e.g., apical amplification theory, dendritic integration theory) and argue that such theories can be tested in humans using recently developed, state-of-the-art methods. Doing so will further facilitate translation of consciousness science into clinical settings and strengthen the bridge between circuit- and network-level theories of consciousness.
22311
Reposted by Moritz Kriegleder
Conrad Hackett @conradhackett.bsky.social · 04/09/2025
"Bluesky shows higher level of content originality in scholarly discourse, perhaps due to a higher proportion of academic users. X tends to favor simple retweets. This positions Bluesky as a richer environment for substantive science communication."🧪 True for our study www.nature.com/articles/s41...
arxiv.org
827783
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 03/09/2025
after the mixed bag of talks at ASSC I can't wait to read a proper review of INTREPID!
040
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
you can't prove causality in a causally-closed universe
110
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 01/09/2025
Thanks for the great discussion on studies of consciousness during EPSA25 at @rug.nl! Had a blast in this gorgeous building and seeing all these diverse approaches to philosophy of science.
281
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 20/08/2025
anyone interested in a consciousness lunch discussion at EPSA25? I would like to organise a little get together for philosophers interested in phil of mind, phil of neuroscience, consciousness... #neurosci #consci #philsci #neuroskyence
152
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 29/07/2025
Since its such a young field I am still not sure how to call it. Consciousness Science? Consciousness Studies? Consciousness Research? Neuroscience of Consciousness? #neurosci #consci #philsci #neuroskyence
550
Reposted by Moritz Kriegleder
Fernando Rosas @frosas.bsky.social · 22/07/2025
Finally published: “Top-down and bottom-up neuroscience: overcoming the clash of research cultures” www.nature.com/articles/s41... Looking for ways to better understand different neuroscientific perspectives and enable productive collaborations
nature.com
Top-down and bottom-up neuroscience: overcoming the clash of research cultures - Nature Reviews Neuroscience
As scientists, we want solid answers, but we also want to answer questions that matter. Yet, the brain’s complexity forces trade-offs between these desiderata, bringing about two distinct research app...
39634
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
finally recovered from all the thought provoking discussions I had at @assc28.bsky.social! presented a meta analysis of the current state of consciousness science and why we should leave theory convergence behind (based on work with @mnoichl.bsky.social & @niccolonegro.bsky.social)
moritz kriegleder presenting a slide on the current state of consciousness science
2152
Reposted by Moritz Kriegleder
Maxim Raginsky @mraginsky.bsky.social · 14/08/2023
Delbrück:
022
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 23/06/2025
“Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.” - Dune
041
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 20/06/2025
i doubt that my grandma knew anything about the psychological literature on ego depletion, but she intuitively understood that I will have a second piece of cake if she asked often enough
040
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 17/06/2025
you know academia got you when you are looking forward to summer to finish writing all the papers you wanted to write
040
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 10/06/2025
I asked gpt 4o to visualise the brain areas involved in consciousness according to IIT and GNWT. turns out it knows as much about neuroscience as the average AI researcher... #neurosci #consci #philsci #neuroskyence
108619
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 05/06/2025
defining consciousness is not only about identifiying necessary conditions. it fulfills more epistemological, interdisciplinary, and socio-cultural roles. thanks for the great discussion at the Ernst Mach Workshop on some ideas I started to draft with @niccolonegro.bsky.social!
081
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 03/06/2025
Great point by @anilseth.bsky.social on the dangers of anthropomorphising current LLMs at the Ernst Mach Workshop in Prague organised by @tmarvan.bsky.social @jakubmihalik.bsky.social @sfink.bsky.social
0334
Reposted by Moritz Kriegleder
Jakub Mihalik @jakubmihalik.bsky.social · 28/05/2025
Thrilled to share a poster for the upcoming workshop on AI consciousness in Prague with our wonderful keynote speakers @anilseth.bsky.social and Kathinka Evers. You can find the CfR and more info here: emw.flu.cas.cz
4237
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 27/05/2025
super exciting workshop in Prague next week! I will also give a talk on perspectivism in consciousness science
181
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 15/05/2025
usage of the word phenomenology in top 20 philosophy journals over the last 40 years 📈
use of the word phenomenology in top 20 philosophy journals over the last 40 years
4185
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 14/05/2025
today is the last day btw!
021
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 14/05/2025
Is there a philosophy of cognitive science? Philosophy of neuroscience makes sense because philosophy is usually not part of their toolkit, but I thought cognitive science started with integration of philosophical methods @ispsm.bsky.social
140
Reposted by Moritz Kriegleder
Anne Sophie Meincke @asmeincke.bsky.social · 03/05/2025
What does it mean to be an agent endowed with free will in an indeterministic world? Is there empirical evidence for free will? Join us for the interdisciplinary conference "Free Will: New Perspectives from Philosophy, Biology and Neuroscience", 11-12 June 2025, Vienna, Austria @oeaw.bsky.social
2156