The law professor who predicted only 500 Americans would die of COVID is back with another expertise-free take.

David Tan (Deakin University, Geelong, Australia - Deakin Law School) has posted Is it possible to have legal knowledge without legal inference? on SSRN. Here is the abstract: Is there a systematic and proper method of legal reasoning or is legal reasoning more open-ended and organic and leading to pluralistic conclusions? I refer to a system of legal inference as a system of legal reasoning that fits the first description; ie there is a systematic and proper methodology for drawing conclusions based on certain premises.

Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, Great Britain, the Netherlands and Finland will face tariffs from 1 February

MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United

In this special bonus episode of Called to the Bar, the full podcast crew assembles to confront the legal fallout from the US bombing of Venezuela and the abduction of its sitting president, Nicolás M

Statehood as Political Community: International Law and the Emergence of New States by Alex Green [Cambridge University Press, 2024, ISBN: 978-10091-7-6309, 254pp, £95 (h/bk)]

In this episode of Called to the Bar: International Law Over Drinks, host Dr Tamsin Phillipa Paige is joined by Professor Rob McLaughlin and Dr Alonso Gurmendi Dunkelberg to unpack a troubling event:

Abstract. Doctrinal research is the distinct methodological approach of lawyers and a core contribution of legal studies to human knowledge. Yet, lawyers d

Evolution was fueled by endosymbiosis, cellular alliances in which one microbe makes a permanent home inside another. For the first time, biologists made it happen in the lab.