Reposted by ANCIENT EVIL
Arienne Childrey resigns as Vice Chair of the Ohio Democratic Pride Caucus.
The state party has censored all attempts to criticize Amy Acton and Marcy Kaptur for their anti-trans votes and/or statements.
ANCIENT EVIL
@ancientevil.bsky.social
986 followers 706 following 1.7K posts
BOOKWORM, MegaTokyo fan/supporter. JOAT via lifelong learning. I love cats but can't eat a whole one.
![Dear Cecilia Tan:
Please respond to the questions below within 45 days and include the [THREAD ID], using the brackets, as part of your response. The [THREAD ID] is located below the Examiner’s signature block. The [THREAD ID] must be in the body of your response, NOT the subject line. If you put the [THREAD ID] in the subject line, we will not get your message.
We are reviewing the copyright application you submitted to register "The Mystery of the Bitten Peach."
Based on our examination, some of the text in this work may have been generated by an artificial intelligence ("AI") program.
To be protected by copyright, a work must have been created by a human author. Material that is generated by an AI program does not satisfy this requirement, even if the material was generated in response to numerous and/or complex prompts entered by a human being. The Copyright Office will not register material generated by an AI program.
If some of the text in this work was generated by an AI program, please authorize the addition of a limitation statement to this application to exclude that material from the scope of your claim. This claim will cover the text that Cecilia Tan, created, but it must exclude the "text generated by artificial intelligence."
Please note that we cannot proceed with registration until the claim has been limited to the copyrightable material created by the human author(s). If you do not agree to exclude AI-generated material from the scope of your claim, the Copyright Office may refuse registration.
If the situation is otherwise, please explain.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:ziuhqi7puh5ivq5tekjunwmy/bafkreig33za4rhl3ix7etn3z6koi4m4v56ipec6cwfpqm6ei552ld247c4)
![On Friday, October 2, the U.S. District Court for New Hampshire issued an order ruling that: “although student identification cards are no longer expressly valid to establish voter identity under RSA 659:13, election officials may consider them, along with other available evidence, when determining voter identity under RSA 654:12(d)(4) and RSA 659:13(c)(1) and (3).”
Accordingly, effective immediately and until further notice:
When a person is registering to vote, student identification cards may constitute “other evidence that reasonably establishes that it is more likely than not that [a voter registrant] is who they claim to be.” RSA 654:12.
When a person is checking in to vote on election day, ballot clerks must direct a voter with a student identification card to the supervisors of the checklist, who shall “review the voter's qualifications and determine if the voter's identity can be verified.” See RSA 659:13, I(c)(1) & (3).
Neither the Court’s order nor the statutory provisions that the Court cites provide any guidance regarding how to determine when a student identification card constitutes “other evidence that reasonably establishes that it is more likely than not that [a voter registrant] is who they claim to be” under RSA 654:12; or how to determine whether a “voter's identity can be verified” under RSA 659:13, I(c)(1) & (3).](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:utq5txoqgh5d5gqy5hs577ad/bafkreig7j3xqxnafxvixx6fcpwzjxycvgtbnb5ccj34fkzk5qwdpirtxam)
