Sign in

Zoe Robinson

@zoerobinson.bsky.social
409 followers 391 following 42 posts

Law Professor

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Stephen Wolf @stephenwolf.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
NEW: The 2026 elections in most states will decide which party runs elections heading into 2028 (see map). We detail how Democrats could hold or gain this power in 14 potentially competitive states—and form a bulwark against MAGA subverting the 2028 elections www.the-downballot.com/p/voters-can...
Map of the United States titled "2026 Elections That Will Decide Which Party Runs Elections," with the subtitle "Includes secretaries of state and other elected offices where relevant." Source: The Downballot. States are colored by incumbent party.

Democratic (blue), 14 states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

Republican (red), 18 states: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming.

Bipartisan (yellow), 4 states: Hawaii, Illinois, New York, and Wisconsin.
Not up in 2026 (gray), 14 states: Delaware, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oregon, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and West Virginia.

Footnotes: Illinois and Wisconsin have Democratic secretaries of state who do not run elections. Pennsylvania's Democratic governor appointed a Republican who typically aligns with Democrats.
8365136
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Micah Schwartzman @micahschwartzman.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
As Linda Greenhouse writes, St. Mary v Roy is a case asking a fundamental question about religious freedom: “Equality or preference?” She links my article with @nelsontebbe.bsky.social and @richschragger.bsky.social, arguing that the Court is committed to the latter — a doctrine of preference.
nytimes.com
Opinion | This Case Has Flown Under the Radar. It Won’t Stay There.
This case has flown under the radar, but it won’t stay there.
1156
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Daphne Pierpoint @daphnepierpoint.com · 29/09/2026
Oof. x.com/meidastouch/...
Footage of Jack Smith at a Maryland/Iowa women’s basketball game
2347883
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Brianne Gorod @briannegorod.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
If you're a law student who wants to spend your summer working in the public interest & is interested in appellate advocacy, apply to join the @myconstitution.bsky.social team this summer! www.theusconstitution.org/legal-intern... 1/2
theusconstitution.org
Legal Internship Summer 2027 | Constitutional Accountability Center
About CAC Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) is a nonprofit law firm and think tank dedicated to fulfilling the inherently progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. ...
196
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
The Washington Post @washingtonpost.com · 19/09/2026
A cancer vaccine succeeded in a clinical trial in preventing the recurrence of melanoma, a result experts say is a breakthrough for mRNA-based treatments. Trials for lung cancer, pancreatic cancer and other diseases' vaccines are also underway.
washingtonpost.com
A melanoma vaccine was hailed as a breakthrough. Which cancers are next?
Trials investigating mRNA vaccines for lung cancer, pancreatic cancer and other diseases are already underway.
151115383
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Jen Taub @jentaub.bsky.social · 17/08/2026
“A single-payer universal health care system could cover every American, save more than 100,000 lives a year, and still cost $1 trillion less than the system it would replace, according to a new preprint study led by researchers at the Yale School of Public Health.” ysph.yale.edu/news-article...
ysph.yale.edu
Universal Health Coverage Could Save $1 Trillion and 114,000 Lives Every Year, Yale Study Projects
A single-payer universal health care system could cover every American, save more than 100,000 lives a year, and still cost $1 trillion less than the system it
595165447121
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Adam Bonica @adambonica.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
Anti-corruption is how you beat authoritarians. Two lessons from Hungary: 1. Our affordability crisis is a corruption problem. Say so. 2. “a message that treats [corruption] as a Trump problem alone will fail to connect with those who believe the entire system is rigged.”
justsecurity.org
What Hungary's Anti-Corruption Election Can Teach U.S. Democracy Advocates
Hungary's anti-corruption win offers U.S. democracy advocates lessons, but success requires a credible messenger and a concrete plan.
5254101
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Daniel G. Aaron, MD, JD @medlawdan.bsky.social · 23/07/2026
Each year, my Torts students create podcasts about the intersections of Tort law with social policy. Below are this past year's podcasts. Most of them are stunningly good and cover important topics like AI, wildfires, medmal, and deepfakes. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
papers.ssrn.com
Tort Reports
Here, you will find the Tort Reports—podcasts created by Prof. Daniel G. Aaron's Torts classes from 2023-2025. They cover an array of social issues that interse
53513
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Prof Caroline Mala Corbin @carolinemalacorbin.bsky.social · 15/07/2026
Is Trump planning some announcement about stolen elections, election fraud, or some such nonsense? Makes me think of a paper I wrote a while back. Trump's Lies: The Unconstitutionality of Government Propaganda buff.ly/gzk9lYS
papers.ssrn.com
Trump's Lies: The Unconstitutionality of Government Propaganda
Government propaganda—the government’s deliberate dissemination of false claims on matters of public interest—has increasingly become a source of concern in the
066
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Leah Litman @leahlitman.bsky.social · 29/06/2026
OMFG. I cannot begin to describe my gasp at how Roberts & co decided to go all in on LOST CAUSE theory & insist that the Reconstruction Congress did Confederate sympathizer President Andrew Johnson wrong by attempting to keep him from destroying Reconstruction www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...
722704896
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Adam Serwer @adamserwer.bsky.social · 27/06/2026
The new racist double standard set up by Alito in the TPS ruling: if there’s any other motive in addition to the racism, the racism doesn’t count, but if the state wants to *prevent* discrimination against black people, that is racist and unconstitutional www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/0...
The Roberts Court has been turning anti-discrimination law upside down for years. Its approach came into particular focus in May, with Louisiana v. Callais, in which it determined that not allowing Louisiana’s government to dilute Black votes was racist. In that case, Alito insisted that forcing the state to draw a second majority-Black congressional district would be an “unconstitutional racial gerrymander” because Republicans were entitled to discriminate against Black voters if they argued that their purpose was partisan instead of racist. The Court reaffirmed that position in a subsequent case dealing with Alabama, after a lower court had found ample evidence of deliberate racial discrimination, as opposed to the discriminatory effect of the Louisiana map.

Mullin now sets up an even more impossible double standard. If the government wants to discriminate against Black people, any pretext will do. “As long as there is a plausible basis—any plausible articulable basis—for the government’s action, then the Court will look to that basis as sufficient,” Aderson Francois, a law professor at Georgetown University, told me, “even in the face of evidence that government actors were motivated by animus.” If a Black person wants to prove they’ve been discriminated against, however, no amount of evidence will suffice.
10748261641
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Kevin M. Kruse @kevinmkruse.bsky.social · 24/06/2026
The Tea Party was (1) small protests which were (2) hyped by media & (3) led to the election of radical nut jobs who (4) badly broke US politics. What we have now are (1) huge protests that were (2) dismissed by media but (3) still got a few candidates in deep blue NYC who (4) will work to fix it.
311366246
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Alanna Vagianos @alannavagianos.bsky.social · 24/06/2026
Four years after the Dobbs decision, pregnant people in states with total abortion bans are now nearly twice as likely to die during pregnancy, childbirth, or the postpartum period.
jamanetwork.com
Abortion Bans and Pregnancy-Related Care Across Physician Specialties
This qualitative study examines the association of abortion restrictions with abortion-adjacent care across medical specialties via interviews with US physicians who care for pregnant patients.
6200132
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Mark Joseph Stern @mjsdc.bsky.social · 23/06/2026
KBJ's dissent: "The court reduces some of Congress’s greatest legislative achievements—federal laws that secure civil rights, environmental stability, healthcare, and more—to nothing more than the wheelings-and-dealings of an especially wealthy private party." www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...
This severance of rights and remedies is a sleight of hand;
it comes by way of the majority’s full-throated endorsement
of a contract analogy even though what secures the rights
at issue is not a contract but a law. Today’s decision magically transforms a federal statute into an invitation to be
accepted or declined, deemed binding only if each particular
defendant has explicitly agreed to be penalized. No matter
that laws, as opposed to contracts, don’t ordinarily work
this way. The trick here is the majority’s effortless conflation of law making and agreement making—two different
sources of binding authority.
The majority’s analysis is spellbindingly straightforward:
Spending Clause statutes are contracts, and contracts bind
only those who consent. Ante, at 6–8. But pulling this rabbit out of the hat requires misconstruing the Spending
Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause, and ignoring
decades of precedent affirming Congress’s authority to use
the power of the purse to govern. In the end, the Court reduces some of Congress’s greatest legislative achievements—federal laws that secure civil rights, environmental
stability, healthcare, and more—to nothing more than the
wheelings-and-dealings of an especially wealthy private
party. Because I would not so trivialize a federal statute or
the constitutional powers pursuant to which it was passed,
I respectfully dissent.
2616252
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Leah Litman @leahlitman.bsky.social · 23/06/2026
ugh-scotus guts individual liability under RLUIPA (&basically says all spending clause statutes don't provide for individual liability) so tally today: victims of human rights violations & beneficiaries of public benefits programs can't sue. oil companies can. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...
supremecourt.gov
24533186
Zoe Robinson @zoerobinson.bsky.social · 04/06/2026
@palesl.bsky.social outlines our empirical work of the past few years highlighting the ideological dimension of judicial selection and decision-making on the High Court of Australia.
010
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Justin Wolfers @justinwolfers.bsky.social · 30/05/2026
Economists call this diminishing marginal utility. The first dollars change your life. The billionth doesn't. So the argument stops being about consumption and starts being about power.
50954351
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Alan Elrod @aselrod.bsky.social · 16/05/2026
Use the map in Virginia. Then, if you get control of Congress, be ruthless. Block everything. Do impeachments. Run investigations. Then in 2029, expand the Supreme Court, make DC a state, expand the House.
826877
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Adam Bonica @adambonica.bsky.social · 14/05/2026
The Trump-IRS settlement talks are blatant corruption being laundered through the legal system in broad daylight. A president suing his own government. Kleptocracy usually requires some effort to hide. Resist the temptation to normalize this. Authoritarians have routinely been overthrown for less.
10418137
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Eddie Yang @eddieyang.bsky.social · 13/05/2026
New paper in Nature. The more a government controls its domestic media, the more it dominates AI training data, the more pro-regime outputs we get from AI. By scraping the open web, LLMs are unwittingly laundering state-coordinated narratives into seemingly objective answers.
25879450
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Rick Hasen @rickhasen.bsky.social · 13/05/2026
My new one @slate.com: Why is John Roberts in a Rush All of a Sudden? slate.com/news-and-pol...
First, and most crassly, these decisions could have been motivated by partisanship. They almost certainly advantage Republicans in the race for control of Congress, because Republicans can do more gerrymandering than Democrats at this stage of the election season—and it’s easier for them to do the sort of gerrymandering the court blessed in Callais.

Second, even if not consciously biased in favor of Republicans, the conservative justices could be the victims of motivated reasoning: They see the risks of changing election rules at the last minute much more clearly when Republicans are hurt than when they are helped. Witness Alito, concurring in the shadow docket order to immediately issue its final judgment in Callais, noting that any delay would allow an unconstitutional map to be used in an upcoming election.

Third, perhaps John Roberts sees the court as running out of time, and he wants to get many rulings in the books that change American politics in his preferred direction and forestall the move toward a multiracial democracy. He’s a 71-year-old chief justice now, not a 26-year-old staffer. The Supreme Court’s rulings in cases ranging from abortion to presidential immunity to the power of the government to fight climate change are growing increasingly unpopular. In the most important cases, the court is now splitting along not just ideological lines but party lines: All the conservative justices on the court have been appointed by Republican presidents, and all the liberals by Democrats.

Roberts well knows that Democrats and progressives are mobilizing against the court. The chief justice has complained about the public viewing the justices as political actors, but that is exactly what they are. People, including me, who had resisted Supreme Court reform, increasingly see it as the only way to save American democracy….
531589461
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Jamal Greene @jamalgreene.bsky.social · 11/05/2026
As Justice Sotomayor's dissent notes, the district court's finding of unconstitutional discrimination is unaffected by Callais. But if the dist. ct. now reinstates that finding on remand, the state will run to SCOTUS and say Purcell forbids the court to do so. You can guess what happens next.
9702165
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Tyler McBrien @tylermcbrien.com · 10/05/2026
🚨 NEW TOOL for U.S. legal journalists ⚖️ I turned @allyjar.bsky.social's incredible crowdsourced Google doc on accessing state court records into an interactive map. Check it out and let me know about any errors, missing information, or ways I can improve this thing (link below)
14754335
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Maggie Blackhawk @maggieblackhawk.bsky.social · 08/05/2026
I dream of a day when the legal academy spends as much attention to congressional and other legislative reform, than they spend debating whom among us is properly critical of the Supreme Court. Reforming Congress is equally (or more) important than rethinking Supreme Court practice and authority.
27724
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
G Elliott Morris @gelliottmorris.com · 08/05/2026
A very Strength In Numbers-coded article today: It looks like Republican Supreme Court justices made a very rudimentary, but willful, statistical error in their effective invalidating of the VRA in the Callais decision. www.gelliottmorris.com/p/2026-05-08...
gelliottmorris.com
The simple statistical error Republican Supreme Court justices used to gut the VRA
The Court says vote dilution can be proven only after "controlling" racial polarization for partisan polarization. This is a nonsensical and impossible test
421123444
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Chad Oldfather @oldfatherc.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
Motivated reasoning, naive realism, and the resulting bias blind spot are powerful, powerful drugs.
011
Zoe Robinson @zoerobinson.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
Pre-ordered this, looking forward to reading!
000
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Liberal Currents @liberalcurrents.com · 07/05/2026
"Our screens are two-way, yes, but we can easily forget that the people on the other end exist as more than characters for our enjoyment. The degradation and humiliation rituals of reality television now play out across our social media feeds." www.liberalcurrents.com/the-parasoci...
liberalcurrents.com
The Parasocial Style in American Politics
Our screens are two-way but we can easily forget that the people on the other end exist as more than characters for our enjoyment.
0153
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Steve Vladeck @stevevladeck.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
We live in a time dominated by deeply unserious people making deeply unserious arguments in support of tragically serious results that serious people would have both avoided and known to avoid.
7044611023
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Rick Hasen @rickhasen.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
Jamelle Bouie: “John Roberts Believes in an America That Doesn’t Exist” electionlawblog.org?p=155957
electionlawblog.org
Jamelle Bouie: "John Roberts Believes in an America That Doesn’t Exist" #ELB
NYT column: For the Roberts court, however, these districts are little more than a “racial entitlement,” to borrow a phrase from Justice Antonin Scalia. In the court’s view, you may have the right to ...
45212
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Rick Hasen @rickhasen.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
Hardline Conservatives Including Justice Alito Really Do Not Like Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson Speaking Truth to Power electionlawblog.org?p=155951 Count me as all the way with KBJ.
electionlawblog.org
Hardline Conservatives Including Justice Alito Really Do Not Like Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson Speaking Truth to Power #ELB
Witness the recent attacks. Count me as all the way with KBJ.
13713
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Adventurism Time @flow.blacksky.app · 06/05/2026
Can't fix racist maps because the election is only a year away, but you can stop an election after voting starts to make the maps more racist. Good thing racism is over. 🤬
3404100
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Rick Hasen @rickhasen.bsky.social · 04/05/2026
Norm Ornstein: “SCOTUS’s Brazen Power Grab Guts Voting Rights” electionlawblog.org?p=155877
electionlawblog.org
Norm Ornstein: "SCOTUS's Brazen Power Grab Guts Voting Rights" #ELB
Norm at The Contrarian: Now to Article III. The Framers did not expect that the judiciary would usurp the powers of the first branch. They created a Supreme Court and gave Congress power to establish ...
086
Zoe Robinson @zoerobinson.bsky.social · 03/05/2026
#historyandtradition
000
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Rick Hasen @rickhasen.bsky.social · 02/05/2026
“Who Will Stand Up to the Supreme Court Justices?” electionlawblog.org?p=155848
electionlawblog.org
"Who Will Stand Up to the Supreme Court Justices?" #ELB
Nikolas Bowie & Daphna Renan NYT oped: With its decision this week in Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court gutted a core part of the Voting Rights Act, Congress’s landmark prohibition on voting rul...
0225
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Niko Bowie @nikobowie.bsky.social · 02/05/2026
By gutting the Voting Rights Act, the Supreme Court is killing the Second Reconstruction. The first Reconstruction shows how Congress should respond. Me and Daphna Renan in the NYT on the tools we have to save democracy from a hostile Court.
nytimes.com
Opinion | Ruling by Ruling, the Supreme Court Is Undoing the Civil Rights Movement
412126688
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
𝕊𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕒𝕖 𝔾𝕦𝕣𝕝 @sundaedivine.lol · 30/04/2026
Hillary was right about everything.
785207875167
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Tom Clark @tomsclark.bsky.social · 30/04/2026
These figures are *crazy.* And, yes, that's a technical term in the study of judicial politics.
172
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Dare Obasanjo @carnage4life.bsky.social · 29/04/2026
American Black women now have fewer voting rights and reproductive rights than their mothers did at the same age. Progress isn’t a straight line, indeed.
slate.com
The Supreme Court’s Conservatives Just Issued the Worst Ruling in a Century
This evisceration of the Voting Rights Act requires us to take SCOTUS reform more seriously.
3826911259
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Rachel Shelden @rachelshelden.bsky.social · 30/04/2026
I don't think it's a coincidence that lots of folks are publishing books this year that explain/contextualize this #SCOTUS & the current moment. Some to look for (& if you've got one I've missed, pls add!). Mine, the Political Supreme Court, will be out in October 1/ uncpress.org/978146969713...
uncpress.org
The Political Supreme Court
Today’s Supreme Court justices bristle at the label “politicians in robes,” insisting that they operate above the fray of partisan politics. But for th...
18034
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Ida Bae Wells @nhannahjones.bsky.social · 29/04/2026
We must understand that the Voting Rights Act was not merely about ensuring Black Americans rights, it was about democratizing America. This ruling is not just a decimation of Black rights and Black Americans’ ability to have representation, it is a fatal blow to multiracial democracy.
128100093532
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Rick Hasen @rickhasen.bsky.social · 29/04/2026
My New One at Slate: “The Supreme Court’s Conservatives Just Issued the Worst Ruling in a Century; This evisceration of the Voting Rights Act requires us to take SCOTUS reform more seriously.” @slate.com slate.com/news-and-pol...
Wednesday’s 6-3 party line decision in Louisiana v. Callais will go down in history as one of the most pernicious and damaging Supreme Court decisions of the last century. All six Republican-appointed justices on the court signed onto Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion gutting what remained of the Voting Rights Act protections for minority voters, while pretending they were merely making technical tweaks to the Act.

This decision will bleach the halls of Congress, state legislatures, and local bodies like city councils, by ending the protections of Section 2 of the Act, which had provided a pathway to assure that voters of color would have some rudimentary fair representation. It’s the culmination of the life’s work of Chief Justice John Roberts and Samuel Alito, who have shown persistent resistance to the idea of the United States as a multiracial democracy, and a brazen willingness to reject Congress’s judgment that fair representation for minority voters sometimes requires race-conscious legislation. It gives the green light to further partisan gerrymandering. It protects Alito’s core constituency: aggrieved white Republican voters. It’s a disaster for American democracy.
722120769
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Laura Portuondo @lauraportuondo.bsky.social · 29/04/2026
Please ignore that "Racism is Over" talking point undermines "there is nothing worse than considering race" talking point.
032
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Steve Vladeck @stevevladeck.bsky.social · 29/04/2026
"I dissent because Congress elected otherwise. I dissent because the Court betrays its duty to faithfully implement the great statute Congress wrote. I dissent because the Court’s decision will set back the foundational right Congress granted of racial equality in electoral opportunity. I dissent."
442634950
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Kyle Griffin @kylegriffin1.bsky.social · 29/04/2026
Justice Kagan: "I dissent. The Voting Rights Act is—or, now more accurately, was—'one of the most consequential, efficacious, and amply justified exercises of federal legislative power in our Nation's history.'
8572152194
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Jonathon Booth @jboothhistory.bsky.social · 29/04/2026
The result of Callais will be that black and latino voters will be prevented from electing representatives of their choosing at every level of government.
145
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Micah Schwartzman @micahschwartzman.bsky.social · 23/04/2026
If you’re a law professor thinking about reposting the claim that the Unite the Right rally was staged or faked, I’d encourage you to read the transcripts from Sines v Kessler. I know they run several thousand pages of testimony from the organizers, but they’re easily accessible and linked below.
1538598
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Rick Hasen @rickhasen.bsky.social · 23/04/2026
To those complaining about the Democrats' partisan gerrymander in Virginia: Congress has the power to ban partisan gerrymandering in congressional elections under its Article I, Section 4 powers. So far Republicans have been almost uniformly opposed. Is this going to change now?
513229
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Gabriel Malor @gabrielmalor.bsky.social · 23/04/2026
There is a WILD ONE out of the 8th Cir. today about a man who stole another man's identity 30 years ago, lived all those years under the other man's identity including getting married and having a kid, who then got the other man prosecuted for identity theft. ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/26/04...
Keirans told the police that he “wishe[d] to prosecute” Woods for “using his identity.”  The police therefore forwarded the case to the county prosecutor’s office, which charged Woods with felony crimes of identity theft and false impersonation.  Throughout the ensuing state court criminal proceedings, Woods insisted that his name was “William Woods” not “Matthew Keirans.”  After Woods’s public defender and an evaluating physician expressed concerns about his competency, the state court determined that Woods was not mentally competent to stand trial and ordered that he be placed in a mental hospital and receive psychotropic medication.  In March 2021, Woods was convicted of the felony charges.  The state court sentenced Woods to time served and ordered that Woods “use only [his] true name, ‘Matthew Keirans.’”  In total, Woods spent 428 days in jail and 147 days in a mental hospital. After his release, Woods continued fighting to reclaim his identity.  Keirans, meanwhile, continued insisting to law enforcement that he was “William Woods” and that Woods was “Matthew Keirans.”  In January 2023, Woods contacted the hospital where Keirans worked, informing its security department that Keirans had stolen his identity.  A hospital employee referred Woods’s complaint to the local law enforcement, which assigned an experienced detective to investigate the complaint. Gradually, the detective unraveled Keirans’s deception.  Using DNA evidence, the detective proved conclusively that Woods, not Keirans, is the true “William Woods.”  In July 2023, the detective confronted Keirans with this evidence.
42646180
Reposted by Zoe Robinson
Micah Schwartzman @micahschwartzman.bsky.social · 22/04/2026
CA5 rules that there is no secular purpose requirement under the Establishment Clause. So when individuals act for religious reasons, their actions are treated as religious, triggering exemption claims; but when the state acts for religious reasons, its actions are ... well, nothing to see here ...
yalelawjournal.org
The Asymmetry of Religious Motivation | Yale Law Journal
The Supreme Court’s religious freedom doctrine treats religious motivation asymmetrically: with respect to free exercise, religious motivation suffices for...
22410