Reposted by Zak Woodman
"When courts insist that race-conscious remedies are constitutionally suspect, they don’t remove values from constitutional adjudication. Instead, they prioritize one value—formal racial neutrality—over competing values."
lnk.thebulwark.com
The Supreme Court Says It’s Neutral. It’s Not.
Some of the Supreme Court’s recent decisions rely on the idea of neutrality. But its appeals to neutrality misunderstand the concept and mask a grasping approach to the law.