Sign in

Yuvraj Joshi

@yuvrajjoshi.bsky.social
1.3K followers 132 following 161 posts

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School

PostsRepliesMedia
Yuvraj Joshi @yuvrajjoshi.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
“Judicial Regrets” is now published in Southern California Law Review! In it, I examine why judges sometimes come to regret their rulings, and how the legal system should respond to such regrets.👩🏾‍⚖️⚖️ southerncalifornialawreview.com/2026/09/24/j...
U.S. Supreme Court Justices have often expressed regret about their most consequential rulings and opinions. Chief Justice Warren lamented his 1955 Brown v. Board of Education opinion ordering desegregation “with all deliberate speed”—ambiguous phrasing that enabled delays in integration. Justice Powell recanted his 1986 opinion in Bowers v. Hardwick, which upheld a Georgia law criminalizing same-sex intimacy. Justice O’Connor predicted in Grutter v. Bollinger that affirmative action policies would no longer be needed within twenty-five years—a prediction she later acknowledged was mistaken. These examples, among others discussed in this Article, illustrate that judicial regret is frequent and poignant, spanning several areas of law.

Judicial regret influences legal development by shaping judicial behavior, informing legislative reform, and empowering social movements. Despite this significance, it remains largely unexplored in U.S. legal scholarship. This Article provides the first systematic analysis of judicial regret by drawing on multidisciplinary research on regret, previously unpublished judicial survey data, and judicial case studies. It examines how the law might better account for judicial regret and underscores insights about law and judging that stem from deeper understandings of it. Because such regret can catalyze legal reforms and rectify past harms, this Article proposes ways to incorporate it into legal interpretation and the treatment of precedent. By contemplating the legal and normative significance of this neglected judicial emotion, this Article aims to help the legal community avoid collectively discounting regret.
032
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Sherrilyn Ifill @sifill.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
So excited to talk with the authors about this remarkable and timely book. @politicsandprose.bsky.social @daphnarenan.bsky.social @nikobowie.bsky.social @daphnarenan.bsky.social
112032
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Niko Bowie @nikobowie.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
Trump says the Court's rulings against him are "shockingly bad." But the rulings to worry about are all the ones putting him above the law. @daphnarenan.bsky.social and I are in Slate this morning on the difference between a Court that enforces acts of Congress and one that defies them.
slate.com
John Roberts’ New Role Model Demonstrates Everything Wrong With the Supreme Court
If the court is curling up anywhere, it is at the feet of a presidency increasingly unchecked by law.
25423
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Daphna Renan @daphnarenan.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
Supremacy is out today! Join @nikobowie.bsky.social and me for a virtual book talk with the great @adamserwer.bsky.social tonight at 7 pm EST.
25814
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Jamal Greene @jamalgreene.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
In which my colleague Dave Pozen and I articulate the (uneasy) case for a constitutional convention. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
papers.ssrn.com
Back to Philadelphia? The Uneasy Case for a New Constitutional Convention
<p><span>No country has ever had a written constitution in longer continuous operation than the United States. Such resilience is cause for commemoration. But f
48226
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Josh Chafetz @joshchafetz.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Another very interesting looking piece from @jamalgreene.bsky.social and Dave Pozen! papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
papers.ssrn.com
Back to Philadelphia? The Uneasy Case for a New Constitutional Convention
<p><span>No country has ever had a written constitution in longer continuous operation than the United States. Such resilience is cause for commemoration. But f
0142
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Liz Sepper @lsepper.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
Today (9/10) at 10am ET, the Indiana Supreme Court will hear arguments in a religious liberty challenge to the state abortion ban. The mostly Jewish plaintiffs have so far prevailed in the state courts under a state Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Watch here:
mycourts.in.gov
Indiana Appellate Clerk's Portal
13923
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Hakeem Jefferson @hakeemjefferson.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
One of my big academic rules: only write papers you really care about on topics you really care about. I try to follow this rule 99% of the time. This paper is one of the best examples of that, and I’m stoked it’s one step closer to being in the world. We’ve corrected proofs & you’ll have it soon!
First page of article proofs for “The Politics of Black Classification: Sociopolitical Cues and Racial Perception”
1145388
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Elizabeth Hidalgo Reese @yunpovi.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
All U.S. courts have judicial review, (aka the supreme power to tell other parts of the government they are behaving unlawfully) right? Actually, no. Some tribal courts don't. Read my latest in UChicago Law Review for more.
35321
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
LPE Blog @lpeblog.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
Are you a law student experiencing the dizzying process of moral decontextualization, as questions of power and justice seem oddly absent from the curriculum? If so, the Law and Political Economy movement might be for you. Check out this classic post on what LPE has to offer to new law students.
lpeproject.org
Law and Political Economy: A (Very) Brief Field Guide for 1Ls
Two 3L LPE fans (and Blog editors) reflect on what LPE has to offer to new law students.
12816
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Niko Bowie @nikobowie.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
Every author hopes for a reviewer who reads generously, takes the argument seriously, and pushes back where it matters. Grateful to Daniel Immerwahr for this review of Supremacy in the New Yorker.
newyorker.com
Has the Supreme Court Sandbagged Democracy?
A new legal history argues that the Justices should be stripped of their power to overrule coequal branches of government. It arrives at an awkward moment.
39823
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Jill Hasday @jillhasday.bsky.social · 29/08/2026
On this day in 1963, the National Council of Negro Women hosted a conference to reflect on the previous day’s March on Washington and plan for the future. Lawyer Pauli Murray criticized the lack of female speakers at the March. The group agreed on the need to fight both racism and sexism. #WeTheMen
Pauli Murray
3332100
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani @mayor.nyc.gov · 25/08/2026
This is truly heartbreaking. Dolly Parton was an extraordinary person and an irreplaceable champion of the working class. We are a better country because of her.
491506737331
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Kim Lane Scheppele @kimlanelaw.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
Lots of headlines on SCOTUS mail-in ballots ruling are wrong. A different injunction blocking the executive order still holds and the Post Office's proposed rule will probably be enjoined too. It ain't over yet. Steve Vladeck sets the matter straight: www.stevevladeck.com/p/246-making...
stevevladeck.com
246. Making Sense of the Mail-in Ballots Ruling
The Supreme Court’s grant of a stay in one of the mail-in ballot cases is deeply wrong, but it’s also not the main event over whether Trump’s patently unlawful executive order can take effect.
4386171
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Tanner Allread @tannerallread.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
Also, guess what?? Native people had a lot to say about the US Constitution and even influenced debates on its meaning, as Greg and I have shown: www.columbialawreview.org/content/we-t...
columbialawreview.org
WE THE (NATIVE) PEOPLE?: HOW INDIGENOUS PEOPLES DEBATED THE U.S. CONSTITUTION - Columbia Law Review
Introduction Writing in the name of the “People of the United States,” white men drafted the U.S. Constitution in 1787. The following year, white men, chosen by an almost exclusively white, male, prop...
0249
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Evan Bernick, a finite mode with a smol hooman and a lorg floof @evanbernick.bsky.social · 18/08/2026
in which Khiara Bridges reviews Akhil Amar's book more harshly than I did, which is really saying something yalelawjournal.org/article/orig...
Bridges, originalism without history


Native people are, for the most part, missing from Born Equal’s recounting. In fact, a reader of Born Equal could get the impression that the landsthe United States came to call its own were unoccupied—entirely devoid of people. That is how removed Native people are from Amar’s narrative.

In this way, and many others, Amar can rest easy that Born Equal will have no trouble getting past the Trump Administration’s censors. 84 Indeed, Born Equal tells exactly the type of history the Trump Administration believes should be told—a history that is “true” and “sane." It is a history devoid of any serious
critique of those who are traditionally figured as national heroes.
Consider, in this light, Amar’s repeated attestation that the Founders (or, at least, the ones that truly matter) abhorred slavery—notwithstanding the fact that several of them owned enslaved people. Amar insists the Founders truly detested the institution. They positively loathed it. In light of this deep-seated revulsion, according to Amar, the Constitution these men created protected slavery, but only “unintentionally." (Oops!)
1116724
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Hakeem Jefferson @hakeemjefferson.bsky.social · 14/08/2026
Sending love to friends who, like me, are feeling especially close to this tragedy today. There is so much I want to say, but for now, just sending love. Take care of yourselves.
126716
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Leah Litman @leahlitman.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
We really wanted to do this series - and are so grateful that THE expert on copwatching Jocelyn Simonson @jocelynsimonson.bsky.social made time for such an informative conversation.
26923
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Can’t Stop Twinkling 💕💚 @proftolson.bsky.social · 11/08/2026
Very grateful for the invitation!
131
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Ally Whelan @amwhelan.bsky.social · 11/08/2026
Very much looking forward to speaking with @yuvrajjoshi.bsky.social’s class in November on law and inequality in the area of reproductive health.
142
Yuvraj Joshi @yuvrajjoshi.bsky.social · 11/08/2026
Back to school! ✨📚 I’m looking forward to teaching “Law and Inequality” again at Brooklyn Law School this fall. Grateful to be joined by six brilliant scholars and a pioneering judge who will enrich our conversations. @tannerallread.bsky.social @amwhelan.bsky.social @proftolson.bsky.social
Professor Tanner Allread, Harvard Law School
Professor Kimberly Robinson, University of Virginia School of Law
Professor Russell Robinson, University of California, Berkeley - School of Law
Professor Courtney Cahill, USC Gould School of Law
Professor Allison Whelan JD,MA, Georgia State University College of Law
Dean Franita Tolson, USC Gould School of Law
Justice Goodwin Liu, Supreme Court of California
3226
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Can’t Stop Twinkling 💕💚 @proftolson.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
Book is out in three days. THREE DAYS! Read the excerpt or pre-order your copy. Details below.
11910
Yuvraj Joshi @yuvrajjoshi.bsky.social · 01/07/2026
Today I join the tenured faculty at Brooklyn Law School as the Ruth Bader Ginsburg Professor of Law. As a constitutional equality scholar, this honor is deeply meaningful, especially now. I’m so grateful to BLS for this appointment and to the law school community for their support. 🙏🏽
The Ruth Bader Ginsburg Professorship will be held by Professor Yuvraj Joshi, who has built a national reputation as a prolific and creative scholar of constitutional law and civil rights.

In the past three years alone, Joshi has published seven articles in the California Law Review, Columbia Law Review, University of Chicago Law Review, UCLA Law Review, Northwestern University Law Review, and Southern California Law Review.  Several papers have earned him prominent honors from peers, including honorable mention for the 2021 AALS Prize in Comparative Law, the 2023 Canadian Association of Law Teachers Scholarly Paper Award, and the 2025 Law and Society Association Article Prize.
5362
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
jamelle @jamellebouie.net · 30/06/2026
i expect that 1) will be the modal outcome.
553996592
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Jay Willis @jaywillis.net · 30/06/2026
The legal arguments for Trump's birthright citizenship executive order are vapid and embarrassing. Multiple lower court judges legit laughed DOJ lawyers out of the room. The fact that four Supreme Court justices twisted themselves into logical pretzels to buy it is a constitutional emergency.
ballsandstrikes.org
The Constitution Is On Life Support
Four justices are prepared to stuff the Fourteenth Amendment’s promises in the garbage because Mister Trump demands it.
4938071030
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Melissa Murray @profmmurray.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
What have we lost? The Fourteenth Amendment is holding on by what is effectively a single vote, and Brett Kavanaugh provided a statutory roadmap for next time (and yes, there will be a next time). But, you're right, time to stop bitching!
14559116
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Evan Bernick, a finite mode with a smol hooman and a lorg floof @evanbernick.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
Nothing bad in the United States is ever over, including constitutional things. These were the same arguments rejected over a century ago, and they'll be back again and we'll have to kill them again. Con law is basically about shotgunning zombies. rarely do you get a headshot.
121070260
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Hakeem Jefferson @hakeemjefferson.bsky.social · 27/06/2026
Yesterday, I submitted the final manuscript for Respectability Politics to the University of Chicago Press. Excited for this next phase and proud of the hard work that’s gone into this book. Endlessly grateful for all the support and assistance I’ve had throughout this process. Happy Pride! 🌈
318010
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Samuel Moyn @samuelmoyn.bsky.social · 15/06/2026
I wrote a book! The pub date is tomorrow! It's about age as a big factor in the distribution of power in American society (including, most important, the sociology of class)! It's full of facts and stories! Last day to preorder it-which would mean a lot! bookshop.org/p/books/gero...
bookshop.org
Gerontocracy in America: How the Old Are Hoarding Power and Wealth—and What to Do About It
How the Old Are Hoarding Power and Wealth—and What to Do About It
193
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Sherrilyn Ifill @sifill.bsky.social · 09/06/2026
My latest. open.substack.com/pub/sherrily...
open.substack.com
Our Constitution Is Not Colorblind
It may be that the most consequential sentence of the Supreme Court’s latest decision in Allen v.
12396138
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Sherrilyn Ifill @sifill.bsky.social · 05/06/2026
Who you say you are, what you say you believe, your identity as a citizen of this country, are all on the table. “Are you prepared to stand and watch as Black political representation is erased? Do you not yet understand that this is also your fight if you have any hope of living in a democracy?”
361541626
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Samuel Moyn @samuelmoyn.bsky.social · 04/06/2026
Final version up! “The Post-Legitimacy Court,” with Ryan Doerfler @ryandoerfler.bsky.social. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/...
journals.uchicago.edu
The Post-Legitimacy Court | The Supreme Court Review: Vol 2025, No null
0155
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Niko Bowie @nikobowie.bsky.social · 02/05/2026
By gutting the Voting Rights Act, the Supreme Court is killing the Second Reconstruction. The first Reconstruction shows how Congress should respond. Me and Daphna Renan in the NYT on the tools we have to save democracy from a hostile Court.
nytimes.com
Opinion | Ruling by Ruling, the Supreme Court Is Undoing the Civil Rights Movement
412126688
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Steve Vladeck @stevevladeck.bsky.social · 29/04/2026
"I dissent because Congress elected otherwise. I dissent because the Court betrays its duty to faithfully implement the great statute Congress wrote. I dissent because the Court’s decision will set back the foundational right Congress granted of racial equality in electoral opportunity. I dissent."
442634950
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Evan Bernick, a finite mode with a smol hooman and a lorg floof @evanbernick.bsky.social · 10/04/2026
My review of Akhil Amar's "Born Equal" has been published by the Harvard Law Review. It is entitled "Alas," because... alas, I did not like it. Here's the opening: harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-13...
W
HETHER WRITTEN OR UNWRITTEN, YOUNG OR OLD, constitutions can't compel the construction of institutions or the enforcement of norms any more than maps can create fences, checkpoints, or border patrols. And
yet constitutions are powerful; they produce effects.? Constitutional power may take the form of physical force; 3 directions that are regarded as legitimate;" or concerted action by members of a political community. 5 It may rarely register at all, as people define the politically possible with reference to constitutions without realizing it. 6
Akhil Amar's Born Equal is an effort to perpetuate the power of the Constitution of the United States. Amar describes his book as a "continu[ation of] a narrative" (p. 15) that will span three volumes (p. 612), and he never leaves his readers in doubt about why he thinks this story is worth telling. Amar believes that people in the United States would be better off following the Constitution - as he understands it — than doing something else (pp. 611-12). He also believes that those who revere the Constitution and advance arguments grounded in its original meaning and purpose are more likely to win the day (p. 620). It's fitting that Amar's book is full of maps (p. 618), as Amar's project resembles that of leading nineteenth-century mapmakers: the forging of a national identity." For Amar, that identity is, and ought to be, grounded in what he labels "originalism" (p. 2).
Amar is an engaging writer and a splendid storyteller. Alas — to borrow one of Amar's favorite interjections - even at 726 pages, Born Equal omits too much of importance. The result of Amar's attempt to fit an entire century's worth of American constitutionalism into a coherent narrative is never boring. But, ultimately, it reveals more about the mapmaker than the territory.
48011
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Niko Bowie @nikobowie.bsky.social · 31/03/2026
After years of research, Daphna Renan & I are thrilled to announce preorders of SUPREMACY. Why is US democracy so broken? One reason is we've wrongly accepted that 9 justices have the final say over the Constitution. This book traces how that happened—& how we can reclaim power to govern ourselves.
wwnorton.com
Supremacy
From two acclaimed legal scholars, a new history of the Supreme Court that overturns our most basic assumptions about its role in our democracy, showing how it seized the power it now wields., Suprema...
31986322
Yuvraj Joshi @yuvrajjoshi.bsky.social · 02/03/2026
As Brooklyn Law School heads into spring break, I’m looking forward to traveling for talks at the Maryland, Yale, Tulane, and Indiana Law Schools. Especially excited for my first visit to New Orleans and grateful for these opportunities to discuss my work! ✈️ murphy.tulane.edu/events/cente...
murphy.tulane.edu
Center for Law & the Economy Workshop: Yuvraj Joshi (Brooklyn) | The Murphy Institute
021
Yuvraj Joshi @yuvrajjoshi.bsky.social · 09/02/2026
Today my Brooklyn Law School colleagues voted to grant me tenure. I’m grateful to continue work that gives me an immense sense of purpose at a time when critical academic work carries particular responsibility. There is no greater gift. ❤️
151877
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Karen Tani @kmtani.bsky.social · 04/02/2026
Over at @lpeblog.bsky.social: My brilliant colleague @serenamayeri.bsky.social on "Writing a History of Marital Privilege in an Age of Retrenchment." #LegalHistory
lpeproject.org
Writing a History of Marital Privilege in an Age of Retrenchment
As the government seeks to erase the past injustices and achievements of marginalized groups, it is worth recalling how those gains were made. Parents, partners, students, and lawyers pursued a more…
0104
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Jill Hasday @jillhasday.bsky.social · 02/02/2026
This morning, I am looking forward to speaking about my new book, We the Men: How Forgetting Women’s Struggles for Equality Perpetuates Inequality, with constitutional law students at Brooklyn Law School. Thanks to @yuvrajjoshi.bsky.social for inviting me. #WeTheMen
We the Men: How Forgetting Women’s Struggles for Equality Perpetuates Inequality
083
Yuvraj Joshi @yuvrajjoshi.bsky.social · 02/02/2026
@jillhasday.bsky.social was outstanding in ways that’ll lead me to teach Lochner differently! Thanks so much for joining us and sharing your brilliant book 🙏🏽🙏🏽
152
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Jocelyn Simonson @jocelynsimonson.bsky.social · 21/01/2026
For years, @ksabeelrahman.bsky.social & I have been frustrated with what we call the Part IV Problem in legal scholarship, the expectation of neat & feasible prescriptions to end pieces. Our frustrations are heightened in this moment of authoritarianism, as we wrote today at @lpeblog.bsky.social:
57030
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Sherrilyn Ifill @sifill.bsky.social · 19/01/2026
My new piece is up! open.substack.com/pub/sherrily...
open.substack.com
It's King Day!
Don't Allow Them to Memory Hole What It Means
15674242
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Kate Redburn @kredburn.bsky.social · 13/01/2026
As arguments begin in the transgender athletes cases, a few things to keep in mind:
11710
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Jill Hasday @jillhasday.bsky.social · 05/01/2026
I'm looking forward to this!
042
Yuvraj Joshi @yuvrajjoshi.bsky.social · 05/01/2026
New year, new course! 👨🏽‍🏫⚖️ This spring, I’m launching a Comparative Constitutional Law course at Brooklyn Law School and also teaching U.S. Constitutional Law. I’m especially excited to place BLS students in conversation with an outstanding group of guest speakers:
Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella (Supreme Court of Canada)
Professor Jill Hasday (University of Minnesota Law School)
Professor Tanya Katerí Hernández (Fordham University School of Law)
Professor David Landau (Florida State University College of Law)
Professor Holning Lau (University of North Carolina School of Law)
Professor Julie Suk (Fordham University School of Law)
Michaele Turnage Young (NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc.)
1111
Reposted by Yuvraj Joshi
Josh Chafetz @joshchafetz.bsky.social · 10/12/2025
1/ A few thoughts about @williambaude.bsky.social’s comment in yesterday’s NYT chat that, “It’s amazing how many of our problems today could be solved by a Congress that was willing and able to legislate in response to national problems.” www.nytimes.com/2025/12/09/o...
nytimes.com
Opinion | At the Supreme Court, Scenes From a Judicial Backlash
25976362
Yuvraj Joshi @yuvrajjoshi.bsky.social · 03/12/2025
In “Judicial Regrets,” I examine why judges sometimes come to regret their rulings—and how the legal system might respond. 👩🏾‍⚖️⚖️ The newest draft develops the practical and theoretical issues that follow from taking judicial regret seriously. Feedback most welcome! papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
052