Reposted by Dheepa Sundaram, PhD (she/her)
Indian authorities have launched a major security crackdown in New Delhi, detaining thousands of protesters who intended to hold a mass demonstration against Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government. n.pr/4rY8Yzv
n.pr
India cracks down on youth protests as anger grows against Modi and election chief
Indian authorities have launched a major security crackdown in New Delhi, detaining thousands of protesters who intended to hold a mass demonstration against Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government.
![Turning to the substance of petitioner’s claim, he alleges that “ICE gave [him]
the form I-200” six hours after his arrest on June 9, 2026. Docket No. 1 at 6.
Petitioner also attaches a copy of the Notice to Appear, which is not dated, but
reflects that petitioner currently resides at 3130 Oakland St. Aurora, Colorado 80010,
which is the Denver Contract Detention Facility. Docket No. 1-2 at 2. Respondents
do not dispute petitioner’s assertions. Therefore, the Court finds that petitioner was
not served the Form I-200 until after his arrest and detention. Juan J.M.E. v.
Easterwood, 2026 WL 1746672, at *3 (D. Minn. Jun 8, 2026), report and](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:63qzp63fz5q45anhnxhoxhl5/bafkreih6l6csbclsoyf7be3nhpxevcjjf3a6gskvqj6p4yscusch2yfzd4)
![The plaintiff organizations argue that the Federal Gov-
ernment will not suffer irreparable harm because federal
law currently prohibits state and local election authorities
from clearing their voter rolls in the weeks leading up to
federal elections. The organizations point to the National
Voter Registration Act (NVRA), 52 U. S. C. §20507(c)(2)(A),
which provides that “[a] State shall complete, not later than
90 days prior to the date of a primary or general election for
Federal office, any program the purpose of which is to sys-
tematically remove the names of ineligible voters from the
official lists of eligible voters.”2 To be sure, that moratorium
limits the potential impact of staying the District Court’s
order in this case. Still, all agree that the order prevents
the Federal Government from using the modified SAVE
program to conduct individualized inquiries, which are per-
mitted under federal law during this period. The District
Court’s order thus inhibits the Federal Government’s ef-
forts to assist state and local agencies in the proper admin-
istration of the midterm elections. Under these circum-
stances, the equities weigh in favor of a stay.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36eqtmzysqf7wsslczw4uxcd/bafkreicwo5ggyfefwfwxzzxz7gljvrrtwfl4dtluqzz5eh6rltxtt54cvy)
