Sign in

Robin Kok

@robinnkok.bsky.social
83 followers 89 following 84 posts

Formerly @robinnkok on "that other site". Culturally, historically, and aesthetically insignificant. ORCID 0000-0001-9845-282X.

PostsRepliesMedia
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
Did you hear about the psychiatrist using steroids to "get swole"? A real bad case of shrinkflation.
000
Reposted by Robin Kok
Sanjay Srivastava @sanjaysrivastava.com · 10/07/2026
Aren't you sure you don't want to not unsubscribe? ⬜ Yes I'm not ⬜ No I am
0303
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 25/07/2026
Do refuse collectors wish each other bin voyage when leaving the depot
110
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
Yes I'll bring amazing home made brownies to the office but I'll also be a dick about it
020
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
Suck it, LLMs.
000
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 02/07/2026
"Data science started when Blaise Pascal..." (I actually read that somewhere)
000
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 27/06/2026
It's simply incredible and impressive how Eurostar manages to combine all the downsides of train travel with all the downsides of plane travel
010
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 11/06/2026
There's a grumpy chicken in my garden and it has Opinions
010
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 03/06/2026
Very happy to see Florian et al. tackle that smug term "real world evidence", which always sounded me like "University? I earned my degree at the school of hard knocks, mate"
044
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 02/06/2026
Generative AI is a magic 8 ball for the mediocre
010
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 28/05/2026
Does anyone else get the idea that this AI-fuelled dystopia is basically Revenge of the Nerds but in slow motion and real life?
010
Reposted by Robin Kok
Josh Grubbs @joshuagrubbsphd.com · 20/05/2026
having one of those days
1524
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 16/05/2026
Do ducks go online and find duckbuddies
000
Reposted by Robin Kok
Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
Best evidence yet that LLMs can match human capabilities in doing science.
928872
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 26/04/2026
We've been studying 1984 for decades but real dystopian hell actually turned out to be the self-checkout at Lidl
000
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 22/04/2026
"Superretractor" is my favourite new word.
010
Reposted by Robin Kok
Overly.Honest.Editor @editoratlarge.bsky.social · 24/02/2026
BSky hive mind, please send help. I've recently (in 2026) seen paper about how people's action on given advice doesn't change much even if they learn advice was given by LLM. Anyone can signpost this, pretty please? #AcademicSky
012
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 15/02/2026
Oh good, Gemini has been updated with the new defiance model.
010
Reposted by Robin Kok
Health Nerd @gidmk.bsky.social · 05/02/2026
The term ultra-processed food is ridiculous and the entire idea is a painfully silly extension of the naturalistic fallacy
36710
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 19/01/2026
If you're going to be sloppy in your meta-analysis because you want to ride the AI hype wave, don't put it on PROSPERO (or is it radical transparency?)
130
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 08/01/2026
Annihilator were way ahead of the kids. youtube.com/watch?v=y12Q...
youtube.com
Sixes and Sevens
YouTube video by Annihilator - Topic
010
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 28/12/2025
Looking forward to next year's APC prices hikes! 🥺
010
Reposted by Robin Kok
Ian Hussey @ianhussey.mmmdata.io · 28/11/2025
"In 2019 we notified journals about serious integrity concerns in 172 clinical trials. Over five years later, only 22 have been retracted. The 135 unretracted trials have 1989 citations in systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, and consensus statements" [paraphrased] www.bmj.com/content/390/...
04117
Reposted by Robin Kok
Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 25/08/2025
Ever stared at a table of regression coefficients & wondered what you're doing with your life? Very excited to share this gentle introduction to another way of making sense of statistical models (w @vincentab.bsky.social) Preprint: doi.org/10.31234/osf... Website: j-rohrer.github.io/marginal-psy...
Models as Prediction Machines: How to Convert Confusing Coefficients into Clear Quantities

Abstract
Psychological researchers usually make sense of regression models by interpreting coefficient estimates directly. This works well enough for simple linear models, but is more challenging for more complex models with, for example, categorical variables, interactions, non-linearities, and hierarchical structures. Here, we introduce an alternative approach to making sense of statistical models. The central idea is to abstract away from the mechanics of estimation, and to treat models as “counterfactual prediction machines,” which are subsequently queried to estimate quantities and conduct tests that matter substantively. This workflow is model-agnostic; it can be applied in a consistent fashion to draw causal or descriptive inference from a wide range of models. We illustrate how to implement this workflow with the marginaleffects package, which supports over 100 different classes of models in R and Python, and present two worked examples. These examples show how the workflow can be applied across designs (e.g., observational study, randomized experiment) to answer different research questions (e.g., associations, causal effects, effect heterogeneity) while facing various challenges (e.g., controlling for confounders in a flexible manner, modelling ordinal outcomes, and interpreting non-linear models).
Figure illustrating model predictions. On the X-axis the predictor, annual gross income in Euro. On the Y-axis the outcome, predicted life satisfaction. A solid line marks the curve of predictions on which individual data points are marked as model-implied outcomes at incomes of interest. Comparing two such predictions gives us a comparison. We can also fit a tangent to the line of predictions, which illustrates the slope at any given point of the curve.A figure illustrating various ways to include age as a predictor in a model. On the x-axis age (predictor), on the y-axis the outcome (model-implied importance of friends, including confidence intervals).

Illustrated are 
1. age as a categorical predictor, resultings in the predictions bouncing around a lot with wide confidence intervals
2. age as a linear predictor, which forces a straight line through the data points that has a very tight confidence band and
3. age splines, which lies somewhere in between as it smoothly follows the data but has more uncertainty than the straight line.
461001285
Reposted by Robin Kok
Jonathan Peelle @jpeelle.bsky.social · 23/07/2025
I was reminded today of the heroic work done by @eikofried.bsky.social and @robinnkok.bsky.social to see what information Elsevier collects on academics and was re-horrified. 🧵 (1/5) eiko-fried.com/welcome-to-h... #academicsky
eiko-fried.com
Welcome to Hotel Elsevier: you can check-out any time you like … not » Eiko Fried
A journey by Robin Kok and Eiko Fried trying to understand what private data Elsevier collects; what private data Elsevier sells; and what to do about it.
42917
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
This @xkcd.com hurts a little
010
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 17/07/2025
"As fax machines were phased out in the late 2010s, engineers desperately sought new ways to annoy, confuse and enrage users. Microsoft SharePoint turned out to be the ideal replacement" - History of Technology, 3rd ed, 2047.
121
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 05/07/2025
For all this talk about U-shaped associations, I have found the optimum amount of yoghurt in your beard is 0.
010
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 03/07/2025
LA YARRRRR
020
Reposted by Robin Kok
Avram Holmes @avramholmes.bsky.social · 30/06/2025
The entire field of psychology from 1967 until 2011, and if we are honest with ourselves most of our current research output.
0154
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 29/06/2025
Generative AI is basically Orwell's "prolefeed" on steroids #showerthoughts
020
Reposted by Robin Kok
Mark A. Hanson @hansonmark.bsky.social · 10/06/2025
New from The Strain Team: 🎊 Springer Nature Discovers MDPI 🎊 Springer Nature has spawned a copycat journal series called "Discover" mimicking #MDPI journal titles and citation behaviours. We even made a browser game to prove it (see 🔗). Gross! 😀 1/n #ResearchIntegrity #SciPub #AcademicSky
the-strain-on-scientific-publishing.github.io
Spinger Nature Discovers MDPI – The Strain on Scientific Publishing
Home page for the paper ‘The Strain on Scientific Publishing’ by Mark A Hanson, Dan Brockington, Paolo Crosetto and Pablo Gomez Barreiro
12248184
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 25/05/2025
Happy weekend!
020
Reposted by Robin Kok
Graham Kendall @grahamkendall.bsky.social · 23/05/2025
In a recent paper of mine, I suggested that the article processing charges (APCs) that were paid should be shown on the aricle, and it shoud also be stated which author(s) paid the APC. 🧵
13113
Reposted by Robin Kok
Nick Brown @steamtraen.eu · 21/05/2025
media.tenor.com
a man and woman are standing in front of a sign that says christmas under the christmas tree
Alt: "Ding ding ding, we have a winner!".
031
Reposted by Robin Kok
Tim Kaiser @tkaiser.science · 20/05/2025
This is also a good time to remind people that, according to the best available evidence, LLM-based chatbot therapy is about as effective as unguided self-help and might not even work for symptoms other than depression.
pubpeer.com
PubPeer - Randomized Trial of a Generative AI Chatbot for Mental Healt...
There are comments on PubPeer for publication: Randomized Trial of a Generative AI Chatbot for Mental Health Treatment (2025)
2199
Reposted by Robin Kok
Malte Elson @malte.the100.ci · 17/05/2025
610220
Reposted by Robin Kok
Gary Collins @gscollins.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
NEW PAPER: Updated SPIRIT-2025 for reporting protocols of randomised trials is now available in the @BMJ.com, @JAMA.com, @thelancet.bsky.social, @PLoS.org, and @natmedicine.bsky.social. —> www.bmj.com/content/389/... #openscience #transparency #medsky #statssky #episky
12622
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 21/04/2025
010
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 03/04/2025
#academicchatter
0152
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 29/03/2025
I'm not distracted, I just have a hyperfocus on everything
041
Reposted by Robin Kok
Gordon Hodson @gordonhodsonphd.bsky.social · 26/03/2025
#AcademicSky #AcademicPublishing #AcademicChatter Opening up more journals because we produce too much output that no-one reads or needs
cartoon: driver in 2 lane highway wants road widened, pleased when it's 3 lanes (but it's just as congested)
1418
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 19/03/2025
Confuse, bewilder and alarm your Gen Z coworkers by citing Sabrina Carpenter lyrics in your meetings. They: "That meeting was a mess, I have no idea how to follow up" Me: "You're confused and I'm upset but we never talk about it"
020
Reposted by Robin Kok
Masud Husain @masudhusain.bsky.social · 06/03/2025
Why academia is sleepwalking into self-destruction. My editorial @brain1878.bsky.social If you agree with the sentiments please repost. It's important for all our sakes to stop the madness academic.oup.com/brain/articl...
51538308
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 04/03/2025
The journal that published this AI-generated dross has an impact factor of 6.9 and charges $3450 per paper.
100
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 01/03/2025
181
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 24/02/2025
Hear me out. What if we build a border...
110
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 18/02/2025
Every time I see one of these I want to call out "SCORCHIO!"
000
Reposted by Robin Kok
Graham Kendall @grahamkendall.bsky.social · 07/02/2025
20,000 scientists publish at unrealistic rates, study says
buff.ly
20,000 scientists publish at unrealistic rates, study says
Analysis finds ‘implausibly high’ numbers of papers from many top scientists
098
Robin Kok @robinnkok.bsky.social · 17/01/2025
Not quite what we wanted the reboot of "Revenge of the Nerds" to look like.
000