Sign in

Peter Gratton

@petergratton.bsky.social
2.3K followers 780 following 5.5K posts

Peter Gratton, PhD, is an editor at Investopedia, book author, and professor of philosophy. He covers political theory, technology, finance, and political economy. Views are definitely my own.

PostsRepliesMedia
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 9h
NBER: authors of the 29% of STEM dissertations written at least in part by AI are less likely to fare well on the job market. www.nber.org/papers/w35859
nber.org
How Heavily Are PhD Students Offloading Their Scientific Writing to AI? Evidence from US STEM PhD Dissertations
Founded in 1920, the NBER is a private, non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to conducting economic research and to disseminating research findings among academics, public policy makers, an...
000
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 11h
Sam Alito: consensus builder.
030
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 14h
Really monkey's paw thing being a philosophy PhD and watching people again and again try to reverse engineer a whole set of debates they know nothing about.
160
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Apple News is a great example. Also—like would anyone prefer to work and plan a life around micropayments for each act they do, instead of steady employment and a regular check?
100
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Also the bigger news is the FRED MCP connector. (Which will mean, FRED officials suggested last week, fewer new kinds of other tools, since those are presumed to be less necessary given AI agential use).
In response to these challenges and opportunities, FRED has introduced the FRED MCP Connector to simplify connecting FRED data with AI systems. Using the Model Context Protocol (MCP), the FRED MCP Connector enables users to find and retrieve data from FRED using an AI agent of their choice—which the FRED staff calls "BYOAI." Why is this a big deal? Up till now, FRED has been designed to be viewed and understood by humans. But an AI bot sees and interprets data very differently. And that means the FRED team must adapt how FRED is presented to this new type of viewer so that the data are conveyed back to the agent's master accurately and in a well-documented manner. There will be a demonstration of the FRED MCP Connector later today, and I encourage you all to attend.
120
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
(they can't.)
120
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Oh right—today is the first FREDcon (on AI).
130
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Scammers now using AI to keep going in coursework to get aid semester after semester. (Imagine starting as a fraudster but getting a degree in counseling or something.) www.investopedia.com/congress-tak...
investopedia.com
Financial Aid Scams: ‘Ghost Students’ Transition From Disappearing to Graduating
Colleges and the government are fighting the evolving problem of “ghost students,” trying to prevent scammers from receiving financial aid while keeping that money accessible to actual students.
010
Reposted by Peter Gratton
lastpositivist.bsky.social @lastpositivist.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
This is the state of the subfield of ethics in analytic philosophy.
511214
Reposted by Peter Gratton
Josh Fruhlinger @jfruh.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
they DIDN'T REFUND her fucking TUITION?????
1454531448
Reposted by Peter Gratton
Connor Ewing @cmewing.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Not you.
936355
Reposted by Peter Gratton
Don Moynihan @donmoyn.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
Now everything is safe and nothing is funded. The labs are clean and the researchers are desperate. The fume hoods work perfectly and no one can afford to use them. We have replaced the danger of mouth-pipetting with the danger of a generation of scientists spending their most productive years writing grants that will not be funded. This is its own form of danger, just slower and less honest than the phenol.
18632
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
Dumb and/or evil—the non-conundrum of our time. Hannah Arendt wrote a whole book on this.
000
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Well how do you ship *your* jet parts?
000
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
New exception to grant of anonymity just dropped.
011
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
Is this because all the philosophers are arguing with Stancil?
040
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
Pangram-backed articles could become the 2020s version of the house ad for campus papers to fill suddenly open space.
000
Reposted by Peter Gratton
Tom Ellison @123tomellison.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
Imagine the vibes in the student newspaper bullpen during these email exchanges. Delectable.
A screenshot of a Dartmouth student newspaper article that says:

In an email statement to The Dartmouth on Sept. 18, Schnell wrote that he uses artificial intelligence for “language refinement, copyediting, improving clarity and organization and making writing processes more efficient,” but “review[s] the final text and take[s] responsibility for its content.”

“I develop ideas and arguments, conduct the research, evaluate the evidence and sources, determine the structure, prepare drafts and decide what appears in the final text,” Schnell wrote. “I regard these technologies as assistive tools. They do not identify the problem, design the research project, guarantee the validity of research results, interpretations, citations, conclusions or substitute for my research, intellectual judgment or authorship.”

Schnell’s Sept. 18 email statement to The Dartmouth was itself “100% AI-written,” according to a Pangram test.

In a follow-up statement about the composition of the email, Schnell wrote that he “developed the substance and wrote a draft” of the email, then “used an Al tool to assist with language and clarity, taking on several suggestions (including reworded sentences), before reading it through, making minor changes and sending it to you with my signature.”
46624
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
Same
020
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
Hope you kept that reveal for the last chapter.
130
Reposted by Peter Gratton
Robin Wigglesworth @robinwigglesworth.ft.com · 21/09/2026
(they move inversely 🫡)
4352
Reposted by Peter Gratton
open borders now @radtranslib.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
Carlo Rosseli wrote the book Liberal Socialism while he was imprisoned on Lipari. By Mussolini.
2225
Reposted by Peter Gratton
Colson Whitehead @colsonwhitehead.com · 21/09/2026
Got an interview request from a Lithuanian journalist…you never know what you’re walking into when it comes to Eastern Europe…kinda racist sometimes...but maybe I’m being too harsh! I should check out the newspaper at least…hit the front page and — www.15min.lt/naujiena/akt...
15min.lt
Lietuvos žmogaus teisių centras apie „juodaodes“ Šilutės šventėje: „Nėra priimtina“
Rugsėjo 5-ąją Šilutėje garavo žuvienės puodai, o aplink vieną iš jų šoko virėjų komanda, apsitaisiusi juodais kostiumais ir vaizduojanti juodaodes moteris. Šis pasirodymas...
20985
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
This is definitely coming. Just like my work inbox is full of warnings over the latest scams and new businesses to help protect you from those scams (which also feel scammy).
010
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
This happens like clockwork in each of these threads on Bluesky—someone reinvents a cruddier version of CPI.
070
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
Over/under on what the material AI mistook for nuclear was? Off-brand Play-Doh?
010
Reposted by Peter Gratton
Spooky Rin Stedecore 👻🎃 🔪 @stedeco.re · 19/09/2026
This is incredible and "but without the opposition to the Anschluss" turns it into art
310926
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
The world may end; markets will not.
010
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
Someone was bound to write the “how to hedge the end of all things” piece. Anyway, tldr: diversify people. And gold.
businessinsider.com
What to do with your money if we're really heading for an AI apocalypse
While some investing experts touted cash and gold, one wealth manager said relationships will be the "asset that matters most" in a doomsday scenario.
110
Reposted by Peter Gratton
Justin Joque @jjoque.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
The AI bubble is first and foremost a bubble of the libidinal economy
0101
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
Hottest idea in retirement savings—pensions. www.wsj.com/personal-fin...
wsj.com
Exclusive | BlackRock Plans to Make the Corporate 401(k) Look More Like a Pension
The investment manager aims to overhaul target-date funds with more options for employers.
010
Reposted by Peter Gratton
Dan Davies @dsquareddigest.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
I think the twist in the show is that half of the prisoners drop out halfway through and set up a startup prison experiment of their own
061
Reposted by Peter Gratton
Stephen Nuñez @socio-steve.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Bringing Emily Wilson back for one final job.
2448
Reposted by Peter Gratton
Jane Coaston @janecoaston.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
This piece was fascinating, getting at a point I'd never considered: bin-Laden's entire concept about what 9/11 would do to America was just... wrong. www.theatlantic.com/magazine/202...
Bin Laden was equally clear about how he thought terrorism would yield his desired result. In a March 1997 CNN interview with Peter Bergen, he spoke of transferring “the battle into the United States.” In a May 2000 speech, he told supporters that the war would henceforth be waged “against the United States, in the United States.” Americans, he observed to ABC’s John Miller in 1998, cannot tolerate pain, and will react to attacks not by fighting back and blaming al‑Qaeda, but instead by asking “what their government has done that forced us to defend ourselves.” In a November 2001 interview, he hinted at a theory of political change in America: Its citizens should “take the same stand that they did previously,” when they protested the Vietnam War and the presidents who waged it.
Nelly Lahoud, a professor at the Army War College and the author of the definitive book on the Abbottabad documents, told me this political pipe dream was bin Laden’s whole plan: “to replicate the anti–Vietnam War movement of the United States, to get the American public to put pressure on the U.S. government to withdraw its forces from the Middle East.” The documents reveal a man and an organization blindsided by the American reaction to the September 11 attacks. Bin Laden and his associates “didn’t think that the United States would respond by waging war,” Lahoud said. He did not contemplate or plan for the long-term occupation of Afghanistan, nor did he expect the methodical killing of his operatives in a campaign that lasted years.
1362355429
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
Just another brutal day in the world of journalism.
030
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 05/09/2026
I was just thinking that! Like what started as a grift now means I really would love to be a therapist.
040
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 05/09/2026
Well at least someone is doing the course work.
190
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 05/09/2026
Didn’t he also just change his chief of staff who came to detest him? And now his current staff is leaking the most damaging stuff because they can’t stand him either?
020
Reposted by Peter Gratton
Nolen Gertz @ethicistforhire.bsky.social · 03/09/2026
Breaking the law once makes you a criminal. Breaking the law as a business model makes you of "national interest"... #NihilismAndTechnology
036
Reposted by Peter Gratton
David S. Bernstein @dbernstein.bsky.social · 02/09/2026
It’s right there in the Constitution: “an Executive Order shall be ratified and binding when adopted by two (2) mobile apps of minimum one million downloads”
49714
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 02/09/2026
This time in Iambic pentameter?
010
Reposted by Peter Gratton
Ana Marie Cox @anamariecox.com · 02/09/2026
Extremely funny that this retracted study claimed to prove that you can’t trust people to police their own behavior without external consequences.
Abstract
Procrastination is all too familiar to most people. People delay writing up their research (so we hear!), repeatedly declare they will start their diets tomorrow, or postpone until next week doing odd jobs around the house. Yet people also sometimes attempt to control their procrastination by setting deadlines for themselves. This paper poses three questions: (1) Are people willing to self-impose meaningful (i.e., costly) deadlines to overcome procrastination? (2) Are self-imposed deadlines effective in improving task performance? (3) When self-imposing deadlines, do people set them optimally, for maximum performance enhancement? A set of studies examined these issues experimentally, showing that the answer is "yes" to the first two questions, and "no" to the third. People have self-control problems, they recognize them, and they try to control them by self-imposing costly deadlines. These deadlines help people control procrastination, but they are not as effective as some externally imposed deadlines in improving task performance.
513327
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 02/09/2026
Wired reporter tries to figure out how accurate Pangram is; comes away wondering about the weirdness of engaging with their CEO. archive.ph/aenhj
000
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 02/09/2026
Like the APSA, the APA also had a hotel fire.
030
Reposted by Peter Gratton
Constantine Sandis @csandis.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
Philosophers completing the research methodology section in grant applications
26311
Reposted by Peter Gratton
Micah @rincewind.run · 02/09/2026
donald trump is about to preside over one of the all time midterm shellackings for an incumbent party in the united states and somehow he did less electoral damage to american conservatives than canadian ones
1850784
Reposted by Peter Gratton
mcc @dryad.technology · 01/09/2026
This is the single biggest physics discovery of my entire lifetime. Or something's wrong with one of the cables. One of the two
9961211239
Reposted by Peter Gratton
Matt Novak @paleofuture.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
This is pretty fucking wild. I had assumed in a worst case scenario he would target blue zip codes and toss ballots based on technicalities but this is even worse than I imagined.
Not only is this system astonishingly untested, USPS has simultaneously implemented an
impracticable zero percent failure rate.
13 When ballots are submitted to USPS in large-volume
batches, if any one ballot in the batch cannot be verified against the Portal, all ballots in that
batch will be rejected. For example, if a state election official brings a batch of 10,000 ballots to
USPS and USPS is unable to match just one of those ballots against the Portal – because, for
example, someone has recently changed their name after marriage or they’ve moved – then
USPS would refuse to mail the remaining 9,999 ballots as well. As the whistleblower notes,
34895864678
Peter Gratton @petergratton.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
Is the game one or many? One in the many? This week in metaphysical conundrums...
000
Reposted by Peter Gratton
Hansi Lo Wang (he/him) @hansilowang.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
SCOOP: After the Census Bureau issued a highly unusual report tied to a President Trump-aligned think tank, the bureau’s parent agency, the Commerce Department, cut language banning political interference from its scientific integrity policy, @npr.org has learned www.npr.org/2026/08/31/n...
npr.org
Trump officials cut political interference ban after unusual Census Bureau report
After the Census Bureau issued a report tied to a Trump-aligned think tank, the bureau's parent agency cut language banning political interference from its scientific integrity policy, NPR learned.
23951509