Sign in

Deborah Pearson

@performingquiet.substack.com
155 followers 91 following 42 posts

Theatre and live art person. London based, Canadian born. FKA shysecretagent on the platform whose name we dare not speak.

PostsRepliesMedia
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 07/02/2026
Doomed to be an artist and doomed to be niche.
000
Reposted by Deborah Pearson
Luc Amkreutz @prehistoryrmo.bsky.social · 31/01/2026
Nice constellation of the almost full moon🌔and Jupiter this evening. Jupiter has 92 moons!! And is the gatekeeper of our solar system, preventing impact from ☄️ comets etc.
241452130
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 30/01/2026
Catherine O’Hara was a hilarious, gorgeous, and older woman. Three things a lot of women grew up thinking didn’t mix, but they did. They all did. RIP you Canadian treasure
031
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 30/01/2026
Catherine O’Hara got us through the pandemic. In our darkest hour Moira Rose lit up the day
021
Reposted by Deborah Pearson
Hannah Nicklin @hannahnicklin.bsky.social · 29/01/2026
Brilliant news
0111
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 10/01/2026
Really enjoyed Midsummer Night’s Dream at #theglobe - A comedy transformed into a class tragedy about agency under authoritarianism, with Bottom as the lead
010
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 07/01/2026
Thread - 1/7 7 reasons #AI is a tool of global domination and tech fascism. 1. Constant hallucinations which are factually incorrect but subtly interwoven with correct information, requiring expertise to spot. As a routinely used research tool, it undermines facts/truth - helpful for fascism.
293
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 17/11/2025
Wrote a little thing on my substack about Mary Beard and Roman Emperors and AI. performingquiet.substack.com/p/what-the-r...
performingquiet.substack.com
What the Roman Empire tells us about AI
GABBO, Vespasian and other instances of Manufactured Demand
000
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 24/10/2025
Wrote about John Berger and The Future Show on my (kind of) brand new substack... open.substack.com/pub/performi...
open.substack.com
What would John Berger do?
In June I made a score for an audience-generated version of The Future Show at the John Berger conference at the University of Potsdam.
000
Reposted by Deborah Pearson
Hannah Berry @streakofpith.bsky.social · 24/02/2025
Who’s been putting off filling in that government consultation on AI then? Because you took one look and realised that fucking thing was designed SPECIFICALLY to put you off? Don’t worry, there are three online guides to help you: The Association of Illustrators theaoi.com/news/the-cop...
theaoi.com
The Copyright and AI consultation - how to respond as an illustrator – The AOI
The Copyright and Artificial Intelligence consultation was published by in December 2024, and we are encouraging illustrators to submit a response to the consultation to demonstrate the negative affec...
16396357
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 24/02/2025
You’ve got the next hour to fill this in if you can. The questions are definitely phrased in a way to discourage you from finishing the survey, but finish it anyway. Our human voices should be heard, not stolen.
051
Reposted by Deborah Pearson
Jonathan Wakeham @jonathanwakeham.bsky.social · 24/02/2025
Last chance to respond to the government’s consultation on AI’s threat to creatives and copyright. Here’s a handy guide to filling it in from @writersguildgb.bsky.social.
001
Reposted by Deborah Pearson
Prof Julia Steinberger 🌹🌱🌍 #ClimateAction #Fightfascism @jksteinberger.bsky.social · 23/02/2025
As promised, here are the slides I shared with students to convince them to NOT use chatGPT and other artificial stupidity. TL;DR? AI is evil, unsustainable and stupid, and I'd much rather they use their own brains, make their own mistakes, and actually learn something. 🪄
NO CHATGPT Or other artificial stupidity: motivation
First, clarity on distinguishing AIs:
Non-generative: grammar aid, translation, dictionary, text-to-audio (e.g. Natural Reader): no problem
As long as you use the appropriate tools (least intensive in data and server energy use).
Why? Because you provide the content. Your brain is doing the most important work
Generative: ChatGPT & Co. 
You only supply the prompt, the AI supplies the content.
Why is this delegation of work problematic?
3 domains: ethical, environmental, intellectual engagement.

(Caveat: generative is probably ok for computer programming, where it can be useful and save time. Not relevant to this class.)
1) AI and ethics
Mass theft of all and everything
«learning» on books, articles, blogs, social media, images, music, cultural production, without  permission of authors/creators, and leading to their mass joblessness. Profits are not reditributed to originators. 
Permanent destruction of the mental health of underpaid precarious tech workers in the Global South (Kenya, Philippines …):
«correction» to avoid production of violent and pedophile contents etc, tech workers are obliged to watch and correct super violent contents for days on end, leading to extreme psychological suffering and trauma, from which recovery is doubtful. No or little compensation (certainly not at the level of the suffering inflicted). 
In short, an industry built on theft of real human creation and sacrifice of real human health, profiting a few megafortunes. 
2) AI and (un)sustainability

Massive consumption of electricity, water, server capacity for generative AI. 
Outcome: keep fossil fuel companies in business, using up new renewable capacity, without any satisfaction of basic human needs.
Massive misappropriation of the finance necessary for climate and ecological action (renewable generation, efficiency and retrofit for buildings, public transit, infrastructures for cycling etc) towards AI industry. 
Overall: undermine climate action, reinforce fossil industry, waste resources necessary for human development. 
3) AI and intellectual engagement

First, what learning is (or should be) about:
The goal should not (only) be the reproduction of «correct» knowledge,
But mainly personal engagement and experience of thinking about topics of interest. Personal engagement = using one’s own brain. 
The most important activity for learning and intellectual engagement is the experience of making one’s own mistakes, by trial and error, corrections based on new ideas, starting over again. Learning to recognise nuances, knowledge gaps, better explanations 
This kind of learning is possible only through using your own brain, not AI. 
Also, Ais are not «intelligent». At all. 
They simply reproduce pre-existing patterns. They «bullshit», invent false references, false facts, false data, simply because those sound plausible. VERY DANGEROUS. 
If you learn how to NOT use AI, and how to research facts and data on your own, this will serve you and your communities for the rest of your life.
23556172098
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 24/02/2025
“I use antlers in all of my decorating.” Is there any better lyric in film?
010
Reposted by Deborah Pearson
Writers' Guild of Great Britain @writersguildgb.bsky.social · 23/02/2025
An important piece in today’s Observer from Katie Hims on why cuts to audio drama are so damaging - to writers, audiences and the wider cultural ecosystem in the UK We continue to campaign to Save Audio Drama at the BBC #SADatTheBBC www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio...
theguardian.com
BBC radio drama is in grave danger. Without it we may lose the next generation of writing talent
Hundreds of hours of original plays have been cut from the corporation’s programming in recent years. If the trend continues, a valuable training ground for writers will be lost
03717
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 20/02/2025
Some people are celebrities as a result of absolute privilege. Some are celebrities as a result of absolute hardship. Some are celebrities as a result of incredibly hard work/virtuosic skill. Liza Minelli is all three. #Legend #LoveLiza
020
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 14/02/2025
Incredibly honest moment: one of the most useful cookbooks I have ever bought is Tim Anderson’s Microwave Cooking. Not necessarily for the recipes but for the paradigm shift it offers a cook in terms of how they think of their microwave. It isn’t just for reheating, it’s a tool.
010
Reposted by Deborah Pearson
Michael Hobbes @michaelhobbes.bsky.social · 10/02/2025
Not exaggerating when I say I would like a personal, handwritten apology from every pundit who barfed out a dozen "the left wants to change the way you talk!" op-eds based on non-mandatory guidelines in obscure PDFs.
691238566774
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 10/02/2025
Anyone else feel like “Feed the Birds” in Mary Poppins is the moment you realise your nanny is a radical anarchist who wants to take down capitalism with her cool chimney sweep artist f-buddy? And does the beauty of that realisation make anyone else cry?
021
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 06/02/2025
Let’s not trade wisdom for knowledge.
010
Reposted by Deborah Pearson
godlessbitch.bsky.social @godlessbitch.bsky.social · 26/01/2025
Grow up
13483331302
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 26/01/2025
There could be a future where algorithms chatting with eachother about all the things the humans used to do is the only intelligent life left in the universe.
020
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 23/01/2025
“Dreyfuss once wrote from Devil’s Island that he would see the most glorious birds. Many years later in Brittany he realised they had only been seagulls. For me, they will always be glorious birds.” - Maude
010
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 22/01/2025
Starmer: Labour will be cutting carbon emissions.

Crowd: Yay!

Starmer: Meet my new robot butler, AI!

(Smoke billows. Crowd coughs.)

Reporter: Didn’t you say we would be cutting carbon emissions?

Starmer: La La La!
030
Reposted by Deborah Pearson
Hoodlum 🇺🇸 @nothoodlum.bsky.social · 20/01/2025
Today, honor a King, not a Felon. #mlkday2025
8519993626090
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 21/01/2025
Anyone truly interested in elegance must admire the inimitable creature that is the cat.
030
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 14/01/2025
After almost 20 years living in the U.K., my North American accent sounds like I left yesterday. But the place where I’ve “gone British” is in emails. I have never signed one “Cheerio” but that could be next
010
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 13/01/2025
So the Labour government clearly does not give a sh*t about climate change. Carbon emissions from even relatively simple AI use are enormous. www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
theguardian.com
‘Mainlined into UK’s veins’: Labour announces huge public rollout of AI
Plans to make UK world leader in AI sector include opening access to NHS and other public data
000
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 09/01/2025
There is a lot of irony in this headline reading “over 40” when every actress referenced in the article is over 50. Why pretend they are 10 years younger? Isn’t it cooler that these women are over 50? www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
theguardian.com
Demi, Jodie and Nicole: is Hollywood finally ready to recognise complex female characters over 40? | Natasha Ginnivan
At the Golden Globes, the spotlight was on women playing multilayered, courageous and middle-aged lead roles
262
Reposted by Deborah Pearson
Katharine Hayhoe @katharinehayhoe.com · 09/01/2025
I am a climate scientist and this is correct ⬇️
317318669160
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 09/01/2025
Some people make life bigger and more beautiful. And some people make life smaller and worse.
010
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 22/12/2024
Master of the cute sulk.
010
Reposted by Deborah Pearson
Courtney Love Lies Bleeding 🫦 @hexadecibelle.fyi · 19/12/2024
once again i am astonished at UK politicians and their inability to understand the simplest fucking things about the gift horse that is the 🇬🇧 creative industry and how little money they will fuck it over for.
922364
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 20/12/2024
“You speak like someone who has no ideals.” “True. I am a neo-frivolist.” “And how does that differ from old-fashioned frivolity?” “Mostly in the ‘neo’ prefix. It makes it more interesting.” - Antal Szerb, The Pendragon Legend, 1933
020
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 19/12/2024
The government will try to sell the public on AI generated art as a collaboration between algorithms and artists, but can collaboration be non-consensual, aimed at erasing the autonomy of the human collaborator? www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
theguardian.com
UK proposes letting tech firms use copyrighted work to train AI
Consultation suggests opt-out scheme for creatives who don’t want their work used by Google, OpenAI and others
010
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 18/12/2024
Re: AI I emailed copyrightconsultation@ipo.gov.uk the following letter. Happy to share and I urge all my colleagues to get in touch with these kowtowers and tell it like it is.
020
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 18/12/2024
Just used this to email my MP. I urge you to do the same. If you are an artist make no mistake, you have skin in the game and corporate greed doesn’t want to eliminate content, it wants to eliminate you, the critical thinking embedded in your “content” and any need to pay you.
020
Reposted by Deborah Pearson
Aliki Chapple @commonmugwort.bsky.social · 18/12/2024
The thing with theatre is you can’t really expect it to become self-funding. You have to think it’s worth funding indefinitely; it’s not a startup, it’s not going to grow up some day and make money. Theatre doesn’t make money. It makes experiences, connections, memories, community, it makes artists.
23814
Reposted by Deborah Pearson
Daniel Bye @danielbye.bsky.social · 18/12/2024
This morning two theatre companies (Freedom Studios and Coney) have announced their permanent closure. Both 'left' the National Portfolio in 2023 and have found the climate impossible since. Their statements are heartbreakingly similar. Without massive funding reform many more will follow in 2025.
43525
Reposted by Deborah Pearson
Kieran Hurley @kieranhurley.bsky.social · 18/12/2024
fuckin hell
3154
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 17/12/2024
Does nobody get this? Artists are likely to be dissidents. If AI takes over art making as a viable industry, fascism is easier to achieve. We have “content” without the pesky artists who make it. This isn’t innocuous AI fun, this is the human spirit at risk… www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
theguardian.com
UK proposes letting tech firms use copyrighted work to train AI
Consultation suggests opt-out scheme for creatives who don’t want their work used by Google, OpenAI and others
14418
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 17/12/2024
Any resemblance to real cats is coincidental
020
Reposted by Deborah Pearson
Caridad Svich @csvich.bsky.social · 16/12/2024
dear theatre, this is how you do it. this is access. for real. if Dan Fishback can do this, so can everyone. learn. listen. do. #theatre
064
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 16/12/2024
List 5 playwrights where your ears would perk up if you heard they had something new on. Here are mine: Annie Baker, Tim Crouch, Brandon Jacob Jenkins, Anne Washburn, Young Jean Lee. Bonus Round: Lola Arias, Daniel MacIvor, John Guare
031
Reposted by Deborah Pearson
Science Explorist @scipexplorist.bsky.social · 12/12/2024
James Webb telescope just dropped its latest image, Neptune, and its rings.
181132561309
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 12/12/2024
Who do I follow? I feel like I got invited to a party and now I’m in a massive gymnasium by myself.
130
Deborah Pearson @performingquiet.substack.com · 11/12/2024
Yesterday the Canadian government emailed me to tell me they were giving me a medal. It turned out the medal was for another Deborah Pearson and they got my email by accident. Meaning I can’t take the medal. So technically I turned down a medal on ethical grounds. Nbd.
271