Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 10hOne thing I miss about smoking? The loitering. My friends and I could really loiter when we smoked. Once we got a ticket! 020
Reposted by Nate Aheld steady @heldsteady.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Not very libertarian to be this bad at picking up an 8 year old. 251132142
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 30/09/2026It reminds me of when gun control opponents treat the arcana of firearms technology as the cost of admission to conversations about preventing mass shootings 130
Reposted by Nate Amattie lubchansky @mattielubchansky.com · 29/09/2026awoke this morning with a Vision 49101141798
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026I often work with faculty in other disciplines on issues related to teaching writing. This helps me understand why professors in Education seem so ready to accept the logic of AI technology and to bring it into their classrooms 100
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026This explains a lot. When discussing AI agents with other faculty it’s the folks teaching in fields tasked with producing bureaucratic subjects (Business, Education) that have been the first to bring AI into their classrooms. 020
Reposted by Nate Amary worth is lit @wilburwurthless.bsky.social · 23/09/2026I made lots of money trading* on sports that I can now buy a new water pipe** used specifically for tobacco*** at the local smoke shop 0354
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 22/09/2026No, he’s trying to get the oligarchs to support his bid for President 010
Reposted by Nate AAsheesh Kapur Siddique @asheeshks.org · 20/09/2026The US higher education system is not equipped to correct for the effects of systemic injustice and underfunding at the high school, middle school, and elementary school levels. 213634
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 20/09/2026A lot of people seem to think that reason, intelligence, and consciousness are widely agreed upon terms for well understood phenomena. Either that or they’re just sloppy thinkers. 020
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 20/09/2026And it’s a world where all of these discussions follow from a dimly remembered intro to philosophy course as narrated over bong hits by the kid who didn’t do the reading 010
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 19/09/2026“American Intelligence “ (AI) is sitting right there. Dude has truly lost a step 070
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 19/09/2026Of course not, but concepts like lock in and path dependence can take you pretty far 020
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 19/09/2026The analogy I find most useful is the historical roll out of the automobile, the history of which has genuinely clarifying similarities to the roll out of AI 120
Reposted by Nate ABrendel @brendelbored.bsky.social · 19/09/2026Oh so when Marion Cotillard does it it’s impressive but when a made up cartoon lady does it because she glitches out while being interviewed by a ham sandwich it’s no longer cool ok 2590079
Reposted by Nate AMagnum, T.I.(M.) @hydrationchimp.bsky.social · 18/09/2026it’s time to give Ms Rachel a gundam 5051361132
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 17/09/2026You can compare the addictive properties of social media to cigarettes, but I’ve never enjoyed using social media as much as I enjoyed smoking cigarettes 000
Reposted by Nate ATobias Wilson-Bates @phdhurtbrain.bsky.social · 17/09/2026Occasional reminder that pedagogy should be eccentric and calibrated to the uniquely bizarre access you have managed to cobble together in order to crack open a complicated form of understanding. 48716
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 15/09/2026I call dibs on the formula for the grease they use to slick the pans 000
Reposted by Nate AJ.D. Connor @jdconnor.bsky.social · 15/09/2026Sometimes the semiotic square articulates a relation of concepts that are synthesized in things; sometimes it articulates a relation among things that resolve as concepts. How can it be both? Because the semiotic square is a cootie catcher 152
Reposted by Nate AIan Boudreau @ianboudreau.com · 13/09/2026It's not hard to understand why appeals to the "center" (which just means the right wing) come at the cost of votes on the left. This seems baffling to many of the "political strategy" minds on here whose apparent plan is to have their cake and eat it 1451957
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 12/09/2026I’m wouldn’t be surprised if that happens, or if an actual lawyer does a final pass for accuracy. My point was just that. as in other fields, AI “labor” is commonly propped up by poorly paid human labor 010
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 12/09/2026But my experience is second hand. I have a lot of students who intern at firms between undergrad and law school 000
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 12/09/2026Fortunately there’s usually a poorly paid intern to do this 100
Reposted by Nate ACoach Finstock @coachfinstock.bsky.social · 12/09/2026For people just joining us, here's what's happening. AI types sold a bunch of B2B snake oil to C suites who forced it on employees. The promises they made haven't come true and now they're pivoting to a protection racket trying to scare those same idiots who believed the first set of lies 5394108
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 10/09/2026Telling students they can use AI sometimes and for certain things makes as much sense as telling students in a health class that unprotected sex is fine so long as it’s “just the tip” 010
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 10/09/2026It’s so well established that brainstorming and outlining are central to the learning process and successful writing outcomes that I feel gaslit when people tell my students that they can just outsource it 110
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 09/09/2026In my hometown there was a moral panic about teenagers hanging out in the creekside tunnels. “What could they possibly be up to?”’ People just hate teenagers 1160
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 08/09/2026I should mention that I realize im coming across adversarially here and I apologize. I suspect we agree on a decent percentage of this stuff 000
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 08/09/2026Yes, because it has been trained and harnessed by people to do this. Shorthand descriptions that elide this fact muddy our understanding of what’s actually at stake in these arguments 010
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 08/09/2026I guess I’m working from the idea that allowing a key term like reason to just float around and mean whatever in an ongoing debate about the relationship between people and technology isn’t going to end well 280
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 08/09/2026Because if you think your LLM is reasoning you either have an exceedingly narrow definition of reasoning or you don’t understand how LLMs work. 100
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 08/09/2026It’s not metaphysical. We know what reasoning is when LLMs do it, and it’s basically stochastic. This can look like reasoning but it isn’t. And that’s an important distinction if we’re comparing what they do to what humans do 150
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 08/09/2026Note the qualifier “if a person was doing it.” Note that a person is not doing it. 280