Sign in

Nate A

@natkinson.bsky.social
386 followers 613 following 1.3K posts

Lecturer in Rhetoric UC Berkeley Political Theory, visual culture, and composition. What could possibly go wrong?

PostsRepliesMedia
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 10h
One thing I miss about smoking? The loitering. My friends and I could really loiter when we smoked. Once we got a ticket!
020
Reposted by Nate A
held steady @heldsteady.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
Not very libertarian to be this bad at picking up an 8 year old.
251132142
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Sounds like something a bot would say
010
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
It reminds me of when gun control opponents treat the arcana of firearms technology as the cost of admission to conversations about preventing mass shootings
130
Reposted by Nate A
mattie lubchansky @mattielubchansky.com · 29/09/2026
awoke this morning with a Vision
that diagram showing  the SUV blind spot in the front but it's lowly worm driving his little applemobile
49101141798
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
Douglas Adams maybe?
040
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
It’s wild
000
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
I often work with faculty in other disciplines on issues related to teaching writing. This helps me understand why professors in Education seem so ready to accept the logic of AI technology and to bring it into their classrooms
100
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
This explains a lot. When discussing AI agents with other faculty it’s the folks teaching in fields tasked with producing bureaucratic subjects (Business, Education) that have been the first to bring AI into their classrooms.
020
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Did you factor in the teenagers?
010
Reposted by Nate A
mary worth is lit @wilburwurthless.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
I made lots of money trading* on sports that I can now buy a new water pipe** used specifically for tobacco*** at the local smoke shop
0354
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
AI? In this political economy?
010
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
No, he’s trying to get the oligarchs to support his bid for President
010
Reposted by Nate A
Asheesh Kapur Siddique @asheeshks.org · 20/09/2026
The US higher education system is not equipped to correct for the effects of systemic injustice and underfunding at the high school, middle school, and elementary school levels.
213634
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
A lot of people seem to think that reason, intelligence, and consciousness are widely agreed upon terms for well understood phenomena. Either that or they’re just sloppy thinkers.
020
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
And it’s a world where all of these discussions follow from a dimly remembered intro to philosophy course as narrated over bong hits by the kid who didn’t do the reading
010
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
“American Intelligence “ (AI) is sitting right there. Dude has truly lost a step
070
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
Of course not, but concepts like lock in and path dependence can take you pretty far
020
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
The analogy I find most useful is the historical roll out of the automobile, the history of which has genuinely clarifying similarities to the roll out of AI
120
Reposted by Nate A
Brendel @brendelbored.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
Oh so when Marion Cotillard does it it’s impressive but when a made up cartoon lady does it because she glitches out while being interviewed by a ham sandwich it’s no longer cool ok
2590079
Reposted by Nate A
Magnum, T.I.(M.) @hydrationchimp.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
it’s time to give Ms Rachel a gundam
5051361132
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 19/09/2026
This is a great read!
152
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
You can compare the addictive properties of social media to cigarettes, but I’ve never enjoyed using social media as much as I enjoyed smoking cigarettes
000
Reposted by Nate A
Tobias Wilson-Bates @phdhurtbrain.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
Occasional reminder that pedagogy should be eccentric and calibrated to the uniquely bizarre access you have managed to cobble together in order to crack open a complicated form of understanding.
48716
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
Next we do Milgram!
000
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
I call dibs on the formula for the grease they use to slick the pans
000
Reposted by Nate A
J.D. Connor @jdconnor.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
Sometimes the semiotic square articulates a relation of concepts that are synthesized in things; sometimes it articulates a relation among things that resolve as concepts. How can it be both? Because the semiotic square is a cootie catcher
Jameson's version of a semiotic square from Nostromo. Abstract terms duplicate character names and general categoriesKrauss's version of a semiotic square to grapple with minimalism
152
Reposted by Nate A
Ian Boudreau @ianboudreau.com · 13/09/2026
It's not hard to understand why appeals to the "center" (which just means the right wing) come at the cost of votes on the left. This seems baffling to many of the "political strategy" minds on here whose apparent plan is to have their cake and eat it
1451957
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
Why is Che there twice?
100
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
Are you talking about a comics order or voting?
100
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
I’m wouldn’t be surprised if that happens, or if an actual lawyer does a final pass for accuracy. My point was just that. as in other fields, AI “labor” is commonly propped up by poorly paid human labor
010
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
But my experience is second hand. I have a lot of students who intern at firms between undergrad and law school
000
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
In my experience? Never
200
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
This is when you use the original AI: Anonymous Intern
000
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
Fortunately there’s usually a poorly paid intern to do this
100
Reposted by Nate A
Coach Finstock @coachfinstock.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
For people just joining us, here's what's happening. AI types sold a bunch of B2B snake oil to C suites who forced it on employees. The promises they made haven't come true and now they're pivoting to a protection racket trying to scare those same idiots who believed the first set of lies
5394108
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
Good catch… there’s some Werner Roth in there too
110
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
Telling students they can use AI sometimes and for certain things makes as much sense as telling students in a health class that unprotected sex is fine so long as it’s “just the tip”
010
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
It’s so well established that brainstorming and outlining are central to the learning process and successful writing outcomes that I feel gaslit when people tell my students that they can just outsource it
110
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
It’s like you were there
000
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
In my hometown there was a moral panic about teenagers hanging out in the creekside tunnels. “What could they possibly be up to?”’ People just hate teenagers
1160
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
They store their toenail clippings in the velvet bag
010
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
I should mention that I realize im coming across adversarially here and I apologize. I suspect we agree on a decent percentage of this stuff
000
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
Fair enough
000
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
Yes, because it has been trained and harnessed by people to do this. Shorthand descriptions that elide this fact muddy our understanding of what’s actually at stake in these arguments
010
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
I guess I’m working from the idea that allowing a key term like reason to just float around and mean whatever in an ongoing debate about the relationship between people and technology isn’t going to end well
280
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
Because if you think your LLM is reasoning you either have an exceedingly narrow definition of reasoning or you don’t understand how LLMs work.
100
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
It’s not metaphysical. We know what reasoning is when LLMs do it, and it’s basically stochastic. This can look like reasoning but it isn’t. And that’s an important distinction if we’re comparing what they do to what humans do
150
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
So you agree that what llms do isn’t reasoning?
141
Nate A @natkinson.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
Note the qualifier “if a person was doing it.” Note that a person is not doing it.
280