New preprint: with ADAPT-MS, discovery plasma proteomics becomes a diagnostic tool for ovarian cancer. We separate benign from malignant adnexal masses and generalize to 5 validation cohorts. Collaboration with @lengyel-ovca-lab.bsky.social
www.medrxiv.org/content/10.6...
medrxiv.org
Differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses by biomarker-agnostic plasma proteomics using adaptive machine learning
Background: Pre-operative triage of adnexal masses with serum CA-125, HE4, and ultrasound (O-RADS) has limited accuracy, contributing to unnecessary surgery. We develop and validate a first of its kind, biomarker panel-free plasma proteomic classifier that distinguishes malignant from benign adnexal masses from a single blood draw, operating directly on discovery-mode mass spectrometry. Methods: In this multicenter prospective observational study, plasma from women with adnexal masses and from healthy controls at a large urban academic center (discovery and four validation cohorts) and an external academic center from another Urban-suburban area (external validation) was analyzed by data-independent-acquisition mass spectrometry (Orbitrap Astral), quantifying >1,000 proteins per sample. Cancerous (malignant, borderline adnexal mass, or metastasis to ovary) versus benign adnexal masses were classified with ADAPT-MS (Adaptive Diagnostic Architecture for Personalized Testing by Mass Spectrometry), which retrains an ElasticNet model for each sample based on the proteins measured. The primary outcome was discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]). Pre-operative O-RADS scores and serum CA-125 were compared and combined with proteomics on matched subsets. Findings: Using a discovery cohort (n=1062), an ADAPT-MS classifier, validated across five independent cohorts (n=623), achieved a summary AUC of 0.835 (cohort range 0.779-0.904). Among patients with pre-operative O-RADS (n=231), proteomics (AUC 0.852) was comparable to O-RADS alone (0.863) and combining them raised discrimination to 0.922. Proteomics outperformed serum CA-125 (0.915 versus 0.777; n=125) and proteome-derived ROMA-like and two-marker surrogates. Biologically, the classification-relevant proteins are enriched for host response proteins rather than tumor cell associated protein changes, comprising ECM remodeling, complement and innate immune response pathways. This explains good detection of tumor with heterogenous pathology and also metastasis to ovary. Interpretation: A single plasma proteomic measurement interpreted using adaptive machine learning discriminates malignant from benign adnexal masses with good internal and external validation, and is complementary to ultrasound, warranting prospective evaluation as a panel-free diagnostic adjunct to imaging. ### Competing Interest Statement MM is an investor in Evosep. All other authors declare no competing interests. ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at The University of Chicago and Roswell Park Cancer Institute, and informed written consent was obtained from all women participating in the study. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Sciences NIH R35 grant Arthur and Nicole Herbst