Reposted by James Youngman
Old thread, but I hadn't realized that it wasn't just Draknek disavowing Blow over this (though that was rad on its own).
Rather, every single developer that Blow licensed a puzzle game from is in here co-signing.
James Youngman
@jyoungman.bsky.social
2.7K followers 715 following 4.1K posts
He/him Game Designer, composer, writer www.gamedeveloper.com/design/ten-le… jamesyoungman.bandcamp.com jyoungman.itch.io Senior Tech Designer at Elsewhere. All opinions my own. #gamedev | #gamedesign
![philipswood 12 hours ago | prev | next [–]
Honest question: how is this different from some unknown mathematician having a breakthrough?
I mean: if some reclusive Japanese genius had a breakthrough on your problem and published it, would you have felt the same?
And if not, why not?
reply
jboggan 12 hours ago | parent | next [–]
If that had happened I would be overjoyed, maybe a hair chagrined that I didn't get it myself, but truly happy that someone got it and that I could go and talk to that person. Because it's the kind of problem I don't think would have fallen to a human after a few hours of thought, and I would have so much to talk about with that person. I would fly to Japan and hope to have tea with them, I would learn some Japanese to make the conversations easier. I would learn some interesting things hearing about their struggles and their false starts. I would make friends with that reclusive Japanese genius and my life would be far richer for it.
I will never meet that person and I will never hold a real conversation with the "creator" of that proof. They will never tell me how they came up with the cancelling exponential summation that cracked the constructio](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:jdum3zo5iqmx4gcnt5vuy7s4/bafkreih7e22vinqkztbymohgv4ldy4qojed452h2xfddb25vvpi2i2tlqi)
