ReproHack: Join us for a mentored three-day reproduction hackathon! Background When building on past research, we rely on it being correct and robust - and yet, these characteristics are rarely assess...

Published in Accountability in Research: Ethics, Integrity and Policy (Ahead of Print, 2026)

YouTube video by Quarks

Register for the FORRT AI in Metascience Online Conference, 28–30 September 2026. Online and free to attend.

YouTube video by Metascience Matters

From the editor's desk, the pressure on peer review is no longer an abstract concern. It appears in the growing number of invitations needed to secure an appropriate report, the repeated reliance on a...

“Publication bias”, aka the “file drawer problem,” refers to results of scientific studies going unpublished non-randomly with respect to some study feature(s). Many discuss…

Adoption hit 89% in three years. The literacy to use these tools safely didn't come with it

A steadfast commitment to scientific integrity should be a fundamental quality of all researchers and is central to their pursuit of knowledge for societal benefit. Failure to uphold this integrity ca...

This came as quite a shock at first. A platform built to preserve, changing this much, feels almost contradictory. But data storage is not the only function of OSF, and I applaud the bold decision to ...

In just a few short days (August 15th, 2026), PsyArXiv – the community preprint server for psychology – turns 10! 🥳 Over the past decade, our community has published over 58,000 preprin…

We are preparing substantial changes to OSF that will reduce its functionality, focus OSF on its unique strengths, and move toward an integrated model with complementary services. As part of that shif...

Editors: Roni Porat and Vishnu SreekumarPsychological Science invites submissions presenting innovative research that brings psychological science “into the wild,” whether to strengthen its ecological...

There is a lot of anecdotal evidence that peer review takes too long, and that it is now taking longer than in the past. But what does the data say? To answer this question, an anonymized version of t...

Review mills — researchers who write fake referee reports with coercive citation requests — are setting off a war in academic publishing. What happens to those caught in the middle?

A weekly roundup of Research Data Management resources.

The Center for Open Science (COS)'s work has evolved with the maturation of the open science movement. Our strategic priorities focus on supporting the growth of lifecycle open science—making research...

Personal type: Scientific staff