Sign in

Daniel Evanko

@evanko.bsky.social
259 followers 236 following 38 posts

Director of Journal Operations at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR). Opinions my own.

PostsRepliesMedia
Daniel Evanko @evanko.bsky.social · 02/02/2026
The estimate that 10% of cancer papers could be from paper mills is somewhat shocking, but less so when country of origin and rate of increase in paper output by country relative to global output is taken into account. Nice to see AACR journals with the lowest percentage of suspect papers.
030
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Bruce Springsteen @brucespringsteen.net · 28/01/2026
I wrote this song on Saturday, recorded it yesterday and released it to you today in response to the state terror being visited on the city of Minneapolis. It’s dedicated to the people of Minneapolis, our innocent immigrant neighbors and in memory of Alex Pretti and Renee Good. Stay free
youtu.be
Bruce Springsteen - Streets Of Minneapolis (Official Audio)
YouTube video by Bruce Springsteen
42569709640543
Daniel Evanko @evanko.bsky.social · 12/09/2025
Nice to see this article in Science about our work at AACR.
160
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Richard Van Noorden @richvn.bsky.social · 12/09/2025
I was surprised to see that a firm claims to have essentially solved the issue of detecting when there‘s LLM-generated text in content. But researchers at Pangram Labs say they have, claiming false-positive rates of 1 in 10,000. www.nature.com/articles/d41... @nature.com | @miryamnaddaf.bsky.social
nature.com
AI tool detects LLM-generated text in research papers and peer reviews
Authors and peer reviewers are failing to disclose the use of LLMs despite journal policies limiting their use.
266
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Society for Scholarly Publishing @scholarlypub.bsky.social · 29/08/2025
Guest Post – Code Plagiarism and AI Create New Challenges for Publishing Integrity - The Scholarly Kitchen
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Guest Post – Code Plagiarism and AI Create New Challenges for Publishing Integrity - The Scholarly Kitchen
This post explores author, reviewer, and publisher ethics and responsibilities related to the use of AI in coding and publishing research software.
032
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
The Economist @economist.com · 18/07/2025
Because cancer is not one illness, but a whole category, much of the progress in fighting it has come not from big breakthroughs, but thousands of smaller advances
econ.st
The world is winning the war on cancer
Progress has been remarkable. Death rates are down substantially, and are likely to fall further
3346
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) @theaacr.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
Today, the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) called on Congress to reject the Administration's nearly 40% cut to the NIH budget and allocate a bipartisan funding increase to $51.3 billion for the agency to accelerate progress for patients. www.aacr.org/about-the-aa...
210447
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Eric Topol @erictopol.bsky.social · 21/04/2025
Overall, cancer cases and deaths in the US are continuing a slow decline acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
618332
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 17/04/2025
Who’s with me? #PeerReview ensures the integrity of scientific knowledge. Science isn’t social media, and it’s dangerous to treat it as such. For this reason, I believe preprints serve an anti-science agenda & threaten our fields. Check out my editorial in @ScholarlyKitchen.bsky.social. 🧪 #SciPub
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Guest Post:  Preprints Serve the Anti-science Agenda – This Is Why We Need Peer Review - The Scholarly Kitchen
Science is built on a foundation of rigor and credibility. Preprints are adding to the crumbling of that foundation, which is already under attack by anti-science political agendas.
163510
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Charlie Brown @crankey1.bsky.social · 05/04/2025
LEAKED: Heard Island tariff response strategy meeting! #auspol #heardisland
Let's hit em and hit em where it hurts boys, now get out there and do your worst
2459
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
The Economist @economist.com · 03/04/2025
Donald Trump has committed the most profound, harmful and unnecessary economic error in the modern era. Almost everything he said—on history, economics and the technicalities of trade—was utterly deluded econ.st/3YbbFjq
483121505325
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Denis Wirtz @deniswirtz.bsky.social · 24/03/2025
Cancer research, long protected, feels ‘devastating’ effects under Trump www.statnews.com/2025/03/24/t... via
statnews.com
Cancer research, long protected, feels ‘devastating’ effects under Trump
Cancer research has had bipartisan support. But Trump administration budget cuts and delays threaten to reverse progress of recent years, experts say.
04832
Daniel Evanko @evanko.bsky.social · 24/03/2025
"The [...] administration’s threat to dramatically reduce or delay funding for the NIH [...] represents a crushing blow not only to the development of future #cancer therapies, but to all of medical research. Without previous funding, I would not be alive today." www.sacbee.com/opinion/op-e...
sacbee.com
Sacramento doctor: If not for NIH funding, I wouldn’t have survived my leukemia diagnosis | Opinion
“My survival is based on research. With limited NIH funding, I fear that my life, and the lives of others, will be left without hope.”
020
Daniel Evanko @evanko.bsky.social · 20/03/2025
The American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) is looking to fill a new publications position of Editorial Ethics Manager to oversee #ResearchIntegrity and #ImageForensics cases related to #CancerResearch manuscripts and articles at our ten journals. careers-aacr.icims.com/jobs/1702/ed...
careers-aacr.icims.com
Career Opportunities | AACR | About Us
The AACR offers a unique opportunity for the qualified individual to make a difference in cancer research by becoming part of its committed staff..
030
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Science Friday @scifri.bsky.social · 16/03/2025
90% of people diagnosed with pancreatic cancer die from the disease. That's why the medical community is excited about the results of a small trial in which nearly half of the pancreatic cancer patients who received an mRNA vaccine for the disease remained relapse-free three years later.
sciencefriday.com
A Vaccine For Pancreatic Cancer Continues To Show Promise
In a small trial, nearly half of pancreatic cancer patients who received an mRNA vaccine for the disease had no relapse three years later.
819325167643
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Christopher Mims @mims.bsky.social · 14/03/2025
Meet Gracie Himes, age 20. Her goal: Fight cancer by developing new medicines. On March 3, her dreams were shattered when Trump admin cuts hit West Virginia University, which rescinded her PhD program offer. www.wsj.com/us-news/educ...
17643461495
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Jan Aerts @janaerts.bsky.social · 12/03/2025
If you're a biologist interested in data visualisation, check out the vizbi conference www.linkedin.com/events/vizbi... #omics
linkedin.com
VIZBI 2025: 15th international meeting on Visualising Biological Data | LinkedIn
VISUALIZING BIOLOGICAL DATA. Join us 8-11 April online or in-person at the University of Cambridge for VIZBI 2025, the 15th international meeting on Visualising Biological Data. Pre-register now at ht...
063
Daniel Evanko @evanko.bsky.social · 07/03/2025
Very happy to see AACR's new guaranteed peer review benefit to reward reviewers highlighted in today's "the Brief" @brieferyet.bsky.social. They incorrectly state that Cancer Discovery "is seemingly excluded from the offer." We will add a table to clarify journal-specific details.
000
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 07/03/2025
Yikes! Peer review is critical for the integrity of our science, and outside experts are always needed to vet new grant proposals. By moving this all in-house at NIH, we lose scientific independence & make it easy for the government to determine what research should be funded. 🧪 #PeerReview
nih.gov
NIH centralizes peer review to improve efficiency and strengthen integrity
The proposed approach is expected to save more than $65 million annually.
931082
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Jeffrey Mervis @policyhound.bsky.social · 06/03/2025
Federal judge blocks change in NIH indirect cost recovering rates, saying it would jeopardize public health. Read about it here: www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
U.S. judge blocks NIH’s plan to slash overhead cost payments
Injunction allows universities to keep receiving billions to recover costs of supporting federal research on campus
16324
Daniel Evanko @evanko.bsky.social · 28/02/2025
AACR journals launch Guaranteed Peer Review. This new benefit for reviewers who are AACR members allows them to bypass editorial desk rejection and go straight to peer review. Over 700 reviewers from 2024 were notified of their eligibility. #PeerReview #SciPub #AACR aacrjournals.org/pages/guaran...
aacrjournals.org
Guaranteed Peer Review | American Association for Cancer Research
Guaranteed Peer Review | American Association for Cancer Research #flexframe { display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: space-between; align-items: stret...
020
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) @theaacr.bsky.social · 18/02/2025
The AACR is deeply concerned that the Administration’s recent actions are threatening NIH and its mission to accelerate progress for patients with cancer and other diseases that afflict millions of Americans. Read our statement: buff.ly/4gRXNB8
38258
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Richard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 28/01/2025
NIH staff told they can submit papers to journals but not preprints. "a short pause to allow the new team to set up a process for review and prioritization" <- review by whom...? www.science.org/content/arti... ht @philipncohen.com 1/2
science.org
NIH memo addresses ‘confusion’ about restrictions imposed by Trump, easing some concerns
Memo from acting director to staff allows some purchasing, and suggests travel and study sections could soon resume
1312263
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Alejandro Montenegro @aemonten.bsky.social · 09/01/2025
Exactly. I've said this countless times re: responding to reviewers. t.co/IX2doZkNbR
4206
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Peer Review Congress #PRC11 Coming 2029! @peerreviewcongress.bsky.social · 03/01/2025
4 Weeks Until Abstract Submission Deadline! PRC10 abstracts are due January 31. To submit your work and learn more, visit peerreviewcongress.org #peerreview #science #scientificpublication #researchethics #AIinMedicine @jama.com @bmj.com @nejm.org @thelancet.bsky.social
peerreviewcongress.org
International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication
Enhancing the quality and credibility of science.
076
Daniel Evanko @evanko.bsky.social · 19/12/2024
Good, but scary, update on recent GenAI advances by @emollick.bsky.social. PhD-level expertise now required to evaluate accuracy of some outputs. Nice point about using GenAI to introduce novel approaches for humans to investigate properly. open.substack.com/pub/oneusefu...
open.substack.com
What just happened
A transformative month rewrites the capabilities of AI
010
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Richard Van Noorden @richvn.bsky.social · 18/12/2024
Fake or flawed studies are polluting systematic reviews in medicine and other fields - but how do you spot them? For Nature, I report on efforts to create a short checklist of red flags, and on the automated integrity tools emerging to help. www.nature.com/articles/d41...
nature.com
Giant study finds untrustworthy trials pollute gold-standard medical reviews
Two-year collaboration aims to create tools to help counter the tide of flawed research.
37428
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Peer Review Congress #PRC11 Coming 2029! @peerreviewcongress.bsky.social · 11/12/2024
The PRC10 abstract submission site is now open! Abstracts that report new research & findings w generalizable results that can improve scientific research will be given priority. Submit by Jan 31, 2025 at abstracts.peerreviewcongress.org Learn more at peerreviewcongress.org @jama.com @bmj.com
peerreviewcongress.org
International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication
Enhancing the quality and credibility of science.
01713
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Lenny Teytelman @lteytelman.bsky.social · 11/12/2024
A summary of the major developments and improvements on @protocolsio.bsky.social this year: youtu.be/xeDDwrdLsBw?....
youtu.be
End-of-year message from Lenny Teytelman
YouTube video by protocolsio
153
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
RRIDs.org @rrids.bsky.social · 11/12/2024
Exciting #RRID news! We are now part of the #DataCite metadata schema. Yes you can use RRIDs to start tracking the datasets (#DOI) associated with your database (#RRID).
rrids.org
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 includes RRIDs! — Research Resource Identifier
The DataCite Metadata Working Group. (2024) just released the new version of the DataCite Metadata and one of the things that it includes is RRIDs. DataCite Metadata Schema Documentation for the Pu...
0113
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Helena Klara Jambor @helenajambor.bsky.social · 03/12/2024
Tips for properly handling **tabular data** MUST READ for 🧪+ 📊 & kind of which my past self would have had this 😢 Part of the "Simple Rules" in @plos.bsky.social computational biology: PLoS Comput Biol 20(11): e1012604. doi.org/10.1371/jour... by Hertz MI, McNeill AS.
Above: hallmarks of well managed tabular data; Below, a negative examples. Contains examples how data should be presented in tables/dataframes to be fully reproducible and legible.
0328
Daniel Evanko @evanko.bsky.social · 29/11/2024
Fake papers poisoning systematic reviews, genAI compromising Wikipedia. Is this an inevitable consequence of our move toward “town square”/“commons” approaches to authoritative information when it becomes too easy to appear to provide quality contributions? arxiv.org/html/2410.08...
arxiv.org
The Rise of AI-Generated Content in Wikipedia
010
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Jennifer Byrne @jabyrnesci.bsky.social · 28/11/2024
🧪The PRIMeR group is offering a research scholarship on metaresearch/ publication integrity. Applicants must be eligible to enrol as a domestic student at the University of Sydney (no international applicants, sorry) Applications close on 19 December 2024 Details: www.sydney.edu.au/scholarships...
sydney.edu.au
Research Scholarship in Literature Reviews in Molecular Cancer Research
Up to $127,320 research scholarship for a PhD student to investigate problematic literature reviews in molecular cancer research.
089
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Karin Wulf @kawulf.bsky.social · 27/11/2024
V good @rickanderson.bsky.social on Clarivate, e-Life, & disruption for disruption's sake. "Because obviously, there’s no such thing as “change” in the abstract....only specific changes to specific things, which may be for the better or for the worse." scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2024/11/27/d...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Disruption As an End in Itself: eLife’s Suspension and DORA’s Response - The Scholarly Kitchen
DORA is outraged by Clarivate's decision not to fully index eLife or assign it an IF. But why?
044
Daniel Evanko @evanko.bsky.social · 27/11/2024
Great blog post by Anita Bandrowski and @amandafrench.net about persistent identifiers (PIDs) for research facilities, and when to use an RRID or ROR identifier. This is critical for giving core facilities credit for the important work they do. @abrf.bsky.social ror.org/blog/2024-11...
Understanding RRID and ROR for Facilities
By Anita Bandrowski (RRID) and Amanda French (ROR) | November 26, 2024
This blog post explores the difference between “core facilities” in RRID and “facilities” in ROR and provides guidance for those who run facilities on how to effectively use these identifiers.
2103
Daniel Evanko @evanko.bsky.social · 23/11/2024
Nice Technology Feature about the computational tools behind the Human Cell Atlas. I’m obviously biased, but I often find the tools and toolmakers behind accomplishments like this more interesting than the results, partly for the simple reason that they are what make the results possible.
020
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Jennifer Byrne @jabyrnesci.bsky.social · 22/11/2024
🧪"A call for research to address the threat of paper mills" 5 key research questions needing resourcing & support Proof: journals.plos.org/plosbiology/... 💙 @abalkina.bsky.social @image-integrity.bsky.social @saraheaton.bsky.social @nhwise.bsky.social, United2Act co-authors and members, COPE & STM
journals.plos.org
A call for research to address the threat of paper mills
Research paper mills are covert organizations that provide low quality or fabricated manuscripts to paying clients. This Perspective, written by members of the United2Act Research Working Group, propo...
37230
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Andy Aydın-Aitchison @andy8chi.bsky.social · 21/11/2024
Academics wanting to 'verify' their Bluesky profile as genuine might give an ORCID identifier in their profile and link back to their Bluesky profile from ORCID. #AcademicSky
A snip of my profile. Banner image incldes Arendt, Durkheim, Fanon and others drawn rouglys on eggs in Black and White. Profile picture is me in front of some autumn leaves. 
Key descriptive text identifies me as a criminologist working on atrocity crime. 
At the bottom, highlighted by a big red arrow is my ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7463-1302A snip from my ORCID profile page - at the left is a list of institutional and other links to social media, including one to Bluesky, highlighted by a big red arrow.
28617274
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
Richard Van Noorden @richvn.bsky.social · 13/11/2024
"AI tools could help scientists to produce high-quality reviews, but might also fuel the rapid generation of substandard ones". Great overview by Helen Pearson of current efforts to have AI create review articles from the scientific literature. www.nature.com/articles/d41...
nature.com
Can AI review the scientific literature — and figure out what it all means?
Artificial intelligence could help speedily summarize research. But it comes with risks.
2126
Reposted by Daniel Evanko
The OncoAlert Network 🚨 @oncoalert.bsky.social · 21/11/2024
Old Twitter” refers to the platform’s earlier role as a hub where scientists could talk to one another, distribute and discuss preprints and published papers and communicate their research to the public. @tmprowell.bsky.social @erikahamilton9.bsky.social www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Like ‘old Twitter’: The scientific community finds a new home on Bluesky
After recent changes to Elon Musk’s X, a gradual migration turns into a stampede
1134
Daniel Evanko @evanko.bsky.social · 19/11/2024
Very helpful summary of the science behind fluoride in drinking water and why the difference between the US and Europe.
010
Daniel Evanko @evanko.bsky.social · 17/11/2024
Survey of biomedical researchers shows how conflicted they are about fraud as a cause of irreproducibility. Participants rank it 2nd highest of all causes that "Does not contribute" and 3rd highest of all causes that "Always contributes." Each choice is demonstrably untrue. doi.org/10.1371/jour...
Table of results showing survey participant perceptions of the causes of irreproducibility
000