Sign in

David Green, PhD

@ecologistgreen.bsky.social
5.7K followers 3.1K following 1.2K posts

Wildlife Ecologist. Passionate about open science, scientific publishing, & peer review. Founder of @StacksJournal.bsky.social, a scientific journal designed ease & ethics. Learn More & Join Us ⬇️ www.stacksjournal.org

PostsRepliesMedia
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 28/05/2026
New research published in @stacksjournal.bsky.social! This study will be super helpful for anyone using camera traps for wildlife monitoring.
042
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 16/04/2026
📣 Calling all hydrologists! Do you study wetlands — or know someone who does? @stacksjournal.bsky.social needs peer reviewers for a new submission on depressional wetlands and groundwater pumping. Repost or sign up below 👇
aj5simwj6qe.typeform.com
Join Peer Review
040
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
Want to improve peer review and collaborate on new hydrology research? We're looking for reviewers @stacksjournal.bsky.social for a new submission examining how groundwater pumping affects depressional wetlands. Sign up to review or repost 👇
aj5simwj6qe.typeform.com
Join Peer Review
010
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 09/04/2026
📣 Calling all immunologists! Do you study lupus or know someone who does? @stacksjournal.bsky.social needs peer reviewers for a new submission on mitochondrial gene expression in lupus & liver, analyzed by sex. Repost or sign up below 👇
aj5simwj6qe.typeform.com
Join Peer Review
020
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 07/04/2026
Want to improve peer review AND collaborate on new immunology research? We're looking for reviewers @stacksjournal.bsky.social for a new submission examining mitochondrial gene expression in lupus-afflicted liver tissue. Interested or know someone who might be? Sign up to review or repost 👇
aj5simwj6qe.typeform.com
Join Peer Review
010
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 17/02/2026
#PeerReview is indeed breaking down, but I believe we should build it back up instead of scrapping it entirely. It's how we ensure trust in science. What would make you more likely to review your colleagues' new research? 🧪 #SciPub #AcademicSky
theconversation.com
The peer review system is breaking down. Here’s how we can fix it
Peer review is so integral to the scholarly system that research would grind to a halt without it.
4124
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 10/02/2026
At what point will we as a field finally abandon Impact Factors and focus the credibility on the actual science? 🧪 #SciPub #PeerReview #AcademicSky
peerj.com
A survey of how biology researchers assess credibility when serving on grant and hiring committees
Researchers who serve on grant review and hiring committees have to make decisions about the intrinsic value of research in short periods of time, and research impact metrics such Journal Impact Facto...
2185
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 05/02/2026
Another article published at @stacksjournal.bsky.social using their new model of collaborative peer review! 🧪🌎 #OpenScience #AcademicSky #PeerReview
010
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 15/12/2025
A new #preprint server where articles are written and reviewed by AI. What could possibly go wrong? 🤔 Do you think #AI has a place in #ScientificPublishing and #PeerReview? How would you incorporate it in a thoughtful and ethical way? 🧪
science.org
A new preprint server welcomes papers written and reviewed by AI
With human peer review struggling to keep pace with machine-generated science, aiXiv enlists bots to help
041
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 01/10/2025
Jane and her work had a special way of bringing you in. She undoubtedly inspired entire generations of conservation biologists, behavioral ecologists, and optimists — Myself included. She will be missed. 🧪🌍
nytimes.com
Jane Goodall, Eminent Primatologist Who Chronicled the Lives of Chimps, Dies at 91
48611
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 25/09/2025
Toucans -- Loud, colorful, and despised by all of the other birds. 🪶🌍 🔉Sound on!
090
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 23/09/2025
What's one thing you'd change about #PeerReview as a reviewer? I'll start: I'd love to see what the other reviewers said about the same paper so I can learn from their perspectives and expertise. 🧪 #SciPub #AcademicSky
2120
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 17/09/2025
It's true: Academic publishing has become a racket. But I think the idea that #peerreview can happen haphazardly in the comments of a preprint server is naive. 1/ 🧪 #AcademicSky #SciPub
wsj.com
Opinion | Academic Publishing Has Become a Racket
Scientists write and review papers without getting paid, and their institutions have to pay for access.
181
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 17/09/2025
Ever watched a scarlet macaw delicately work to get at a piece of fruit? These birds are more than just pretty; they're also important seed dispersers. Sometimes they even swallow fruit whole and plant new trees with their droppings! 🪶🌍🧪
0234
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 15/09/2025
I left academia to build something I couldn't stop thinking about: a better way to #PeerReview research. It isn't an easy path, but I couldn't stand by any longer without trying to fix a broken system. I'm really proud of what we're building at stacksjournal.org. 🧪 #SciPub
0253
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 15/09/2025
Well this is just the coolest! Scientists discovered an ant queen that can lay eggs that hatch into two different species. 🐜🌍✨🤯
science.org
Ant queen lays eggs that hatch into two species
Bizarre discovery of interspecies cloning “almost impossible to believe,” biologists say
070
Reposted by David Green, PhD
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 09/09/2025
And sometimes it feels personal. 🧪 #SciPub
3211
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 11/09/2025
Interesting read about Impact Factors and vanity metrics in #ScientificPublishing. If we continue to let these measures become the goal, we will lose sight of the meaning, the unseen impact, and continue to limit what research is deemed important. How do you choose where to submit your research? 🧪
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
When the Scoreboard Becomes the Game, It’s Time to Recalibrate Research Metrics - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's guest post discusses research metrics and their relationship to research integrity, inclusivity, and long-term impact.
0111
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 11/09/2025
Null results matter, but too often, they never see the light of day. When journals only publish splashy findings, we lose valuable science. That's why I'm excited about 2-pagers at @StacksJournal.bsky.social. Streamlined publishing for results that deserve to be shared. 🧪 #SciPub #AcademicSky
nature.com
Researchers value null results, but struggle to publish them
Survey finds that fear of reputational harm and a lack of support and publication platforms are among respondents’ key concerns.
0197
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 09/09/2025
And sometimes it feels personal. 🧪 #SciPub
3211
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 08/09/2025
What do you think will be the short- and long-term consequences of these new payment limits in #AcademicPublishing? Do you think publishers will just raise their rates to the new cap? 🧪
2101
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 03/09/2025
It's outrageous that taxpayer dollars were ever used to pay more than $2000 to publish a single article. While it does cost money to have research peer-reviewed and published, the system doesn't make sense when the big publishers are making more money than Google or Amazon. 🧪 #SciPub #AcademicSky
science.org
NIH details options for limiting its payments for open-access publishing fees
Other publishing proposals would scrap reimbursements or pay peer reviewers, unprecedented steps for a major government funder
3161
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 01/09/2025
$3,000 to publish $50 to read $0 to understand #AcademicPublishing is broken 🧪 #SciPub
1549
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 28/08/2025
✨Resplendent Quetzal✨ So lucky to see one of these magical birds the other day. But did you know that their feathers aren't actually green? They actually look green because of how they bend light. There’s no green pigment at all, and they can even look brown under different lighting. 🪶🧪🌍
4525
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 27/08/2025
Very important question for @whysharksmatter.bsky.social
191
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 27/08/2025
Yes! @stacksjournal.bsky.social is working hard to improve #PeerReview. Take a look! 🧪 #academicsky
084
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
The moment we distill research quality into meaningless metrics, they get gamed and lose all meaning. Are citation counts, h-indexes, and impact factors still useful? How do you think we should be evaluating research? 🧪 #SciPub #AcademicSky
science.org
How easy is it to fudge your scientific rank? Meet Larry, the world’s most cited cat
“Exercise in absurdity” reveals flaws in Google Scholar’s productivity metrics
0130
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 25/08/2025
What’s the single worst comment you’ve ever received from a reviewer? I'll go first: "The authors should consider finding a study replicate." ...It was an observational ecology study. 🤦‍♂️ 🧪 #SciPub #AcademicSky
2151
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 21/08/2025
Editor says it’s ‘out of scope’… but they published three just like it last week. 🧪 #SciPub
1144
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 20/08/2025
Not every study needs to be a 20-page paper that takes months—or years—to write. Negative results, small studies, and datasets deserve a home, too. That’s why we created the 2-pager at @StacksJournal.bsky.social — a simple format to share all credible findings. 🧪 #SciPub #AcademicPublishing
stacksjournal.org
The Two-Pager | Stacks Journal
Easily share your research with a 2-Pager in Stacks Journal. Peer review and publish datasets, small studies, null results, and more in a quick, concise format.
183
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 19/08/2025
When I started @StacksJournal.bsky.social, I thought the hardest part would be building a modern #PeerReview platform. Turns out, it's when you're slowly gaining traction. Some days it's overwhelming. Other days, a researcher says, "We need this so badly." It all keeps me going. 🧪 #SciPub
0193
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 19/08/2025
Capuchins are some of the smartest monkeys in the Americas. They use tools, solve puzzles, and clearly know what matters in life: 🍌 🦊🌍
0103
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 18/08/2025
Frustrated by the current system of #PeerReview? What would you change? 🧪 #SciPub #AcademicSky
6212
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 18/08/2025
One of the solutions mentioned here is to pay peer reviewers. What do you think about that? Do you think it introduces a conflict of interest? 🧪 #SciPub #AcademicSky
nature.com
The peer-review crisis: how to fix an overloaded system
Journals and funders are trying to boost the speed and effectiveness of review processes that are under strain.
382
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 15/08/2025
When you: ✅ Funded the research ✅ Wrote the article ✅ Paid to publish ...and now others have to pay to read it. Make it make sense. 🧪 #SciPub
2261
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 13/08/2025
If you could change one thing about #PeerReview, what would it be? I'll go first: make it double-blind during review, but reveal reviewer identities when the paper is published. 🧪 #SciPub #AcademicSky
9193
Reposted by David Green, PhD
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 11/08/2025
🦥 Did you know that two-toed sloths don’t fart? They actually reabsorb gas into their bloodstream and release it through their lungs. 🧪🌍🦊
1177
Reposted by David Green, PhD
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 08/08/2025
Sometimes it’s not about science — it’s about vibes. 🧪 #SciPub
042
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 11/08/2025
🦥 Did you know that two-toed sloths don’t fart? They actually reabsorb gas into their bloodstream and release it through their lungs. 🧪🌍🦊
1177
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 08/08/2025
Sometimes it’s not about science — it’s about vibes. 🧪 #SciPub
042
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 06/08/2025
We all want one thing: to trust published research. Sleuths like @elisabethbik.bsky.social have exposed flaws in #PeerReview, but this doesn't mean science is broken. It means we need to fix peer review — for better, more trustworthy science. #SciPub
nature.com
Research-integrity sleuths say their work is being ‘twisted’ to undermine science
Some sleuths fear that the business of cleaning up flawed studies is being weaponized against science itself.
042
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 05/08/2025
What happens when Peer Review focuses on collaboration and learning, instead of gatekeeping? #SciPub 🧪 It's what we're building at @stacksjournal.bsky.social. A 🧵
183
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 04/08/2025
I think I could watch howler monkeys eat leaves all day. But did you know they also have the loudest call of any land mammal? It can travel up to 3 miles through the jungle! 🦊🌍🧪
1224
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 01/08/2025
Sometimes Reviewer 2 can be a disaster. 🧪 #SciPub #PeerReview #AcademicSky
161
Reposted by David Green, PhD
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 31/07/2025
“Everybody agrees that the system is kind of broken and unsustainable...but nobody really knows what to do about it." I hear this a lot. But the path forward to me is clear: improve #PeerReview and make it actually mean something again. 🧪 #SciPub #AcademicSky
theguardian.com
Quality of scientific papers questioned as academics ‘overwhelmed’ by the millions published
Widespread mockery of AI-generated rat with giant penis in one paper brings problem to public attention
1131
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 31/07/2025
Some helpful info here to help conserve fireflies! ✨🪲🌎
xerces.org
Are Fireflies Going Extinct? Here Are Six Ways To Make Sure They Survive
Is this the last generation to see fireflies? We don’t think so. But we need to take action now to ensure they’re here to stay.
12015
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 31/07/2025
“Everybody agrees that the system is kind of broken and unsustainable...but nobody really knows what to do about it." I hear this a lot. But the path forward to me is clear: improve #PeerReview and make it actually mean something again. 🧪 #SciPub #AcademicSky
theguardian.com
Quality of scientific papers questioned as academics ‘overwhelmed’ by the millions published
Widespread mockery of AI-generated rat with giant penis in one paper brings problem to public attention
1131
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 31/07/2025
“…may be the heaviest insect in Australia.” Whoa! 🧪🌏
theguardian.com
Supersized stick insect discovered in high-altitude trees in Australia
The 40cm-long insect, named Acrophylla alta, weighs slightly less than a golf ball and may be the heaviest insect in Australia
43410
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 30/07/2025
I’ve never felt more seen in a post before. 🪶 Any other birders out there feel the same?
1212
David Green, PhD @ecologistgreen.bsky.social · 30/07/2025
Does it ever feel like #AcademicPublishing is a cartel with citations and impact factors? 🧪 #SciPub
142