Sign in

Eric Scheuch

@ericscheuch.bsky.social
101 followers 73 following 63 posts

Deputy Experiments Director at Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. PhD from Yale, BA from Columbia. Public opinion, quantitative methods, urban/rural divide. ericscheuch.org/about

PostsRepliesMedia
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 08/10/2026
We thank @ispsyale.bsky.social, @jacobhacker.bsky.social and the American Political Economy Exchange (APEX) for funding and research support. Looking forward to your questions! (end)
060
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 08/10/2026
Overall, this provides evidence that the coalition funding urban policing extends across municipal boundaries, organized less by exposure to the service than by defense of a racial-spatial boundary, and provides an opinion explanation why police budgets continue to be high in many urban cores.
194
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 08/10/2026
We find symbolic concerns play a role: racial resentment strongly predicts support for police funding among all residents, while fear of racial change is a significant driver for white suburbanites. These symbolic variables persist in their predictiveness after controlling for demographics.
1124
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 08/10/2026
However, this partially reverses after controlling for demographics. Suburban willingness to pay for urban policing is partly explained by demographics, particularly ideology and age, but material self-interest, such as commuting to the city for work, is not a significant driver.
1102
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 08/10/2026
Through a divide-the-dollar game in a survey of six U.S. metros (N = 6,200), we tested the extent to which suburban residents support using their taxes to fund police in the urban core compared to core residents. Surprisingly, suburban residents are as or more willing to pay than urban residents.
170
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 08/10/2026
Why would suburban residents use their taxes to fund policing in the city center? Two literatures generate divergent answers: one treats policing as a spatial public good whose support tracks direct benefit, another as an instrument of racial hierarchy whose support tracks group-position defense.
1113
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 08/10/2026
Why are metro police budgets high even after years of activism? In a new paper, @taransamarth.bsky.social and I use original survey data from six U.S. metro areas to test one explanation: suburban voters are willing to use their taxes to fund police in the urban core: doi.org/10.1177/1532...
22511
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 07/10/2026
I recover little evidence of opinion backlash: a pro-climate decision moves norms but not beliefs, and an anti-climate decision moves neither. This is good news for the movement: activists can pursue climate cases with confidence such cases may help, and are unlikely to hurt, public opinion (end).
051
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 07/10/2026
I randomized participant exposure to news about a climate change case similar to the one currently before the Court. I randomized exposure to a pro-climate decision, an anti-climate one, or a control group, differentiating between personal beliefs and social norms a la Tankard and Paluck (2017).
110
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 07/10/2026
The new climate case before the Supreme Court has raised the question if these cases are a strategic risk for the climate movement, given the high probability of loss and the possibility of opinion backlash. I've tested this in a new experiment (1/n) www.scotusblog.com/2026/10/cour...
scotusblog.com
Court sends mixed signals on whether it will allow state-tort suits seeking to hold energy companies liable for climate change to go forward
110
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Alexander Wuttke @kunkakom.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
We are hiring at LMU Munich: two PhD positions and one postdoc on democracy, political psychology and computational social science. Start: January 2027 or as soon as possible. We review applications on a rolling basis until October 20. Details below. Reposts very welcome! 1/7
26083
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Alex B. Rivard @alexbrivard.bsky.social · 27/08/2026
New paper out in Cities. We combine a survey of city councillors with a survey of the general public. Do councillors share their constituents’ housing preferences? Yes. Are they responsive to these preferences? Also yes—but only to those ideologically proximate www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
sciencedirect.com
122
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
This summer's heat has drawn attention to the impact of climate change on the home insurance market. Less clear is if individuals experiencing these changes change their opinions or behaviors in response. I investigate in a new working paper (osf.io/preprints/so... : (1/n)
1115
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
Many thanks to @ispsyale.bsky.social for funding support, and the many individuals who have given feedback on this project. I welcome your questions! (end)
030
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
So, what does this mean for insurance and climate policy? Well, in order to build support for policy reforms (like @thomasnhale.bsky.social's Safehouse Plan www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/pub...), communications campaigns are necessary-the crisis alone will not build necessary support. (8/n).
bsg.ox.ac.uk
The Safehouse plan: protecting American homes and making them affordable as the climate changes
Safehouse is a state-level plan to build this new climate coalition by protecting our homes and making them affordable. Through the plan, homeowners get support to upgrade their homes to a robust stan...
130
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
Why is attribution low? I investigate using 2.9 million news articles and social media data from 55,000 public officials. Neither the media nor public officials frequently discuss climate when discussing insurance. Within insurance coverage, both discuss weather more often than climate (7/n)
130
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
This partisan pattern maps onto policy connection (e.g. what policies individuals believe will reduce their insurance rates). Adaptation policies face little polarization and broad belief, mitigation policies, lots of polarization and lower belief (6/n).
140
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
Rather, I find that the problem is attribution: respondents blame extreme weather without blaming climate change, and Republicans are nearly as likely to blame immigration as climate. (5/n)
130
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
Why do individuals move their economic behavior, but not their opinions? I use original survey data to investigate. The problem is not perception-most Americans notice increases, across party lines. (4/n)
120
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
Next, I examined the impact of insurance premium increases on support for climate policy, voting, and homeownership. I find no evidence for individuals moving their climate opinions or voting behavior, but that more-impacted individuals are more likely to sell their homes (+2 pp per sd)(3/n)
111
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
First, I merged 8 years of panel data with data from 246 million home insurance records. This confirms that the insurance crisis is distributed across the country, and that most Americans are seeing increases above the rate of inflation (2/n).
120
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
This summer's heat has drawn attention to the impact of climate change on the home insurance market. Less clear is if individuals experiencing these changes change their opinions or behaviors in response. I investigate in a new working paper (osf.io/preprints/so... : (1/n)
1115
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Nick Ottone @nottone.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
What's been driving the success of progressive insurgents in Democratic primaries? Ideology? Maybe. Old-fashioned canvassing? Definitely. New short working paper (osf.io/preprints/so...) on the impact of canvassing in a local election @houseourneighbors.bsky.social Thread below ⬇️ 1/9
Abstract for working paper by Nicholas Ottone: "Canvassing Mobilizes and Increases Vote Share: Evidence from a Local Election in Seattle":

A long line of research has shown that door-to-door canvassing is a potent campaign tactic for increasing turnout and, in some cases, vote share. More recent work has theorized, however, that canvassing effects are largest in low-salience elections without party cues and concentrated among occasional voters canvassed closer to Election Day. In this research note, I test these theoretical expectations by examining the effect of canvassing in a February local election in Seattle for a housing-related ballot measure. Using a novel geo-coded dataset of seventy doorknocking campaigns over three months, I find that voters more proximate to canvassing operations were more likely to vote and that proximate precincts had a slightly higher vote share for the targeted ballot measure. Moreover, consistent with recent theorizing, I find that turnout effects were concentrated among targeted Democrats canvassed soon before the election.
1112
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Yale Program on Climate Change Communication @yaleclimatecomm.bsky.social · 12/08/2026
Brief 🧵on a new paper on the power of local climate policy, from our Deputy Experiments Director:
022
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Drew Engelhardt @amengel.bsky.social · 18/08/2026
Working on a dissertation in American political behavior and need money for survey research? Apply for a grant worth up to $15,000 from the Rapoport Family Foundation. They’re planning on awarding up to 15 grants this cycle. Deadline Oct. 21. www.rapoportfamilyfoundation.com/phdgrant
rapoportfamilyfoundation.com
Rapoport Doctoral Dissertation Grants
Supporting projects for PhD students doing political science research, democracy and social justice.
17790
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
This points to local climate policy as a promising area of progress on climate, particularly adaptation, in the face of continued retrenchment from the federal government. Thanks to UAR for publishing, and @ispsyale.bsky.social for survey funding (end).
000
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
The paper measures if individuals are willing to pay for local climate policy in their communities. The answer: yes, quite a bit-$250-$330 annually. Willingness to pay is particularly robust for local adaptation policies, which show less partisan polarization than mitigation policies. (2/n)
110
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 10/08/2026
I have a new paper out (open access!) in @urbanaffairsreview.bsky.social assessing the ability of local climate policy to be a partial replacement for federal policy. Read it (and onward) for some good news! doi.org/10.1177/1078...
264
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 01/07/2026
As this heat wave worsens, it's important that the imagery the news uses to illustrate it matches its severity. My colleagues at @yaleclimatecomm.bsky.social recently showed that positive imagery (e.g. people on the beach) reduces how worried individuals are about the heat wave in question.
010
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
David Ho @davidho.bsky.social · 15/06/2024
This is the right image to use for a heat wave; not one of children playing in the fountain or people frolicking on the beach.
8749181
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 26/05/2026
Pam is so essential to ISPS operations that I used to joke that I wanted to graduate before she retired. I made it by two weeks! Congratulations Pam, on a well deserved retirement. And remember to thank your admin staff, without whom we would all be stuck.
040
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Consortium on the American Political Economy (CAPE) @cape-team.bsky.social · 22/05/2026
The 6th Annual CAPE Research Conference program is live! Join us virtually July 27-29 at 12:00 PM ET for the latest (and greatest) in American Political Economy (APE) research. Free registration and full schedule: americanpoliticaleconomy.org/events/annual-conference 👇
americanpoliticaleconomy.org
Annual Conference | Consortium on the American Political Economy
The annual CAPE research conference is a forum for APE-oriented scholars to present work in progress and receive feedback from the broader APE community.
1811
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse @whitehouse.senate.gov · 07/05/2026
Top 10 reasons why Democrats need to talk about climate change now: 🧵
25606227
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Yale Program on Climate Change Communication @yaleclimatecomm.bsky.social · 08/05/2026
New study: How to communicate the impact of climate change on extreme weather in India, the UK, and the US. Simple messages can help build public understanding that climate change is making extreme weather more likely:
doi.org
Communicating the Impact of Climate Change on Extreme Weather in India, the United Kingdom, and the United States| Global Environmental Psychology
As climate change increasingly affects the likelihood and severity of extreme weather events such as flooding and heat waves around the world, it is more important than ever to encourage both mitigation and adaptation. As an important step, people need to understand the links between climate change and extreme weather. We conducted a preregistered online randomized experiment with over 10,000 participants across India, the UK, and the USA, three countries that are large annual emitters but have different patterns of extreme weather. We tested the impact of different numerical frames (percentage versus times) and types of extreme weather (heat waves versus flooding) on beliefs that climate change made extreme weather in 2023 more likely. All four message treatments had a significant effect, increasing the percentage of participants who believed climate change made extreme weather more likely by 4.5 to 6.1 percentage points. However, there was no main effect of specific event type or numerical framing. We found message treatments also increased worry about climate change in general, although impact on policy support or information-seeking behavior was limited. The findings of this study contribute to the scarce literature on which messages are effective at communicating extreme weather event attribution.
095
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Miranda Yaver @mirandayaver.bsky.social · 23/04/2026
Coverage Denied: How Health Insurers Drive Inequality is finally out in the world! Combining nationwide survey evidence, state administrative data, and 111 interviews with patients, physicians & others, it tells the long-overdue story of coverage barriers and their deepening of burden an inequity.
32960374
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Yale Program on Climate Change Communication @yaleclimatecomm.bsky.social · 22/04/2026
We're hiring a new Managing Director! If you have senior experience in operations, administration, development, communications, and program management, this New Haven-based role may be a good fit - check out the details, and please spread the word:
climatecommunication.yale.edu
Employment - Yale Program on Climate Change Communication
Browse currently available full-time, post-doctorate, and contract-based jobs at the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
044
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Zeke Hausfather @zekehausfather.com · 10/04/2026
We now have 13 different models with 637 different ensemble members with El Niño forecasts out through at least September 2026. They suggest a best estimate of 2.2C for September; interestingly ECMWF (which was seen as particularly hot when it came out) is right around the middle of the pack:
515452
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Charlie Warzel @cwarzel.bsky.social · 26/03/2026
The AI economy looks...really precarious. So @matteowong.bsky.social & I did a bunch of reporting to try to figure out what happens when a potential bubble collides with a war in Iran and a potential resource shortage. The answer is...arguably the most dire stuff i've heard from smart ppl in a while
theatlantic.com
The AI Boom Wasn’t Built for the Polycrisis
“There are too many ways for it to fail for it not to fail.”
632169774
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Tom Broderick @trumbullbrod.bsky.social · 25/03/2026
Plug-in solar is one of a suite of solar recs that I’d urge CT legislators to adopt. I’d call it the “ @volts.wtf Listener Suite” of policy proposals, as anyone who’s been a long-time listener probably has a set of dream proposals for their state! www.volts.wtf/p/whats-the-...
volts.wtf
What's the deal with balcony solar?
Cora Stryker joins me to explain how "plug-in" solar took Europe by storm and is finally, via Utah (?), making its way to America.
34213
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 25/03/2026
Now that my dissertation is submitted (and I caught up on sleep), I'm excited to share I'll be joining @yaleclimatecomm.bsky.social this summer as Deputy Director of Experimental Research! My last three years at YPCCC have been transformative and I'm thrilled to continue our important work.
051
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 02/03/2026
On Wednesday, I'm giving a virtual talk on why hurricanes (don't) change public opinion on climate change, with applications to causal attribution in political economy. Come by, or DM me for the paper if you're interested and can't make it!
041
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Junior Americanist Workshop Series @jawspolisci.bsky.social · 26/02/2026
Join us next Wednesday at 1 pm ET for our next workshop, featuring great work by Daniella Alva and @ericscheuch.bsky.social on public opinion 📈🤔Register and read the papers here: jawspolisci.network
jawspolisci.network
Junior Americanist Workshop Series
A virtual workshop for American politics research.
023
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Luke Sanford @lcsanford.bsky.social · 19/02/2026
Announcing the 2026 Political Economy of Climate and Environment (PECE) Conference! When: 9/2/2026 Where: Harvard CFP: www.pece-conference.org/cambridge-20... Submit your papers or apply to attend: forms.gle/6y7YUoxJ6HTsz4cy8 Sponsored by @weatherheadcenter.bsky.social and the Sala Institute
forms.gle
174
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Amelia Malpas @malpas.bsky.social · 17/02/2026
Thrilled to see our paper abt comparative factional conflict out!
0263
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 13/02/2026
Preston Johnston (MIT) and I are organizing a one-day virtual workshop on home insurance and climate, cosponsored by @cape-team.bsky.social on April 10th, 2026, tailored to grad students or postdocs. Message me with questions or indicate your interest here: forms.gle/ZKVv7wLWpDpP...
forms.gle
012
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Tom Broderick @trumbullbrod.bsky.social · 12/02/2026
My answer after listening to the new @volts.wtf pod: YES! “Special” shout-out for Connecticut folks at the 45 minute mark, where Dave refers to the utility/GOP anti-democratic, utter bad-faith smear campaign against Marissa Gillett open.spotify.com/episode/2MZl...
open.spotify.com
Are utilities making too much money?
0178
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
Ryan Briggs @ryancbriggs.net · 11/02/2026
I have a new paper. We look at ~all stats articles in political science post-2010 & show that 94% have abstracts that claim to reject a null. Only 2% present only null results. This is hard to explain unless the research process has a filter that only lets rejections through.
It must be very hard to publish null results
Publication practices in the social sciences act as a filter that favors statistically significant results over null findings. While the problem of selection on significance (SoS) is well-known in theory, it has been difficult to measure its scope empirically, and it has been challenging to determine how selection varies across contexts. In this article, we use large language models to extract granular and validated data on about 100,000 articles published in over 150 political science journals from 2010 to 2024. We show that fewer than 2% of articles that rely on statistical methods report null-only findings in their abstracts, while over 90% of papers highlight significant results. To put these findings in perspective, we develop and calibrate a simple model of publication bias. Across a range of plausible assumptions, we find that statistically significant results are estimated to be one to two orders of magnitude more likely to enter the published record than null results. Leveraging metadata extracted from individual articles, we show that the pattern of strong SoS holds across subfields, journals, methods, and time periods. However, a few factors such as pre-registration and randomized experiments correlate with greater acceptance of null results. We conclude by discussing implications for the field and the potential of our new dataset for investigating other questions about political science.
29643220
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
John Holbein @johnholbein1.bsky.social · 03/02/2026
Are female economists treated differently than males in academic seminars? These authors wanted to know whether gender shapes how scholars are treated when presenting research. So they built a massive dataset of 2,000+ economics seminars, job talks, and conference presentations from 2019–2023...
10411187
Eric Scheuch @ericscheuch.bsky.social · 02/02/2026
Possibly the best thing we can do (now) to cut emissions and energy bills is build more rooftop solar. My new paper in Climatic Change pins low deployment and racial inequality on high up-front costs: link.springer.com/article/10.1... And this @volts.wtf episode walks through how to fix that!
06229
Reposted by Eric Scheuch
John Holbein @johnholbein1.bsky.social · 02/02/2026
So much of classic political science research is woefully underpowered. I'm glad we're slowly coming to our senses.
56820