Reposted by Emil DimanchevMIT Press @mitpress.bsky.social · 01/09/2026In "The Carbon Wave," climate advocate @leahstokes.bsky.social chronicles the turbulent path of the largest climate law in American history alongside policy wonk Sonia Aggarwal in the White House, and DC insider Adrian Deveny in the Senate: lnkd.in/e_a34nCt 2136
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 07/08/2026For me I can safely say that trail riding with a hard tail is just not something I’d consider doing after experiencing full suspension. Latter just unlocks so much more joy on the trail. And I’m not even talking about advanced trails. But I’m a noob. YMMV. 010
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 28/07/2026Source: economist.com/business/202...economist.comElon Musk’s vision of the futureThe world’s richest man sits down with The Economist 011
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 28/07/2026These are all traits of terrible forecasters. 3100
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 21/07/2026Europe can build a lot of renewables without getting into grid issues. What’s also worth noting here is that private investors must have known this all along. That this hasn’t yet happened means there are barriers to investment beyond the grid. 020
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 09/07/2026Woah so hard to say but I guess I can do worse than Gibbon's History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. 040
Reposted by Emil DimanchevKevin J. Kircher @kevinjkircher.com · 05/07/2026Now that millions of electric vehicles have been on the road for a decade or more, we have the data to check in on how their batteries are holding up. Quite well, it turns out.wsj.comEV Batteries Are Defying Expectations After Hundreds of Thousands of MilesIndustry experts think newfound knowledge of battery durability is a game-changer for consumer confidence in EVs. 692149599
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 04/07/2026This is a rather weird fourth. I fell in love with America, the country where it doesn’t matter where you are from. It saddens me how much we’ve regressed, but I also believe that that America as an idea is still alive. 091
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 30/06/2026Yeah the energy twitter community got owned by the network effect. 150
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 24/06/2026I agree that getting more empirical grounding on firmness will be useful. 110
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 24/06/2026The firmness is not addressed by different capacity factors. LCOE is just inherently the wrong tool here. The real question is whether a system with a specific set of resources is cheaper than another. Not the cost difference b/n resources with different capabilities and thus different system values 140
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 24/06/2026Solar plus storage does not have the same availability (firmness if we are being precise) does it? Are you not comparing apples to oranges? 130
Reposted by Emil DimanchevMIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research @mitceepr.bsky.social · 11/06/2026Least-cost electrification plans have become more sophisticated. This working paper proposes an integrated regulatory–financial framework. Universal access becomes bankable when planning, regulation and financing are integrated. ceepr.link/4lc8Ysm 031
Reposted by Emil DimanchevElle Cordova @ellecordova.bsky.social · 10/06/2026Famous authors asking you out 1223421772
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 03/06/2026On paths, I have been wondering if it's worth reallocating efforts to those pockets of the country where evidence-based decision making still happens to a sufficiently constructive degree? 110
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 03/06/2026Ok thanks I see more of what you mean now! Do agree that cost-minimization has been used normatively, though I think the best examples of it are when such studies retain a positive stance of "if society wants cost-min, here is how". 110
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 02/06/2026Exactly. And regarding shuffling, in the long term if we manage to build a lot of renewables, the valuable part of the hydro will be the storage power capacity (there is already a lot of energy storage capacity), so shuffling of hydro energy should decline as a concern. 030
Reposted by Emil DimanchevPete Sikora @petesikora.bsky.social · 01/06/2026TODAY: New York City’s entire electric grid just got about 20% more renewable power. That’s because it’s the first day the CHPE transmission project is sending commercial power to New York City's electric grid. 👏👏👏 Lower prices! Less pollution! HUGE! 216653
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 01/06/2026I do appreciate you bringing this up because the severity of the problem you are pointing to is truly immense and we all have to grapple with it. 100
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 01/06/2026Not sure I fully understand what you mean. That scientists should turn advocates? As much as I agree with the premise I don't agree with that conclusion. Yeah it's bleak, but there are a few different paths here. 110
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 28/05/2026If those authors did believe in that as a BAU, there is no argument that they should update (and should have a while back). 010
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 28/05/2026Yes definitely a stronger claim, I agree. About those papers, there are other things that go into picking a scenario beyond genuine beliefs about BAU (nothing nefarious per se but it's a convenient anchor that can obviate the need to sit and think about what the BAU should be). 210
Reposted by Emil DimanchevMatt Burgess @matthewgburgess.bsky.social · 29/01/2026Hi everyone! I'm new to Bluesky. I'm an economist who studies growth, political polarization and the environment. Here are recent summaries of some of the things I'm working on: Long-run growth patterns and their implications: guidedcivicrevival.substack.com/p/regular-ec...guidedcivicrevival.substack.comRegular economic development patterns with seismic implicationsGlobal economic development has progressed with several highly regular patterns for more than half a century. These patterns may change, but their implications deserve much more attention and respect. 33012
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 27/05/2026Thanks for clarifying! I suppose my nitpicking here is about the framing around the commonality of 8.5 use as BAU which is is quite contestable (eg below). I probably would have instead asked what a fair prior and update would have been. bsky.app/profile/stev... 140
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 26/05/2026So is your point then that the removal of 8.5 constitutes an update about the true distribution? That’d be an interesting argument. Or is it “8.5 projections should now be 4.5 projections” which I think we’ve known already. 100
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 26/05/2026Yeah I am in (a) though I'd sharpen it by amending it to something like "the presence of 8.5 among the set of scenarios chosen to be included in those particular assessments" 100
Reposted by Emil Dimanchevno brain, only alison @alisonborealis.bsky.social · 26/05/2026A child on a bicycle on the sidewalk next to a gigantic pickup truck that's parked backed up to the sidewalk, wheels directly on the curb and tail and trailer hitch hanging over more than half the sidewalk. The child on their bike is shorter than the truck's closed tailgate. 710525
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 26/05/2026H/T @laurentfranckx.bsky.social for reposting and making me aware of this blog post. 110
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 26/05/2026And when I sad "not a credible projection of impacts" above I meant not a credible best-guess/central/baseline/etc projection. Of course it did have utility as a what-if scenario projecting outcomes under a very specific edge-case set of assumptions. 100
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 26/05/2026I guess this is about semantics? I read your statement as a Bayesian update of expected outcomes when you meant, I think, that projections between the two sets of scenarios differ. 100
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 26/05/2026The former was not a credible projection of impacts to begin with (rather it was useful e.g. for the purposes of modeling sensitivities and ranges). In other words, in Bayesian terms, my expectation of impacts did not shift with the retirement of RCP8.5. 120
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 26/05/2026Appreciate the nuance! "does substantially revise down our projections of some impacts" surprised me. If I understand correctly, what you are saying here is that moving from RCP/SSP5-8.5 to RCP/SSP2-4.5 reduces estimated impacts (depending on elasticities), which is fair of course, but ... 110
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 18/05/2026As an American immigrant from Bulgaria, I thought I left this graft and corruption behind. Apparently not. 071
Emil Dimanchev @emildimanchev.bsky.social · 17/05/2026Another reason I write and advise others to is that *writing is thinking*. It is a process by which we learn what we do not yet fully understand, and a way to sharpen our thinking. 180
Reposted by Emil DimanchevJonathan Buonocore @jjbuonocore.bsky.social · 02/05/2026I was on a flight and I watched an interesting documentary about the Straight of Hormuz 1131