It’s creating more jobs than it’s destroying. It’s probably making entry-level jobs more interesting. It has potential to make education better, not worse. Enough with the doomerism!

They should also learn how poor America used to be. I am launching a new course this fall that will try to teach these things.

The strength of extreme event attribution science is not the pivotal issue in climate lawsuits. So, let's separate wonky debates about attribution science from contentious debates about litigation.

Recent scientific reassessments strengthen the case for rapid climate action rather than weaken it.

Some Democratic and activist rhetoric probably alienated voters, but the climate change issue hurt Republicans, not Democrats. Voters want a common-sense approach that takes the issue seriously.

Model created by researchers shows better outcomes are often more likely when people are not too ambitious

Global economic development has progressed with several highly regular patterns for more than half a century. These patterns may change, but their implications deserve much more attention and respect.

A starting point for thinking about how our understanding of climate change impacts has changed (or not changed) with the retirement of RCP8.5.

To ensure proper procedures are followed? Yes. To make new policy in the courts? No. I discuss the Endangerment Finding, Environmental Defense Fund v. Wright, and Lighthiser v. Trump.

YouTube video by St. Luke's Health System

Riparian vegetation reduced gulf turbidity up to 800 meters offshore, overlapping coral reefs and seagrasses, while pasture and gravel roads increased turbidity, according to a scalable framework usin...

Global economic development has progressed with several highly regular patterns for more than half a century. These patterns may change, but their implications deserve much more attention and respect.