iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Neil Shephard @neilshephard.bsky.social · 11/09/2026

Been looking at Richard Samworth and Rajen Shah's new CUP textbook on modern statistical methods. Really nice selection of topics and pace. www.cambridge.org/core/books/m...

095

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Iván Díaz @idiaz.bsky.social · 10/09/2026

(1/22) Over the last few days I have been discussing the role of formal causal inference in RCTs, and in general the role of formalism and rigor in statistics in twitter with @f2harrell.bsky.social. Thread with an example for why both are fundamental for biomedical research:

3135

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Molly Offer-Westort @mollyow.bsky.social · 26/08/2026

I participated in a reading group of Asymptotic Statistics this summer (thanks @bobbygulotty.bsky.social!). The text is very dense and there is not a lot of hand-holding, so I used an AI assistant to write up notes informed by our discussions mollyow.github.io/bloomsday/

mollyow.github.io

Reading Companion for Asymptotic Statistics

173

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Rachel Leah Childers @donskerclass.bsky.social · 28/03/2025

Went to look up textbook results after getting the nagging feeling that an ML paper was reinventing classical ideas, and found this gem: "Not reading to the end of Le Cam's papers became not uncommon in later years. His ideas have been regularly rediscovered." At least they're in good company.

Text from van der Vaart, "Asymptotic Statistics" Ch 27, http://www.stat.yale.edu/~pollard/Books/LeCamFest/VanderVaart.pdf

The theorem may have looked to somewhat too complicated to gain popularity. Nevertheless Hájek's result, for general locally asymptotically normal models and general loss functions, is now considered the final result in this direction, Hájek wrote:

"The proof that local asymptotic minimax implies local asymptotic admissibility was first given by LeCam (1953, Theorem 14). ... Apparently not many people have studied Le Cam's paper so far as to read this very last theorem, and the present author is indebted to Professor LeCam for giving him the reference"

Not reading to the end of Le Cam's papers became not uncommon in later years. His ideas have been regularly rediscovered

1162

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 30/09/2024

From twitter: A short thread: It amazes me how many crucial ideas underlying now-popular semiparametrics (aka doubly robust parameter/functional estimation / TMLE / double/debiased/orthogonal ML etc etc) were first proposed many decades ago. I think this is widely under-appreciated!

34412

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 13/01/2025

"Randomized trials should be used to answer any causal question that can be so studied... But the reality is that observational methods are used everyday to answer pressing causal questions that cannot be studied in randomized trials." - Jamie Robins, 2002 tinyurl.com/4yuxfxes tinyurl.com/zncp39mr

2253

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Peter Hull @instrumenthull.bsky.social · 27/12/2024

What's the best paper you read this year?

13344

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Iván Díaz @idiaz.bsky.social · 13/12/2024

Thank you Alec for leading this project, I learned a lot! This paper has a very useful study of what contrasts are feasible in situations with many treatments and positivity violations, including necessary assumptions and efficient one-step estimators. Check it out!

0123

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Alec McClean @alecmcclean.bsky.social · 13/12/2024

New-ish paper alert! arxiv.org/abs/2410.13522 We tackle the challenge of comparing multiple treatments when some subjects have zero prob. of receiving certain treatments. Eg, provider profiling: comparing hospitals (the “treatments”) for patient outcomes. Positivity violations are everywhere.

arxiv.org

Fair comparisons of causal parameters with many treatments and positivity violations

Comparing outcomes across treatments is essential in medicine and public policy. To do so, researchers typically estimate a set of parameters, possibly counterfactual, with each targeting a different ...

1285

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Gautam Kamath @gautamkamath.com · 13/12/2024

Found slides by Ankur Moitra (presented at a TCS For All event) on "How to do theoretical research." Full of great advice! My favourite: "Find the easiest problem you can't solve. The more embarrassing, the better!" Slides: drive.google.com/file/d/15VaT... TCS For all: sigact.org/tcsforall/

313128

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Alec McClean @alecmcclean.bsky.social · 13/12/2024

@bonv.bsky.social presented this at NYU this week -- terrific work with an excellent presentation (no surprise there)! I found the connections to higher-order estimators and the orthogonalizing property of the U-stat kernel fascinating&illuminating.

121

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 13/12/2024

Should we use structure-agnostic (arxiv.org/abs/2305.04116) or smooth (arxiv.org/pdf/1512.02174) models for causal inference? Why not both? Here we propose novel hybrid smooth+agnostic model, give minimax rates, & new optimal methods arxiv.org/pdf/2405.08525 -> fast rates under weaker conditions

1201

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Iván Díaz @idiaz.bsky.social · 06/12/2024

I see renewed discussion on #statsky about the interpretation of confidence intervals. I will leave here this quote from Larry Wasserman's All of Statistics, which I love. Controlling one's lifetime proportion of studies with an interval that does not contain the parameter is surely desirable!

1344

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Clément Canonne @ccanonne.github.io · 15/11/2024

Reminder/plug: my graduate-level monograph on "Topics and Techniques in Distribution Testing" (FnT Comm. and Inf Theory, 2022). 📖 ccanonne.github.io/survey-topic... [Latest draft+exercise solns, free] 📗 nowpublishers.com/article/Deta... [Official pub] 📝 github.com/ccanonne/sur... [LaTeX source]

3859

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Adam L @adam-lg.bsky.social · 25/11/2024

🔥🔥🔥 from Chris Adams's "Learning Microeconometrics with R:"

I strongly believe that the average treatment effect is given way too much
prominence in economics and econometrics. ATE can be informative, but it
can also badly mislead policy makers and decision makers. If we know the joint
distribution of potential outcomes, then we may be able to better calibrate
the policy. I hope that Kolmogorov bounds will become a part of the modern
econometrician’s toolkit. A good place to learn more about this approach is
Fan and Park (2010). Mullahy (2018) explores this approach in the context of
health outcomes.
Chuck Manski revolutionized econometrics with the introduction of set
identification. He probably does not think so, but Chuck has changed the
way many economists and most econometricians think about problems. We
think much harder about the assumptions we are making. Are the assumptions
credible? We are much more willing to present bounds on estimates, rather
than make non-credible assumptions to get point estimates.
Manski’s natural bounds allow the researcher to estimate the potential
effect of the policy with minimal assumptions. These bounds may not be
informative, but that in and of itself is informative. Stronger assumptions may
lead to more informative results but at the risk that the assumptions, not the
data, determine the results.

1235

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 24/11/2024

"There’s no way you can just sit down & do a `big thing', or at least I can’t. So I just went back to doing lots of little things, & hoping that some of them will turn out okay. Statistics is a wonderfully forgiving field... all you have to do is get an idea & keep at it." - Brad Efron #statsquotes

3515

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Johan Ugander @jugander.bsky.social · 22/11/2024

Kandiros, Pipis, Daskalakis, and Harshaw have a really Interesting new arxiv preprint on "conflict graph designs" for interference/spillovers: arxiv.org/abs/2411.10908 For GATE estimation the improvement is very significant and I'm optimistic/excited about how the ideas will impact the literature..!

1248

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

The EuroCIM @eurocim.bsky.social · 22/11/2024

The European Causal Inference Meeting 2025 is coming to Ghent! ✨ Share your work with experts across the globe – abstract submission for oral & poster presentations is now open! eurocim.org/abstracts.html

11510

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 22/11/2024

New paper! arxiv.org/pdf/2411.14285 Led by amazing postdoc Alex Levis: www.awlevis.com/about/ We show causal effects of new "soft" interventions are less sensitive to unmeasured confounding & study which effects are *least* sensitive to confounding -> makes new connections to optimal transport

35914

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Dylan Foster 🐢 @djfoster.bsky.social · 21/11/2024

As my first post on this platform, allow me to advertise the RL theory lecture notes I have been developing with Sasha Rakhlin: arxiv.org/abs/2312.16730 (shameless repost of my pinned tweet)

421135

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Matt Blackwell @mattblackwell.bsky.social · 20/11/2024

What’s the best way to structure a quantitative methods sequence? Our current take is roughly: 1) Probability/Inference/Regression 2) Causal Inference 3) Model based inference (MLE/Bayes) 4) Machine Learning

11323

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 13/11/2024

In this paper we consider incremental effects of continuous exposures: arxiv.org/abs/2409.11967 i.e., soft interventions on cts treatments like dose, duration, frequency it turns out exponential tilts preserve all nice properties of incremental effects with binary trt (arxiv.org/abs/1704.00211)

0163

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 12/10/2023

This work was led by Alex Levis - an amazingly talented postdoc, who I've been lucky to work with on a surprisingly wide variety of really interesting causal inference problems www.awlevis.com/about/

001

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 12/10/2023

This paper was so fun: arxiv.org/pdf/2301.121... We give new methods for estimating bounds on avg treatment effects - trt is confounded, but an instrument is available. Super common in practice The bounds are non-smooth, so std efficiency theory isn't applicable Lots of useful nuggets throughout!

2116

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 12/11/2024

Very excited about this paper! arxiv.org/abs/2305.04116 We study if one can improve popular semiparametric / doubly robust / DML causal effect estimators - w/o adding structural assumptions... Short answer: nope! Turns out these methods are minimax optimal here www.ehkennedy.com/uploads/5/8/...

2403

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Oliver Maclaren @omaclaren.bsky.social · 12/11/2024

Wow things seem to actually be taking off here…

161

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 12/11/2024

there are *surprisingly many* open problems when it comes to theory/methods in causal inference check out this talk by Siva Balakrishnan for an excellent & comprehensive summary of the state of the art www.youtube.com/live/Mnum0Ox... www.stat.cmu.edu/~siva/

2142

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 12/11/2024

CMU Stats & Data Science is hiring! www.cmu.edu/dietrich/sta... forms.stat.ufl.edu/statistics-j...

0146

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 30/09/2024

Short story - the ideas behind “causal ML” and “double machine learning” go back at least 40 years Here is an estimator from a 1982 textbook that today would be called double machine learning or something similar

172

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 30/09/2024

34412

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Ian Waudby-Smith @ianws.bsky.social · 15/12/2023

Awesome. This interview is also a gem www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIO2...

youtube.com

DS027 Herbert Robbins

A Conversation with Herbert Robbins (1990), 55 minutes

111

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 13/12/2023

Some amazing quotes by Herbert Robbins here: jiayinggu.weebly.com/uploads/3/8/... "Why does it take so long? Why haven't I done ten times as much as I have? Why do I bother over & over again trying the wrong way when the right way was staring me in the face all the time? I don't know."

260

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 05/11/2023

Larry Wasserman’s talk on “Problems with Bayesian causal inference” youtu.be/sZyyaNdvfto?...

1275

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Vitor Possebom @vitorpossebom.bsky.social · 02/11/2023

One of my pastimes is to watch videos about writing fiction. Many things that work when writing fiction also work when writing academic papers! I think this video on editing is quite useful: youtu.be/WLAmilJx3Us?.... E.g., accept that your manuscript will evolve a lot over time!

173

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 21/10/2023

Check out this great paper by Mateo Rubio (scholar.google.com/citations?us...), rigorously estimating causal effects of the "cycle of violence" Superb example of how to tell a story including average effects, heterogeneous effects, & sensitivity analysis (i.e., relaxing assumptions abt confounding)

181

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 21/10/2023

Excellent news! blog.arxiv.org/2023/10/20/a...

081

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 17/10/2023

CMU Stats & Data Science is hiring! apply.interfolio.com/134121 www.cmu.edu/dietrich/sta...

01016

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham @paulgp.com · 16/10/2023

I have some line in my first set of slides like "Not every economics research paper is estimating a causal quantity. But, the implication or takeaway of papers is (almost) always a causal one." I should just quote Wasserman!

0111

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 16/10/2023

"There are two types of statisticians: those who do causal inference and those who lie about it." - Larry Wasserman #statsquotes www.jstor.org/stable/26699...

34916

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 16/10/2023

"Statisticians are engaged in an exhausting but exhilarating struggle with the biggest challenge that philosophy makes to science: how do we translate information into knowledge?" - Stephen Senn #statsquotes

030

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Vitor Possebom @vitorpossebom.bsky.social · 16/10/2023

Econometrics Thread (#EconSky) Today, I will talk very briefly about a few recent methodological papers that I think are super useful to applied researchers. Basically, below, you will find some new tools that may help you to answer relevant empirical questions. +

39746

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 15/10/2023

Matteo Bonvini made an R package for our “proportion of unmeasured confounding” sensitivity approach here: github.com/matteobonvin... Paper: arxiv.org/abs/1912.02793

2144

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 14/10/2023

"Sensitivity analyses can remain agnostic about [causal] structure. This is one reason they are useful; they adjudicate debates bc people can agree on validity w/out reaching full agreement on what constitutes plausible causal knowledge." - Aronow & Savje #statsquotes arxiv.org/pdf/2003.116...

35316

Reposted by Edward H. Kennedy

ArXiv Paperboy (Stat.ME+Econ.EM) @paperposterbot.bsky.social · 13/10/2023

Model-Agnostic Covariate-Assisted Inference on Partially Identified Causal Effects arxiv.org/abs/2310.08115 Many causal estimands are only partially identifiable since they depend on the unobservable joint distribution between potential outcomes. Stratification on pretreatment covariates c 📈🤖

044

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 12/10/2023

this new Interactive Causal Learning Conference looks pretty great: interactivecausallearning.com/2023/#speakers can't go wrong with people like: Judith Lok, Eli Ben-Michael, Roshni Sahoo, Mats Stensrud, Mark van der Laan, Linbo Wang, etc etc. bet their talks will be 🔥🔥🔥

061

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 12/10/2023

2116

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 12/10/2023

"Don't worry about the overall importance of the problem; work on it if it looks interesting. I think there's a sufficient correlation between interest and importance." - David Blackwell #statsquotes en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_B...

020

Edward H. Kennedy @edwardhkennedy.bsky.social · 11/10/2023

Cool thread! MTE/LIV is pretty neat - very natural & advantageous w/ cts IVs I worked on semiparametric methods for this effect here: arxiv.org/pdf/1607.025... Also interesting statistically - a ratio of derivatives of partially averaged regression functions, leading to some quirky theory/methods

1103