Sign in

Eamon Duede

@eduede.bsky.social
1.5K followers 1.4K following 66 posts

epistemology of science and artificial intelligence // asst prof purdue university // argonne national lab // phd, university of chicago www.eamonduede.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
Silvia De Toffoli and I wrote a guest article for Terence Tao's blog in response to the recent AI Navier-Stokes result. We argue that the 'AI has "solved" mathematics' idea rests on two assumptions, both seductive & plausible, but both wrong. #philsci #AI #math terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/09/12/a...
terrytao.wordpress.com
After Math
[This is a guest post by Silvia De Toffoli and Eamon Duede. This blog post was initially written in a different file format and converted using AI. — T.] Silvia De Toffoli (University School …
2199
Reposted by Eamon Duede
Richard Jean So @richardjeanso.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
Humanistic AI conference at Duke (9/25-6), full schedule forthcoming but speaker/title list is up! We have an amazing line up - @tedunderwood.com @laurenfklein.bsky.social @mariaa.bsky.social @hoytlong.bsky.social @eduede.bsky.social + others; if in area, please come! sites.duke.edu/humanisticai...
sites.duke.edu
Speakers – Humanistic AI Conference at Duke
1218
Reposted by Eamon Duede
Alisa Bokulich @alisabokulich.bsky.social · 22/08/2026
Postdoc in Integrated History & Philosophy of Modern Science at my alma mater #HPS program at Notre Dame. $75K +$15K research funds Deadline Dec 1st. #PhilJobs #philsci #philsky #histSTM #histmod philjobs.org/job/show/31869
philjobs.org
Postdoctoral Fellow, University of Notre Dame - PhilJobs:JFP Postdoctoral Fellow, University of Notre Dame
An international database of jobs for philosophers
13225
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 19/08/2026
Excellent @randomwalker.bsky.social essay on how frontier labs might navigate various layers of the value stack to survive. open.substack.com/pub/aisnakeo...
open.substack.com
Up the Stack: How AI’s Escape From the Commodity Trap Risks Enterprise Lock-in
Critics and boosters are both looking in the wrong place
041
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 02/08/2026
Nice talk by @randomwalker.bsky.social at #icml www.normaltech.ai/p/what-will-...
normaltech.ai
What will be left for us to work on?
My keynote at ICML 2026
140
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 01/08/2026
Nature did a nice, accessible write up of a recent piece I wrote with @mjcrockett.bsky.social, Kevin Gross, and @carlbergstrom.com. Also, check out Carl's more detailed thread (with link to the paper in both). "Scientists using LLMs will ‘do more, less well'" www.nature.com/articles/d41...
nature.com
Scientists using LLMs will ‘do more, less well’, modelling study predicts
Research suggests that the combination of incentives to publish and the use of large language models will lead to more papers, but they will be less refined.
0209
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
We were thinking along this lines, too! If it makes you more selective in discovery, you probably have a better project... don't waste that in development!
100
Reposted by Eamon Duede
Lena Struwe @drgentian.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
"Hence our dismal conclusion: rather than finding that LLMs free us to do a better job of what we were doing before they came along, they shift scientific incentives (and the playing field of academic competition) in ways that compel us to do more and more, faster and faster, less and less well."
018491
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
New preprint with @carlbergstrom.com, Kevin Gross, and @mjcrockett.bsky.social. See Carl's thread. Surprise! Even if LLMs work perfectly, they'll make scientists refine their work less deeply, because they raise the opportunity cost of time, pushing researchers to do more, less well.
A figure describing the results.
1238
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 11/05/2026
#philsci #philsky
052
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 29/04/2026
Women's shoes louder than men's shoes... besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Sex matters: European urban birds flee approaching women sooner than approaching men
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
010
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 23/04/2026
If you're at #ICLR and interested in #humanities centered work on #AI (plus a radical take on the problem of #LLM hallucination), check out our paper arxiv.org/abs/2511.07722 on Fri, Apr 24 at 11:15 AM – 1:45 PM PDT Pavilion 3 P3-#1819. Joint work w/ @richardjeanso.bsky.social @hoytlong.bsky.social
arxiv.org
Critical Confabulation: Can LLMs Hallucinate for Social Good?
LLMs hallucinate, yet some confabulations can have social affordances if carefully bounded. We propose critical confabulation (inspired by critical fabulation from literary and social theory), the use...
271
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 26/03/2026
As AI starts proving theorems, a question becomes urgent: when does a formal derivation correspond to a particular proof idea—not just prove the same theorem a different way? @simondedeo.bsky.social and I argue this 'correspondence problem' has been hiding in plain sight. arxiv.org/abs/2603.13680
arxiv.org
A correspondence problem for mathematical proof
Mathematical proofs are often said to justify their conclusions by indicating the existence of a corresponding formal derivation. We argue that this widespread view relies on an under-examined notion ...
020
Reposted by Eamon Duede
Richard Jean So @richardjeanso.bsky.social · 13/03/2026
The talk is based on a paper I co wrote with @eduede.bsky.social @hoytlong.bsky.social & Patrick Sui that is accepted and forthcoming at ICLR 2026. Here's the preprint: arxiv.org/abs/2511.07722
arxiv.org
Critical Confabulation: Can LLMs Hallucinate for Social Good?
LLMs hallucinate, yet some confabulations can have social affordances if carefully bounded. We propose critical confabulation (inspired by critical fabulation from literary and social theory), the use...
053
Reposted by Eamon Duede
CAIC @ Purdue @caic-at-purdue.bsky.social · 06/03/2026
The schedule and RSVP link for the CAIC launch event is now live on our website 🚀 Check the schedule and RSVP to attend ✏️ caic.centers.purdue.edu
033
Reposted by Eamon Duede
Richard Jean So @richardjeanso.bsky.social · 09/02/2026
Cool postdoc: hiring someone with training in philosophy + computational methods to study how AI is transforming epistemic norms & practices across academic fields of knowledge. Can vouch the PI is both a fantastic advisor & person. Great academic network too: Purdue to CMU to Chicago to Princeton.
063
Reposted by Eamon Duede
Richard Jean So @richardjeanso.bsky.social · 04/02/2026
New paper on Why Slop Matters w/ great group of co authors (@hoytlong.bsky.social @eduede.bsky.social @ari-holtzman.bsky.social + others not on Bluesky) from ACM AI Letters. We try to move the debate re: AI Slop past normative, neg claims & towards parsing its social uses. dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/...
dl.acm.org
Why Slop Matters | ACM AI Letters
AI-generated “slop” is often seen as digital pollution. We argue that this dismissal of the topic risks missing important aspects of AI Slop which deserve rigorous study. AI Slop serves a social funct...
1238
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 23/01/2026
Excited to recruit a 🚨 postdoc 🚨 for projects on #AI and evolving scientific practice, norms, and impact! Interdisciplinary work across science of science, philosophy of science, math with creative Purdue/Argonne/CMU/Chicago/Princeton collaborators! *pls repost*! careers.purdue.edu/job/Postdoc-...
careers.purdue.edu
Postdoc Research Assoc/Sloan Fdn
Postdoc Research Assoc/Sloan Fdn
11515
Reposted by Eamon Duede
PhilSci-Archive @philsci-archive.bsky.social · 02/01/2026
New on the Archive: Avigad, Jeremy (2026) Mathematical Understanding. [Preprint] philsci-archive.pitt.edu/27708
011
Reposted by Eamon Duede
PhilSci-Archive @philsci-archive.bsky.social · 03/01/2026
New on the Archive: Duede, Eamon and Friedman, Daniel (2025) Epistemic Gaps and the Attribution of (AI) Discovery. [Preprint] philsci-archive.pitt.edu/27719
031
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 07/01/2026
Excited this piece is finally out in Philosophy of Science. We argue that, paradoxically, we can have certainty about theorems in math, the proofs of which we can never understand. That's weird and tells us something important about why we do math in the first place #philsky tinyurl.com/3dxxb98a
cambridge.org
A Priori Knowledge in an Era of Computational Opacity: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Mathematical Discovery | Philosophy of Science | Cambridge Core
A Priori Knowledge in an Era of Computational Opacity: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Mathematical Discovery
041
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 02/12/2025
Reviewer 2 may have used the autopen during the final days of the Biden administration
010
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 30/11/2025
Philosophy paper pitchbot
040
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 28/11/2025
Factor Fexcectorn
020
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
I've long felt that there's something about working through logic (particularly mathematical logic) that is clarifying for thought in ways that turning the formal crank more generally isn't... like having to prove out an actual argument form using only syntactic rules is forceful learning
140
Reposted by Eamon Duede
M.J. Crockett @mjcrockett.bsky.social · 21/10/2025
Can AI simulations of human research participants advance cognitive science? In @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social, @lmesseri.bsky.social & I analyze this vision. We show how “AI Surrogates” entrench practices that limit the generalizability of cognitive science while aspiring to do the opposite. 1/
sciencedirect.com
AI Surrogates and illusions of generalizability in cognitive science
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have generated enthusiasm for using AI simulations of human research participants to generate new know…
9288119
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 15/11/2025
Tell us about the singer songwriters who hurt you, Jonathan
000
Reposted by Eamon Duede
Carl T. Bergstrom @carlbergstrom.com · 24/10/2025
1. We ( @jbakcoleman.bsky.social, @cailinmeister.bsky.social, @jevinwest.bsky.social, and I) have a new preprint up on the arXiv. There we explore how social media companies and other online information technology firms are able to manipulate scientific research about the effects of their products.
Three schematic diagrams. The first illustrates selective publishing of internal resection, the second selective causal focus, and the third selective access and funding for researchers.
16754356
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
New piece w/ James Evans in Science explores what we call 'science after science', an era where our ability to control nature may exceed our ability to understand it; a new struggle to sustain curiosity & understanding under AI's predictive dominance. #ai #science www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
science.org
After science
Twenty-five years ago, Ted Chiang wrote a prescient science fiction short that began: “It has been 25 years since a report of original research was last submitted to our editors for publication, makin...
02911
Reposted by Eamon Duede
Carl T. Bergstrom @carlbergstrom.com · 13/11/2025
Twin cities friends: I'll be speaking tomorrow at the Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science on how AI disrupts the sometimes precarious balance of scientific incentives.
35221
Reposted by Eamon Duede
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science @thebjps.bsky.social · 12/11/2025
One of the best #philsci conferences in one of the best cities: the 2026 BSPS Annual Conference is taking place in Leeds 21–23 July. Keynotes by Robin Hendry, Tarja Knuuttila & Eleanor Knox. More info: www.thebsps.org/news/bsps-an... #philsky
thebsps.org
BSPS Annual Conference 2026
The BSPS Annual Conference takes place on 21–23 July 2026 at the University of Leeds
093
Reposted by Eamon Duede
Carl T. Bergstrom @carlbergstrom.com · 09/11/2025
it’s crazy because no one knows what the aim of science is
2311211
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 29/10/2025
"Coming back to life" is also surprising because it's nothing like them and also great
010
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 28/10/2025
Most underrated Floyd album
110
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 03/10/2025
thank you for your careful engagement with the arguments of the paper...
000
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 03/10/2025
In 1977 computers proved the 4Color Theorem. Human's can't check that proof, but trust it because they understand it. Now #AI can generate proofs we'll never understand. Can we trust those? In a new paper out in PhilSci @philscijournal.bsky.social, we argue yes! with a catch: tinyurl.com/yhmnrx5m
cambridge.org
Apriori Knowledge in an Era of Computational Opacity: The Role of AI in Mathematical Discovery | Philosophy of Science | Cambridge Core
Apriori Knowledge in an Era of Computational Opacity: The Role of AI in Mathematical Discovery
271
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
I'm seeing this, too!
010
Reposted by Eamon Duede
Matt Grossmann @mattgrossmann.bsky.social · 23/08/2025
AI use & coverage are growing quickly & recently across academic fields arxiv.org/pdf/2405.15828
011
Reposted by Eamon Duede
Carl T. Bergstrom @carlbergstrom.com · 19/08/2025
1. The philosophy of science sometimes gets an unearned reputation as a purely academic exercise that offers little by way of concrete tools for advancing research. This is wrong. And today, as we grapple with how AI is changing the nature of scientific activity, it's desperately wrong.
19797240
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 04/08/2025
"the bar is on the floor and, if you're going to make it in the hard tech era, you can no longer ooze under it"
030
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 31/07/2025
www.theatlantic.com/science/arch...
theatlantic.com
Every Scientific Empire Comes to an End
America’s run as the premiere techno-superpower may be over.
061
Reposted by Eamon Duede
Santa Fe Institute @sfiscience.bsky.social · 28/07/2025
Applications are open for SFI's 2026 Complexity Postdoctoral Fellowships If you’ve recently earned a Ph.D. in any scientific field and want to pursue independent, transdisciplinary research, consider applying. Deadline: October 1, 2025 Apply here: santafe.edu/sfifellowship
06669
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 31/07/2025
Can we talk about how fantastic that grounds crew is? Look at that cut!
010
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 24/07/2025
Tennis one point, no difference. Chess a pawn, game over. White moves twice initially, game over. Black gets two moves after white's first move... I thought I could just set that up on the computer but it occurred to me that if black knows they'd get to move twice, then they might find a novel first
040
Reposted by Eamon Duede
Carl T. Bergstrom @carlbergstrom.com · 25/06/2025
A few months ago, Nature published how-to guide for using ChatGPT to write your peer reviews in 30 minutes. This is, of course, a horrible idea. Here’s my response with @jbakcoleman.bsky.social .
nature.com
AI, peer review and the human activity of science
When researchers cede their scientific judgement to machines, we lose something important.
15589233
Reposted by Eamon Duede
lastpositivist.bsky.social @lastpositivist.bsky.social · 14/06/2025
Paper is finally up and open access (www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/...), it's a sequel to an earlier paper where we'd argued that there's not good evidence that pre-publication peer review is a net benefit (www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1093/...). So in this one we suggest an alternative.
Jury Theorems for Peer Review
Marcus Arvan, Liam Kofi Bright, and Remco Heesen

Abstract:

Peer review is often taken to be the main form of quality control on academic research. Usually journals carry this out. However, parts of maths and physics appear to have a parallel, crowd-sourced model of peer review, where articles are posted on the arXiv to be publicly discussed. In this article we argue that crowd-sourced peer review is likely to do better than journal-solicited peer review at sorting articles by quality. Our argument rests on two key claims. First, crowd-sourced peer review will lead on average to more reviewers per article than journal-solicited peer review. Second, due to the wisdom of the crowds, more reviewers will tend to make better judgements than fewer reviewers will. We make the second claim precise by looking at the Condorcet jury theorem as well as two related jury theorems developed specifically to apply to peer review.
1523485
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 21/05/2025
... though behavioral economists suspect that this may not be optimal
000
Reposted by Eamon Duede
Martin Kusch @martinkusch.bsky.social · 28/04/2025
Would you like to teach philosophy of science and technology in Vienna? #philosophy #STS jobs.univie.ac.at/job/Senior-L...
jobs.univie.ac.at
Senior Lecturer in Philosophy of Science and Technology
Senior Lecturer in Philosophy of Science and Technology
26357
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 24/03/2025
I'll buy you both a pint just 'cause
110
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 14/02/2025
The plan is to threaten to primary the diseases
010