A modular, extendable system for checking research outputs for best practices using text search, R code, and/or (optional) LLM queries.

Many peer review attributes are widely criticized and poorly investigated, particularly in the context of proposals’ peer review. This study aims to explore stakeholders’ perspectives on the role o...

This blogpost was written by dr. Olmo van den Akker. He is a postdoc in our department working on two projects: a systematic review of studies that simulate p-hacking, and a randomized controlled tria...

Between 20 and 24 April, PYMS will be hosting a series of online lunch meetings. During these sessions, you can present one of your completed research projects, an ongoing study, or early‑stage ideas ...

February 19, 2026

This blogpost has been written by Michèle Nuijten. Michèle is an assistant professor of our research group who investigates reproducibility and replicability in psychology. Also, she is the developer ...

Interview with Gisela Govaart and Antonio Schettino, developers of the new ERP preregistration template on the Open Science Framework (OSF).

A new machine learning tool has identified more than 250,000 cancer research papers that may have been produced by so-called “paper mills”.

It’s hard to measure social and economic impacts of making papers and data free, researchers say

Various methods are available to help users assess whether selective non-publication of studies or selective non-reporting of study results has occurred, but not its impact on a meta-analysis. This li...

Open Peer Review is gaining prominence in attention and use, but to responsibly open up peer review there is an urgent need for additional evidence. This Perspective proposes a preliminary research ag...