Reposted by Sarah Szalavitz💡
By my math, the order was filed 11 minutes after the Trump administration's reply brief came in.
Sarah Szalavitz💡
@dearsarah.bsky.social
121K followers 1.2K following 38K posts
Accountability Architect💡 Artisanal Database Maker🔎 🧾 Storyteller/Writer/Producer🎙️✍️🎥 Avenger, Academic, Lawyer🗳️ Redistributive Justice ⚖️ Choice Optimizer🤖 Researcher & OG Prompt Engineer🧌 Whistleblower🚨 Human Palantir🔮 linktr.ee/realdearsarah
![In light of the Government’s flagrantly unlawful conduct,
today’s decision might suggest the Government faces extraordinary harms. Yet even that is not the case. Rather,
following a recent trend, the Court appears to give no serious consideration to the irreparable harm factor. See, e.g.,
id., at ___ (slip op., at ___); SSA v. AFSCME, 605 U. S. ___
(2025). Without a showing that a stay is necessary to avoid
irreparable harm, however, this Court’s midstream intervention is inexcusable. See, e.g., Hollingsworth, 558 U. S.,
at 190.
Besides the facially absurd contention that the Executive
is “irreparabl[y]” harmed any time a court orders it temporarily to refrain from doing something it would like to do,
see Application for Stay of Injunction 37, the Government](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:3n55ofeg53jvxkslkg3hyayd/bafkreifnzkwk7tufmilnaj77doiol7ov2og4mqn32mvepl7imtbn22nrmq)
