Sign in

Daniel Drucker

@danieldrucker.bsky.social
1.1K followers 1.1K following 2.4K posts

Philosophy professor at UT Austin who thinks about attitudes, epistemology, and communication. www.danieldrucker.info

PostsRepliesMedia
Daniel Drucker @danieldrucker.bsky.social · 18h
@kmahowald.bsky.social and I wrote this piece on expressives in LLM agents' chains of thought: www.theatlantic.com/technology/2... We look at some surprising, emotionally expressive language that appears in AIs' "thinking" when they're doing math, or hacking. We argue it's likely functional!
theatlantic.com
2224
Daniel Drucker @danieldrucker.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
dailynous.com/2026/08/13/p... This strikes me as among the most interesting, cool things in the world that we seem to have created intelligences that can write (haven't read it yet) decent papers on things like epistocracy (and the papers they write will only get better), wondrous even.
dailynous.com
Philosophy Journal Publishes Largely AI-Authored Article — On Purpose (guest post) - Daily Nous
Philosophy & Public Affairs recently---and knowingly---published an article written mostly by Claude, Anthropic's LLM. The article's thesis was supplied by Simon Goldstein, associate professor of phil...
120
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Mark Riedl @markriedl.bsky.social · 24/06/2026
I'm going to use this in a lecture on chain-of-thought for my NLP class
4515
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Michela Massimi @michelamassimi.bsky.social · 08/06/2026
Bas van Fraassen receives the Rolf Schock Prize 2026 with other laureates in mathematics, music, and visual arts in recognition for creativity in humanities, arts, and science. And tomorrow a symposium will celebrate Bas’s lifelong achievements 🎉 #philsci
05110
Daniel Drucker @danieldrucker.bsky.social · 29/05/2026
Why are disjunctive questions ("who are you or what do you want?") infelicitous? Conjunctive ones are felicitous! ("Who are you and what do you want?"). It's puzzling to me, but I might be missing something obvious.
9150
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Rebecca Buxton @rebeccabuxton.bsky.social · 21/05/2026
Extremely sad for us at Bristol, but delighted for my lovely friend and colleague @wiglet1981.bsky.social. All hail the new Wykeham Professor of Logic! *bows*
4427
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
ryan cooper @ryanlcooper.com · 15/05/2026
fuckin crazy story. some Ukrainian kid probably saved his whole family from being killed by a Russian drone murder squad by spotting and cutting the fiber optic connection www.washingtonpost.com/world/2026/0...
washingtonpost.com
In northern Ukraine, it was boy vs. Russian drone. The boy won.
A soldier taught a 12-year-old how to disable the fiber-optic drones that Russia has been using to hunt Ukrainian civilians in a campaign the U.N. has labeled a war crime.
91359359
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Kyle Mahowald @kmahowald.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
New paper with @danieldrucker.bsky.social! We had language models play The Counterexample Game, a philosopher's pastime where one person proposes a conceptual analysis , another pokes holes in it, and the first one tries to repair it. What happens over long iterated chains? arxiv.org/abs/2605.03936
arxiv.org
The Counterexample Game: Iterated Conceptual Analysis and Repair in Language Models
Conceptual analysis -- proposing definitions and refining them through counterexamples -- is central to philosophical methodology. We study whether language models can perform this task through iterat...
1289
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Matt Darling @besttrousers.bsky.social · 05/05/2026
A real problem is that people have started using "counterintuitive takes that defy.conventional wisdom" as a *positive* signal of accuracy.
414415
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Kyle Mahowald @kmahowald.bsky.social · 17/04/2026
Richard @futrell.bsky.social and I have posted our response to the commentaries on our BBS target article "How Linguistics Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Language Models." The response is: "You Can't Fight in Here! This is BBS!" arxiv.org/abs/2604.09501
arxiv.org
You Can't Fight in Here! This is BBS!
Norm, the formal theoretical linguist, and Claudette, the computational language scientist, have a lovely time discussing whether modern language models can inform important questions in the language ...
13513
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Ronan Farrow @ronanfarrow.bsky.social · 06/04/2026
The reporting on OpenAI and Sam Altman I've been working on for the past year and a half, for @newyorker.com, with Andrew Marantz: www.newyorker.com/magazine/202...
newyorker.com
Sam Altman May Control Our Future—Can He Be Trusted?
New interviews and closely guarded documents shed light on the persistent doubts about the head of OpenAI.
1482615871
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Matthias Michel @matthiasmichel.bsky.social · 14/01/2026
New paper coming out in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research: "Consciousness doesn't do that". I explain why I believe that animal sentience research is in large part built on sand. In my opinion, we should be skeptical of many of the claims made in this field. philpapers.org/rec/MICCDD
philpapers.org
Matthias Michel, Consciousness doesn't do that - PhilPapers
The question of which mental functions require consciousness has recently come to the forefront because of its relevance for investigating animal consciousness. Finding out that an animal can perform ...
710025
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Dan Harris @danielwharris.bsky.social · 07/01/2026
Elmar Unnsteinsson (@eunnsteins.bsky.social) and I have a new paper forthcoming in Noûs. "Genre and Conversation" We show how to generalize the classic pragmatic theories to conversational genres that aren't factual, cooperative, committal information exchanges. philpapers.org/rec/ELMGAC-2
philpapers.org
Unnsteinsson Elmar & Harris Daniel W., Genre and Conversation - PhilPapers
Conversations can belong to different types, or genres. We consider four dimensions of variation as case studies: Some conversations are about sharing information, others about making decisions; some ...
1324
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Joseph Sommer @bayesandbounds.bsky.social · 02/01/2026
"Beliefs* drive behavior" stocks up big *including ideological, political, identity-central, motivated, etc. beliefs
051
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham @paulgp.com · 31/12/2025
Researchers had people do a memory task, take a 10-min break (rest, Twitter, YouTube, or TikTok), then resume. Result? Only TikTok wrecked their ability to remember planned intentions. After scrolling, accuracy dropped from ~80% to basically coin-flip levels. Twitter & YouTube? No effect.
arxiv.org
Short-Form Videos Degrade Our Capacity to Retain Intentions: Effect of Context Switching On Prospective Memory
Social media platforms use short, highly engaging videos to catch users' attention. While the short-form video feeds popularized by TikTok are rapidly spreading to other platforms, we do not yet under...
529085
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Richard Pettigrew @wiglet1981.bsky.social · 30/12/2025
A while ago, I posted a set of notes about the Bayesian approach to inquiry and how it can help us think about questions raised in the recent literature on zetetic epistemology. I’ve now corralled that material into something like a first draft of a book. I hope it might be of interest to others.
philarchive.org
Richard Pettigrew, The value of information and the epistemology of inquiry - PhilArchive
In the analytic tradition, epistemology has typically begun at the point at which we have our evidence; it has then asked which beliefs or credences are justified or warranted by that ...
27217
Daniel Drucker @danieldrucker.bsky.social · 27/12/2025
Another argument against Hamblin's idea of questions as sets of their possible answers. Consider (i) the question asked by 'were dogs domesticated once or more than once times?', and (ii) the set {<dogs were domesticated once>, <dogs were domesticated more than once>}.
151
Daniel Drucker @danieldrucker.bsky.social · 26/12/2025
Consider "is the correct answer to this question 'no'?". If 'yes' is correct, then the correct answer to it is 'yes' and 'no', which seems like a contradiction. If 'no', then 'no' is and isn't the correct answer to the question, once again a contradiction. Is the question ill-formed, or what?
7100
Daniel Drucker @danieldrucker.bsky.social · 23/12/2025
Is it analytic that every puzzle has a solution? (Kuhn, SSR: "On the contrary, the really pressing problems, e.g., a cure for cancer or the design of a lasting peace are often not puzzles at all ... Though intrinsic value is no criterion for a puzzle, the assured existence of a solution is.")
590
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Tomer Ullman @tomerullman.bsky.social · 17/12/2025
i teach a seminar on the Imagination, that I split into 5 Acts, e.g. 'Act 1: Imagery, Scene 1: The Imagery Debate'. A nonsense challenge for myself is to find a somewhat-related quote from Shakespeare for the topic, from any play, but it has to be that Act/Scene combo
181
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Philip Eil @phileil.bsky.social · 11/12/2025
Can't say I ever expected to see a "That Font was No Angel" headline. But here we are.
A New York Times headline that reads: "Calibri’s Run-In With Rubio Wasn’t Its First Controversy."
16179631559
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Julian @juliangrove.bsky.social · 02/12/2025
This paper with @aaronstevenwhite.io is finally published! Check it out here: doi.org/10.1007/s110... (Or, if you don't have institutional access, you can download it from lingbuzz: ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/007...)
doi.org
Factivity, presupposition projection, and the role of discrete knowledge in gradient inference judgments - Natural Language Semantics
We investigate whether the factive presuppositions associated with some clause-embedding predicates are fundamentally discrete in nature—as classically assumed—or fundamentally gradient—consistent wit...
0164
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
G. Willow Wilson @gwillow.me · 29/11/2025
The death of browsing is part of the reason art is the way it is now. Our opinions are largely fed to us by algorithms. Spending a spare 15 minutes wandering around a bookstore or comic shop or video rental place was how you found stuff you wouldn't ordinarily pick up and thereby expanded your taste
18982322331
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Fintan Mallory @fintanmallory.com · 20/11/2025
And Putnam's paper comparing Rorty and Quine has one of my favourite titles.
A Comparison of Something with
Something Else
Hilary Putnam
The idea of comparing the views of Willard Van Quine and Richard Rorty may seem a trifle bizarre, not to say dotty, but
I have a justification (I think). First of all, the present paper was written for a conference at which we were invited to compare
issues in literary theory and issues in the philosophy of science (or at least that is how I construed the title of the conference and the announcement that we would "discuss such questions as ... ," followed by the formidable list of questions that we all received). Now, I don't want to plead complete innocence with respect to literary theory, but I have to admit that this idea made my blood run cold. On the other hand, there are points at which the ideas of Richard Rorty and the ideas of Van Quine can be compared, and I do think such a comparison can deepen our understanding of both thinkers. Rorty is close to (if by no means identical with) "literary theory," and Quine is certainly a towering figure in "philosophy of science." So I was sort of fulfilling the assignment (as the student says, shamefacedly) by comparing R. R. and W.
1132
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
David Chalmers @davidchalmers.bsky.social · 20/11/2025
a new paper on mind, computation, and identity in large language models. with inspiration from raymond carver (title) and severance (thought experiments). i'll be talking about this on saturday at the eleos AI conference on AI consciousness and welfare in berkeley. philpapers.org/rec/CHAWWT-8
philpapers.org
David J. Chalmers, What we talk to when we talk to language models - PhilPapers
When we talk to large language models, who or what is our interlocutor? First, I address some issues about how best to characterize the interlocutor in terms of mental states. Second, ...
6428
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Brendan Nyhan @brendannyhan.bsky.social · 19/11/2025
Put writing high quality literary text on the list of things that AIs used to not be able to do but now can do With fine-tuning, now outperforming MFA-trained expert writers at emulating award-winning authors when rated blindly by MFA-trained experts papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
38258
Daniel Drucker @danieldrucker.bsky.social · 26/10/2025
Quick argument against Hamblin's view of questions (a question is a partition of its possible answers). Suppose p possibly answers Q iff in some world w, p is the correct answer to Q. Consider "is 'this sentence isn't true' true?". "Yes": then it's not true. Contradiction.
480
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Eliana Hadjiandreou @elianahadtime.bsky.social · 08/10/2025
Why do we derogate effective altruists, activists, & other radically prosocial individuals? In new work, we discuss how doing good that deviates from social norms gets stigmatized. New preprint w/ @dcameron.bsky.social @tlau.bsky.social @desmond-ong.bsky.social: osf.io/preprints/ps...
13515
Daniel Drucker @danieldrucker.bsky.social · 03/10/2025
Why did PPR ruin its layout so badly?? philpapers.org/go.pl?aid=RO... (the paper looks interesting, no shade to the paper)
philpapers.org
7121
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Carlos Muñoz Pérez @cmunozperez.bsky.social · 02/10/2025
SALT 36 will be held at my alma mater, the University of Buenos Aires, on July 29-31 2026. This will be the first time the conference takes place in South America. Abstract deadline: Dec 15, 2025 Link: saltconf.github.io/salt36/
0226
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
BeijingPalmer @beijingpalmer.bsky.social · 29/09/2025
This is my regular reminder to everyone that jstor is open to the general public now; a free account there will give you access to 100 papers a year.
8333811201
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Kathleen Bachynski @bachynski.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
This is huge: “A drug that provides near-perfect protection against H.I.V. with shots just twice a year will be made available at $40 per patient annually in low- and middle-income countries, offering new hope… making lenacapavir a realistic choice in countries with constrained resources.”
nytimes.com
Philanthropies Strike a Promising Deal to Turn Back H.I.V.
441071277
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Kyle Mahowald @kmahowald.bsky.social · 15/09/2025
📣@futrell.bsky.social and I have a BBS target article with an optimistic take on LLMs + linguistics. Commentary proposals (just need a few hundred words) are OPEN until Oct 8. If we are too optimistic for you (or not optimistic enough!) or you have anything to say: www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
cambridge.org
How Linguistics Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Language Models
How Linguistics Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Language Models
45110
Daniel Drucker @danieldrucker.bsky.social · 10/09/2025
What's been the most philosophically substantive and interesting change of mind that someone has had recently? (As with, say, Russell or Putnam.) Do any come to people's minds? I realized it was very hard for me to think of major cases, but that could be my own limitation.
440
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Matthew Kirschenbaum @mkirschenbaum.bsky.social · 01/09/2025
70 years ago yesterday, they applied for summer money.
Typescript cover page to A PROPOSAL FOR THE
DARTMOUTH SUMMER RESEARCH PROJECT
ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEFirst typescript page of A PROPOSAL FOR THE
DARTMOUTH SUMMER RESEARCH PROJECT
ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. First paragraph reads:
“We propose that a 2 month, 10 man study of artificial intelligence be
carried out during the summer of 1956 at Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire. The study is to proceed on the basis of the conjecture that every aspect of learning or any other foature of intelligence can in principle be no precisely described that a machine can be made to simulate it. An attempt will be made to find how to make machines use language, form abstractions and concepts, solve kinds of problems now reserved for humans, and improve themselves. We think that a significant advance can be made in one or more of these problems if a carefully selected group of scientists work on it together for a summer.”
55612
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
noam @noamchompers.bsky.social · 22/07/2025
where do they FIND these people?!
411115
Daniel Drucker @danieldrucker.bsky.social · 17/07/2025
Is there any work on conditionals like '[Larry David is making a new show with the Obamas.] If Susie Essman is involved, hooray!'? It seems really hard to make sense of it on most of the approaches to conditionals/expressives that I'm aware of, but I'm curious if people know stuff or have thoughts.
662
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Kevin Zollman @kevinzollman.com · 17/07/2025
I did the thing you are never supposed to do. I wrote a (rough draft of a) textbook: Theories of Rational Decision It's technical, but from a philosophical perspective. It focuses on the normative theory but touches on some behavioral issues as well. raw.githubusercontent.com/kzollman/Rat...
raw.githubusercontent.com
912523
Daniel Drucker @danieldrucker.bsky.social · 30/06/2025
Why isn't there a common distinction between "act" and "rule" decision theories in the way that there is between act and rule varieties of consequentialism? Aspects of the distinction might be simulated in other ways (resolute choice etc?), but I suspect they don't touch the core of the distinction.
160
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Franz Berto @franzberto.bsky.social · 30/06/2025
Spread the word! The Philosophical Quarterly is celebrating the philosopher philosophers love: 'Themes from David Lewis's Metaphysics' will be our next Special Issue, call for papers here: academic.oup.com/pq/pages/cal... @oupphilosophy.bsky.social @standrewsphil.bsky.social
02615
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Dmitri Gallow @dmitrigallow.bsky.social · 14/06/2025
Last semester, I taught a graduate seminar on Bayesian epistemology. Here are my lecture notes: jdmitrigallow.com/teaching/epist25/aitbe.pdf
jdmitrigallow.com
0102
Daniel Drucker @danieldrucker.bsky.social · 23/06/2025
My paper just came out in PPR today, here: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/.... It's about interesting relationships that our attitudes bear to the world. I argue that belief is very different from other attitudes, and this difference follows from its relationship to the truth of token contents.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Some attitudes we usually do not have
I present a new attitude puzzle involving disjunction. Specifically, though it can sound strange to ascribe the belief that ϕ$\phi$ or ψ$\psi$ when ⌜ϕ⌝$\ulcorner \phi \urcorner$ and ⌜ψ⌝$\ulcorner \ps...
2389
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Kieran Setiya @ksetiya.bsky.social · 10/06/2025
I wrote about the social history of analytic philosophy @lareviewofbooks.bsky.social lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-...
lareviewofbooks.org
The Politics of Apoliticism | Los Angeles Review of Books
Kieran Setiya reviews Christoph Schuringa’s “A Social History of Analytic Philosophy.”
55321
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Fr. Robert Ballecer, SJ @padresj.bsky.social · 19/05/2025
Corgis have an extremely low center of gravity and the density of a dead star. PERFECT for skateboarding! 😇
217119193376
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
NBC News @nbcnews.com · 16/04/2025
A 2-year-old boy who spent the night alone in the remote Arizona wilderness and walked 7 miles through mountain lion territory was led to safety by a rancher's dog, authorities say.
1412323371
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
annamariaaeder.bsky.social @annamariaaeder.bsky.social · 24/03/2025
🥁🎉It's time again! My colleague Thomas Grundmann is organising the Cologne Summer School in Philosophy. This year's star is @aworsnip.bsky.social (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). 🎊📢 You can find more information on the following website: cssip.uni-koeln.de Spread the word and repost!
0134
Reposted by Daniel Drucker
Kyle Mahowald @kmahowald.bsky.social · 12/03/2025
If I ask model A “is this sentence grammatical” and it says yes, does that mean model A is more likely to produce that sentence than model B? Check out our new paper on whether models introspect about knowledge of language.
1121