Sign in

David Crotty

@dacrotty.bsky.social
1.5K followers 254 following 897 posts

Executive Director, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Head Chef at The Scholarly Kitchen. Ex-Publishing Consultant, Ex-Editor-in-Chief, Ex-Scientist, Ex-etc. All opinions my own.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by David Crotty
Siobhan @siobhanh.bsky.social · 12h
I should probably turn this into a LinkedIn post when I have a little more brainpower, but here we go. Some quick thoughts/speculation on the announced Taylor & Francis-Informa split alongside the £2.24bn Clarion Events deal, after a quick browse of the numbers and reports 🧵
166
Reposted by David Crotty
Butlerian Jihadist of House Dornick @shimminykricket.blacksky.app · 20h
Harvard just dropped a study AI productivity in software engineering and it found the average increase in productivity from using Claude code is.....zero and for exactly the reasons you'd think fion.ac/jellyfish.pdf
8955922207
Reposted by David Crotty
Richard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 20h
“This guy’s cursing me up. I better reconsider my decision”, said no editor ever…
2226
Reposted by David Crotty
Richard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 19h
Other strategies not recommended: citing work by Galileo, Prusiner or Watson & Crick as comparable scenarios.
371
Reposted by David Crotty
Richard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 19h
And finally any version of “Do you know who I am?”. Really no answer to that benefits you in the face of a rejection, and worst-case scenario the retort will be “yeah and you’re lucky we didn’t factor that in to the decision”. 🤣
2162
Reposted by David Crotty
Matt Binder @mattbinder.bsky.social · 07/10/2026
the tech industry is about to invent books
Andrew Yeung 
@andruyeung
X.com
We created gyms because modern day work no
longer required physical activity. Without exercise,
our muscles atrophy.
I predict we'll need gyms for our brains too, once Al
starts doing our knowledge work.
10:53 PM • 10/4/26 • 1.3M Views
572214184173
Reposted by David Crotty
Sharesify @sharesifysocial.bsky.social · 06/10/2026
Informa in strategic shift with Clarion deal and review of academic business: Group doubles down on the live events market with the £2.2 billion purchase of Clarion and the separation of Taylor & Francis. #INF #B2B #liveevents #UKstocks #investing sharesify.com/informa-in-s...
sharesify.com
Informa in strategic shift with Clarion deal and review of academic business
Informa announces a strategic shift with the Clarion deal, focusing on B2B growth and reviewing its academic business.
012
Reposted by David Crotty
southpaw @nycsouthpaw.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
A nonfiction book written in, let’s say, the year 1795, is most likely still around in a library somewhere and every other work it referred to is probably accessible in some archive as well. A nonfiction book written in 2007 probably cites a bunch of urls that are dead or rotted beyond recognition.
14677101
David Crotty @dacrotty.bsky.social · 06/10/2026
Informa buys Clarion; spins off Taylor & Francis www.investing.com/news/stock-m...
investing.com
Informa to buy Clarion for £2.24 bln, plans to separate Taylor & Francis business By Investing.com
Informa to buy Clarion for £2.24 bln, plans to separate Taylor & Francis business
001
Reposted by David Crotty
Richard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
arXiv rate limiting submissions in face of AI deluge blog.arxiv.org/2026/10/01/u...
blog.arxiv.org
Fair Moderation, Equitable Access, and AI: arXiv’s Updated Rate Limit Policy
arXiv, and the scientific community at large, are facing a watershed moment. Scholarly publishing is currently changing at a rapid pace, and we are seeing a…
22616
Reposted by David Crotty
John Scalzi @scalzi.com · 02/10/2026
The rush to accuse, without anything approaching due diligence, artists of using "AI," should be treated with contempt. An artist gets their work *ripped off* to train a plagiarism machine, which then shits out inferior versions of that work, so then you accuse the artist of using "AI"? Fuck you.
251527409
Reposted by David Crotty
Alejandro Montenegro @aemonten.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
A new issue of CSH Protocols is out! @cshlpress.bsky.social The cover image highlights the work by Zimina et al., who summarize various approaches for examining meiosis & meiotic recombination in maize, & introduce a set of accompanying protocols to study meiosis in this species🌽 ⬇️Links below
196
Reposted by David Crotty
Jennifer Ouellette @jenlucpiquant.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Tiny image sparks big backlash in Nikon photo contest. Dr Ning Xu denies he broke the rules of Nikon's annual Small World In Motion contest. www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
bbc.co.uk
Tiny image sparks big backlash in Nikon photo contest
Dr Ning Xu denies he broke the rules of Nikon's annual Small World In Motion contest.
164
Reposted by David Crotty
Damon K @dadadrummer.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
I thought this weirdness about copyright needed to be pointed out dadadrummer.substack.com/p/rough-music
dadadrummer.substack.com
Rough Music
Chalking the line between music that uses machine learning, and GenAI
0105
Reposted by David Crotty
Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe @lisalibrarian.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
They do. But they also say authors should submit their own work, declare funding and COIs, etc. So, you know. 🤷🏼‍♀️ As long as we look to journals to catch bad behavior rather than the field to deal with it (shame, censure, expulsion, etc), well, 🤷🏼‍♀️.
022
Reposted by David Crotty
Carl Zimmer @carlzimmer.com · 27/09/2026
Four days ago, a scientist was surprised by the news that Anthropic discovered new virus genes for making DNA. He says he’s been studying them for years—and feeding his data to Anthropic’s AI as part of his own research. Coincidence? Here’s my story. nyti.ms/3VSWayc
nyti.ms
Did Anthropic’s A.I. Really Make a Scientific Discovery on Its Own? (Gift Article)
An expert at the University of Copenhagen said his team had been sharing its research with the company’s A.I. model, Claude, and that its new finding matched their work.
882123874
Reposted by David Crotty
Josh Marshall @joshtpm.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
These sound like non-trivial problems.
61940224
Reposted by David Crotty
Chris Lintott @chrislintott.bsky.social · 27/09/2026
On similar lines, if we’re not careful: A. Scientific journals will only accept submissions from established researchers working within institutions. B. Data we’ve spent ages making open will be hidden to avoid the expense of continued download by bots.
1018039
Reposted by David Crotty
McSweeney's @mcsweeneys.net · 27/09/2026
"I don’t know about you, but I can’t wait to get my hands on some fucking gourds and arrange them in a horn-shaped basket on my dining room table. That shit is going to look so seasonal." buff.ly/pykYN6f
buff.ly
It’s Decorative Gourd Season, Motherfuckers
For the seventeenth year: Welcome to autumn, fuckheads.
012136
David Crotty @dacrotty.bsky.social · 27/09/2026
On craft, AI, and what gets lost when we skip the slow part (gift link) www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
nytimes.com
Opinion | A.I. Shortcuts Are Ruining How We Think (Gift Article)
Anything worth remembering came from a person who did not know where she or he was going until arriving.
010
Reposted by David Crotty
Alejandro Montenegro @aemonten.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
I'm shocked, SHOCKED! www.nature.com/articles/d41...
nature.com
Hundreds of ‘free’ academic journals have started charging fees
A study tracking diamond open-access journals has found an increase in titles switching to other publishing models — especially over the past few years.
194
David Crotty @dacrotty.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
And Michael Clarke's classic 2010 piece on why scholarly publishing hasn't been disrupted (at least yet, which still seems to be holding) scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/01/04/w...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Why Hasn't Scientific Publishing Been Disrupted Already? - The Scholarly Kitchen
Despite predictions and analyses to the contrary, STM publishing hasn't been disrupted yet. Perhaps there's more here than meets the eye . . .
001
David Crotty @dacrotty.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
Speculations on the forthcoming AI deluge of true but inconsequential articles here: giorgio.gilest.ro/the-weimar-o...
giorgio.gilest.ro
The Weimar of knowledge – la bottega
100
David Crotty @dacrotty.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
For those who attended Silverchair's #strategies26, the articles I mentioned during the panel I was on are as follows: AI and reading and Foxes and Hedgehogs here: scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/23/a...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
AI and Scholarly Reading: Foxes versus Hedgehogs - The Scholarly Kitchen
Some readers are foxes, and some are hedgehogs. What kind of reader is AI, and how will that impact both the practice of science and the business of journal publishing?
131
Reposted by David Crotty
Leah McElrath @leahmcelrath.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
AP Stylebook warns against anthropomorphizing AI systems: “Avoid language that gives them human characteristics… Instead, explain what a system does, how well it performs, who built it and who could be affected by it.”
APStylebook @APStylebook
X.com
Artificial intelligence systems do not think, feel, want or understand. Avoid language that gives them human characteristics. This is called anthropomorphizing, when we ascribe human traits, emotions or behaviors to non-human things, such as animals or inanimate objects.
Instead, explain what a system does, how well it performs, who built it and who could be affected by it.
1970182260
Reposted by David Crotty
Richard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
"one can’t help but think there’s perhaps an unsubtle critique of the academic career and funding system inherent in a prolific researcher publicly stating that their own publications are both too abundant and not worth reading even for their own students" scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/23/a...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
AI and Scholarly Reading: Foxes versus Hedgehogs - The Scholarly Kitchen
Some readers are foxes, and some are hedgehogs. What kind of reader is AI, and how will that impact both the practice of science and the business of journal publishing?
0146
Reposted by David Crotty
aj-boston.neocities.org @aj-boston.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
"The author would like it to be made clear that this is not an AI-generated image, rather it is a poorly photoshopped collage of separate stock photos." Hell yeah, brother.
142
David Crotty @dacrotty.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
No need for slop. I can make crappy images all on my own, thank you.
020
Reposted by David Crotty
Society for Scholarly Publishing @scholarlypub.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
AI and Scholarly Reading: Foxes versus Hedgehogs - The Scholarly Kitchen
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
AI and Scholarly Reading: Foxes versus Hedgehogs - The Scholarly Kitchen
Some readers are foxes, and some are hedgehogs. What kind of reader is AI, and how will that impact both the practice of science and the business of journal publishing?
022
Reposted by David Crotty
Sabina Pagotto @spagotto.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
A little bit about reading, a lot about how in scholarship the process should be as important as the output. Unfortunately, we were already in a world where output was king way before the AI wave came along and exacerbated all these problems. (500 papers not worth reading!!)
022
David Crotty @dacrotty.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
New from me today @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social -- some thoughts on scholarly reading, and what happens if we outsource our information gathering and learning to AI. Also, foxes and hedgehogs. scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/23/a...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
AI and Scholarly Reading: Foxes versus Hedgehogs - The Scholarly Kitchen
Some readers are foxes, and some are hedgehogs. What kind of reader is AI, and how will that impact both the practice of science and the business of journal publishing?
121
Reposted by David Crotty
Sarah Andersen @sarahseeandersen.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
The image is of a four panel comic.
In the first panel we see Sarah, the protagonist, next to a stick figure labeled “AI”. The stick figure says, “my outputs look just like yours now.”
The second panel zooms in on Sarah’s face. Above her we see text reading “I think”.
The third panel zooms in closer on Sarah’s face. Text above her reads “you missed”.
The fourth panel shows Sarah drawing happily in a sunlit room. The text above her reads “the point”.
64185054557
Reposted by David Crotty
Drew Magary @drewmagary.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
“Like everything else online, cooking-recipe searches have been rendered unreliable thanks to SEO-gaming, AI fuckery, and all other manner of digital nonsense.” defector.com/i-fought-a-p...
defector.com
I Fought A Pie And I Won | Defector
Sometimes a recipe leads you astray. It happens to the best of us, myself included. Sometimes a bad recipe will leave you with no recourse. You simply have to accept that you wasted all of your time a...
0555
Reposted by David Crotty
@LaBonneLaB @labonnelab.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
Another assault on science. It is relentless... www.nytimes.com/2026/09/20/s...
nytimes.com
White House Moves to Take Control of N.I.H. Grants (Gift Article)
Federal officials are drafting an executive order that would place grants under review by an outside panel, the latest effort to redirect billions of dollars in research spending.
043
Reposted by David Crotty
Richard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
"All corners of academia will soon be flooded with AI-generated research....Maths and CS go first because their entire output is symbol manipulation...Biology comes later not because biologists are cleverer but because the rate-limiting step is physical" giorgio.gilest.ro/the-weimar-o...
giorgio.gilest.ro
The Weimar of knowledge – la bottega
56641
Reposted by David Crotty
Hetan Shah @hetanshah.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
AI is screwing up journal papers: Journal editor asks authors of 10 submitted papers to meet and discuss their paper. Of the 7 that showed up, 3 were unable to answer basic questions about the paper and 3 had difficulty when asked further questions on technical details… medium.com/@TmlrOrg/ask...
medium.com
Asking Authors About Their Own Papers
By Nihar B. Shah
1315785
Reposted by David Crotty
Genes & Development @genesdev.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
We are saddened by the loss of G&D's long-time Editor, Terri Grodzicker. When Terri stepped down as Editor in 2022, friends and colleagues wrote about her contributions to the research community. We are re-visiting these pieces, and thinking of her. ➡️ genesdev.cshlp.org/content/37/1-2.t…
066
Reposted by David Crotty
#BruceSterling @bruces.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
*Before we get all purist about it, how much of "human" DNA is viralized junk-DNA that isn't even people. Quite a lot of, eight percent, maybe even 40 percent *What if I haul out my 40 percent and replace it with USDA-grade rat or fruit-fly, would I be better off www.cshl.edu/the-non-huma...
cshl.edu
The non-human living inside of you | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
« Previous Story Next Story » Half of your genome started out as an infection; if left unchecked, some parts of it can turn deadly all over again. The human genome contains billions of pieces of infor...
116919
Reposted by David Crotty
Jennifer Regala @jenniferaregala.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
The #sspND2026 meeting never disappoints 💕✨
021
Reposted by David Crotty
Richard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
fascinating. Seems premised on the idea that all papers have code and usable data though. That may come to pass but certainly isn't true now. most do not have code, and outside genomics, etc. the data landscape is highly fragmented, many wet labs still wedded to paper notebooks, etc.
1203
Reposted by David Crotty
Leah @leah.myatproto.social · 17/09/2026
nope, nope, no, no and absolutely not
48025
Reposted by David Crotty
jamelle @jamellebouie.net · 16/09/2026
"I wrote the piece and Claude found the links relevant to my claims" is, even without the AI, such an admission of poor thinking and argumentation. your claims should emerge from the evidence!
793122379
Reposted by David Crotty
Richard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
After Terri stepped down as G&D Editor, friends and former colleagues contributed a series of wonderful essays about her for a special issue. I encourage anyone who'd like to know more about her to read them 3/n genesdev.cshlp.org/content/37/1...
genesdev.cshlp.org
Table of Contents — January 1, 2023, 37 (1-2)
A biweekly scientific journal publishing high-quality research in molecular biology and genetics, cancer biology, biochemistry, and related fields
061
Reposted by David Crotty
Richard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
Deeply saddened to learn of the death of my colleague Terri Grodzicker. She was an amazing molecular biologist who did fundamental work on adenovirus. Many will know her as the charismatic long-time editor of Genes & Development and organizer of CSHL meetings 1/2 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terri_G...
en.wikipedia.org
Terri Grodzicker - Wikipedia
54415
Reposted by David Crotty
Kevin Gannon (now a Moo Deng fan account) @thetattooedprof.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
The whole thread, but especially this 👇. Teaching is not simply content delivery, and almost none of the "let's put AI in education" discourse acknowledges that fundamental reality. Probably because it's emanating from everyone except actual teachers.
48921
Reposted by David Crotty
@LaBonneLaB @labonnelab.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Some Rare good news: Judge postpones the DHS rule . restricting international students to 4 years the day before it would have taken effect. International students add so much to our scholarship and economy. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com
Memorandum & Order – #50 in Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration v. United States Department of Homeland Security (D. Mass., 1:26-cv-13799) – CourtListener.com
District Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Plaintiffs' motion for APA § 705 relief, a preliminary injunction, or, in the alternative, summary judgm...
052
Reposted by David Crotty
Laura Helmuth @laurahelmuth.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
FOIAed records show the DOJ accused prominent journals of being “partisans in various scientific debates” & demanded explanations of their editorial processes. www.aip.org/fyi/doj-offi... by @danvergano.bsky.social
aip.org
DOJ Official Queried a Dozen Journals on 'Partisan' Views in 2025
The Justice Department fulfilled the public records request for the letters just as their author departed the agency.
73824
David Crotty @dacrotty.bsky.social · 27/08/2026
From 2017: scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/05/24/r...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Reproducible Research, Just Not Reproducible By You - The Scholarly Kitchen
What happens when an experiment is correct, but it's really hard to replicate? Are there research results that are accurate but not reproducible?
100
Reposted by David Crotty
Alejandro Montenegro @aemonten.bsky.social · 27/08/2026
And not only "magic hands": this also highlights the importance of proper documentation and carefully prepared protocols. We are glad to contribute to this via CSH Protocols.
1102
Reposted by David Crotty
Richard Van Noorden @richvn.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
Everyone's talking about Pangram and other AI-detection software like GPTZero. They promise impressive accuracy at spotting AI-written text. Science journals are starting to use them. How good are they? @miryamnaddaf.bsky.social and I take a look for @nature.com 🧵 www.nature.com/articles/d41...
nature.com
AI-detection tools have made huge leaps forward — how good are they?
Scientists and publishers are testing a new breed of software that promises impressive accuracy at spotting AI-written text.
12615