Sign in

The Scholarly Kitchen

@scholarlykitchen.bsky.social
4.1K followers 19 following 803 posts

What's hot and cooking in Scholarly Communications. Blog from the Society for Scholarly Publishing -- account run by Editor David Crotty

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Society for Scholarly Publishing @scholarlypub.bsky.social · 10h
Guest Post — Medical and Health Data Sharing Policies Need Specific Guidance: New STM Recommendations Aim to Help - The Scholarly Kitchen
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Guest Post — Medical and Health Data Sharing Policies Need Specific Guidance: New STM Recommendations Aim to Help - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's post summarizes STM's data-sharing guidance for medical and health science publishers, where privacy, regulation, and ethics make generic policy language especially hard to apply.
012
The Scholarly Kitchen @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social · 11h
Guest Post — Medical and Health Data Sharing Policies Need Specific Guidance: New STM Recommendations Aim to Help scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/30/g...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Guest Post — Medical and Health Data Sharing Policies Need Specific Guidance: New STM Recommendations Aim to Help - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's post summarizes STM's data-sharing guidance for medical and health science publishers, where privacy, regulation, and ethics make generic policy language especially hard to apply.
000
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Society for Scholarly Publishing @scholarlypub.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
Are libraries prepared for the second digital transformation of distinctive collections?
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Are libraries prepared for the second digital transformation of distinctive collections?
Academic and research libraries, as well as public libraries, historical societies, and other organizations, hold extensive collections of rare and unique materials, such as archival and manuscript collections. These materials form an essential part of humanity’s cultural and historical record, and they are the vital source material for many humanistic fields. I believe that a second digital transformation is at hand for distinctive collections. How can library leaders establish a strategy for their distinctive collections that is fit for purpose today?
032
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Karin Wulf @kawulf.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
As ever on point @rschon.bsky.social! Reading abt next steps for rare materials digitization +access I'm feeling *so* good abt @jcblibrary.bsky.social's work. nb when I call cataloging ->digitzation workflow* my main achievment & they think I'm kidding. scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/29/a...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Are libraries prepared for the second digital transformation of distinctive collections?
Academic and research libraries, as well as public libraries, historical societies, and other organizations, hold extensive collections of rare and unique materials, such as archival and manuscript co...
2116
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Mitja Alexander Linss @sciencemkt.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
Attribution is often considered the holy grail of marketing. But what does that mean for publishing? Read more in a guest post I co-authored for The @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social. Six ways to close the Attribution Loop in Publishing.
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Guest Post — Six Ways to Close the Attribution Loop in Publishing  - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's guest bloggers present a 6-part model for explaining spikes in manuscript submissions and better informing future publishing strategies.
001
The Scholarly Kitchen @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
Are Libraries Prepared for the Second Digital Transformation of Distinctive Collections? scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/29/a...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Are libraries prepared for the second digital transformation of distinctive collections?
Academic and research libraries, as well as public libraries, historical societies, and other organizations, hold extensive collections of rare and unique materials, such as archival and manuscript collections. These materials form an essential part of humanity’s cultural and historical record, and they are the vital source material for many humanistic fields. I believe that a second digital transformation is at hand for distinctive collections. How can library leaders establish a strategy for their distinctive collections that is fit for purpose today?
012
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Society for Scholarly Publishing @scholarlypub.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
Mental Health Monday’s: What We Haven’t Talked About - The Scholarly Kitchen
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Mental Health Monday’s: What We Haven’t Talked About - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's post shares a personal reflection on the importance of Suicide Prevention Month and how our community can best support colleagues who may need support.
012
The Scholarly Kitchen @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
Mental Health Monday’s: What We Haven’t Talked About scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/28/m...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Mental Health Monday’s: What We Haven’t Talked About - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's post shares a personal reflection on the importance of Suicide Prevention Month and how our community can best support colleagues who may need support.
022
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Publish-Review-Curate (PRC) Alliance @prcalliance.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
"PRC makes the full process of scientific dispute visible: instead of concealing deliberation behind editorial decisions, it exposes disagreement, revision, and assessment as integral parts of scientific discovery."
032
The Scholarly Kitchen @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Guest Post — Integrity First: Inside Ukraine’s Publishing Reforms scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/25/g...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Guest Post — Integrity First: Inside Ukraine's Publishing Reforms - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today, we feature an interview with Tetiana Yaroshenko, Deputy Director for Research and International Affairs at the State Scientific and Technical Library of Ukraine, and Denys Kurbatov, Deputy Mini...
011
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Society for Scholarly Publishing @scholarlypub.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
Guest Post — Six Ways to Close the Attribution Loop in Publishing - The Scholarly Kitchen
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Guest Post — Six Ways to Close the Attribution Loop in Publishing  - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's guest bloggers present a 6-part model for explaining spikes in manuscript submissions and better informing future publishing strategies.
112
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
David Crotty @dacrotty.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
And Michael Clarke's classic 2010 piece on why scholarly publishing hasn't been disrupted (at least yet, which still seems to be holding) scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/01/04/w...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Why Hasn't Scientific Publishing Been Disrupted Already? - The Scholarly Kitchen
Despite predictions and analyses to the contrary, STM publishing hasn't been disrupted yet. Perhaps there's more here than meets the eye . . .
001
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
David Crotty @dacrotty.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
For those who attended Silverchair's #strategies26, the articles I mentioned during the panel I was on are as follows: AI and reading and Foxes and Hedgehogs here: scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/23/a...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
AI and Scholarly Reading: Foxes versus Hedgehogs - The Scholarly Kitchen
Some readers are foxes, and some are hedgehogs. What kind of reader is AI, and how will that impact both the practice of science and the business of journal publishing?
131
The Scholarly Kitchen @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
Guest Post — Six Ways to Close the Attribution Loop in Publishing scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/24/g...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Guest Post — Six Ways to Close the Attribution Loop in Publishing  - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's guest bloggers present a 6-part model for explaining spikes in manuscript submissions and better informing future publishing strategies.
043
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Richard Sever @richardsever.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
"one can’t help but think there’s perhaps an unsubtle critique of the academic career and funding system inherent in a prolific researcher publicly stating that their own publications are both too abundant and not worth reading even for their own students" scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/23/a...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
AI and Scholarly Reading: Foxes versus Hedgehogs - The Scholarly Kitchen
Some readers are foxes, and some are hedgehogs. What kind of reader is AI, and how will that impact both the practice of science and the business of journal publishing?
0146
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
aj-boston.neocities.org @aj-boston.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
"The author would like it to be made clear that this is not an AI-generated image, rather it is a poorly photoshopped collage of separate stock photos." Hell yeah, brother.
142
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Society for Scholarly Publishing @scholarlypub.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
AI and Scholarly Reading: Foxes versus Hedgehogs - The Scholarly Kitchen
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
AI and Scholarly Reading: Foxes versus Hedgehogs - The Scholarly Kitchen
Some readers are foxes, and some are hedgehogs. What kind of reader is AI, and how will that impact both the practice of science and the business of journal publishing?
012
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Sabina Pagotto @spagotto.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
A little bit about reading, a lot about how in scholarship the process should be as important as the output. Unfortunately, we were already in a world where output was king way before the AI wave came along and exacerbated all these problems. (500 papers not worth reading!!)
022
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
David Crotty @dacrotty.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
New from me today @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social -- some thoughts on scholarly reading, and what happens if we outsource our information gathering and learning to AI. Also, foxes and hedgehogs. scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/23/a...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
AI and Scholarly Reading: Foxes versus Hedgehogs - The Scholarly Kitchen
Some readers are foxes, and some are hedgehogs. What kind of reader is AI, and how will that impact both the practice of science and the business of journal publishing?
111
The Scholarly Kitchen @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
AI and Scholarly Reading: Foxes versus Hedgehogs scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/23/a...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
AI and Scholarly Reading: Foxes versus Hedgehogs - The Scholarly Kitchen
Some readers are foxes, and some are hedgehogs. What kind of reader is AI, and how will that impact both the practice of science and the business of journal publishing?
020
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Aries Systems @ariessystems.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
Check out @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social interview with Aries’ Jennifer Fleet and ChronosHub Christian Grubak! Together they explore how author expectations are evolving and introduce the EM Enhanced Researcher Experience™ powered by @chronoshub.bsky.social as a more modern solution: bit.ly/4xDEzIu
001
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Society for Scholarly Publishing @scholarlypub.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
Damned if You Do, Damned if You Don’t: Multilingual Researchers’ Use of AI in Academic Writing - The Scholarly Kitchen
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Damned if You Do, Damned if You Don’t: Multilingual Researchers’ Use of AI in Academic Writing - The Scholarly Kitchen
Generative AI has made language tools ubiquitous, but it introduces risks of homogenized texts and semantic slippage.
001
The Scholarly Kitchen @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social · 22/09/2026
Damned if You Do, Damned if You Don’t: Multilingual Researchers’ Use of AI in Academic Writing scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/22/d...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Damned if You Do, Damned if You Don’t: Multilingual Researchers’ Use of AI in Academic Writing - The Scholarly Kitchen
Generative AI has made language tools ubiquitous, but it introduces risks of homogenized texts and semantic slippage.
031
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Society for Scholarly Publishing @scholarlypub.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
Mental Health Awareness Mondays — Maternal Mental Health: It’s More than Postpartum Depression - The Scholarly Kitchen
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Mental Health Awareness Mondays — Maternal Mental Health: It’s More than Postpartum Depression - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today’s post takes us through the history of maternal mental health and explores the complex systems and pressures that shape the experiences of many mothers.
002
The Scholarly Kitchen @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
Mental Health Awareness Mondays — Maternal Mental Health: It’s More than Postpartum Depression scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/21/m...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Mental Health Awareness Mondays — Maternal Mental Health: It’s More than Postpartum Depression - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today’s post takes us through the history of maternal mental health and explores the complex systems and pressures that shape the experiences of many mothers.
011
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Peer Review Congress #PRC11 Coming 2029! @peerreviewcongress.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
Science progresses not only by confirming what we already know, but by recognizing what we have not yet learned to expect. #PeerReview should be designed to protect that possibility @peerreviewweek.bsky.social @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social
011
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Society for Scholarly Publishing @scholarlypub.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
Guest Post — Does Peer Review Favor Familiarity Over Innovation? - The Scholarly Kitchen
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Guest Post — Does Peer Review Favor Familiarity Over Innovation? - The Scholarly Kitchen
Closing out Peer Review Week 2026, today's post suggests that research novelty and capacity for innovation should be given greater priority than clarity and comprehensiveness in peer review.
035
The Scholarly Kitchen @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
Guest Post — Does Peer Review Favor Familiarity Over Innovation? scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/18/g...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Guest Post — Does Peer Review Favor Familiarity Over Innovation? - The Scholarly Kitchen
Closing out Peer Review Week 2026, today's post suggests that research novelty and capacity for innovation should be given greater priority than clarity and comprehensiveness in peer review.
000
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Integra @integranxt.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
New on The Scholarly Kitchen: “Rethinking Scholarly Evaluation: Matching Rigor to Purpose.” Ashutosh Ghildiyal, Mathïs Fédérico & Maria Machado explore better ways to evaluate diverse scholarly contributions. Read: scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/17/r... @ashutoshg.bsky.social
012
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Peer Review Congress #PRC11 Coming 2029! @peerreviewcongress.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
#PeerReview should evaluate not if a paper is the final word but what it establishes, what is uncertain, & whether its reasoning & evidence are sound, transparent, & defensible enough to support further examination @ashutoshg.bsky.social @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social @peerreviewweek.bsky.social
053
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Society for Scholarly Publishing @scholarlypub.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
Rethinking Scholarly Evaluation: Matching Rigor to Purpose - The Scholarly Kitchen
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Rethinking Scholarly Evaluation: Matching Rigor to Purpose - The Scholarly Kitchen
What if the systems designed to protect scientific rigor are also making it harder for new ideas to emerge? Do different scholarly contributions deserve unique forms of evaluation?
033
The Scholarly Kitchen @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social · 17/09/2026
Rethinking Scholarly Evaluation: Matching Rigor to Purpose scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/17/r...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Rethinking Scholarly Evaluation: Matching Rigor to Purpose - The Scholarly Kitchen
What if the systems designed to protect scientific rigor are also making it harder for new ideas to emerge? Do different scholarly contributions deserve unique forms of evaluation?
011
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
PREreview @prereview.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
💬 In this interview for @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social, Daniela highlights the community component in #OpenPeerReview infrastructure: the relationships, facilitation, training, and culture that enable people to participate meaningfully & safely. scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/16/k... #PRW2026
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Kitchen Essentials: An Interview with Daniela Saderi of PREreview - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's Peer Review Week post is a Kitchen Essentials interview with Daniela Saderi, Executive Director of PREreview.
011
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Society for Scholarly Publishing @scholarlypub.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
Kitchen Essentials: An Interview with Daniela Saderi of PREreview - The Scholarly Kitchen
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Kitchen Essentials: An Interview with Daniela Saderi of PREreview - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's Peer Review Week post is a Kitchen Essentials interview with Daniela Saderi, Executive Director of PREreview.
023
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
ore-consulting.bsky.social @ore-consulting.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
It's #PeerReviewWeek2026 and, to celebrate, our @alicemeadows.bsky.social interviewed @neurosarda.bsky.social about her work with @prereview.bsky.social in today's @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social - enjoy! scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/16/k...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Kitchen Essentials: An Interview with Daniela Saderi of PREreview - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's Peer Review Week post is a Kitchen Essentials interview with Daniela Saderi, Executive Director of PREreview.
043
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
alicemeadows.bsky.social @alicemeadows.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
Such a pleasure to interview @neurosarda.bsky.social for my latest Kitchen Essentials post in @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social -- what great work they're doing at @prereview.bsky.social 👏👏👏 Happy #PeerReviewWeek2026 everyone!
021
The Scholarly Kitchen @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social · 16/09/2026
Kitchen Essentials: An Interview with Daniela Saderi of PREreview scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/16/k...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Kitchen Essentials: An Interview with Daniela Saderi of PREreview - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's Peer Review Week post is a Kitchen Essentials interview with Daniela Saderi, Executive Director of PREreview.
010
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Silverchair @silverchairnews.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
Peer review is pulled three ways: authors drive volume, editors set pace, reviewers and editors guard quality. Submissions are up ~68% since 2018, desk rejects too. Our VP Hannah Heckner Swain unpacks why in a new Scholarly Kitchen post, via our 2026 Peer Review Report. bit.ly/4jb35MK
bit.ly
Guest Post — Peer Review Triage: Deciding What’s Worth Saving - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's guest post asks what about our current peer review system is worth saving and if we're able to establish one that protects editorial judgment and preserves research integrity.
031
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Peer Review Congress #PRC11 Coming 2029! @peerreviewcongress.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
To ensure we’re protecting the time and service of editors & reviewers, we need a system to ease the tension b/ volume, speed, & quality in a way that protects editorial judgment & preserves research integrity. @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social @silverchairnews.bsky.social @peerreviewweek.bsky.social
012
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Society for Scholarly Publishing @scholarlypub.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
Guest Post — Peer Review Triage: Deciding What’s Worth Saving - The Scholarly Kitchen
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Guest Post — Peer Review Triage: Deciding What’s Worth Saving - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's guest post asks what about our current peer review system is worth saving and if we're able to establish one that protects editorial judgment and preserves research integrity.
033
The Scholarly Kitchen @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
Guest Post — Peer Review Triage: Deciding What’s Worth Saving scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/15/g...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Guest Post — Peer Review Triage: Deciding What’s Worth Saving - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's guest post asks what about our current peer review system is worth saving and if we're able to establish one that protects editorial judgment and preserves research integrity.
021
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
alicemeadows.bsky.social @alicemeadows.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Kicking off #PeerRevWeek26 on @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social w/ some thoughts from @rickanderson.bsky.social @Ashutosh Ghildiyal, Hong Zhou, @9thprime.bsky.social @irfanullah.bsky.social Stephanie Lovegrove Hansen @roohighosh.bsky.social & me. Enjoy! scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/14/a...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Ask the Chefs: Peer Review Capacity — Uncomfortable Truths and Overlooked Conversations - The Scholarly Kitchen
For Peer Review Week 2026, we asked the Chefs two questions: What is one uncomfortable truth about peer review that the scholarly publishing community doesn’t talk about enough? And, beyond recruiting...
002
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Peer Review Congress #PRC11 Coming 2029! @peerreviewcongress.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Per @alicemeadows.bsky.social: We don’t talk enough about the ethos of #PeerReview, why it’s a critical part of being a scholar/scientist — conversations about capacity likewise overlook its impact. importance as a form of community service @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social @peerreviewweek.bsky.social
051
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Society for Scholarly Publishing @scholarlypub.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Ask the Chefs: Peer Review Capacity — Uncomfortable Truths and Overlooked Conversations - The Scholarly Kitchen
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Ask the Chefs: Peer Review Capacity — Uncomfortable Truths and Overlooked Conversations - The Scholarly Kitchen
For Peer Review Week 2026, we asked the Chefs two questions: What is one uncomfortable truth about peer review that the scholarly publishing community doesn’t talk about enough? And, beyond recruiting more reviewers, what conversation about peer review capacity are we overlooking?
032
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Ben Williamson @benpatrickwill.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
"Reviewing is cognitive labor. If we continue expecting largely invisible cognitive labor from unpaid reviewers while AI makes it easy to generate polished review reports for free, we should not be surprised if reviewers increasingly delegate that cognitive labor to these systems."
064
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Asheesh Kapur Siddique @asheeshks.org · 14/09/2026
“The uncomfortable truth of peer review is that it is fundamentally a hard job and something that is surprisingly undervalued by the community that relies so deeply upon it.“
293
The Scholarly Kitchen @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social · 14/09/2026
Ask the Chefs: Peer Review Capacity — Uncomfortable Truths and Overlooked Conversations scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/14/a...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Ask the Chefs: Peer Review Capacity — Uncomfortable Truths and Overlooked Conversations - The Scholarly Kitchen
For Peer Review Week 2026, we asked the Chefs two questions: What is one uncomfortable truth about peer review that the scholarly publishing community doesn’t talk about enough? And, beyond recruiting...
074
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
Society for Scholarly Publishing @scholarlypub.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
Guest Post — A Groupthink We Don't Talk Much About - The Scholarly Kitchen
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Guest Post — A Groupthink We Don't Talk Much About - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's guest post challenges our community to face tendencies toward groupthink and address the incentive structures that resist adaptation and innovation.
001
The Scholarly Kitchen @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
Guest Post — A Groupthink We Don’t Talk Much About scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/11/g...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Guest Post — A Groupthink We Don't Talk Much About - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's guest post challenges our community to face tendencies toward groupthink and address the incentive structures that resist adaptation and innovation.
022
Reposted by The Scholarly Kitchen
NISO @nisoinfo.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
In today's @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social, @9thprime.bsky.social Roy Kaufman, @rickanderson.bsky.social & @irfanullah.bsky.social share perspectives on the US DOJ's recent Statement of Interest in current litigation on AI, LLMs, and fair use: scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/09/10/a...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Ask the Chefs: AI and Copyright Licensing - The Scholarly Kitchen
The US Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest in the copyright infringement litigation between The New York Times and OpenAI and Microsoft, et. al., largely siding with the AI companies a...
002