Reposted by CubeThoughts
I said this in a thread last night and in a thousand threads before it, but you really are doing the work of those who would destroy democracy and the rule of law when you are a doomer.
You can be aware of — and vigorously oppose — the lawlessness of this administration without insisting on doom.
![Screenshot of legal text:
[..]committed” a felony. Id. The governor of the asylum state “shall cause [the accused individual] to be arrested and secured, and [shall] notify the [governor] making such demand, or the agent of[..]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:7sbxarhqirb234sdlpbldr6j/bafkreif3hkqqyusv2o3xeogum5pdu3cqg5ho2mdlbiks752tcr2o2dd4ca)
![Sceeenshot of legal text:
[..]impose a hardship on Minnesota’s prosecutorial efforts. But that possible outcome does not alter the analysis. At most, the impending release and potential flight by Castro supports Minnesota’s showing of irreparable injury, for purposes of the second prong of the Rule 65 analysis. But the threat of irreparable injury does not obviate the need for Minnesota to demonstrate that it has a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of at least one of its causes of action. And the threat of injury by itself does not create an issue ripe for adjudication.
Effectively, Minnesota requests that the Court impose the 90-day detention limit within
Articles 51.05 and 51.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure as the outer limit for Texas’s
consideration of Minnesota’s extradition request. If Texas fails to act within those 90 days,[..]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:7sbxarhqirb234sdlpbldr6j/bafkreidqjfosonvqjjm4wf5mtwxrwy6b62bifnmeda7adbsy2ozgztnhlq)
