Sign in

Crystal Steltenpohl

@cnsyoung.com
1.4K followers 239 following 658 posts

Training and Education Manager at the Center for Open Science | Quala Lab Member | Former President of SIPS | Mixed Methods Researcher & Evaluator | Community Psychologist | she/her | 🇩🇪🇺🇸

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Joshua Foust 🪖🎮 @joshuafoust.com · 28/09/2026
3. Taken together — scientists rely on AI to generate work faster and the AI companies steal their work — this actually looks worse than the widespread theft of art and literature that has powered these models, as companies cultivate use to them steal for their own development.
1347
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Neil Lewis, Jr. @neillewisjr.bsky.social · 7h
"For many Black scholars, academia is a burning house. If we cannot extinguish that fire, Black scholars will always bear a greater risk of being burned–& therefore have to insulate themselves against the risk more than others." @cydneydupree.bsky.social www.timeshighereducation.com/opinion/blac...
timeshighereducation.com
Black academics face extra scrutiny. Our research shows its consequences
Scholars of colour told us they engage in strategies to make it harder for them to be dismissed as biased or lacking rigour, says Cydney Hurston Dupree
210563
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 28/09/2026
🗓️ Reminder: The first OSF Projects transition deadline is 7 weeks away. Starting November 16, 2026, you will no longer be able to create new OSF Projects or add new components to existing projects. (🧵1/3)
OSF projects changes chart
11113
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 29/09/2026
COS researchers and collaborators have developed and piloted Registered Revisions—an approach designed to reduce uncertainty and publication bias when substantive changes to a study’s analysis are requested during peer review Noah Haber previews what's in the report:
cos.io
What is in the Registered Revisions Meta Trial Development and Pilot Report?
COS Principal Research Scientist Noah Haber shares how the SCORE project developed a collaborative reproducible manuscript workflow, walks through two different approaches, and introduces an open-source R package created from that work.
034
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Tech Policy Press @techpolicypress.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
The term artificial intelligence (and yes, the term ‘super intelligence’ too) actively distorts our cognitive understanding, misdirects public concern, and derails legal and policy frameworks, says Amber Sinha, contributing editor at Tech Policy Press.
buff.ly
Artificial or ‘Super Intelligent’? The Broken Metaphors of AI
To construct effective technology regulation, we must dismantle the mythological language surrounding AI, argues Amber Sinha.
0123
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Sleestak @sleestak.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
and behold a pale horse. and the name that sat on him was death. and hell followed with him
cat on a statue
2958301372
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
J. Emory Parker 🏳️‍🌈 @jaspar.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
Meta muse saying why would I deceive you?
53920901
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Institute for Replication @i4replication.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
1/ What is the prevalence of personally identifiable information (PII) in author-collected data publicly shared in the social sciences? We audited 327 replication packages from 11 leading journals in economics, political science, and psychology Answer: surprisingly high 🧵
25437
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Crystal Lewis @cghlewis.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
Issue 59 of #rdmweekly is out! 📬 ➡️ AsCollected Platform ➡️ Enacting Open Science Values in Qualitative Leadership Research @cnsyoung.com ➡️ For a Decade CRediT has Quietly Reshaped Academic Authorship – What Comes Next? @drachiarelli.bsky.social and more! rdmweekly.substack.com/p/rdm-weekly...
rdmweekly.substack.com
RDM Weekly - Issue 059
A weekly roundup of Research Data Management resources.
0144
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 19/08/2026
📢 COS seeks volunteers for the Transparency & Openness Promotion (TOP) Advisory Board The Board provides guidance and oversight for the TOP Guidelines—a policy framework designed to increase the verifiability of empirical research Apply or nominate a colleague by Sept. 21:
cos.io
Call for Volunteers: TOP Guidelines Advisory Board
Would you like to make a difference in how open science is implemented? The Center for Open Science (COS) is currently seeking volunteers to be our colleagues and join the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines Advisory Board.
01011
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Amanda Kay Montoya @akmontoya.bsky.social · 11/08/2026
COS is making some big changes to projects. If you regularly use OSF this will impact your workflow. Our lab will be migrating data and file hosting to other places, but still use OSF for prereg and preprints. Happy to chat with people about how you’ll approach the transition!
2316
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Sanjay Srivastava @sanjaysrivastava.com · 11/08/2026
If you’re an academic looking for a new place to host open scientific content, etc. here’s a friendly reminder to check with your institution’s library
1104
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS) @improvingpsych.org · 11/08/2026
The Center for Open Science recently announced its decision to phase out OSF Projects. We want to share how those changes will affect PsyArXiv, a psychology preprint server run and maintained by SIPS volunteers but hosted on the OSF platform. improvingpsych.org/2026/08/11/w...
improvingpsych.org
What Researchers Need to Know about PsyArXiv Given Upcoming Changes to OSF Projects
In just a few short days (August 15th, 2026), PsyArXiv – the community preprint server for psychology – turns 10! 🥳 Over the past decade, our community has published over 58,000 preprin…
02628
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Steve Kambouris @steve-kambouris.bsky.social · 11/08/2026
Further to this: the news about OSF is the perfect time to recommend @re3data.bsky.social, the Registry of Research Data Repositories - you can search for potential repositories for your data, and filter the results by a vast number of repo features (e.g., does the repo offer versioning or not)
re3data.org
Home | re3data.org
02316
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Josh de Leeuw @joshdeleeuw.bsky.social · 11/08/2026
With the upcoming changes to OSF, DataPipe (pipe.jspsych.org) is migrating to a multi-backend model. We're currently developing support for Zenodo, Dataverse, and Google Drive. If there are other providers that you'd like to see as options please get in touch.
pipe.jspsych.org
DataPipe
23017
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 11/08/2026
Important context for why we are making these changes is available in this summary: www.cos.io/blog/osf-cha...
cos.io
OSF Changes: A Note to Users
The Center for Open Science announced a significant change to the Open Science Framework (OSF). This post shares what led to the change, implications, and what's next.
11917
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Dermot Lynott @dermotlynott.bsky.social · 11/08/2026
For reassurance, the changes to OSF have no impact on PsyArXiv (and other preprint communities hosted by the Center for Open Science), which will continue to operate as normal blog.psyarxiv.com/2026/08/11/w...
blog.psyarxiv.com
What Researchers Need to Know about PsyArXiv Given Upcoming Changes to OSF Projects – PsyArXiv Blog
In just a few short days (August 15th, 2026), PsyArXiv – the community preprint server for psychology – turns 10! 🥳 Over the past decade, our community has published over 58,000 preprints, allowing re...
03117
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 11/08/2026
COS is announcing important changes to the Open Science Framework (OSF). OSF Projects—used for project collaboration, file mgmt, & storage—is being phased out as an active workspace over the next 6 months. This change does not affect persistence & accessibility of existing public projects. (🧵1/2)
53945
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 30/07/2026
We'll also be hosting a launch webinar for the draft strategic plan on August 6. The webinar will introduce the plan's case for action, pillars, and the coalition model it proposes. Most importantly, we'll open the floor for community input and questions. 💻 Register: cos-io.zoom.us/webinar/regi...
cos-io.zoom.us
Welcome! You are invited to join a webinar: Building a Coalition for Resilient Research Data Infrastructure: Introducing a Draft Strategic Plan for Community Input. After registering, you will receive...
Federally funded research data is a public good — but the repositories and infrastructure that keep it findable, accessible, and usable have long been fragile, and recent funding, staffing, and policy...
021
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 30/07/2026
COS is working with a committee of experts through the Coalition for Resilient Research Data Infrastructure to develop a strategic plan for strengthening federally funded research data infrastructure. We want to hear from you! The draft plan is open to feedback until Sept 30:
cos.io
Announcing the Coalition for Resilient Research Data Infrastructure (CRRDI) Strategic Plan
The Center for Open Science collaborated with research data infrastructure experts on a strategic plan for the Coalition for Resilient Research Data Infrastructure—a coalition working to build a more resilient ecosystem for federally funded research data. The draft is available for community comment.
1118
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Theo Priestley @theopriestley.net · 28/07/2026
Fucking hell as if receiving automated rejection letters for jobs wasn't bad enough.
872476696
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
SPARC @sparcopen.bsky.social · 28/07/2026
Meet librarians who have walked away from publisher packages & products. Our exit interview series describes how institutions decided to leave, preparation involved, alternative access options, next steps & advice. It's easier than many thought possible! #OpenAccess sparcopen.org/our-work/exi...
sparcopen.org
Exit Interviews: Leaving Big Deals & Proprietary Products - SPARC
021
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Tech Policy Press @techpolicypress.bsky.social · 28/07/2026
How do surveillance, censorship, and technologies of control get weaponized—and how do we push back? Justin Hendrix talks with Jonathon W. Penney, author of "Chilling Effects: Repression, Conformity, and Power in the Digital Age," about his roadmap for reform.
buff.ly
A Roadmap for Confronting the Chilling Effects of Censorship, Surveillance and New Technology
A conversation with Jonathon W. Penney, author of Chilling Effects: Repression, Conformity, and Power in the Digital Age.
1106
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
TechCrunch @techcrunch.com · 25/07/2026
At libraries around the country, "Avoiding AI" workshops have elicited unprecedented demand.
techcrunch.com
Librarians are hosting viral 'Avoiding AI' workshops for people who are fed up with Big Tech | TechCrunch
At libraries around the country, "Avoiding AI" workshops have elicited unprecedented demand.
2043421768
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 17/07/2026
NCI Data Jamboree: Enhancing Data Sharing & Utility to Advance Cancer Research Nov 16–18, 2026 Researchers, postdocs, students, citizen scientists, patients, and advocates are invited to collaboratively solve problems using cancer research datasets. Register by: July 27 events.cancer.gov/nc...
041
Crystal Steltenpohl @cnsyoung.com · 06/07/2026
New article from @mattmakel.bsky.social, Melanie Meyer, and Mary Pei about qualitative replication.
doi.org
Replication is possible, can be relevant, and is useful in qualitative research
In 2022, we argued that replication is relevant to qualitative research. In this manuscript, we update and clarify that idea to make three more specific claims about replication in qualitative rese...
011
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 02/07/2026
🚀 2026 Big Team Science Conference 🗓️ October 6-8 on Zoom This conference convenes researchers, funders, and stakeholders to discuss advancements, challenges, and future opportunities related to big team science. Featured sessions include leaders of COS's SCORE project!
bigteamscienceconference.github.io
Big Team Science Conference
The goal of the Big Team Science Conference is to bring together a multidisciplinary group of researchers, funders, and stakeholders to discuss advancements, challenges, and future opportunities related to large scientific collaborations. The fifth annual Big Team Science Conference will be held virtually via Zoom, October 6-8, 2026. We loosely...
132
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Crystal Lewis @cghlewis.bsky.social · 17/06/2026
Using headers at the start of your code files provides a helpful introduction to your project. One way you can standardize this information is through code snippets in R! Once the snippet is created and named ("header" in this case), just enter the name and press tab and voila!
2407
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
John Cluverius @johncluverius.bsky.social · 17/06/2026
Per @tressiemcphd.bsky.social this is gold: 1. Polling we did in ME shows same. Data centers are underwater in every subgroup we poll in. 2. Local organizing as party building LFG 3. Please grad students this is a great area for a dissertation.
nytimes.com
Opinion | This Could Be the Winning Issue for Democrats
35018
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 05/06/2026
⭐ New blog post from the NIH-funded Generalist Repository Ecosystem Initiative (GREI)—comprised of 7 generalist repositories including OSF. GREI’s Year 4 update showcases new shared standards, improved dataset discovery, and practical tools shaped by community input.
medium.com
GREI Year 4: Reflections, Progress, and What Comes Next
As the Generalist Repository Ecosystem Initiative (GREI) concludes its fourth year and moves into its fifth, this update examines the…
052
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
SocArXiv @socarxiv.bsky.social · 15/06/2026
Thank you for sharing! SocArXiv is accepting an average of 12.9 papers per day in 2026 -- a 50% increase from 2025. Kudos to our moderation team, who are working very hard to efficiently get your real research up while weeding out the rising tide of AI slop.
plot showing 12.9 papers per day
0103
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 11/05/2026
🆕 The Open Scholarship Training for Researchers Series offers self-paced online courses created in response to researchers' needs. Each focuses on a core open scholarship practice, with real-world examples. First two courses enrolling now; more to come through Winter 2026!
cos.io
Introducing the COS Open Scholarship Training for Researchers Series
The Center for Open Science (COS) introduces Open Scholarship Training for Researchers: self-paced online courses developed in response to researcher needs.
0115
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Ed Zitron @edzitron.com · 01/05/2026
Joined the Times Tech Report to talk about how OpenAI’s missed revenue targets threaten the stability of the circular AI economy, and how token-based billing is increasingly costing as much as a human employee. youtu.be/fmK40iq-U6Y?...
youtu.be
AI bubble: How OpenAI’s missed targets threaten AI’s circular financing | Ed Zitron
YouTube video by The Tech Report
419341
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Berna Devezer @devezer.bsky.social · 30/04/2026
📣 The difference between replicable and not replicable is not itself scientifically replicable. 📣 New work with Erkan Buzbas, showing that verdicts such as "X% of results replicated" are based on an inferential machinery that doesn't work. arxiv.org/abs/2604.26268
Screenshot of a paper's title page. Title: "The Difference Between 'Replicable' and 'Not replicable' is not Itself Scientifically Replicable". Authors: Berna Devezer and Erkan O. Buzbas, both at the University of Idaho — Devezer in the Department of Business and the Institute for Modeling Collaboration and Innovation, Buzbas in the Department of Mathematics and Statistical Science. Authors contributed equally. Corresponding author: bdevezer@uidaho.edu.
Abstract: Replication studies estimate the replicability rate of scientific results by aggregating binary verdicts of experiments. Exact replications are rarely attainable, so most replication sequences are non-exact. Experiments differ in ways that matter and do not share a single common data-generating process. We formalize two statistical interpretations of this non-exactness. In a shared latent rate model (benchmark), experiments are exchangeable and depend on a common random replicability rate. In a conditionally independent rates model (operational), each experiment has its own replicability rate drawn independently from a population distribution. Under the shared latent rate model, even small variability among replicability rates induces an irreducible variance floor on the estimated mean replicability rate that cannot be eliminated by adding more replications. Under the conditionally independent rates model, the degree of non-exactness is not identifiable from standard replication data, because one binary verdict per experiment contains no information about between-experiment heterogeneity. Researchers therefore cannot tell which precision regime they are operating in or whether high- and low-replicability sequences can be distinguished in principle. As a result, the usual data structure of one binary verdict per experiment cannot support reliable demarcation between "replicable" and "not replicable" results and systematically understates uncertainty, making high- and low-replicability sequences appear discrim…
15543204
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Hypervisible @hypervisible.blacksky.app · 20/04/2026
Why.
theverge.com
This pasta sauce wants to record your family
Even dinner wants to listen to your conversations now.
1711316
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Joshua Foust 🪖🎮 @joshuafoust.com · 20/04/2026
Larry Ellison’s TikTok forcing “AI Remixing” onto their entire user base without their knowledge or consent is a really great microcosm of what US tech overlordship looks like — and why the backlash against this technology is only growing.
piunikaweb.com
A new TikTok AI toggle is causing panic among creators
TikTok creators say a new AI remix setting is enabled on videos by default, forcing users to manually review and change permissions.
015973
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 20/04/2026
🗞️ A recent editorial in The Guardian draws on SCORE findings to examine how replication results are interpreted: “Not every failed replication signals a crisis...Results that don’t consistently replicate should be weighed against a wider evidence base when guiding policy”
theguardian.com
The Guardian view on social science research: embracing uncertainty | Editorial
Editorial: Science rarely produces identical outcomes. Mistaking this for failure turns caution into an excuse for inaction
012
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Crystal Lewis @cghlewis.bsky.social · 13/04/2026
211520
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 13/04/2026
In our latest researcher Q&A, research scientist and biostatistician Alisha Bruton shares how she integrates open science into her workflow, navigates data sharing in collaborative research, and applies FAIR principles to help make research more findable and reusable. 💡
cos.io
Q&A with Alisha Bruton: Open Science in Integrative Medicine Research
Research scientist and biostatistician Alisha Bruton shares how she integrates open science practices into her workflow, navigates data sharing decisions, and applies FAIR principles to make research findable and reusable over time.
043
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 07/04/2026
What can large-scale studies tell us about reproducibility? In our webinar on April 16, researchers from COS, I4R, and META-REP will discuss findings from three papers—one from the recently published SCORE effort—and insights on reproducibility, transparency, and credibility cos-io.zoom.us/webin...
Virtual Event
April 16 // 1 pm ET
NEW EVIDENCE ON REPRODUCIBILITY ACROSS SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH
Moderator: Tim Errington
Speakers: Katrin Auspurg, Abel Brodeur, and Andrew Tyner
02814
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 30/03/2026
New on the Generalist Repository Ecosystem Initiative (GREI) blog: highlights from the Streamlining Data Sharing webinar series, featuring practical guidance and tools, real-world user stories, solutions to common data sharing challenges, and more! 📖 medium.com/@blog-gre...
022
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 25/03/2026
COS is pleased to welcome Chris Bourg (MIT) and Marcus Munafò (University of Bath) to our Board of Directors. Their leadership in equitable open scholarship, research culture reform, and metascience will help shape how the next phase of our work unfolds. 🎉
cos.io
The Center for Open Science Welcomes Chris Bourg and Marcus Munafò to its Board of Directors
The Center for Open Science is pleased to welcome Chris Bourg (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) and Marcus Munafò (University of Bath) to the COS Board of Directors in 2026.
0176
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 12/03/2026
📋 TOP 101: An Overview of the Transparency & Openness Promotion Guidelines April 1, 11 AM ET Learn about the TOP framework, which provides recommendations for journals, funders, universities, & researchers about practices that can increase verifiability of research claims.
cos-io.zoom.us
Welcome! You are invited to join a webinar: TOP 101: An Overview of the Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines. After registering, you will receive a confirmation email about joining the webinar.
The Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines (TOP) is a policy framework that can provide specific recommendations for journals, research funders, universities, and researchers about practices that are designed to increase the verifiability of empirical research claims. TOP was updated in 2025 and contains three main parts: Research Practices, Verification Practices, and Verification Studies. This webinar will include an overview of these components and how TOP’s tiered and modular structure makes it applicable to a diverse community of researchers and policymakers. This webinar is part of COS’s ongoing campaign to demonstrate implementations of our Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines (https://bit.ly/top-guidelines), grounding our policy framework in real-world examples. If you have feedback, implementation stories, or lessons learned from working with TOP, get in touch with us at top@cos.io.
043
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 12/03/2026
The 2025 COS Impact Report is now live! From open infrastructure to research initiatives, policy engagement, and global partnerships, see what COS accomplished over the past year to advance transparent, rigorous, and accessible research. 🔍 Check out the report: www.cos.io/impact
094
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 09/03/2026
⏰ REMINDER: Applications for AREN's Local Network Leads program are open through March 16. This program trains researchers & research professionals in #Africa to become #openscience leaders who can establish a community of practice at their institution. Learn more & apply:
africanrn.org
African Reproducibility Network (AREN)
Reproducibility Network (RN) in Africa
033
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 27/02/2026
Replication Research (R2), a 🆕 community-led Diamond OA journal, makes replication studies more discoverable, publishable & rigorously evaluated—without subscription barriers or author fees. Ahead of #LoveReplicationsWeek, R2's senior editors shared their vision in our Q&A:
cos.io
Building a Publishing Model for Replication: Q&A with the Senior Editors of Replication Research
COS spoke with the senior editors of Replication Research—a community-led Diamond Open Access journal that supports reproduction and replication studies.
0139
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 27/02/2026
The updated Generalist Repository Ecosystem Initiative (GREI) flowchart offers clearer guidance and a more streamlined decision pathway to help researchers, librarians, and support teams choose the most appropriate generalist repository for their data. 📖 medium.com/@blog-gre...
021
Reposted by Crystal Steltenpohl
Center for Open Science @cos.io · 19/02/2026
🚀 NASA Summer Internship: Open Science Impact This summer internship offers an opportunity to work with a NASA mentor on efforts to assess how open science practices accelerate discovery & broaden participation in science. Deadline: Feb 27. Application portal: stemgateway.nasa.gov/s/course-off...
stemgateway.nasa.gov
STEM Gateway
023