Nathalie Maréchal asks, why are we betting the economy and the future of democracy on cult-like beliefs?

The dark and distressing way that Silicon Valley talks about A.I. can be traced to a philosophy that influenced many tech executives.

A 24-year-old investor hailed as a visionary attracted billions—before turning into Wall Street’s latest cautionary tale.

After an AI detector classified one of my opinion pieces as entirely AI-generated, I found myself questioning where authorship ends, where expertise begins and what readers deserve to know.

Scientists trained artificial intelligence on libraries of DNA and then asked the model to create recipes for viral genomes. Sixteen of them were viable, yielding new viruses.

Senator Rand Paul may have approached the matter with theatrics and ill will, but Dr. Anthony Fauci’s decision not to testify was a loss.

People in tech use AI apps to record and transcribe meetings, workplace chats and even dates—all in the name of productivity.

Taken to its logical conclusion, this line of thinking is absurd—and damning.

Taken to its logical conclusion, this line of thinking is absurd—and damning.  

Patients are using chatbots for medical advice, while the NHS is still debating where AI belongs

Large language models (LLMs) are known to generate plausible but false information across a wide range of contexts, yet the real-world magnitude and consequences of this hallucination problem remain p...