iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Replies

Torsten Bell @torstenbell.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

After a week of faffing around the @dailymail.co.uk have agreed to apologise. Here it is. Fingers crossed for fewer lies/smears dressed up as news in future

Torsten Bell@torstenbell.bsky.social

Good to see @dailymail.co.uk @thetimes.com and @telegraphnews.bsky.social all delete their articles - sad the lies went up in the first place

34748243

Tim Hill of Antifa, #FBPE @tjrh.uk · 01/11/2025

While I disagree with 99.999% of Trump's tactics, kicking the bad press out of Westminster would be a huge win for Labour. Trouble is, you're all too scared of Murdoch and the effing Mail. It's pathetic, really.

010

@stefanpaetow.bsky.social @stefanpaetow.eurosky.social · 01/11/2025

The Daily Heil and fewer lies in the future? Don’t hold your breath.

090

Jan70 @jan-70.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

Regrettably I think it will take more than crossed fingers. New legislation perhaps?

010

sootie123.bsky.social @sootie123.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

What charity did they make the donation to?

000

Urbane Cyclist @urbanecyclist.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

Anyway what is wrong with an adjustable standing desk? I have one in each of my offices. Not sure how much they cost but think it is around 700 a piece. Occupational Health costs £. Invest in people.

1100

Grahame @grahameg6mzk.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

Fingers crossed, eh? If only there was some way a government could, somehow, oblige the press to be a little more honest in their reporting.

000

Rootless Cosmopolitan @brennick.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

It wasn’t an error, it was an attempted smear.

050

Yorkshire Paddy @yorkshirepaddy.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

Don't hold your breath. An apology costs them nothing and thousands of people will have internalised the lie. They are vile scum.

0170

TrueGoode @truegoode.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

But is the apology in exactly the same font and in exactly the same position as the original smears? If not, Gov. needs to pass a law insisting that it always is.

010

Safety🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇺🇦🇪🇺💚 @safetygooner.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

Height adjustable desks are good for reducing the risk of musculoskeletal disorders; about 450,000 cases of low back pain a year keep people off work and unproductive

000

max @doctorsnacks.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

an apology perhaps the form of paying for those desks would be a good gesture, seeing as its just words

000

Markeye @markeye.bsky.social · 02/11/2025

Time we had a process of adding hefty and incremental fines to such transgressions. If all they have to do is issue a weak apology and publish it at the bottom of page 17 then they’ll continue to publish lies like this.

000

isosolies.bsky.social @isosolies.bsky.social · 02/11/2025

Decent office furniture isn't cheap and you want to make sure your staff have chairs that won't cause them back damage. The Mail don't have a clue.

000

James @fesx-fiddler.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

The should be made to publish/print the correction in the same place (i.e. with the same prominence) that it was first published.

060

Sky Bloo 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 @sky-bloo.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

Have they been listening in to your voicemail messages and misheard something? It happens.

000

Ant @tonyman.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

They're shameless bastards. Something needs to be done about the UK press.

010

Alison @alison263.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

They should have to put apologies on the front page & in keeping with their normal editorial style,... 'OUTRAGE AS WE TELL YET MORE LIES!' . I think inaccurate copy would reduce.

000

Stuart Fuller @stufuller.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

“Error”? As in “accidental mistake”? Hmmm.

000

Stephen Kinsella @stephenstroud.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

I admire your optimism. You have a public profile and the ability to extract a (weak, limited) correction. Most of those traduced by our press don’t have your advantages. We need genuine, muscular, independent press regulation. Don’t you agree? @hackedoff.bsky.social @pressjustice.bsky.social

050

James Southern @james.fieldleveltech.org · 01/11/2025

What incentive do they have for that?

030

Ben Sowton @bensowton.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

That’s classic smearing. Lie then retract. Damage done. These people are despicable and totally dishonest

020

British Summer Dave. @shoutydavid.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

"Error". What crap. They were rapidly called out for the lies they tried to get away with.

000

ayowhose.bsky.social @ayowhose.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

Strange. When he axed Leveson 2 - that addresses exactly this problem - Matt Hancock said it was no longer needed because the ‘world has changed’. And Starmer & Lisa Nandy agree. Time for Labour to stop kowtowing to Murdoch & do the decent thing for the UK. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-poli...

bbc.co.uk

Leveson Inquiry: Matt Hancock axes proposed second stage

Labour calls the decision to axe Leveson part two a

010

Mr Bumpton 🇬🇧🇪🇺 @ivorbumpton.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

Another Epic Daily Fail 🤦‍♂️

120

Tom @tomrees.eurosky.social · 01/11/2025

This is a good way to identify the media outlets that are propagandists masquerading as journalism. Daily Mail and Telegraph are obvious, but the Times has recently also crossed the boundary.

000

Gildy Stern 🇺🇦 @oldhamletsghost.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

Well done sir 👍

050

Elaine Wyatt @elainewyatt.bsky.social · 01/11/2025

Articles are read, but many just look at headlines or ignore corrections that contradict their opinions. That's if they see them. If corrections appeared on front pages, some media outlets might behave very differently. It shouldn't have taken you a week to get this sorted. I'm glad it has.

010