Sign in

Western Environmental Law Center

@westernlaw.org
3K followers 609 following 985 posts

We use the power of the law to foster thriving, resilient western lands, waters, wildlife, and communities in the face of a changing climate.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 10h
The Green NGO movement is not a monolith. But my informed sense is that most folks are alarmed by the permitting deal. So let me say this respectfully, gently, but firmly to my beloved comrades: political access is not political power.
Josh Siegel: "I later called another speaker on the call, Erik Schlenker-Goodrich, executive director of the Western Environmental Law Center, who explained the divide among greens this way: 'The elephant in the room is Sens. Heinrich and Whitehouse are perceived to be champions of environmental issues, and a lot of the large environmental groups are reluctant to push back for well-intentioned reasons to maintain relationships with them."
32711
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Pete Sikora @petesikora.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
😳😳😳 I guess that’s one way for pro-permitting deal people to sell it
094
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Manuel Salgado @manuelsalgado.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
I really thought after the 2024 EPRA fight and the clean energy folks acknowledging they didn't see Trump's war on renewables as possible, they would have a bit more humility with their assumptions and yet here we are repeating the same conversation but for a WORSE bill. It is maddening.
132
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 03/10/2026
Great thread (and noting Julia’s correction to “In early 2025”) that illustrates why you cannot accommodate and coddle the O&G. You need to bring O&G to its knees. This is ultimately a fight over 💥power💥, not emissions.
084
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 03/10/2026
Would also appreciate, since the article linked to other groups statements, a link to ours, which you quote from.
westernlaw.org
Five-alarm fire: Radical Senate ‘permitting reform’ bill threatens to eviscerate environmental, wildlife, water, climate laws - Western Environmental Law Center
The Republican-controlled Senate will soon formally announce a legislative “permitting reform” deal to speed the development of AI data centers and energy infrastructure. We expect the Senate will the...
121
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 03/10/2026
Thanks for covering, Dan. Note that the claim that SunZia took ~18 years b/c of environmental review is wildly inaccurate. Actual NEPA once functional company took over and fixed original developers’ mistakes: only 1.5 years. westernlaw.org/wp-content/u...
161
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Nature vs. Machine. This is the distilled essence of the permitting reform fight. ➡️ Do we embrace a future predicated on human kinship with each other and the world? ➡️ Or cede that future to the machine now being built by tech, energy, and finance that dissolves our kinship? Choose wisely.
2101
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
Also an analysis that explicitly excludes the climate-worsening impacts of more-easily-permitted fossil fuel projects is always going to give a big old thumbs up as a result? www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
One new analysis published this week offers a sense of the potential climate payoff from an important piece of the legislation: transmission reform. Streamlined rules making it faster to connect energy projects to the grid and expand energy connection, or transmission, between regions could cut carbon dioxide emissions by 71 million metric tons, or 9%, in 2035 compared to a non-reform scenario.

The modeling, conducted by the nonprofit Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) and consulting company Greenline Insights, does not comprehensively address the bill’s laundry list of proposed reforms. It’s only focused on the transmission piece and on how changes would affect four regions of the country that account for about half of US electricity demand.

Despite those limitations, C2ES president Nathaniel Keohane told Bloomberg News he’s confident the bill “on net is good for the economy, it’s good for consumers, and it’s good for climate.” The estimated impact on power-sector emissions is particularly notable, he added: “We’re talking gigaton-scale emissions reductions over time.”
3243
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 02/10/2026
If data centres have an easier time connecting to the grid rather than using off-grid gas, that doesn't make their climate impacts immediately zero or even beneficial somehow? Increasing grid demand still predominantly leads to worse climate impacts in the US.... www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
Rob Gramlich, president of the consulting firm Grid Strategies LLC, said that although the package is technology neutral — meaning it doesn’t favor specific types of energy generation — it “enables a clean energy future” that’s “just going to be very hard to get” otherwise.

Consider data centers. One way to power them quickly is to build gas infrastructure on site. “This bill would open up a lot more options,” Gramlich said, adding that there are many states, utilities and technology companies looking to clean up their power supply.
24811
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Ariel Moger @arielmoger.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Hey @whitehouse.senate.gov and @heinrich.senate.gov why are you ruining my Schmitt 🏀 fumble news cycle with your data center buildout permitting bill nonsense? I want to focus on winning in November, not fighting my supposed allies to protect enviro laws.
095
Western Environmental Law Center @westernlaw.org · 02/10/2026
Go get 'em y'all. You're the best!
072
Western Environmental Law Center @westernlaw.org · 02/10/2026
150 days for public review not being enough time IS THE POINT in order to kill any resistance to data centers, fossil fuel pipelines/power plants, or anything else oligarchs want to put within spitting distance of your home, water supply, whatever. This is billionaires saying shut up and take it.
1105
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Listen, @adamjentleson.bsky.social, you willfully ignorant fool. The idea that a bill that radically transforms the entire domain of energy & environmental protection should not be assessed on a single reductionist metric that hides massive fossil fuel entrenchment should not be in dispute.
Jentleson: "It’s instructive to see groups ostensibly dedicated to fighting climate change say they don’t think a bill should be judged by whether it reduces carbon emissions" quote posting an excerpt of from a leaked transcript of a call as follows: "Yeah. So we we made. We made the point that this bill should not be judged just
based on a net emissions analysis, and that that sweeps aside ecological and
community values. So there was an ask about what that. look like? So that would be a
good thing for folks to ponder as they're engaging in offices. Like, we'd like to
see… and what we… and then, so as an example, we said we'd love an assessment to…
we'd love an assessment to see what this means for public lands. You know, how many
data centers would this open the doors to? How much additional fossil fuel
development would this open the door to? How would this impact habitat quality on
public land? So focusing on that public land side of the equation and the
infrastructure that would be built on public lands. But that's that's just one
domain, you know. You could see it also with imperiled species or environmental
justice. I don't know what those analyses look like at that level. But I think
that's something that we could push."
1248
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Lifting up this specific post & the thread below it b/c it relates to how the permitting deal dramatically weakens Endangered Species Act protections for imperiled wildlife, from grizzly bears and wolverine vulnerable to climate change, to wolves which help restore ecological structure & function.
2115
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Correct. NEPA's trigger is a "major federal action" & the deal excludes natural gas pipelines from definition of "major federal action." Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717f, is what confers FERC w/natural gas pipeline authority. Major win for fossil fuels & data centers.
2207
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Animal Welfare Institute @awionline.org · 01/10/2026
Yesterday, a sweeping permitting bill containing shocking giveaways to industry interests at the expense of threatened and endangered species was introduced in the Senate. If enacted, the bill would fundamentally weaken the Endangered Species Act. Learn more: awionline.org/news/awi-str...
A Florida panther strides across grass. Text on the image reads, "AWI strongly opposes permitting bill that would stab 'heart' of Endangered Species Act." Photo credit Aline
077
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Weird how @heinrich.senate.gov still seems, on the one hand, to proclaim his love of public lands while, on the other hand, has invested vast time and energy into a permitting deal that will gut the very laws that have ensured the integrity of our public lands system for more than 50 years.
172
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
I was told by a Hill staffer that this Permitting Reform bill allows fossil fuel companies to enlarge (that is, expand) their natural gas pipelines without any environmental review so long as there's an existing pipeline in place. This is very bad.
68926
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Brad Johnson @climatebrad.hillheat.com · 30/09/2026
Absolutely wild how you can see it in their body language - Mike Lee's smug smirk, Capito's relaxed cheer, Heinrich's pursed lips, Whitehouse's slump, both Democrats looking down and away...
Mike Lee, Shelley Capito, Martin Heinrich, and Sheldon Whitehouse promote an environmentally catastrophic "permitting reform" deal
44218
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Manuel Salgado @manuelsalgado.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
I’m begging that anyone making claims of lower ghg emissions from this bill to show their work and be holistic. During the EPRA debate 2 years ago, claims were made with modelers eventually stating they could not have foreseen the clean energy pushback from admin. I suspect we’re repeating that.
141
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Silvia Secchi @profsecchi.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
The conversation that Danny started with this post is the reason why I hang around this neck of the virtual woods. Good, informed opinions - and experts disagreeing in measured terms on the basis of their knowledge of institutions and their reading of the current political climate.
3182
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
WE MUST NOT PERCEIVE "ABUNDANCE" AS PURELY A FUNCTION OF BUILT INFRASTRUCTURE BUT ALSO ECOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE.
We must rethink “abundance” to include clean air and water, protected public lands, and wildlife that has room to roam free and wild, not just renewable energy, housing, and other infrastructure, as important as such infrastructure is to a thriving future. We also need to think about not just material infrastructure — whether built or natural — but also social infrastructure that fosters mutual trustworthiness, shared opportunity, and a sense of belonging — social infrastructure that bedrock laws, such as the National Environmental Policy Act, provide. See Or. Nat. Desert Ass’n v. BLM, 625 F.3d 1092, 1121 n.24, 1122 (9th Cir. 2010) (agency’s obligation to obtain and disclose environmental information during the public review process is central to NEPA’s principle of “democratic decisionmaking” and NEPA is designed to bring “fairly debatable issues” like these “out in the open” for analysis and discussion). Notably, MIT found that agencies and project developers can boost trust and confidence in climate action and the energy transition if they take the public’s place-based values seriously, before decisions are made and projects gather momentum.
EPRA flouts these sensible ideas, recalling Rhiana Gunn-Wright’s warning, issued in the wake of the Inflation Reduction Act’s passage, that climate debates are frustratingly marked by ideas “that define the climate crisis as a matter of energy policy, separate from concerns about the environment and unconnected to efforts to build a more just society.”
151
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
GOOD POLICY ACCOUNTS FOR DOWNSTREAM POLITICAL AND LEGAL EFFECTS. PERMITTING REFORM AS CONCEIVED DOES NOT.
Congress does not pass laws in a vacuum. Different political branches, in the exercise of their powers, often take wildly divergent and conflicting actions. Moreover, public and private stakeholders actively work across all three branches of government to shape — and sometimes block or undermine — the actions of other branches through their particular ideological lens.
In this context, the Supreme Court of the U.S. is keen on engineering far-right outcomes, usurping power from the legislative and executive branches, and undermining U.S. climate and conservation action. The far right 6–3 majority is not, in the words of Chief Justice Roberts for which he is rightly scorned, just “call[ing] balls and strikes.” In just the past three terms, the Supreme Court has, among other things:
Engineered into existence the “major questions doctrine,” a tool that is negatively reshaping and reinterpreting bedrock environmental and administrative laws in the image of far-right political ideology;
Elevated property interests over the country’s national interest in clean water, a decision that exposes 95% of New Mexico’s rivers and streams and 88% of the state’s wetlands to the risk of losing water quality protections; and
Overturned 40-year-old precedent providing that courts should defer to expert agency implementation of law, undermining public rulemaking processes and agency scientific and technical experts.
132
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
EMISSIONS MODELS ARE NOT PREDICTIONS
Models (and other analyses) of emissions costs and benefits are not predictions. We should be particularly careful to not overstate their ability to estimate EPRA’s emissions costs and benefits given the bill’s qualitative provisions, lack of emissions guardrails, and political uncertainties. In this context, EPRA’s GHG reduction benefits would be secured through the bill’s transmission provisions, with its costs a product of the bill’s fossil fuel concessions, which are the focus of my critique.
Models are of course useful, but they are driven by assumptions that may or may not prove true in the real world, especially regarding the complex behavior of multiple federal agencies interacting with the public and private sectors over different administrations with highly varied approaches to energy policy and across a wide range of energy sectors and decision-making processes. Newfound uncertainties arising from the Supreme Court’s recent jurisprudence only complicate the picture.
121
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
GOOD CLIMATE POLICY MUST ADDRESS THE FOSSIL FUEL PRODUCTION GAP, NOT JUST BEAN COUNT NET EMISSIONS
This is a function of sustained dependency on fossil fuel production. As the U.N. Environment Programme found in its 2023 Production Gap Report, “[G]overnments are planning on producing around 110% more fossil fuels in 2030 than would be consistent with limiting warming to 1.5° C, and 69% more than would be consistent with limiting warming to 2.0° C.” This led the U.N. Environment Programme to warn that:
The current misalignment of climate ambitions and fossil fuel production plans undermines efforts to reduce fossil fuel use and emissions by sending mixed signals about countries’ intentions and priorities and by locking in new fossil fuel production infrastructure that will make the energy transition more costly, difficult, and disruptive.
In other words, we suffer from not only an “emissions gap,” but a “production gap”— i.e., “the difference between governments’ planned fossil fuel production and production levels consistent with limiting global warming to 1.5° C or 2.0° C.” The U.S. itself is expected to increase oil and gas production, creating “a real risk that current production plans are undermining the energy transition by exacerbating ‘carbon lock-in’ and entrenching fossil fuel dependence.”To limit warming to 1.5° C, “there is strong consensus that global coal, oil, and gas production decline rapidly and substantially between now and mid-century,” with “an almost total phase-out of coal and deep reductions in oil and gas production in this period” (emphasis added). The 2023 Production Gap Report’s finding on this front is echoed by the International Energy Agency’s finding that “[t]he path to net zero emissions [by 2050] is narrow” and required that the world stop approving new oil and gas fields beginning in 2021. Alas, we did not.
In addition to EPRA’s fossil fuel concessions, the International Monetary Found determined that the world still provides the fossil fuel industry with $7 trillion in annual direct and indirect subsidies. Further, the U.S. Department of the Interior has steadily approved new, large-scale domestic U.S. oil and gas projects in recent years, such as the $8 billion Willow Project on the North Slope of Alaska’s Brook Range, and, since 2020, nearly 12,000 new drilling permits. Notably, the U.S. is producing more crude oil than any country worldwide — ever.
When it comes to fossil fuels, we’re moving at a dangerous pace in a very dangerous direction.
122
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
GOOD POLICY IS ABOUT MORE THAN GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS.
Estimates of the EPRA’s net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions costs and benefits have been cobbled together, concluding the bill would trigger a net reduction in GHGs. These estimates are not, however, the full story. Lost in the debate over EPRA’s merits is an otherwise obvious point: The bill affects a range of resources and values, not just GHG emissions. Unfortunately, despite efforts to assess EPRA’s GHG emissions, Congress has yet to seek estimates of EPRA’s full range of costs and benefits. This is a mistake.
EPRA’s very structure — a hodgepodge of fossil fuel concessions and transmission reforms — is shaped by the same non-climate geopolitical, domestic political, and economic factors that have led the U.S. to prop up and boost oil and gas production for decades. To shift this dynamic, we must account for a more expansive range of public interest values — including public lands, clean air and water, and the imperative to integrate justice and equity into a shared energy transition.The politically convenient but discordant “all of the above” approach to energy policy that animates EPRA and, for now, prevails in our national political and legislative discourse ignores the broader range of values that people care about. With this approach, U.S. policy narrowly encourages everything and anything to be built hoping, in the end, that it’ll all shake out to achieve U.S. climate goals even as many have designed and shaped the “all of the above” approach in search of profit and power, not GHG emissions reductions.
It is, in my estimation, a short-sighted approach that will hemorrhage support for U.S. climate action and the country’s energy transition. EPRA’s proponents, rather than center these values and address the bill’s full range of costs and benefits, shrug these concerns away, contending that the bill, by virtue of transmission provisions that will (according to estimates) drive a net reduction in GHG emissions relative to the status quo, warrants the sacrifice of other values. This glib dismissal of the values people care about invites backlash that can and should be avoided.
122
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
This from 2024 on permitting reform—the underlying theory of change, role of emissions modeling, & broad array of values beyond energy infrastructure that are affected—very much holds up. Give it a read to get up to speed & understand the background of what'll prove a hotly contested fight.
medium.com
DON’T OPEN THE GATES: LATEST DIRTY DEAL IN CONGRESS A TROJAN HORSE
Energy Permitting Reform Act (S. 4753) Would Entrench Fossil Fuels, Risk Backlash Against U.S. Transition to Renewable Energy
196
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Brad Johnson @climatebrad.hillheat.com · 01/10/2026
@rephuffman.bsky.social takes down the Senate's Data Centers Everywhere deal
082
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Tony Dutzik @frontiertony.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Not only are many of the bill’s provisions unmodelable(?) but the history of forecasting the impacts of deals like this is … not great. frontiergroup.org/resources/ho...
frontiergroup.org
How energy experts missed the U.S. oil boom
A decade ago, the U.S. lifted long-time restrictions on crude oil exports. Experts said it would be no big deal. They were wrong.
031
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Tony Dutzik @frontiertony.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Keep in mind: Anyone who tells you they know whether, and to what extent, “permitting reform” will increase or decrease carbon emissions, and by how much, doesn’t. Know, that is.
163
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
jenny hay @ajennyh.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
I read the permitting reform bill. As we try to come together, I hope climate folks will look into the role of Tribal Historic Preservation Offices and culture folks will reflect on the source of the HPF funds. I'm extremely concerned.
185
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Brad Johnson @climatebrad.hillheat.com · 01/10/2026
The first vote of the Senate lame duck will be the Heinrich-Whitehouse Data Centers Everywhere bill.
259
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Wait. I may be confused. Maybe they're not panicked. Maybe fossil fuels loves the permitting deal. Maybe they're wielding entrenched, incumbent power with Big Tech & AI hyperscalers to lock it in. W/X's centrist energy wonks creating a very convenient permission structure for Heinrich/Whitehouse.
193
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
The American Petroleum Institute, Natural Gas Supply Association, and U.S. O&G Association are definitely panicked that the permitting deal will erode U.S. dependency on fossil fuels!
1175
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) @doctorvive.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
None of the cheerleaders of the Permitting Reform bill are talking about the fact that it establishes a 150-day statute of limitations for lawsuits under *any* federal law challenging authorizations for coal, oil, and gas extraction. Forever. 150 days is no time at all.
24419
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Kevin J. Kircher @kevinjkircher.com · 30/09/2026
One thing to bear in mind about a federal permitting bill is that its mistakes would be essentially permanent - Dems could only reverse mistakes with a filibuster-proof 60-vote supermajority in the Senate. Repubs, on the other hand, could use captured courts to shave off bits their donors dislike.
23915
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Climate Justice Alliance @cjaourpower.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Today, @cjaourpower.bsky.social, @greenlatinos.org, @ienearth.bsky.social, @weact4ej.bsky.social, and @westernlaw.org led a coalition to oppose a deregulatory permitting reform proposal, titled the ‘Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act.’ climatejusticealliance.org/broadcoaliti...
095
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Kevin J. Kircher @kevinjkircher.com · 30/09/2026
Not a lawyer, but "SEC. 209. ENEPA TECHNOLOGIES" (pages 74-94) appears to require creation of AI tools for a) company use to generate environmental docs and b) agency use to review environmental docs. AI-generated forms reviewed by AI tools in understaffed/underfunded agencies! What could go wrong.
24914
Western Environmental Law Center @westernlaw.org · 30/09/2026
Without giving up any environmental protections? Bull. SHIT.
052
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
I'm throwing well-deserved shade at @whitehouse.senate.gov & @heinrich.senate.gov for the Senate permitting deal. We were betrayed. But don't forget this deal is built w/i a frame set by Joe Manchin in 2022 exploited by Trump, Sen. Lee (of public land sale infamy), & Sen. Capito.
092
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
US Political Politics News 💙🌈🦋The Fighting Liberal @us-political-news.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Democrats Abandon Environmental Laws to Advance Pro-Fossil Fuel ‘Permitting Reform’ Legislation Would Dismantle Protections for Hundreds of Endangered Species to Speed Approvals for Corporate Polluters ...
commondreams.org
Democrats Abandon Environmental Laws to Advance Pro-Fossil Fuel ‘Permitting Reform’
Legislation Would Dismantle Protections for Hundreds of Endangered Species to Speed Approvals for Corporate Polluters
035
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Friends of the Earth U.S. (Action) @foeus.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Another day, another attack on the environment framed as "permitting reform"... foeaction.org/news/permitt...
foeaction.org
'Permitting Reform' Deal Hurts Animals, People & the Environment
Permitting reform rushed through a vote before the public has their say isn't a deal, it's a backroom sellout.
075
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Oil Change International @oilchange.org · 30/09/2026
We all deserve a voice in the decisions that impact our lives. The ‘dirty deal’ shuts communities out of decisionmaking spaces, particularly the Black, Brown, and Indigenous communities that are disproportionately harmed by polluting fossil fuel projects. bit.ly/4xY65zY
bit.ly
A Blatant Giveaway to Big Oil and Big Tech: Oil Change International Opposes Potential Permitting Bill - Oil Change International
The Senate may imminently announce a permitting reform bill that would gut bedrock environmental laws and enable a massive buildout of fossil fuel
182
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Oil Change International @oilchange.org · 30/09/2026
This "dirty deal" would raise electricity prices by accelerating the buildout of energy-guzzling AI data centers and liquefied natural gas export projects, raising demand for gas to levels that can only be met through more $$ production.
162
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Oil Change International @oilchange.org · 30/09/2026
‼️ Today, the Senate unveiled a permitting reform bill that would make it easier for fossil fuel + tech companies to steamroll community opposition to their polluting, climate-wrecking projects. This bill would benefit Big Tech and Big Oil, not working families.
11310
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich @riogranderift.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Here's the view from the American West, far from the ruins of Washington, D.C. politics.
westernlaw.org
Five-alarm fire: Radical Senate ‘permitting reform’ bill threatens to eviscerate environmental, wildlife, water, climate laws - Western Environmental Law Center
The Republican-controlled Senate will soon formally announce a legislative “permitting reform” deal to speed the development of AI data centers and energy infrastructure. We expect the Senate will the...
087
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Michael Caley @michaelcaley.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
if @janeaflegal.bsky.social likes the permitting reform bill this much then god damn x.com/janeaflegal/...
08820
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
Rethink the Wolf! (Don't believe the myth!) @rethinkthewolf.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Oh No! 😡 Please call your U.S. senator after you read this! Switchboard (202) 224-3121 It does take a village, and more, to create change‼️‼️‼️ westernlaw.org/5-alarm-fire...
westernlaw.org
Five-alarm fire: Radical Senate ‘permitting reform’ bill threatens to eviscerate environmental, wildlife, water, climate laws - Western Environmental Law Center
The Republican-controlled Senate will soon formally announce a legislative “permitting reform” deal to speed the development of AI data centers and energy infrastructure. We expect the Senate will the...
0139
Western Environmental Law Center @westernlaw.org · 30/09/2026
@heinrich.senate.gov is at a press conference talking about doing this disastrous "permitting reform" bill being BECAUSE the SunZia transmission line took a long time to "permit." He is wrong about that. Here is the timeline: westernlaw.org/wp-content/u...
sunzia timeline
021
Reposted by Western Environmental Law Center
LCV – League of Conservation Voters 🌎 @lcv.org · 30/09/2026
By gutting Utah’s public lands protections, Trump is destroying “irreplaceable cultural, historic, scientific, ecological and recreational value.” These lands are for us, not Trump’s cronies for coal and uranium extraction. Thank you for fighting back to protect our public lands, @lujan.senate.gov.
santafenewmexican.com
We keep standing up for shared monuments
The 1906 Antiquities Act gives presidents the authority to designate monuments, not destroy them.
075