Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersThe Ramsey Lab @theramseylab.bsky.social · 29/09/2026Are you interested in the past, present & future of Artificial Life (ALife) as a scientific field? 🚨 We are hosting an interdisciplinary minisymposium this December, so send us your work & come along! Please share widely! 🔗 hiw.kuleuven.be/clps/events/... #philsci #academicsky #evobio #AI #HPS 13220
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersPrinceton University Press @princetonupress.bsky.social · 25/09/2026Wonderful to see that Helen De Cruz has won the International Society for Science & Religion's General Readership Book Prize for her work, Wonderstruck! This illuminating book reveals how wonder and awe are catalysts that can help us reclaim what makes life worth living. Learn more: buff.ly/IYNfe0Q 112442
Sylvia Wenmackers @sylviawenmackers.be · 23/09/2026My two brains: (1) Putnam's two brains: getting a bit crowded in this vat. (2) Boltzmann's two brains: poof! (and they're gone) 010
Sylvia Wenmackers @sylviawenmackers.be · 23/09/2026De Wereld van Sofie hoorde dat wiskundigen dobbelstenen hebben gemaakt waarmee je met één worp kunt bepalen wie een spel mag beginnen. Een nutteloze uitvinding, vonden ze. Ik mocht vertellen over het nut van schijnbaar nutteloos onderzoek. Vanaf 39:07: www.vrt.be/vrtmax/luist...vrt.beDe wereld van Sofie - woensdag 23 september 2026 om 10:00 | VRT MAXDe wereld van Sofie - Beluister De wereld van Sofie met VRT MAX via de site of app. 231
Sylvia Wenmackers @sylviawenmackers.be · 22/09/2026Earlier this year, Alicja Kwade had a magnificent solo-exhibition in museum M Leuven. In the catalogue, I compare her sculptures with scientific models: "In the sway of a simple model; A philosophical reflection on Alicja Kwade’s pendulum". Pdf: www.sylviawenmackers.be/documents/We... #Art #PhilSci 0112
Sylvia Wenmackers @sylviawenmackers.be · 19/09/2026Column voor Eos: Dat mag niet! Over de Doomsday-formule, delen door nul en extrapolaties. www.sylviawenmackers.be/blog/2026091... 163
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersAlisa Bokulich @alisabokulich.bsky.social · 16/09/2026Postdoc in history of physics @ Radboud University in The Netherlands on "Origins of Irreversibility" part of larger grant to explore fundamental questions concerning entropy, chaos, & irreversibility #HPS ⚛️ Deadline: 14 October 2026 Duration: 2 years, starting 2027 www.ru.nl/en/working-a...ru.nlPostdoc Positions: Origins of Irreversibility | Radboud UniversityDo you want to work as a Postdoc at the Faculty of Science? Check our vacancy! 03518
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersVSC | Vlaams Supercomputer Centrum @vschpc.bsky.social · 16/09/2026🔬 RESEARCH SHOWCASE | Is scientific research really becoming less disruptive? VUB & KU Leuven researchers uncovered how missing citation data exaggerated the reported decline, using VSC high-memory computing to analyse millions of papers. 👉 www.vscentrum.be/post/a-hidde... #HPC #Researchvscentrum.beA hidden peak behind the decline in scientific disruptionA new Nature study by researchers from VUB and KU Leuven challenges the reported decline in scientific disruption. Using VSC’s high-memory CPU nodes to analyse citation networks with hundreds of milli... 094
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersHorizons Magazine @horizons-en.bsky.social · 16/09/2026Both basic and applied research suffer from overpromising rhetoric, says integrity researcher and psychiatrist Joeri Tijdink. He calls for more honest communication in which #reliability, #rigour and #reproducibility are the main product of science. 👇 www.horizons-mag.ch/2026/09/03/a...horizons-mag.chAdmitting uncertainty is the real breakthroughHorizons (EN) - Back to basic research 0115
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersElizabeth Hargrave @elizhargrave.bsky.social · 12/09/2026Charming weekend scavenger hunt from twigandtoad.com 34914
Sylvia Wenmackers @sylviawenmackers.be · 09/09/2026It was the yearly cake baking competition. Sally made her usual: a mulberry cake without eggs, because she was allergic. Jimmy made cakes in creative shapes, like a dinosaur. And Tina just liked to try new things. She didn't enter the competition last year, because her experiments usually failed. 194
Sylvia Wenmackers @sylviawenmackers.be · 08/09/2026Back in 2015, my footnotes in "Children of the Cosmos" were mentioned in the jury report of the @fqxi.org essay competition. I still believe it was mainly due to this one. 🤠💃 051
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersAlejandro Fábregas-Tejeda @alejandrofabregastejeda.com · 08/09/2026Interesting 📰 @theguardian.com by @samanthsubramanian.bsky.social on non-neural cognition: www.theguardian.com/news/ng-inte... Confronted with this polarizing debate, @philosobio.bsky.social & I wrote a balanced take on basal #cognition from an #evobio lens 👇 link.springer.com/article/10.1... #HPStheguardian.com‘This is dangerous’: slime moulds and the bitter debate over the nature of intelligenceThe long read: Scientists are battling over whether supposedly simple organisms should be considered ‘intelligent’. The outcome could reshape our understanding of the natural world – and our own place... 45023
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersGrin & Bear It @michelesliger.bsky.social · 06/09/2026Love this quote: “I have really always thought of science fiction - from Margaret Cavendish and Mary Shelley onwards, through Ursula Le Guin, Octavia Butler, and, of course, Margaret Atwood - as a women’s genre. It is a way of talking about the world as it could be, not as it is. 1268
Sylvia Wenmackers @sylviawenmackers.be · 04/09/2026A bit of an inspection paradox: 🤓 I was part of 5 thesis defenses today and didn't see any women there. Yet, for the other jury members, their colleagues' gender distribution was 50/50, and for the students, jury's gender imbalance was never <1/3. Anyway, my working day didn't pass the Bechdel test. 000
Sylvia Wenmackers @sylviawenmackers.be · 03/09/2026TFW you get asked for a #SciCom event: AMA! 🤩 But the format is: an AI answers first and then you can discuss it. 😭 I refused & said this is irresponsible. First layer of truth sandwich is missing here. Anchoring effect, automation bias & bullshit asymmetry all work against expert in this format. 😩 150
Sylvia Wenmackers @sylviawenmackers.be · 01/09/2026First author of the critique @vincentholst.bsky.social presented "How Open Code and Data Unveiled Errors in Measuring Scientific Disruption" at STI 2024 in Berlin. Slides available here: data.research.vub.be/sites/defaul... Yes, we firmly agree on the importance of open science in these matters! 🔓data.research.vub.be 065
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersMassimiliano Simons @masssimons.bsky.social · 01/09/2026The program is out! Looking forward to three days of great talks on the history of philosophy of technology! All welcome in Maastricht #philtech #histtech #sts #hopos #hopot2026 11911
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersJulia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 31/08/2026Me reading psychology: sheesh people should really be more precise in their language. Me reading analytical philosophy:static.klipy.comNot Like ThisAlt: Matrix: Not Like This, not like this 823026
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersAndra Meneganzin @andrameneganzin.bsky.social · 27/08/2026I’m excited, and still quite dazed, to share some big news. Starting this fall, I'll be an Associate Professor (Maître de Conférences) in Philosophy & History of Biology/Biomedical Sciences at the University of Bordeaux. 🧪🦣💀🏺 philinbiomed.cnrs.fr/andra-menega...philinbiomed.cnrs.frAndra Meneganzin joins PACEA in Bordeaux – philinbiomed 9762
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersMark Ziemann 🇺🇦🌻🦩 @mdziemann.genomic.social.ap.brid.gy · 24/08/2026Yesterday marked 10 years since the publication of our article on how Excel spreadsheets cause autocorrect errors to genomics data. link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s… #bioinformatics #genomicslink.springer.comGene name errors are widespread in the scientific literature - Genome BiologyThe spreadsheet software Microsoft Excel, when used with default settings, is known to convert gene names to dates and floating-point numbers. A programmatic scan of leading genomics journals reveals that approximately one-fifth of papers with supplementary Excel gene lists contain erroneous gene name conversions. 1212
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersPeder M Isager @isager.bsky.social · 11/08/2026Perspectives on Scientific Error 2027 is heading to Copenhagen, Jan 27th to 29th PSE brings together philosophers of science, statisticians and metascientists around 1 question: how do errors get into the scientific record, and what can we do about them? Register your interest at errorsin.scienceerrorsin.sciencePerspectives on Scientific Error 2027 · PSE9 02210
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersMark Rubin @markrubin.bsky.social · 20/08/2026“Trustworthy scientific knowledge requires more than replicability. It flourishes when a scientific community is sufficiently diverse (in people and in methods) and open to criticism.” 2164
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersThe Economist @economist.com · 19/08/2026The extent to which new scientific papers and patents shake up their fields has been hotly debated in recent years. A new paper adds another layer of complexity to the argumentbit.lyMaybe scientific progress isn’t slowing, after allA new paper takes aim at the claim that science has become less disruptive 043
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersJoe Bak-Coleman @jbakcoleman.bsky.social · 14/08/2026This is the funniest thing I've read all week. In 2024, a retraction for serious issues was framed by its authors as a "Retract, revise and resubmit" over a single misleading sentence. They're sticking to it, somehow maintaining that minor error story amidst an apparent two year revision process. 1244
Reposted by Sylvia Wenmackersvincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 14/08/2026So how can the process be improved? Some ideas to initiate a discussion: substantiated critiques should be handled faster than original research, not twice as slowly, and articles under substantiated critique should carry a visible flag while the exchange is under review. 7/7 1165
Reposted by Sylvia Wenmackersvincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 14/08/2026We know that it is difficult for outsiders to grasp the full details of all analyses, but we believe everyone can see what they are doing here. As much as we want to focus on the science, we cannot let these these tactics go uncommented. At some point, Brandolini’s law takes its toll on us. 6/7 2133
Reposted by Sylvia Wenmackersvincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 14/08/2026Additionally, they use questionable language. Every children's book they name is classified as a ‘Book’ in SciSciNet. We ran multiple robustness checks, including one that removes all books, all of which can be found in our supplementary information. Our results remain unchanged. 5/7 182
Reposted by Sylvia Wenmackersvincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 14/08/2026As another example, Park et al. stated the raw rewired curves to be available upon request in their original peer review file, never supplied them despite repeated requests, and now question the reconstruction this made necessary. They have still not shared their figure. 4/7 193
Reposted by Sylvia Wenmackersvincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 14/08/2026For example, the reply of Park et al. omits every analysis that could directly test the artefact explanation for Web of Science, such as a random source-document audit of papers with zero recorded references. 3/7 172
Reposted by Sylvia Wenmackersvincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 14/08/2026To explain this a bit more, a core tension in this exchange was that only the critiqued authors had access to metadata for Web of Science, such as the number of cited references. Every fast step in this story ran through open code and data. And every slow step ran through closed ones. 2/7 1114
Reposted by Sylvia Wenmackersvincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 14/08/2026There are multiple reasons for the delay. A Matters Arising is peer reviewed. Park et al. kept changing their defence, and every iteration took many months. The original authors had no incentive to reply swiftly and even outright refused to share data ‘available upon request’. 1/7 2146
Reposted by Sylvia Wenmackersvincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 14/08/2026As promised, we now share some details why it took 32 months to get this Matters Arising published, and, since many asked, share some comments on the reply to our critique. All details can be found in this small FAQ vincentholst.github.io/the_curious_.... Below is a summary 🧵vincentholst.github.ioThe Curious Case of the Declining Disruption’s Disappearance 48348
Reposted by Sylvia Wenmackersvincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 13/08/2026Shoutout to my co-authors @andresalgaba.bsky.social, FlorianoTori, @sylviawenmackers.be, and @vincentginis.bsky.social. This entire saga required incredible teamwork. Full paper, code, and data below Paper: rdcu.be/fzwzq Code: github.com/VincentHolst... Data: zenodo.org/records/1512... 8/8rdcu.beDataset artefacts can partially drive the measured decline in disruptionNature - Dataset artefacts can partially drive the measured decline in disruption 54210
Reposted by Sylvia Wenmackersvincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 13/08/2026Instead of a decline in the disruptiveness of scientific and technological knowledge, the data mainly show an increasing metadata quality over time: relatively fewer papers with zero references due to database errors. 7/8 14013
Reposted by Sylvia Wenmackersvincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 13/08/2026The Monte Carlo simulations randomly rewired citations while preserving each paper's number of references. Zero-reference papers are thus preserved, and the rewired networks inherit the peak at CD=+1. Their decline mirrors the observed decline in disruption. 6/8 1112
Reposted by Sylvia Wenmackersvincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 13/08/2026Why didn’t the robustness checks catch this? The linear regression did not control for the discontinuity of the CD index at zero references. Simply adding a dummy for zero references improves the adjusted R^2 from 0.15 to 0.95, and the adjusted CD index becomes essentially flat. 5/8 1131
Reposted by Sylvia Wenmackersvincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 13/08/2026Why so many papers with a CD index of exactly 1? In the open-source SciSciNet database, 97% of them make zero references. Of 100 randomly sampled source documents, 93 do contain references. They are dataset artefacts. 4/8 1155
Reposted by Sylvia Wenmackersvincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 13/08/2026When removing the hidden outliers with CD = +1, the reported decline in disruption largely disappears across all databases used in the Nature study. For Web of Science, it reduces by 93 %. 3/8 1185
Reposted by Sylvia Wenmackersvincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 13/08/2026Due to a (then unreported) bug in the seaborn plotting software, the published histograms silently dropped the largest data points. A peak of papers with the maximum disruption score of CD = +1 was hidden from view, while these papers were kept in the analysis. 2/8 23111
Reposted by Sylvia Wenmackersvincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 13/08/2026The study is based on the CD index, a citation-based measure of how much the successors of a work still rely on its predecessors, running from -1 (consolidating) to +1 (disruptive). Key detail: a paper with zero references automatically gets CD = +1 as soon as it is cited once. 1284
Reposted by Sylvia Wenmackersvincentholst.bsky.social @vincentholst.bsky.social · 13/08/2026In 2023, @nature.com published 'Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time', receiving world-wide media attention. Our Matters Arising, published after a 32 month delay (more on that soon), shows that the reported decline can largely be attributed to dataset artefacts. 🧵 9351173
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersAndreas De Block @andreasdeblock.bsky.social · 12/08/2026Glad this is FINALLY published by Nature. It took them a while to let science be self-correcting. Luckily, in the meantime, nobody cited or used the flawed paper. 071
Sylvia Wenmackers @sylviawenmackers.be · 12/08/2026When your dog is called Luna, you have to show her the power of the moon. 🐶🌚🌞 Mandatory #eclipse picture as seen from Belgium, using a colander for pinholes. 030
Sylvia Wenmackers @sylviawenmackers.be · 12/08/2026It was quite an adventure to be part of this research! Our findings are published today by Nature: rdcu.be/fzwzq Congratulations to Vincent Holst, who found the initial error, and to the rest of the team @andresalgaba.bsky.social, Floriano Tori, and @vincentginis.bsky.social - aka team CSI Academia.rdcu.beDataset artefacts can partially drive the measured decline in disruptionNature - Dataset artefacts can partially drive the measured decline in disruption 2217
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersThe Ramsey Lab @theramseylab.bsky.social · 10/08/2026New 📄 🚨! #CellBio is teeming with simulations comprising an extraordinarily high number of components. We argue that model complexity will not automatically lead to a better understanding of biological systems & discuss how modeling practices could be repurposed: arxiv.org/abs/2608.06998 #philsciarxiv.orgSimulating is not always understanding: When model complexity obscures biologyIn cell biology, computational models of biological systems range from minimal representations with a handful of parameters to whole-cell simulations tracking thousands of molecular species across a c... 47835
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersCentre for Logic and Philosophy of Science (CLPS) @clpskuleuven.bsky.social · 13/07/2026Are you interested in climate modeling & #ML? Sylvia Wenmackers is looking for a #philsci PhD student to examine #uncertainty & #causality in climate science 👇🌍🌡️ www.kuleuven.be/personeel/jo... Apply by August 31 & please help us spread the word! #philsky #academicsky #MLsky #envhum #HPS 11812
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersPhilip Ball @philipcball.bsky.social · 10/08/2026"The central challenge is no longer building models that reproduce biological behavior, but building models from which causal structure can be inferred." Very sensible paper about not just throwing everything into your simulation or model. arxiv.org/abs/2608.06998arxiv.orgSimulating is not always understanding: When model complexity obscures biologyIn cell biology, computational models of biological systems range from minimal representations with a handful of parameters to whole-cell simulations tracking thousands of molecular species across a c... 911734
Reposted by Sylvia WenmackersMichael Barany @mbarany.com · 24/02/2025Absolutely thrilled to be delivering this year's Philosophy of Mathematical Practices Masterclass at Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 18-20 June. Grad students and postdocs, come and talk with me about materials, institutions, and critical contexts! sites.google.com/view/mc-pmp-...sites.google.comMC-PMP-Brussels-2025About 1101