Sign in

ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@

@sven.blacksky.app
1.6K followers 3.9K following 4.4K posts

ɹǝǝuᴉƃuǝ ǝsɹǝʌǝɹ

PostsRepliesMedia
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 24m
Broke: Rogue Nicotine Pouches Woke: Rogue AI Bespoke: Rogue Solar System
020
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 27m
static.klipy.com
Morpheus (Lawrence Fishburne) says 'At last.'
Alt: Morpheus (Lawrence Fishburne) says 'At last.'
020
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 28m
Like every day in Y, harassing of Timnit Gebru, denying her expertise or calling her conspiracy theorist. The person behind this cassandroid account deleted their very stupid / misogynoir original post
David Stansell @daves1412.bsky.social

+ Follow

I think it's both. The Al risk doesn't solely originate from TechBro comms. It also comes from people who invented the stuff (eg Hinton) and who resigned from Al firms. The issue with conspiracy theories is that they can encourage both complacency and passivity. I don't think either are justified. 8:04 PM • Oct 2, 2026+ Follow

@cassandroid.substack.com

Chanda, I'm neurodivergent. Not an excuse for anything. But this is me disagreeing with a message because it does not match 2026's reality, not a person per se. This has nothing to do with race or gender. You don't know me. Let's address the topic at hand. 12:43 PM • Oct 3, 2026cassandroid xo vix @cassandroid.substack.com • 12h The fact that many of the most prominent voices in #ai are crazy assholes (Musk, Thiel, Altman, Huang, ...) doesn't mean that Al can't surpass and thus overpower us. Timnit, please step out of your bubble. Reality does not just cater one problem at a time. 2/3 4 cassandroid x5 uJx @cassandroid.substack.com

••.

+ Follow

I love that you're pointing out the other problems current Al brings. That *does not* exclude the likelihood of Al ending us once it's given the chance. There's a huge fallacy in the center of your argument, which I'm not smart enough to verbalize right now. @xriskology.bsky.social 3/3 11:44 AM • Oct 3, 2026 3 quotes 1 like
000
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Meredith Martin @mmvty.bsky.social · 3h
Our knowledge of “the history of interpretive attitudes about media in transition” uniquely qualifies us to frame, interpret, & rethink our present era of mediatic and technological shift, & the broader disciplinary entanglements that shift requires. scholarlypublishingcollective.org/psup/victori...
scholarlypublishingcollective.org
Digital Victorians: From Nineteenth-Century Media to Digital Humanities by Paul Fyfe
At once a timely, crucial, and sophisticated account of how nineteenth-century thinkers navigated media and technological shift and an argument for how our access to nineteenth-century materials is al...
162
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 2h
Maybe Amenábar's The Others (2001) also ?
000
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 2h
ICYMI 👇
032
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Corey @kh0rish.bsky.social · 10h
Okay. Seeing as these systems are not doing anything remotely similar to cell biology, describe what they do without any terms from biology/psychology, and tell us how these systems will be able to accomplish what you claim. Explain what you are seeing, without alluding to things it is clearly not
1252
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Chanda Prescod-Weinstein 🌌 @chanda.blacksky.app · 02/10/2026
thebulletin.org/2026/09/how-...
thebulletin.org
How the bad science of AI doomerism is good for big business
There is no clear path showing that today’s AI systems will lead to superintelligence, much less a basis for calculating the probability of doom.
17022
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Adolfo Neto @adolfoneto.elixiremfoco.com · 9h
"AI’s major, sustainable, long-term use case is spam generation using locally-run crappy models." sfba.social/@drahardja/1...
sfba.social
Dave Rahardja (temporarily spooky) (@drahardja@sfba.social)
AI’s major, sustainable, long-term use case is spam generation using locally-run crappy models.
0338
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Corey @kh0rish.bsky.social · 9h
They cant stop using analogies and completely out of scope terminology. If they did, they would realize how ridiculous they sound with this shit. Software is ephemeral magic that exists on an intelligence astral plane, instead of just loops through that hardware finite instruction set architecture
cassandroid says:
The architecture of LLMs is built. The weights are grown. We don't understand how these systems actually work internally. Intelligence emerges, nature has shows us that many times. You can't even define what "think" means.
1210917
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 5h
But at the same time, let us remember that heptafluoroisopropyl pentafluoroethyl ketone exists.
040
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 5h
Let's be very clear: water is wet.
250
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 8h
"Capacities are not tasks" -- van Rooij & Guest (2026) journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
be ruled out, it may seem that AI systems that can
(be made to) perform like humans on cognitive tasks
provide at least possible theories of how cognition could
work. However, this inference is not licensed either.
Computational models of tasks, and task performance,
are not yet theories of cognition (Guest & Martin, 2021;
Morrison & Morgan, 1999). Theories of cognition should
at a minimum provide possible explanations of one or
more substantive human cognitive capacities, such as
vision, decision-making, reasoning, concept formation,
learning, or communication (Cummins, 2000; Egan, 2018;
van Rooij & Baggio, 2021). “A capacity is a more or less
reliable ability (or disposition or tendency) to transform
some initial state (or ‘input’) into a resulting state (‘out-
put’)” (van Rooij & Baggio, 2021, p. 684). A cognitive
capacity is thus the ability to transform cognitive states
(e.g., percepts, preferences, beliefs) into other cognitive
states (e.g., beliefs, plans, decisions, actions). Although it
is true that in (hyperempiricist) psychology cognitive
capacities are typically studied by having people perform
various tasks, computationally (or, more often, statisti-
cally) modeling task performance does not yield explan-
atory theories of the full-blown capacities. This is noonly because tasks do not map one-to-one, or in any
other straightforward way, to substantive cognitive capac-
ities, but also because even if they could, the models
would not be able to scale up to situations of real-world
complexity.
AI systems cannot scale. For computational models of
cognition to be able to scale up from toy scenarios (such
as studied in the psychological labs or such as form the
bases of training AI systems through machine learning),
these models should minimally be computationally trac-
table (van Rooij, 2008). That is, the input-output map-
pings hypothesized by the computational models should
in principle be computable using a realistic amount of
resources (Box 1). However, when existing computa-
tional models are mathematically analyzed for their
resource demands it turns out that such models are either
tractable but limited in their input domains, or they are
domain-general but then the models are intractable (for
a textbook introduction to this methodology, see van
Rooij et al., 2019). Consequently, no computationally
tractable account exists to date for substantive and
domain-general cognitive capacities, such as reasoning,
communication, decision-making, planning, analogizing,
categorization, and concept formation (van Rooij et al.,
2019). Moreover, there is no good reason to believe that
such tractable accounts will be forthcoming via machine
learning (van Rooij, Guest, et al., 2024) or otherwise
(Rich et al., 2021). Hence, if someone claims their con-
crete AI system is a “theory” of human cognition, they are
more likely than not overstating the scope and capacities
of the system (van Rooij et al., 2019) and obfuscating the
system’s limits, including the human in the loop needed
to make such systems “work” (Guest & Martin, 2025
0197
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 6h
This bat looks like it saw you picking your nose and eating your boogers.
030
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 6h
Aww, isn't this little guy cute? I'm gonna take him home and hug him and kiss him and squeeze him with all my heart and be such a great friend and call him George.
180
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
merriam 🇰🇳 @merriam.blacksky.app · 15h
The Dominican Republic lost to Haiti 4-1 this week, and because Haitians that had traveled to support their football club had the audacity to celebrate after the victory voilence was inflicted upon them by the local population, and in their tantrum they have banned the Haitian football club
reuters.com
Dominican Republic bans Haiti from its stadiums after Nations League clash
The Dominican Republic on Friday banned Haiti's national soccer team from playing at its sports venues after crowd trouble at a Concacaf Nations ​League match between the two island neighbours.
12014
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Genie Lauren @moreandagain.me · 7h
And shit like this is why you will never catch me stepping FOOT in the Dominican Republic. Fuck that racist-ass country.
12413
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Chanda Prescod-Weinstein 🌌 @chanda.blacksky.app · 8h
Way more *followers lol
1291
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Chanda Prescod-Weinstein 🌌 @chanda.blacksky.app · 8h
We see this all the time with a certain person who has way more influencers than me and people will just say ANY OLD THING about him and then crash out when he calls their shit out bsky.app/profile/chan...
1714
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Chanda Prescod-Weinstein 🌌 @chanda.blacksky.app · 8h
The Bluesky philosophy absolutely is that once a Black person reaches a certain number of followers, people are allowed to talk to us any old way and we are supposed to take it and the medical and psychological consequences of swallowing it because we have a lot of followers
217529
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 7h
« Poor poor pitiful me. Those Black women won't let me be. Lord, have mercy on me. Woe is me » (Also LMAO at « "Black Bluesky" _blacklist_ » )
030
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 8h
Ah, thanks I did miss this post !
040
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 9h
☝️
140
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Heba Gowayed هبة جويد @hebagowayed.bsky.social · 9h
When my father was faculty at Cornell he was stopped by the police chief in the street & asked who he was & where he was going. When he balked at the fact that no one but him, an Arab man, was being asked, the chief said “I’m just protecting students” Same guy failed to investigate 7 rapists.
131898468
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 9h
99.999% of numbers made up by people with quantitative brain rot are very large, even impressive numbers.
140
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 10h
Did you address your misogynoir yet?
static.klipy.com
Pee-wee Herman: I Know You Are But What Am I?
Alt: Pee-wee Herman: I Know You Are But What Am I?
080
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 11h
It's getting worse and worse 😢
140
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
jace cavacini @dysamoria.com · 12h
“When Lynn Margulis went off track, she didn't risk taking human existence down with her.” You appear to be subscribing to the “existential threat” belief system. You might want to check on that, because it appears to be lead by delusional people, many super-wealth, operating like a cult.
techdirt.com
Effective Altruism’s Bait-and-Switch: From Global Poverty To AI Doomerism
The Effective Altruism movement Effective Altruism (EA) is typically explained as a philosophy that encourages individuals to do the “most good” with their resources (money, skills). Its “effective…
1141
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 11h
"Coward" says the one who (1) denies the expertise of a Black academic woman; (2) instead of apologizing, uses their neurodivergence as a shield against folks calling out their racism; and (3) tries to get out of the racist and misogynistic mess they have just gotten themselves into.
cassandroid x5 01x @cassandroid.substack.com

+ Follow

Chanda, I'm neurodivergent. Not an excuse for anything. But this is me disagreeing with a message because it does not match 2026's reality, not a person per se. This has nothing to do with race or gender. You don't know me. Let's address the topic at hand. 12:43 PM • Oct 3, 2026
1121
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Chanda Prescod-Weinstein 🌌 @chanda.blacksky.app · 12h
I’m gonna make a general comment here: every person who comes into a Black woman’s mentions to say she doesn’t know her intellectual place thinks that race and gender has nothing to do with it. BUT: The decision not to consider how Black women are targeted before commenting is itself misogynoir.
1040360
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 12h
I mean, right? Am I huffing clown dust?
150
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 12h
they're playful tho...
130
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 12h
If you were really honest, you'd probably say: "I go after black academics because I'm a racist", not try to hide behind your lack of smarts And lol at "disalowing responses", tired stupid cowardly pretext
1131
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
ProPublica @propublica.org · 30/09/2026
RFK Jr. has been transforming a government that long championed vaccines into one that questions their safety. This is what could happen over the next 25 years if shots are unavailable even to the people who want them. (Published March)
projects.propublica.org
The Horrors That Could Lie Ahead if Vaccines Vanish
Researchers at Stanford University modeled how many people could die or be disabled in 25 years if vaccines for polio, measles, rubella or diphtheria were no longer available.
25480253
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 12h
they're smart enough to use the fancy verb 'to verbalize' though /s
150
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 12h
idk, random guess 👇
Peter Griffin skin color chart race terrorist blank Meme 
The Family Guy skin color chart meme, with lighter tones labeled "don't risk taking human existence down " and darker ones labeled "risk taking human existence down "
The card is held up in front of caucasian apotheosis Peter Griffin, who is sitting in a car, wearing a red vest and red fez cap.
060
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Timnit Gebru @timnitgebru.blacksky.app · 13h
Lolll I've been doing this shit forever and saying the same exact thing I'm saying right now more than a decade ago and am "being pushed by contrarian media dynamics." 🙄 All of you are hypnotized by talk of fictional machine gods and it's me who has to bring evidence to the contrary.
22696130
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Chanda Prescod-Weinstein 🌌 @chanda.blacksky.app · 12h
What’s up everyone, why are you on this one this week
Butterfly meme.
Top: folks on social media
Butterfly: Black woman 
Bottom: is this my punching bag?
237553
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 12h
« There's a huge fallacy in the center of your argument, which I'm not smart enough to verbalize right now. »
static.klipy.com
Tom Senya Puts on Clown Mask
Alt: Tom Senya Puts on Clown Mask
2192
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Antonio E. Porreca 🐳 @aeporreca.org · 19h
I don’t know what’s more stupid here: the bot spamming emails, the researchers answering, the name of the bot, or the journalist “interviewing” it (no, I’m not calling it he/him). Y a rien qui va.
2209
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 14h
« Broken company culture, but with very intelligent, competent, and well-meaning people who might be interested in my future ventures, so I would rather not burn all my bridges. Oh, and I've hired a PR agency. These are undoubtedly my words in this opinion piece published by The Atlantic. »
OpenAI, of course, stands by its safety practices, and maintains that it is being careful enough. I did not make my decision to leave the company lightly. I believe that this technology can be useful and valuable. My former colleagues are smart, work hard, and try to make good choices. But as the company sprints from one launch to the next, it is failing to achieve the level of care that I believe is needed. Now I plan to work on the outside, in the hope that I can help more people understand the risks I saw, and strengthen the incentives OpenAl and other firms have to be safer. Like other colleagues, I'm figuring out exactly what that means. After I quit, I enlisted a PR firm, Spitfire Strategies, to help me navigate the attention and scrutiny that I realize I may now receive. But the decision to speak out is mine alone.
1144
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Cynthia Rose @stillcham.blacksky.app · 14h
Injustice is defined entirely by how bad a thing does or doesn't make them feel *personally.*
021
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
tante @tante.cc · 15h
So the "I left $AILab for ethical reasons" grift is starting up: I understand wanting that bag, wanting to be in on a big thing. But if you thought OpenAI or Anthropic were okay a year ago or so, I really am not willing to give you any credit for leaving now.
theatlantic.com
I Quit OpenAI Because Its Culture Is Broken - The Atlantic
The industry’s approach to safety will guarantee more failures unless something changes.
1223052
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 14h
You gotta admit that it makes much better headlines than your old school Nigerian prince scams. /s
040
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Mark @maetl.bsky.social · 19h
Seems misguided at best and irresponsible patsy at worst to frame this as around ‘communication’ from an ‘entity’, rather than contextualise it as part of a deliberate project to collect responses and develop agent coordination features. (And promote the project itself.)
1344
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Mark Dingemanse @markdingemanse.net · 15h
Definitely great coverage for Ray Rothrock's investment portfolio in cyberscurity (RedSeal), data centers (armada) and AI sales leads (Revic AI) Well done @science.org, you're making your sugardaddy happy
Science's AI IN science reporting initiative is supported by Ray Rothrock & family
0154
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 14h
“Colonist one… Oh my god it admits it.”
static.klipy.com
Tim Robinson: Oh My God, He Admit It!
Alt: Tim Robinson: Oh My God, He Admit It!
010
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 15h
I see one rogue person on the photo and that's not the owl.
131
Reposted by ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@
Andrew (🎃) @athomashemlock.bsky.social · 03/10/2026
Anthony is absolutely spot-on here. And, btw, I don't think these guys really understand that what they're doing IS rhetoric. I think maybe a scant few of the EA dorks just know "I argue with people to convince them of something because rationalism." They are DOING rhetoric, but they don't know it.
173
ddɐ˙ʎʞsʞɔɐlq˙uǝʌs@ @sven.blacksky.app · 03/10/2026
They are outdoing themselves today it seems, is there full moon or something ?
120