Sign in

Mikaela Spruill

@spruill.bsky.social
5.6K followers 447 following 37 posts

Assistant Professor of Psychology| Arizona State University | 1913 | Examining how individual judgments & decisions sustain systemic racial inequity | she/hers mikaelaspruill.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Apoorva Sarmal @apoorvasarmal.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
We’re back with another edition of the Critical Perspectives in Psychology! This year’s theme is Grasping the Root: Bridging Academic & Community Approaches in Psychological Science. We are accepting abstracts for posters, data blitzes & podium talks. Apply by October 8. Link below!
Poster describing the Critical Perspectives in Psychology Preconference 2027. The poster lists three keynote speakers: Dr. Michelle Twali, Dr. Camilla Griffiths, and Dr. Allison Skinner. Now accepting submissions until October 8, 2026. Link on poster and in a post below.
131
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Stanford SPARQ @stanfordsparq.bsky.social · 12/08/2026
New paper from Postdoc Fellow @spruill.bsky.social on "legal enculturation" - a framework for how laws shape people’s beliefs and perceptions. From redlining to jury exclusion, structural inequity gets written into law, which influences our psychology. tinyurl.com/23jtmxjt
031
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Stanford SPARQ @stanfordsparq.bsky.social · 01/07/2026
Jennifer Eberhardt, @spruill.bsky.social, and Julia Proshan attended the APS 2026 convention!🌟 Eberhardt received the James S. Jackson Lifetime Achievement Award, and Proshan presented on the relationship between historical redlining and current disparities in police officers' treatment of drivers.
063
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Stanford SPARQ @stanfordsparq.bsky.social · 24/06/2026
SPARQ is officially on Bluesky! We're excited to connect with the community and share updates and news about our work here!💫
073
Mikaela Spruill @spruill.bsky.social · 25/06/2026
💡New Publication💡 I am excited to share my latest publication and first solo-authored piece “The Law Shapes the Mind: Structural‐Level Influence on Individual‐Level Psychology.” Out now in Social & Personality Psychology Compass dx.doi.org/10.1111/spc3...
192
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
M.J. Crockett @mjcrockett.bsky.social · 21/10/2025
Can AI simulations of human research participants advance cognitive science? In @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social, @lmesseri.bsky.social & I analyze this vision. We show how “AI Surrogates” entrench practices that limit the generalizability of cognitive science while aspiring to do the opposite. 1/
sciencedirect.com
AI Surrogates and illusions of generalizability in cognitive science
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have generated enthusiasm for using AI simulations of human research participants to generate new know…
9288119
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Taya D. Henry, PhD @tayadhenry.bsky.social · 17/06/2025
Our lab’s first study is published in @pppl-journal.bsky.social! We review definitions used in psych & law to describe those wrongly involved in the legal system. doi.org/10.1037/law0000468 @gblancovelasco.com @carinacardoso.bsky.social @karlihamilton.bsky.social @kimberleyclow.bsky.social
1117
Mikaela Spruill @spruill.bsky.social · 20/10/2025
*We are 3 days away from the SPSP Preconference submission deadline!* If your research breaks boundaries in social psychology or you are applying exciting methods to your research, apply today!! spsp.wufoo.com/forms/2026-p...
Advertisement for the Critical Perspectives in Psychology preconference. Displays the invited speakers names & pictures. Includes a QR code to the submission portal.
1103
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Phia Salter @doctaphia.bsky.social · 30/09/2025
We're accepting abstract submissions for the Critical Psychology Preconference until Oct 23rd. Join us! spsp.wufoo.com/forms/2026-p...
0102
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
keturahragland.bsky.social @keturahragland.bsky.social · 29/09/2025
Come join us!!
021
Mikaela Spruill @spruill.bsky.social · 29/09/2025
The Critical Perspectives in Psychology Preconference is back again for year two!! If your research breaks boundaries in mainstream social psych or you are applying exciting methods to your experimental research, our submissions are open! #SPSP2026
195
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Brennan Center @brennancenter.org · 26/09/2025
Join us on September 30 at 3 p.m. ET for a virtual discussion with legal experts and longtime Supreme Court watchers. They’ll break down some of the major cases on the Court's upcoming docket and explain what the outcomes could mean for the future of American democracy. RSVP: bit.ly/4nKeDFP
brennancenter.org
Democracy’s Day in Court
Supreme Court watchers preview pivotal cases on voting rights, fair representation, and presidential power.
13117
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick @reichlinmelnick.bsky.social · 15/05/2025
Supreme Court unanimously rejects the "moment-of-threat rule," which required courts to examine only the exact moment in which a police officer alleged that their safety had been threatened in determining whether they acted reasonably. Kagan's opinion makes clear that this idea is clearly absurd.
Most notable here, the “totality of the circumstances” inquiry has no
time limit. While the situation at the precise time of the shooting will
often matter most, earlier facts and circumstances may bear on how a
reasonable officer would have understood and responded to later ones.
Prior events may show why a reasonable officer would perceive otherwise ambiguous conduct as threatening, or instead as innocuous.
Plumhoff v. Rickard, 572 U. S. 765, well illustrates this point. There,
an officer’s use of deadly force was justified “at the moment” partly
because of what had transpired in the preceding period. Id., at 777.
The moment-of-threat rule applied below prevents that sort of attention to context, and thus conflicts with this Court’s instruction to
analyze the totality of the circumstances. By limiting their view to the
two seconds before the shooting, the lower courts could not take into
account anything preceding that final moment. So, for example, they
could not consider the reasons for the stop or the earlier interactions
between the suspect and officer. And because of that limit, they could
not address whether the final two seconds of the encounter would look
different if set within a longer timeframe. A rule like that, which precludes consideration of prior events in assessing a police shooting, is
not reconcilable with the fact-dependent and context-sensitive approach this Court has prescribed. A court deciding a use-of-force case
cannot review the totality of the circumstances if it has put on chronological blinders.
The Court does not address a separate question about whether or
how an officer’s own “creation of a dangerous situation” factors into the
reasonableness analysis. The courts below never confronted that issue, and it was not the basis of the petition for certiorari. Pp. 4–9.
91 F. 4th 393, vacated and remanded.
KAGAN, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. KAVANAUGH,
J., filed a con
330784
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Mark Joseph Stern @mjsdc.bsky.social · 15/05/2025
The Supreme Court's first and only decision today is Barnes v. Felix. Per Kagan, the court unanimously rejects the 5th Circuit's narrow approach to deadly force claims against police, holding that a proper analysis looks to the "totality of the circumstances." www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...
JUSTICE KAGAN delivered the opinion of the Court.
A police officer’s use of deadly force violates the Fourth
Amendment when it is not “objectively reasonable.” Graham v. Connor, 490 U. S. 386, 397 (1989). And that inquiry
into reasonableness, we have held, requires assessing the
“totality of the circumstances.” Id., at 396 (quoting Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U. S. 1, 9 (1985)).
The question here is whether that framework permits
courts, in evaluating a police shooting (or other use of force),
to apply the so-called moment-of-threat rule used in the
courts below. Under that rule, a court looks only to the circumstances existing at the precise time an officer perceived
the threat inducing him to shoot. Today, we reject that approach as improperly narrowing the requisite Fourth
Amendment analysis. To assess whether an officer acted
reasonably in using force, a court must consider all the relevant circumstances, including facts and events leading up
to the climactic moment.
7430113
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
The Atlantic @theatlantic.com · 10/04/2025
The Supreme Court’s emergency ruling blocked the Trump administration from removing supposed Venezuelan gang members without any legal process, @qjurecic.bsky.social writes. But it “also narrowed the path by which those detainees can contest their removal”:
bit.ly
What, Exactly, Is the Supreme Court Thinking?
The justices exhibit a disturbing willingness to ignore the human costs of Trump’s actions, preferring instead to remain within the more comfortable zone of high-minded legal theory.
1013648
Mikaela Spruill @spruill.bsky.social · 31/03/2025
Thank you all so much for having me!! It was a joy to share more about my research in psychology and law. If you want to learn more about legal judgment & decision making, intriguing Supreme Court cases and what “objectively reasonable” actually means to people, listen to this episode!
0197
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
J. Nathan Matias @natematias.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
Scholarship is an expression of deep hope in the future — by writing things down, we hope that future generations can make some use of what we do. Writing today about the science of AI policy, I am citing a 1950s book on the role of scientists in labor unions. Thank you Milton Nadworny <3
04710
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Neil Lewis, Jr. @neillewisjr.bsky.social · 27/02/2025
Some good news: "The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation will increase its giving over the next two years in response to what it calls a 'crisis' prompted by the Trump administration’s freeze..." www.philanthropy.com/article/maca...
philanthropy.com
MacArthur Foundation to Increase Giving for Two Years in Response to ‘Crisis’
The move was prompted by the Trump administration’s freeze on federal foreign aid and the now-suspended freeze on federal grants.
210916
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Association for Psychological Science @psychscience.bsky.social · 27/02/2025
Congratulations to the newest class of APS Rising Stars ⭐! www.psychologicalscience.org/members/awar...
1629
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Morteza Dehghani @mdehghani.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
At @spspnews.bsky.social, many asked for guidelines on using LLMs in the social sciences. Our new paper in AMPPS addresses exactly that! We provide a primer for evaluating LLMs in social science research, focusing on methodological rigor, replicability, and validity: osf.io/preprints/ps...
1229
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Isha Smith-Ramakrishnan @ishasr.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
First @spspnews.bsky.social symposium complete! I presented my work on differing gendered perceptions of East and South Asians. Really excited to continue this line of work as I wrap up my master’s thesis. Thank you to everyone who came to support! #SPSP2025
0102
Mikaela Spruill @spruill.bsky.social · 20/02/2025
✨Starting in 30 minutes!✨ See you all there! @jadacopelandhayes.bsky.social @keturahragland.bsky.social
020
Mikaela Spruill @spruill.bsky.social · 20/02/2025
Happy SPSP Day to those who celebrate! I’m looking forward to starting this conference off sharing new research, “Right, Wrong or Reasonable? Morality in Legal Decision Making” in the Moral Pre conference!! #SPSP2025
0142
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Equal Justice Initiative @eji.org · 19/02/2025
Where the death penalty remains active, increasing jury diversity can increase reliability and help reduce the risk of wrongful convictions.
eji.org
Diverse Juries More Reliable, Less Likely in Alabama Death Penalty
Accurate representation among juries can reduce wrongful convictions.
26217
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Ronda F. Lo @rondalo.bsky.social · 18/02/2025
I'll be presenting 3 posters at SPSP2025 this weekend! ‼️Thursday Pre-Conferences: Social Psychology in Legal Contexts - 12:15-1pm 🚔 Psychology of Police Shows Advances in Cultural Psychology -3:30-4:45pm 🧬 Gene-Culture Studies ‼️Friday Poster Session B (9-10am) 😷 Asian Health Hazard Stereotype
4183
Mikaela Spruill @spruill.bsky.social · 17/02/2025
Check out the amazing line up of speakers for the inaugural Critical Perspectives in Psychology Preconference! If you are going to #SPSP2025 you don’t want to miss this!!
16220
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Nick Camp @ncamp.bsky.social · 14/02/2025
Going to #spsp2025? Interested in what psychology can tell us about what works (or doesn't) to change policing? Join me @andreadittmann.bsky.social @calvinklai.bsky.social @spruill.bsky.social & Kyle Dobson very early next Saturday to find out.
164
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Politics and Social Change Lab @pascl-stanford.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
A huge thank you to @spruill.bsky.social for sharing her research exploring the influence of legal language on Black and White Americans’ perceptions of police officers and police use-of-force. Truly thought-provoking work!
022
Mikaela Spruill @spruill.bsky.social · 20/01/2025
“To treat the symptoms of creative maladjustment would be to dull a necessary and noble pain that is an authentic moral response to injustice. For King, maladjustment to injustice is an illness with only one cure—justice.” Today’s very timely read.🤔 spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
030
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Mark Anthony Neal (@NewBlackMan on X) @markanthonyneal.bsky.social · 10/12/2024
115534
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Kiana C. @kianacoxphd.myatproto.social · 10/12/2024
You get introduced to some ppl so young & thru the lens of history. To you, they are a legend, an idea, a symbol of excellence, a commitment to Blackness and its humanity. And when they die, you are in profound disbelief. Both surprisingly and predictably, I forgot she was human.
0243
Mikaela Spruill @spruill.bsky.social · 10/12/2024
“If you don’t understand yourself, you don’t understand anyone else.” -Nikki Giovanni 🤍🕊️✨
0155
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Marginalia Science @marginaliascience.bsky.social · 30/11/2024
ICYMI: check out our october newsletter featuring @spruill.bsky.social ✨ the second marginalia science x boston college symposium is coming up; apply to be a speaker by oct 25 (more details and application link in the newsletter) t.co/CsK7PA9g9Q
t.co
https://open.substack.com/pub/marginaliascience/p/newsletter-october-2024?r=ud0ov&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
012
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Brennan Center @brennancenter.org · 26/11/2024
A new analysis shows that the average U.S. Supreme Court justice serves more than twice as long as their counterparts in other major democracies. These longer terms don’t earn the United States better judicial performance, but they do come with costs.
brennancenter.org
Life Tenure for U.S. Supreme Court Justices Is a Global Oddity with Clear Costs
Compared to other democracies, the United States is an outlier in granting life tenure to justices, producing diminishing returns and mounting costs.
28930
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Dee @deelasheeart.bsky.social · 22/11/2024
“The Shop”
illustration of a vibrant Black hair salon with various clients and stylists doing hair. The scene is filled with dynamic energy, showcasing clients getting their hair braided, styled, and flat ironed. The space is warmly lit, with salon tools and hair products visible on counters and shelves. In the background, a stylist sweeps the floor while a child sits under the dryer.
281198386
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Hakan Çakmak @hakancakmak.bsky.social · 22/11/2024
Finally, something like this is out in PSPR! Identities, ideologies, status quos... Exactly where these variables and their antecedents operate in predicting individual responses to political realities hadn't been starkly addressed in mainstream psychology until now. See: doi.org/10.1177/1088...
23614
Mikaela Spruill @spruill.bsky.social · 22/11/2024
My people have arrived!! Welcome to these brilliant scholars & wonderful humans!✨ @keturahragland.bsky.social @marc-alessi.bsky.social @snsmith.bsky.social @jwroberson.bsky.social @callmedanny-7.bsky.social @chadedarby.bsky.social @mohammadwiswall.bsky.social
183
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Matthias Nau @matthiasnau.bsky.social · 19/11/2024
Want to make your research more rigorous and robust? Check out this great set of exercises by @juliafstrand.bsky.social designed to help prevent research mistakes in the lab — perfect for your next lab meeting! carleton-wp-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/site...
0134
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Anthony Perillo, Ph.D. @anthonyperillo.bsky.social · 18/11/2024
Tuesdays (1pmET/11amMT) I host a webinar w/ other experts in behavioral health & law on various #PsychLaw issues. It's free & providers get free CEUs! This week, Terrill Taylor discusses ways stigma for those w/ criminal legal involvement impacts wellness. Register: hsc-unm.zoom.us/webinar/regi...
Tuesday, November 19, 2024 11:00AM - 12:00PM

Law and Mental Health
Breaking Barriers: How the Stigma of Criminal Legal Involvement Affects Mental Health and Help-Seeking Behavior

Terrill O. Taylor, Ph.D.
Anthony Perillo, Ph.D.

Disclosure Statement: The presenters have no financial relationship to this activity.

Outcomes/Objectives
1. Describe the stigma of criminal legal involvement.
2. Analyze the impact of stigma for justice-involved individuals on mental health outcomes and help-seeking behavior.
3. Examine structural barriers that contribute to internalized stigma for justice-involved individuals experiencing mental health concerns.
4. Examine the role of language in shaping perceptions and reducing biases within professional and social contexts, particularly regarding individuals with justice system experience.
0126
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
rytah! ✍🏾 @iamdcarrington.bsky.social · 18/11/2024
Nikki Giovanni: Why do we as black writers seem to be so hung up on the truth? James Baldwin: Because the responsibility of a writer is to excavate, because the act of writing is the intention of it, the root of it is liberation. “A Conversation.” [1971]
074
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Roseanna Sommers @rosesomm.bsky.social · 14/11/2024
Kate Weisburd and I have a new empirical paper out in the Northwestern University Law Review! We ask: what do ordinary Americans believe about how Miranda rights are invoked? t.co/fjpjlJ4vUY 1/4
78335
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Jess Salerno @jesssalerno.bsky.social · 14/11/2024
@spspnews.bsky.social @spspsc.bsky.social come join @kurtjgray.bsky.social @jackiemchen.bsky.social @erichehman.bsky.social and others to learn about Social Psychology in Legal Contexts at our preconference...we have a killer line up!
0123
Mikaela Spruill @spruill.bsky.social · 15/11/2024
“Whereas the law seeks to provide fair process in a timely fashion, science seeks to discover truth over time. This means that what was once fair may become unfair; the justice of yesteryear may be unjust today.”
050
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Nils Reimer @reimtime.bsky.social · 13/11/2024
I am hoping to recruit a Ph.D. student to join our Social Injustice and Social Change research group at UC Santa Barbara in Fall 2025! You can more information about the position, about our team, and about our research on our website. sisc.psych.ucsb.edu/posts/recrui...
sisc.psych.ucsb.edu
Social Injustice and Social Change (UCSB) - Recruiting Ph.D. Students
13935
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Andy Luttrell @andyluttrell.bsky.social · 12/11/2024
Whoa, this place is exploding! With everything going on last week, I forgot to share the latest episode of my social science podcast, "Opinion Science." Ep 101 featured an interview w/ Dr. Rich Petty, co-developer of the Elaboration Likelihood Model & all-around persuasion expert Links below...
1249
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Joel Le Forestier @joelleforestier.bsky.social · 12/11/2024
Now that everyone is back on 🦋, it seems as good a time as any to remind people: I'm recruiting my first PhD student(s) this cycle! Deadline is December 1! Apply! We have lots of exciting and important work to do! Lab info: joelleforestier.com Program info: www.psychology.pitt.edu/social-program
joelleforestier.com
Identity & Intergroup Relations Lab
Identity & Intergroup Relations Lab in the Department of Psychology at the University of Pittsburgh, directed by Dr. Joel Le Forestier, studying intergroup experiences, prejudice, and interventions.
04628
Mikaela Spruill @spruill.bsky.social · 12/11/2024
This. This failure is the one I find myself returning to this past week. In the most progressive state in the U.S., we saw a distinct regression regarding the criminal legal system (see Prop. 36, as well). This should concern us all.
281
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Joel Le Forestier @joelleforestier.bsky.social · 11/11/2024
The starter pack I was looking for but couldn't find: Social psychologists who study diversity, equity, inclusivity, and related topics, broadly construed. DM me if you want to be added (or removed)! #PsychSci #socialpsyc go.bsky.app/MAoGLF4
2313958
Reposted by Mikaela Spruill
Mary C. Murphy @marycmurphy.bsky.social · 11/11/2024
Now more than ever community and support is needed. That’s why @sylviapperry.bsky.social and I are happy to solicit applications for the 3rd annual CASBS Summer Institute on Diversity. If you're a pre-tenure prof studying diversity, apply & repost! Apps due: Dec 11 casbs.stanford.edu/call-applica...
Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences (CASBS) at Stanford University Institute on Diversity
05843