A new report argues New Zealand can meet its looming energy shortfall by accelerating rooftop solar and electric hot water

MacKenzie Scott was the nation’s top philanthropist in 2025 and ranks third behind Warren Buffett and Bill Gates and Melinda French Gates in terms of lifetime giving.

For many Adelaideans, Adelaide Writers’ Week (AWW) is the highlight of their year. A glorious six days when the Pioneer...

Attorney-General Michelle Rowland asked Paul Brereton to explain why his ongoing ties to Defence had not been "adequately" disclosed in a letter sent last year.

It often shows up in a small, familiar moment. A people decision squeezed between meetings. A difficult conversation shortened because the calendar allows ten minutes, not thirty. A trade-off felt instinctively, then overridden because speed feels safer than delay. Nothing dramatic happens. The decision moves on. The impact lands later. Across organisations, moments like these are becoming more common. Decisions carrying significant human and ethical consequence arrive faster than ever, while the space required to process them with care continues to contract. Under AI-accelerated conditions, this compression intensifies. Senior leaders, particularly women who carry responsibility for culture, people, and ethical consequence operate within a widening mismatch. Expectations for sound judgement, humanity, and discernment rise, while time, attention, and relational capacity tighten. When leadership environments privilege speed as a proxy for effectiveness, judgement narrows. Trade-offs become harder to hold. Ethical complexity gets managed through urgency rather than deliberation. The qualitative research explored in my latest white paper _The Compassion Advantage_ examined this dynamic through in-depth interviews with female leaders across 12 industries. The findings surfaced a consistent pattern: leadership systems now move at a pace that routinely outstrips the conditions sound human judgement relies on to operate effectively. ## **The Illusion of Efficiency** For many professional women, leadership under pressure has become a diagnostic lens into a broader organisational issue. While leaders aspire to show up with care, courage, and presence, the systems they operate within steadily erode the conditions that make this possible in practice. Longstanding leadership norms reward visible movement, control, and output. Within these “busy” systems, leaders described how creating space for deep listening, reflection, and ethical sense-making carried reputational risk, even as complexity increased. Over time, efficiency masks erosion in decision quality. Choices narrow, trade-offs receive less consideration, and relational impact shifts downstream. Human consequence becomes something addressed after the fact rather than held at the point of decision. The research names this pattern as a compassion deficit: a system state where the human capabilities required to navigate complexity are overtaken by constant urgency. ## **Trust is the New Power** One of the clearest signals emerging from the research relates to how influence functions under pressure. In high-pressure environments, formal authority alone rarely sustains meaningful followership. Influence increasingly flows through relational trust, the lived experience of being seen, heard, and considered. Where trust remains thin, performance contracts to what compliance can enforce. When trust is designed into leadership systems as infrastructure, contribution expands. Leaders gain operational leverage, the ability to slow decisions that carry consequence, name trade-offs clearly, and lead through uncertainty without defaulting to control. Trust, in this sense, re-expands decision space inside compressed systems. ## **Compassion Dies in a Busy System** Across the research, organisational pace emerged as a structural force shaping how leadership is practised. As busyness became the default operating state, work organised itself around speed, throughput, and constant motion. Within these conditions, compassion became harder to sustain because time, attention, and proximity were steadily removed from leadership work. What surfaced was a misalignment between responsibility and support. Leaders carried accountability for people and culture inside systems that reduced the space required to practise care in real time. Compassion was not absent. It was outpaced by design, as pace increasingly dictated what leaders could notice, hold, and follow through on. ## **Care is a Leadership Capability** A recurring gap emerged between the way organisations speak about empathy and the skills they build to support it in real leadership moments. Care frequently operates as an informal expectation, while leadership systems invest little in the skills required to practise it under pressure. When compassion rests solely on personal disposition, it becomes fragile under accelerating demands. The research frames care as a developable leadership capability, supported by specific skills such as perspective-taking, ethical reasoning, and the ability to hold difficult conversations with clarity and humanity. Without system reinforcement, leaders absorb escalating emotional load without corresponding capacity. Over time, this dynamic accelerates exhaustion and compassion fatigue, particularly for women who often carry disproportionate relational and ethical responsibility. ## **Purpose is a Performance Advantage** In AI-shaped environments, the ability to choose well under pressure emerges as a defining leadership challenge. The research highlights purpose as a stabilising force, an internal reference point that supports judgement when options narrow and human consequence intensifies. Purpose in corporate environments often lives as language on a slide or a statement of intent on a wall. In practice, it works best as a decision guardrail when pressure tightens and trade-offs carry human consequence. It helps leaders orient toward long-term impact while navigating short-term demands, preserving coherence when speed threatens to override sense-making. ## **Designing for Judgement** For women shaping culture and capability, attention increasingly turns toward system fitness as AI accelerates pace and exposes the limits of individual endurance. The question becomes whether leadership environments are designed to strengthen judgement as consequence increases or whether they continue to erode it. As AI increases pace, complexity, and decision volume, organisations best positioned for the long term are redesigning leadership systems to support how human judgement operates under sustained pressure. This shift from individual endurance toward structural support sits at the heart of _The Compassion Advantage_ findings and recommendations. If the moments described here reflect your leadership context, the full white paper explores these patterns in depth and offers a framework for redesigning leadership systems that protect sound human judgement in a world that keeps moving faster. You can download a copy here. Penny Locaso is a behavioural scientist and leadership advisor supporting senior leaders and organisations to strengthen sound judgement and decision quality in fast-moving, high-consequence environments. Her work explores how leadership systems shape behaviour, ethics, and impact as AI accelerates pace and complexity. Share this AIwomen in leadershipworkplace by Penny Locaso 20 hours ago ## Stay Smart! Get Women's Agenda in your inbox * Email * Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ ## Latest news ### From classroom to leadership: Women are driving Australia’s educational transformation ### Women to watch: The leaders transforming education in Australia ### Lack of progress for women startup founders masked by headline improvement, 2025 report shows ### Melinda French Gates says Bill must answer questions on Epstein files ### How Trump’s USAID cuts and the anti-rights backlash have hit adolescent girls in Asia Pacific ### How an International Court judge thinks about hope

SA Treasurer claims if Whyalla Steelworks is not sold it’s Canberra’s problem and refused to say whether more taxpayers dollars are needed.