Sign in

Robert Ross

@robert-m-ross.bsky.social
800 followers 1.1K following 98 posts

Cognitive scientist at Macquarie University in Sydney. Research on delusions, metascience, misinformation, reasoning, and religion. Google Scholar: tinyurl.com/5f2udu5p

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Robert Ross
Jenny Terry @jennyterry.bsky.social · 17/08/2026
Welcome to the Jangle (Fallacy): The Case of Statistics and Mathematics Anxieties, with Charlie Lea and @profandyfield.com, is out now in the British Journal of Educational Psychology (open access): bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/... #StatsEd #MathsEd
bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
<em>British Journal of Educational Psychology</em> | Wiley Online Library
Background Statistics-related anxiety is a common barrier to learning in higher education, particularly for psychology and other non-specialist students. High prevalence rates are concerning because...
142
Robert Ross @robert-m-ross.bsky.social · 26/07/2026
www.bps.org.uk/research-dig...
bps.org.uk
Do people really believe the conspiracy theories they say they do? | BPS
A recent paper looks more closely at suspiciously high research estimates of conspiracy endorsement.
010
Reposted by Robert Ross
Eiko Fried @eikofried.bsky.social · 15/07/2026
Great work by @robert-m-ross.bsky.social: Do People Sincerely Believe Conspiracy Theories That They Endorse? Raccoon pink/yellow (highly bizarre army conspiracy) is a yes/no sincerity check; green/orange is self-report if they answered sincerely. online.ucpress.edu/collabra/art...
072
Reposted by Robert Ross
Beth Clarke @bethclarke.bsky.social · 15/07/2026
If you had to guess, what proportion of social/personality psych articles include a claim that the findings can be applied in the real world?
53514
Robert Ross @robert-m-ross.bsky.social · 07/07/2026
Every wonder whether people *really* believe in magic? @neillevy.bsky.social, Ryan McKay, and I have the carefully reviewed the literature and can provide you with the definitive answer: sometimes. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
0256
Robert Ross @robert-m-ross.bsky.social · 06/07/2026
cc @wchiggins.bsky.social
000
Reposted by Robert Ross
Prof Neil Martin @thatneilmartin.bsky.social · 05/07/2026
And here's a spotlight I wrote for the next edition of Psychology cc @robert-m-ross.bsky.social
031
Reposted by Robert Ross
Prof Neil Martin @thatneilmartin.bsky.social · 05/07/2026
A propos nothing very much at all, here's a review of the Reading The Mind In The Eyes test which was based on, well, some unusual data and practices. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38232573/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Construct validity evidence reporting practices for the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: A systematic scoping review - PubMed
The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) is one of the most influential measures of social cognitive ability, and it has been used extensively in clinical populations. However, questions have been...
121
Reposted by Robert Ross
Theiss Bendixen @theissbendixen.bsky.social · 06/06/2026
It's alive! 🎉 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘀𝘁'𝘀 𝗚𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗖𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗘𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁 is out -- an introduction to causal inference in practice. The first two chapters are available for free here: theissbendixen.com/dag-book/ More below 👇
38522
Reposted by Robert Ross
mat marques, ph.d. @mdmarques.com · 11/05/2026
if you're really curious about the true state of reality, click below for the latest from @matthewmatix.bsky.social @scicomguy.bsky.social @srhastraea.bsky.social @lingtax.bsky.social @robert-m-ross.bsky.social @eddieclarke.bsky.social, Martin, and me reported in the @aunz.theconversation.com
theconversation.com
Conspiracy theories: do 300,000 Kiwis really believe Canada is building an army of mutant super-raccoons?
Surveys may overestimate belief in conspiracy theories because of trolls and jokers – but genuine believers can still cause real-world harm.
1134
Reposted by Robert Ross
Pablo Solana @p-solana.bsky.social · 17/04/2026
Glad to see this finally out! Grateful to have been part of such a large collaborative effort: ✨️ Effects of Psychological Distance on Mental Abstraction: A Registered Report of Four Tests of Construal-Level Theory 📚 Out now in AMPPS journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
journals.sagepub.com
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
153
Reposted by Robert Ross
Saloni @scientificdiscovery.dev · 28/04/2026
You ever try the 'Reading the Mind in the Eyes test' and wonder, how is that any of them?!
A woman turning and looking at the viewer. Pick the word that fits best. 1. aghast, 2. baffled, 3. distrustful, 4. terrified.
21544
Reposted by Robert Ross
Justin Sulik @justinsulik.bsky.social · 15/04/2026
We have a new preprint that underscores some key claims here: even if one *can* design an agent that gets through a survey fine, it doesn't follow that such agents are undetectable or common. We find that they are far from common! Preprint link in thread👇
1178
Reposted by Robert Ross
Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
Important reminder why survey results examining the % of people who believe in conspiracies should not directly be interpreted as the % of people who believe in conspiracies. Respondents don't all answer seriously, so the news that 12 million people believe in lizard people is not accurate.
1183
Robert Ross @robert-m-ross.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
Survey research is often interpreted as showing that belief in conspiracy theories can be surprisingly widespread, including belief in conspiracy theories that would be astonishing if true. For example, in The Atlantic we learn that “12 million Americans believe lizard people run our country”
38338
Reposted by Robert Ross
Eiko Fried @eikofried.bsky.social · 09/03/2026
Curious about how psychological theories are built, tested, and refined in practice? This summer, the Theory Methods Society is launching the very first edition of the summer school Theory Building in Psychology at the University of Amsterdam (July 6–10, 2026). theorymethodssociety.org
theorymethodssociety.org
Theory Methods Society –
05318
Reposted by Robert Ross
Pat Savage @patrickesavage.bsky.social · 23/02/2026
My book is now published! 🌏🎶🧪
 You can download it for free at academic.oup.com/book/62353 - I’d be grateful if you do! I also published an accessible summary with audio/video today in @nature.com: www.nature.com/articles/d41... Try reading that first, then give the whole book a read if you like it!
Front cover of my book, titled "Comparative musicology: Evolution, universals, and the science of the world's music" (published today by Oxford University Press)1st of my 4-page essay published in Nature today titled "Music is not a universal language - but it can bring us together when words fail"
Picture caption: "Puerto Rican rapper Bad Bunny (centre) performed in Spanish at the half-time show of the 2026 American Football Super Bowl LX."
711251
Reposted by Robert Ross
David C. Vaidis @vaidis.bsky.social · 22/01/2026
📢 Post-doc position – Toulouse (France) 🇫🇷 A post-doctoral position (12 months) is open at CNRS in Toulouse to work with me on the relationship between signal detection theory, conspiracy beliefs, and perceptions of corruption... 🔗 emploi.cnrs.fr/Offres/CDD/U... Feel free to share!
emploi.cnrs.fr
Portail Emploi CNRS - Offre d'emploi - PhD contract on ANR COPYCAT : "Study of the relationship between conspiracist beliefs and perceptions of corruption" M/F
Assurez-vous que votre profil candidat soit correctement renseigné avant de postuler
067
Reposted by Robert Ross
Wendy Higgins @wchiggins.bsky.social · 24/01/2026
Thrilled to share our new paper introducing “validity potential” versus “realised validity” as a key distinction for psychological measurement, with @davidmkaplanx.bsky.social, Alexander Gillett, @suttonprofessor.bsky.social, and @robert-m-ross.bsky.social www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
sciencedirect.com
Rethinking psychological measurement: Validity potential versus realised validity
We propose a concept of validity with a novel feature that we argue can facilitate improved measurement validation practices in the psychological scie…
2275
Reposted by Robert Ross
Niels G. Mede @nielsmede.bsky.social · 21/10/2025
Published today: One of the biggest #science #communication studies to date. We asked 71,922 people in 68 countries how they #engage with information about #science and combined the data with several country-level factors: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/... #OpenAccess
415783
Reposted by Robert Ross
Samantha Joel @datingdecisions.bsky.social · 10/09/2025
In a new paper, my colleagues and I set out to demonstrate how method biases can create spurious findings in relationship science, by using a seemingly meaningless scale (e.g., "My relationship has very good Saturn") to predict relationship outcomes. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
journals.sagepub.com
Pseudo Effects: How Method Biases Can Produce Spurious Findings About Close Relationships - Samantha Joel, John K. Sakaluk, James J. Kim, Devinder Khera, Helena Yuchen Qin, Sarah C. E. Stanton, 2025
Research on interpersonal relationships frequently relies on accurate self-reporting across various relationship facets (e.g., conflict, trust, appreciation). Y...
1721581
Robert Ross @robert-m-ross.bsky.social · 29/08/2025
My collaborator Alessandro Sparacio is leading a new multisite study examining the effectiveness of self-administered mindfulness meditation for stress reduction. More details here: www.linkedin.com/posts/alessa...
linkedin.com
Research Scientist | Alessandro Sparacio
🤝 Join Our Global Study on Mindfulness & Mental Health! 🌍 We are seeking international collaborators for a funded, multi-site study: "Building Resilience Across Socioeconomic Contexts." This projec...
041
Reposted by Robert Ross
Nick Byrd, Ph.D. @byrdnick.com · 25/08/2025
Those experiencing delusions were more likely to jump to conclusions on certain tasks. 🤔 But the *strength* of delusional beliefs did not correlate with propensity to jump to conclusions. Open access link below. #logic #psychiatry #criticalThinking #cogSci #decisionScience
151
Reposted by Robert Ross
Association for Psychological Science @psychscience.bsky.social · 08/08/2025
APS's journal AMPPS has accepted its first manuscript through a collaboration with a nonprofit that offers decentralized, community-driven peer review. @dsbarra.bsky.social 
psychologicalscience.org
AMPPS Accepts First Manuscript From Innovative Peer Review System
The APS journal Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science has accepted its first manuscript through a collaboration with a nonprofit that offers decentralized, community-driven peer review.
02916
Reposted by Robert Ross
Wendy Higgins @wchiggins.bsky.social · 06/08/2025
oh wow! lovely to see people engaging with my research 😃 www.bps.org.uk/research-dig...
bps.org.uk
The ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test’ may be less robust than we thought | BPS
A new paper assesses the widely-used tool.
1339
Robert Ross @robert-m-ross.bsky.social · 01/08/2025
Is there a relationship between delusional ideation and a jumping to conclusions cognitive bias? Our new meta-analysis led by Rose Doherty (wisely not on social media) syntheses evidence from 42 studies and finds... nothing! First publication from her PhD research 🎉
160
Reposted by Robert Ross
Omid Ghasemi @omidghasemi.bsky.social · 05/06/2025
Our recently published paper in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review on #reasoning styles and #belief in God is now featured by @psychonomicsociety.bsky.social! Thanks, Jonathan Caballero, for the interesting article. 📄 Read the paper here: doi.org/10.3758/s134...
doi.org
Reflective thinking predicts disbelief in God across 19 countries - Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
In the present study, we tested three hypotheses about relationships between reflective thinking, intuitive thinking (both measured using the Cognitive Reflection Test; CRT), and belief in God or gods...
0189
Reposted by Robert Ross
Psychonomic Society @psychonomicsociety.bsky.social · 03/06/2025
Mysterious ways our reasoning styles relate to belief in God. #psynomPBR paper by @omidghasemi.bsky.social @onurcanyilmaz.bsky.social @jennyterry.bsky.social @robert-m-ross.bsky.social. Post by J Caballero
wp.me
Reflecting on godly matters … and on cognitive reasoning styles
Our world is incredibly vast and culturally diverse. One of the evident ways in which cultures differ includes their religious beliefs, creating a rich array of expressions and practices. Wandering…
075
Robert Ross @robert-m-ross.bsky.social · 18/05/2025
I had hoped AI could unlock the secrets of the universe. Sadly, I was wrong...
020
Reposted by Robert Ross
Nature Human Behaviour @nathumbehav.nature.com · 17/04/2025
Why do scientists disagree with each other? This new study from @justinsulik.bsky.social et al. surveys psychologists to find that scientific divides are associated with differences in researcher cognitive traits. @mi3lab.bsky.social www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
Differences in psychologists’ cognitive traits are associated with scientific divides - Nature Human Behaviour
Scientific disagreements are not just a matter of using different methods or having conflicting data. Sulik et al. surveyed psychological scientists and found that disagreements are also associated wi...
15113
Robert Ross @robert-m-ross.bsky.social · 18/04/2025
Just in time for Easter lighthouse.mq.edu.au/article/apri...
lighthouse.mq.edu.au
Atheists have a soft spot for God, new study shows
121
Reposted by Robert Ross
Mark Alfano @markalfano.bsky.social · 16/04/2025
new preprint available! Trust from Mistrust: When is Trust Rationally Justified? Co-authors @michalk.bsky.social @stevebland.bsky.social @robert-m-ross.bsky.social osf.io/preprints/ps... Drawing on insights from Nietzsche's Human All-too-human, we develop a framework for wisely placing trust 🧵
osf.io
OSF
164
Robert Ross @robert-m-ross.bsky.social · 10/04/2025
Wendy Higgins (@wchiggins.bsky.social), who developed all these projects that interrogated the validity of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test, has just been awarded her PhD and joined BlueSky! Follow her for more cutting-edge research on measurement and meta-science!
2164
Robert Ross @robert-m-ross.bsky.social · 10/04/2025
Dr Wendy Higgins, who developed several brilliant projects that interrogated the validity of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test, has been awarded her PhD and joined BlueSky! Follow her for cutting-edge research on measurement and meta-science as she begins the next stage of her academic carer! 😀
040
Robert Ross @robert-m-ross.bsky.social · 10/04/2025
Is Publons defunct? It got bought by Clarivate Analytics several years ago (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publons). When I dig around on their webpage attempting to access it I go round in circles. I was thinking of mentioning it in a metascience paper as an example of an attempt to reward peer review.
220
Reposted by Robert Ross
Neil Levy @neillevy.bsky.social · 01/04/2025
I’ve seen philosophers citing work on the RMET. Might be a good time to stop doing that.
2153
Reposted by Robert Ross
Nick Brown @steamtraen.eu · 01/04/2025
media.tenor.com
a man is singing into a microphone while wearing a yellow shirt .
ALT: a man is singing into a microphone while wearing a yellow shirt .
031
Reposted by Robert Ross
Lisa DeBruine @debruine.bsky.social · 01/04/2025
Yes, constantly
1132
Reposted by Robert Ross
Natalie Christie Peluso 🧠 @nataliepeluso.com · 01/04/2025
Reading the Mind in the Eyes test... Ugh. Uninterpretable is an understatement - check thread with links for why this test should never be in your social cognition battery. Ever.
2112
Reposted by Robert Ross
Cat Hicks @grimalkina.bsky.social · 01/04/2025
worst fight I ever got into in grad school was me borderline losing my shit completely at autism dev researchers about this kind of thing
7463
Reposted by Robert Ross
Nate Phillips @nphillips36.bsky.social · 01/04/2025
Really dig this paper and kudos to the authors on a methodologically rigorous, transparent evaluation of a widely used measure of social cognition across nine (!) existing datasets. Well worth checking out
111
Reposted by Robert Ross
Sara Grady @saramgrady.bsky.social · 01/04/2025
If there was a March Madness for measure I most loathe, this would wear the crown
131
Robert Ross @robert-m-ross.bsky.social · 01/04/2025
Have you every found yourself wondering whether the most widely used measures of social cognitive ability measure what they are supposed to measure?
58230
Reposted by Robert Ross
Will Gervais @willgervais.com · 28/03/2025
🚨New Paper Klaxon 🚨 Belief in Belief: Even Atheists in Secular Countries Show Intuitive Preferences Favoring Religious Belief. Now out at PNAS www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/... Here's a quick 🧵 on what we did and found!👇 1/ 11 🧪 #atheism #religion #culture #evolution
pnas.org
Belief in belief: Even atheists in secular countries show intuitive preferences favoring religious belief | PNAS
We find evidence of belief in belief&mdash;intuitive preferences for religious belief over atheism, even among atheist participants&mdash;across eight comparat...
56829
Reposted by Robert Ross
Will Gervais @willgervais.com · 07/02/2025
You know how Dennett wrote about *belief in belief* in Breaking the Spell? Well we found it! Maybe. Evidence that even atheists in secular spots tend to intuitively prefer faith over #atheism, using the Knobe effect. Updated preprint here, and a thread below. Enjoy! 🧪 osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io
OSF
11710
Reposted by Robert Ross
Michelle Dawson @autismcrisis.bsky.social · 13/12/2024
Reiterating "that RMET scores are unsubstantiated, and thus uninterpretable" & again recommending "that researchers stop using the RMET as a measure of social cognitive ability and re-evaluate existing research findings based on RMET scores" www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... autism-relevant
sciencedirect.com
Why most research based on the reading the mind in the eyes test is unsubstantiated and uninterpretable: A response to
Murphy and Hall (2024) present two criticisms of our review of construct validity evidence reporting practices for the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Te…
2124
Reposted by Robert Ross
Niels G. Mede @nielsmede.bsky.social · 20/01/2025
Out now in Nature Human Behaviour: Our 68-country #survey on public attitudes to #science 📣 It shows: People still #trust scientists and support an active role of scientists in society and policy-making. #OpenAccess available here: www.nature.com/articles/s41... @natureportfolio.bsky.social (1/13)
7358163
Reposted by Robert Ross
mat marques, ph.d. @mdmarques.com · 20/01/2025
read some good news on January 20 2025 theconversation.com/most-of-us-t...
theconversation.com
Most of us trust scientists, shows a survey of nearly 72,000 people worldwide
A global new survey shows there’s no crisis of trust in scientists, as some might claim. But there are some nuances.
33511
Reposted by Robert Ross
Viktoria Cologna @colognaviktoria.bsky.social · 20/01/2025
Our global study on the state of trust in scientists is now out in Nature Human Behaviour! 🥳 With a team of 241 researchers, we surveyed 71,922 people in 68 countries, providing the largest dataset on trust in scientists post-pandemic 👇🧵https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-02090-5
24903384