Sign in

Rick Carlsson

@rickcarlsson.bsky.social
2.1K followers 613 following 24 posts

Open Science. Meta-Science. Editor-in-Chief at Meta-Psychology.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Nick Brown @steamtraen.eu · 02/08/2026
I'm disappointed that after 8 comments nobody has yet asked the obvious question here.
A Facebook question: "Has anyone else used Updoc for their certificate of good health?"
191
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Chelsea Parlett @chelseaparlett.bsky.social · 04/05/2026
I am SO DELIGHTED that public libraries exist🥹 I went to return a book (operation bounce house) and pick up a new one (bobiverse #2: for we are many) and I was so HAPPY to see so many people there enjoying books, services, or just somewhere quiet to exist without buying anything 🙏 Truly incredible.
2446
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Melissa Kline Struhl @mekline.bsky.social · 05/05/2026
Psych-DS is spellcheck for your datasets, and it has an R package now! Available in beta now, made by the excellent Brian Leonard, instructions here: psych-ds.github.io/psychds-r/
Screenshot of the "Create Dataset" page of the psych-DS Shiny app from the new R package psychds
38139
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Saloni @scientificdiscovery.dev · 15/04/2026
I gave a TED talk today!
me on the TED stageMe giving the TED talkMe, still talkin'
1827716
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Nick Brown @steamtraen.eu · 09/04/2026
Guéguen is now up to 12 retractions and 15 "eXpReSsIoNs Of CoNcErN" at 13 different journals. docs.google.com/spreadsheets... cc @harrisonmanley.bsky.social @jamesheathers.bsky.social
docs.google.com
Loading Google Sheets
Web word processing, presentations and spreadsheets
072
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Health Nerd @gidmk.bsky.social · 08/04/2026
A new paper has come out that has Twitter/X afire. It seems to argue that gender-affirming care for transgender youth is not only ineffective, but potentially harmful. It's also a very poorly-done piece of work. My new piece: gidmk.substack.com/p/does-gende...
gidmk.substack.com
Does Gender-Affirming Care Make Mental Health Worse?
The case of a rather poorly-done paper.
1033165
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Ian Hussey @ianhussey.mmmdata.io · 01/04/2026
Majestic, well done @rickcarlsson.bsky.social
The alt text for this image is available upon reasonable request.
26827
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Richard McElreath 🐈‍⬛ @rmcelreath.bsky.social · 02/04/2026
how I feel when open science initiatives choose to publish in Nature
Batman breaking a firearm and saying, "This is the journal of the enemy. We do not need it. We will not use it."
522840
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Eiko Fried @eikofried.bsky.social · 18/03/2026
Hey friends, my new paper was just published in JAMA Psychiatry. I draw on biological species classification to sketch a new framework for psychiatric nosology. Brief summary follows below. Full text link: jamanetwork.com/journals/jam... 🧪 #PsychSciSky #MentalHealth
jamanetwork.com
Mental Disorders as Homeostatic Property Clusters
This narrative review explores the idea of understanding mental disorders according to homeostatic property clusters rather than through typical classification systems.
315457
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Marcus Crede @marcuscrede.bsky.social · 17/11/2025
I am hoping to recruit a graduate student for next year. That person would help conduct research on leadership, individual differences, and methodological skullduggery. Please forward to any potentially interested students.
199
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 08/11/2025
My Shiny app containing 3530 Open Science blog posts discussing the replication crisis is updated - you can now use the SEARCH box. I fixed it as my new PhD Julia wanted to know who had called open scientists 'Methodological Terrorists' :) shiny.ieis.tue.nl/open_science...
shiny.ieis.tue.nl
Open Science Blog Browser
Open Science Blog Browser
34319
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Marcus Crede @marcuscrede.bsky.social · 09/11/2025
I struggle to think of a statistical "method" that has been more damaging to psychology (and related disciplines) than mediation analysis based on observational data. IMHO all such manuscripts should be desk rejected.
152
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 09/11/2025
This one surely has something on offer for every one: In this cross-sectional mediation analysis, the "effects" of soft drink consumption on depression were "mediated" by abundance of Eggerthela in the gut microbiome. This was sent to me via dm and now you all got to suffer as well.
jamanetwork.com
Soft Drink Consumption and Depression Mediated by Gut Microbiome Alterations
This cohort study examines the association between soft drink consumption and major depressive disorder diagnosis and severity and whether this association is mediated by changes in the gut microbiota...
149723
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 28/07/2025
New blog post! Calculating a correlation is easy enough. But let's say you calculated two of them and they happen to differ. What follows from that? Turns out there are too many moving parts for an easy answer. www.the100.ci/2025/07/28/w...
the100.ci
What’s in a correlation?
Correlation may not imply causation, but let’s just ignore that for a second. Correlations are standardized effect size metrics and as such have some quirks by design. These are benign enough when you...
88627
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · 07/11/2025
I feel like psychometrics is uniquely bad at naming things. Parallel, congeneric, tau-equivalent, essentially tau-equivalent measures? Configural, metric, scalar, residual invariance? Item difficulty defined so that the higher the difficulty, the easier the item???
16957
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 29/10/2025
New blog post: Why we should stop using statistical techniques that have not been adequately vetted by experts in psychology daniellakens.blogspot.com/2025/10/why-... where I reflect on how we should check the quality of novel statistical techniques.
3135
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Nick Brown @steamtraen.eu · 31/10/2025
Pro tip: When fabricating a dataset, also make several errors in the analysis of the fake data. Then when sleuths point out the errors as well as the fabrication, you can make a more plausible fake dataset when the editor lets you correct the statistical errors "in the interest of fairness".
072
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Marcus Crede @marcuscrede.bsky.social · 27/06/2025
After a day or two of sleuthing I have realized that a recent (and likely to be very influential) meta-analysis missed 30%-40% of the relevant literature. Do I bother trying to correct the record?
481
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Melissa Kline Struhl @mekline.bsky.social · 09/04/2025
Psych-DS is (1) spellcheck for your datasets and (2) a pathway to standardizing data in our academic fields that *everyone* can learn. And it's live RIGHT NOW! psych-ds.github.io (This is the announcement post I've been leading up to)
psych-ds.github.io
Psych-DS
A specification for psychological datasets. JSON metadata, predictable directory structure, and machine-readable specifications for tabular datasets.
913360
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Nick Brown @steamtraen.eu · 10/03/2025
This article notes that "Among 40 papers flagged as having issues, he [i.e., me] found 14 false positives (for example, the model stating that a figure referred to in the text did not appear in the paper, when it did)". For background, here are the cases that I believe to be false positives. /0
27728
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Florian Naudet @floriannaudet.bsky.social · 06/03/2025
OSIRIS (Open Science to Improve Reproducibility in Science) is currently conducting several interventional studies on Open Science practices. We invite interested colleagues to register and join a group that may take part in these studies. More info and registration 👇
osiris4r.eu
Join the OSIRIS Reproducibility Network: A Collaborative Effort to Advance Open Science
Become part of a dynamic network committed to enhancing research transparency and reproducibility through innovative randomized controlled trials. Contribute your expertise, gain valuable training, an...
01618
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Overly.Honest.Editor @editoratlarge.bsky.social · 15/02/2025
I will therefore not complain if someone tries to introduce more structure. And so here you go: a decent attempt at methods building from @jamesheathers.bsky.social : jamesheathers.curve.space (Could I have a PDF though? </s>) 2/
jamesheathers.curve.space
An Introduction To Forensic Metascience
151
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Malte Elson @malte.the100.ci · 24/02/2025
Wow, this should be super interesting. Wait, no, that's his book from 2022. Sorry!
2246
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Elisabeth Bik @elisabethbik.bsky.social · 10/01/2025
I am sorry that you fail to see the benefit of this paper or this type of work, Brett. Read it first, perhaps.
21114
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
ERROR @error.reviews · 08/01/2025
We are excited to announce the review of Lades et al. (2020) "Daily emotional well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic". Based on the review by Joop Adema, we find Moderate Errors which do not affect the core conclusions. We recommend the authors seek a correction error.reviews/reviews/lade...
error.reviews
Lades et al. (2020)
ERROR is a bug bounty program for science to systematically detect and report errors in academic publications
12216
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Marcus Crede @marcuscrede.bsky.social · 05/01/2025
Hey Quant Folks: Does anyone have any recommendations for testing if two correlation matrices are meaningfully and/or statistically significantly different from each other? NB: In the words of Jeremy Irons: "Please feel free to speak to me as you might to a young child or a golden retriever."
6142
Rick Carlsson @rickcarlsson.bsky.social · 17/11/2024
Bluesky has finally reached the maturity that we get the important content
030
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Saloni @scientificdiscovery.dev · 17/11/2024
Just thinking, my name sounds Italian enough that I could probably invent a new pasta shape and name it after myself and no one would find it strange.
10842
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Jack Wilkinson @jdwilko.bsky.social · 15/11/2024
I understand that there was considerable resistance to the introduction of Risk of Bias tools, but I don't know where to find this discussion, which took place before my entry into the world of research. Any suggestions?
166
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Pam Davis-Kean, PhD @umpamdk.bsky.social · 15/11/2024
And just like that-academic twitter reformed into academic BlueSky. I’ve missed seeing all this interaction and sharing of science.
924616
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Adam Kucharski @adamjkucharski.bsky.social · 04/10/2024
Gladwell's latest book includes the below conclusion about who we might target during pandemics (from: www.theguardian.com/books/2024/s...). But the below plot seems to be the main evidence driving this claim, and it's... not very convincing (from: www.pnas.org/doi/epub/10.... )
75811
Rick Carlsson @rickcarlsson.bsky.social · 22/05/2024
Join our conference on Open Science and Reproducibility. Keynote by Lakens and @annemscheel.bsky.social , with @nulliusinverba.bsky.social live on stage at the record shop / “folkölscafé” (bar) Mono. opensciencesweden.org/aktiviteter....
Conference flyer, all information also in the link
22315
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
Peder M Isager @isager.bsky.social · 18/03/2024
Interested in replication research? Consider writing a commentary for the next special issue in Meta-Psychology which will publish critiques of the article "Replication value as a function of citation impact and sample size": open.lnu.se/index.php/me...
11412
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
👊 Ulrich Schimmack 👊💥 ❤️ 🇨🇦 🇪🇺 🇺🇦 👎🇺🇲 @ulrichschimmack.bsky.social · 03/01/2024
A comparison of vanZwet et al. (Gelman, Goodman) and Schimmack and Bartos's studies of clinical trials in medicine using abstracts and Cochrane reviews. replicationindex.com/2024/01/03/a...
011
Reposted by Rick Carlsson
simine vazire @simine.com · 08/12/2023
Finally! New policies for Psych Science in 2024 (part 1): Editorial 1: www.psychologicalscience.org/public… Editorial 2 w/ @tomhardwicke.bsky.social : www.psychologicalscience.org/public…
psychologicalscience.org
311262