Reposted by @penguinonepal.bsky.socialCristian Farias @cristianfarias.com · 03/01/2026Best thing I’ve read this morning, from a human rights lawyer in Mexico. Translation is in the ALT-text. 3927961346
Reposted by @penguinonepal.bsky.socialSteven Mazie @stevenmazie.bsky.social · 26/09/2025Justice Kagan writes a dissent, joined by Sotomayor and Jackson. The majority has “enabled the presidential usurpation of Congress‘s power of the purse”. 07033
Reposted by @penguinonepal.bsky.socialFree Law Project ⚖ @free.law · 31/07/2025Thanks Orin! Lots of details here for those interested: bsky.app/profile/free... 023
Reposted by @penguinonepal.bsky.socialTrump Litigation Bot @trumplitigation.bots.law · 24/07/2025New filing: "State of Washington v. Trump (Birthright Citizenship (Appeal))" Doc #163-1: Opinion Download PDF | View Full Case #CL69621321 001
Reposted by @penguinonepal.bsky.socialAnne Joseph O’Connell @ajosephoconnell.bsky.social · 23/07/2025Since @orinkerr.bsky.social asked, a thread, from limited information reported online, about how I see the US attorney mess in DNJ. 1. Trump picked Habba as interim US Attorney under 28 USC 546. Technically, the AG is supposed to pick, but whatever. She gets 120 days to serve. 12672174
Reposted by @penguinonepal.bsky.socialCharlotte Garden @charlottegarden.bsky.social · 14/07/2025I'm not pollyannaish about the Court, but I'm still shocked by this - there will be an enormous amount of chaos, and damage that cannot be undone. And zero explanation from the 6 justices in the majority. 68924
Reposted by @penguinonepal.bsky.socialBlake Emerson @blakeprof.bsky.social · 08/07/2025It’s like we get treated to two levels of arbitrary rule: first Trump, and then the Court, when they summarily stay lower court orders. 0305
penguinonepal.bsky.social @penguinonepal.bsky.social · 08/07/2025Glad to see Justice Jackson making this really essential point. If only she wasn't making it alone. 010
Reposted by @penguinonepal.bsky.socialSteve Vladeck @stevevladeck.bsky.social · 03/07/2025"Today’s order clarifies only one thing: Other litigants must follow the rules, but the administration has the Supreme Court on speed dial." 648283
Reposted by @penguinonepal.bsky.socialAaron Reichlin-Melnick @reichlinmelnick.bsky.social · 23/06/2025I'm writing this post in high dudgeon because what the Court endorsed today is unamerican and contemptuous not just of the role of the judiciary but also of the responsibility we have as a nation to those in our custody and those we subject to punishment. I'm mad as hell. You should be too. 251904439
Reposted by @penguinonepal.bsky.socialBobby Kogan @bbkogan.bsky.social · 22/06/2025The third traunche of Byrd bath results is out! Unsurprising but very welcome news - Republicans may not limit the ability of federal courts to issue preliminary injunctions or temporary restraining orders www.budget.senate.gov/ranking-memb...budget.senate.govMore Provisions in Republicans’ “One Big, Beautiful Bill” Are Subject to Byrd Rule, Parliamentarian Advises | U.S. Senate Committee On The BudgetThe Official U.S. Senate Committee On The Budget 732283
Reposted by @penguinonepal.bsky.socialMatthew Stiegler @matthewstiegler.bsky.social · 13/06/2025I'm in the minority, and maybe a small one, but I think these administrative stays are genuinely harmful and should not be treated as routine. A federal court has ruled that a dramatic step of national significance was illegal and unconstitutional. It ruled. 1/ 20643151
Reposted by @penguinonepal.bsky.socialTrump Litigation Bot @trumplitigation.bots.law · 05/06/2025New filing: "Aviel v. Gor (IAF Dismantling [Appeal])" Doc #1208746275: Per Curiam Order Filed (Special Panel) Download PDF | View Full Case #CL69853472 001