Sign in

Pablo Gómez Barreiro

@pagomba.bsky.social
1.5K followers 233 following 234 posts

🌱 Seeds |🌿 Plants |📜Academic publishing Most limited of all specialists. Infamous bibliometrician. Amateur photographer of tiny things 📷🔬. 👨‍💻 Too much R. Proud father of #MDPIexploreR. 📈 Surfing the strain: doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00327

PostsRepliesMedia
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 18/09/2026
Which one is it?
000
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 11/07/2026
I think I'm providing nesting material for all the leafcutter #bees in the neighbourhood. 🐝 🍃
Shrub with numerous circular cutouts in its leaves, made by leafcutter bees
020
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Sholto David @sholtodavid.bsky.social · 17/06/2026
Recently published "Expert Review of Clinical Immunology": A so called "scattered plot", which plots something against nothing in particular. A diagram that looks convincing but is back to front; assigning low COVID-19 mortality to western countries. 10.1080/1744666X.2026.2664060
282
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 03/06/2026
Not immediately, though. More like it takes 37 days. Figure from direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
010
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Sajad Alipour @sajadalipour98.bsky.social · 03/06/2026
Tussilago farfara Asteraceae Tehran, Iran February 2026 Elevation 1800m
1538
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 17/05/2026
#ggplot detected in Invincible S04 episode 3?
010
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 13/05/2026
Ah, I remember the twitter days and the hashtag #receptiogate to refer to this case.
020
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
🌲 CT scan of an Allocasuarina tessellata cone. With thanks to the National X-ray Computed Tomography group.
25015
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
🧪
010
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
🌲 CT scan of an Allocasuarina tessellata cone. With thanks to the National X-ray Computed Tomography group.
25015
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Reese Richardson @reeserichardson.bsky.social · 28/04/2026
In @science.org by @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social : www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Thousands of shady ads sell paper authorship for cash, large-scale investigation finds
Results are “only the tip of the iceberg” of shadowy paper-mill marketplace
171
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Solal Pirelli @solalpirelli.bsky.social · 27/04/2026
Did you know there's a barely hidden market for authorship of fake scientific papers in conferences? New preprint w/ @abalkina.bsky.social, @mkunesova.bsky.social, and @yaamurozturk.bsky.social : arxiv.org/abs/2604.22458 We found 4,000+ ads & matched them to 1,720 IEEE conf. papers! ...🧵
arxiv.org
Opening Pandora's box: Paper mills in conference proceedings
Paper mills are a growing threat to the integrity of science, yet their penetration in conference proceedings remains underexplored despite conferences being more important than journals in some scien...
16437
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Plants, People, Planet @plantspeopleplanet.bsky.social · 27/03/2026
Climate-driven intraspecific shifts in seed germination phenology: Consequences for native temperate woodland restoration and regeneration Dayrell et al. 📖 nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... @robertadayrell.bsky.social @rbgkew.bsky.social #PlantScience Photo: @pagomba.bsky.social
Close-up photo of a line of germinating seeds.
002
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 26/03/2026
Late to the party. Took me a while to find an old section pic of a Ceiba seed
140
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Sarah Hird, PhD @sarahhird.bsky.social · 26/03/2026
I appreciate that the scientists who made this both convey their results & their personal opinions on the taxa. Bats = beautiful, majestic creatures worthy of our investigation & wonder Rodents, monkey, dog, cow, donkey = meh Humans = barely tolerable Cats = laughable evolutionary mistakes, idiots
Phylogeny with various taxa represented by pictogramsClose up of the 2 bats who are very detailed and in gray scale. Close up of dog and cat. Dog is silhouette of real looking dog. Cat is definitely not a real cat with eyeballs, a nose, three legs in a weird pose and … fingers?
1319
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Jean-François Cudennec @limpetnerd.eurosky.social · 12/03/2026
1/ Homing is a widespread animal behaviour and uses lots of different mechanisms : magnetoreception for migrating birds, time-compensated sun compass for monarch butterfly... But one animal's homing ability remains unexplained after 60+ years of research: the limpet.
25323
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 06/03/2026
:)
030
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 06/03/2026
Success!
100
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 06/03/2026
Shit
100
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 06/03/2026
I'm going to click save. Wish me luck
120
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Al Yankovic @alyankovic.bsky.social · 16/02/2026
Did you know that strawberries are not berries, and are actually mammals?
2985489781
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 13/02/2026
Maybe it was 17, and then the union got involved and gave editors a tea break. A wild guess of course
100
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 13/02/2026
Loving the wild energy of this invitation to publish with #MDPI. Keep it up!
101
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Mark A. Hanson @hansonmark.bsky.social · 02/02/2026
All set for New Horizons 💎 #OpenAccess in Nijmegen! Thank you to the organisers for the opportunity to speak on the Strain, Stain, & Drain of scientific publishing. Looking forward to great conversations on moving #ScientificPublishing forward! bit.ly/StrainQSS www.horizondiamond.nl#schedule
November 01 2024
The strain on scientific publishing Open Access
Mark A. HansonCorresponding Author 
ORCID logo
 , Pablo Gómez Barreiro 
ORCID logo
 , Paolo Crosetto 
ORCID logo
 , Dan Brockington 
ORCID logo
Crossmark: Check for Updates
Author and Article Information
Quantitative Science Studies (2024) 5 (4): 823–843.
https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00327
Article history
Cite Icon
Cite
Open the
PDFfor in another window
Permissions
Share Icon
Share 
Views Icon
Views Open MenuThe Drain of Scientific Publishing
Fernanda Beigel, Dan Brockington, Paolo Crosetto, Gemma Derrick, Aileen Fyfe, Pablo Gomez Barreiro, Mark A. Hanson, Stefanie Haustein, Vincent Larivière, Christine Noe, Stephen Pinfield, James Wilsdon
The domination of scientific publishing in the Global North by major commercial publishers is harmful to science. We need the most powerful members of the research community, funders, governments and Universities, to lead the drive to re-communalise publishing to serve science not the market.
Comments:	1 Figure, 1 Table, 1 Supplementary Table
Subjects:	Digital Libraries (cs.DL)
Cite as:	arXiv:2511.04820 [cs.DL]
 	(or arXiv:2511.04820v2 [cs.DL] for this version)
 
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.04820
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Dan Brockington [view email]
[v1] Thu, 6 Nov 2025 21:20:22 UTC (2,101 KB)
[v2] Mon, 17 Nov 2025 20:05:17 UTC (2,113 KB)The Issue with Special Issues: when Guest Editors
Publish in Support of Self
Paolo Crosetto1*, Pablo Gómez Barreiro2
, Mark Austin Hanson3*
1. Univ. Grenoble Alpes, INRAE, CNRS, Grenoble INP, GAEL; Grenoble, France
2. Department of Science Operations, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Wakehurst, UK
3. Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter; Penryn, Cornwall, UK
* corresponding authors – PC: paolo.crosetto@inrae.fr, MAH: m.hanson@exeter.ac.uk
Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID)
PC: 0000-0002-9153-0159
PGB: 0000-0002-3140-3326
MAH: 0000-0002-6125-3672
3145
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
🌴 Scott Zona, Ph.D. 🌴 @scottzona.bsky.social · 26/01/2026
Two weeks ago, I posted this photo of Guiacum sanctum seed, which prompted a viewer to ask, What is the function of ruminate endosperm? This week, we’ll look at ruminate (not ruminant 🐄) endosperm. 🧵 #Zygophyllaceae #seed #endosperm #ruminate #Botany 🌾🧪🌱 1/2
Close-up photo of a seed that has been cut in half longitudinally. One half has the cut surface exposed (right), showing the embryo and ruminate endosperm. The other half (left) is turned to show the surface, which is dark brown and covered with tiny pits. Photo by Scott Zona CC BY-NC 2.0.
1356
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Jeffrey Brainard @jeffreybrainard.bsky.social · 17/01/2026
#SpecialIssues have fueled the growth of some of the largest #OpenAccess publishers. Does a journal that allows a #GuestEditor to both plan a special issue and write many articles in it have a conflict of interest? #scicomm #peerreview @science.org www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Some guest editors pack special issues with their own articles
Thousands have penned more than one-third of a journal issue, raising conflict-of-interest concerns
22618
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Mark A. Hanson @hansonmark.bsky.social · 13/01/2026
We've got ISSUES. Literally. We scraped >100k special issues & over 1 million articles to bring you a PISS-poor paper. We quantify just how many excess papers are published by guest editors abusing special issues to boost their CVs. How bad is it & what can we do? arxiv.org/abs/2601.07563 A 🧵 1/n
17514314
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 13/01/2026
🧪 Thousands of special issues are stained with PISS (>33% of articles authored by the guest editor). See @hansonmark.bsky.social's thread below for a brief summary, read our preprint (arxiv.org/abs/2601.07563), explore our ShinyApp to see where it occurs (paolocrosetto.shinyapps.io/Editors_as_a...).
arxiv.org
The Issue with Special Issues: when Guest Editors Publish in Support of Self
The recent exceptional growth in the number of special issues has led to the largest delegation of editorial power in the history of scientific publishing. Has this power been used responsibly? In thi...
01511
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 19/12/2025
I’ve zoomed in on the graph peaks and enhanced the result.
000
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 18/12/2025
Night encounters 🦊
050
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Public Knowledge Project @pkp.sfu.ca · 08/12/2025
📣 Our friends at the #ScholCommLab have published a preprint, "The Drain of #ScientificPublishing", and are calling for #research communities, funders, governments, and #universities to "re-communalise publishing to serve #science not the market" doi.org/10.48550/arX... #ScholComm #AcademicSky
Infographic titled “The Drain of Scientific Publishing,” describing four problems in scholarly publishing: Money, Time, Trust, and Control.

Money: Illustration of flying dollar bills and buildings beside a bank. Text explains that for-profit publishers charge unreasonable reading and publishing fees disconnected from production costs, noting that Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley, and Taylor & Francis made $US 12 billion profit from 2019–2024.

Time: Illustration of a stressed researcher surrounded by stacks of papers and a clock. Text states researchers spend enormous time as authors, reviewers, and editors, maintaining a system that prioritizes quantity over quality, causing burnout and reduced rigor.

Trust: Illustration of a magnifying glass over retracted papers. Text describes commercial pressures to publish quickly, enabling low-quality and fraudulent papers, eroding public confidence.

Control: Illustration of a person with medals labeled with journal metrics. Text explains that rankings like journal impact factor and h-index dictate success, with infrastructures biased toward English journals and controlled by for-profit companies.

At the bottom, a stop-sign graphic reads “Stop the Drain.” Additional text calls for altering incentives and ownership of publishing, re-communalizing scholarly publishing, building community-led systems, preventing unreasonable profits, and using existing open models and infrastructures (e.g., preprints, diamond journals, OJS, SciELO). A final statement urges aligning research assessment with open, community-led publishing.
12615
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 03/12/2025
All hail the one true metric
010
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Paolo Crosetto @paolocrosetto.bsky.social · 30/11/2025
Since AI slop is again all over Scientific Reports, a thread on the economics of grey-zone publishing. Why does slop keep getting published? What does it mean for science? How can we stop this? Background readings: Understand the strain: tinyurl.com/2b6wxx5r Stop the drain: tinyurl.com/3jfscscy
An obviously AI-generated figure with AI slop and fake text all over it, recently published in Scientific Reports.
411172
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Samuel Moore @samuelmoore.org · 28/11/2025
Interesting investigation into a dodgy Elsevier journal -- with the additional nugget that the CEO of Elsevier's parent company made more than €15 million in total compensation last year. english.elpais.com/science-tech...
english.elpais.com
The fall of a prolific science journal exposes the billion-dollar profits of scientific publishing
One of the 15 publications that put out the most studies globally has been expelled from the indexing system for irregularities. Its publisher, Elsevier, has a 38% profit margin that reached $1.5 bill...
38960
Pablo Gómez Barreiro @pagomba.bsky.social · 28/11/2025
www.theguardian.com/artanddesign...
theguardian.com
Pearly kings and queens of London in their 150th year – photo essay
Photographer Owen Harvey explores belonging and identity in his work, and as the pearlies reach a major milestone, he decided to capture their traditions and discuss their future
020
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
LSE Impact @lseimpactblog.bsky.social · 19/11/2025
💥New: Money, Time, Trust, Control – How commercial publishers drain science ✍️ @danbrockington.bsky.social @aileenfyfe.bsky.social @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca #AcademicSky #ScholComm #AcademicPublishing
blogs.lse.ac.uk
Money, Time, Trust, Control – How commercial publishers drain science - Impact of Social Sciences
Have the interests of commercial publishers now become antithetical to the pursuit of knowledge?
32825
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Danny Kingsley @dannykay68.bsky.social · 15/11/2025
EXCELLENT graphic on the drain of scientific publishing! zenodo.org/records/1759...
04636
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Lizzie Wall @wall-e2.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
~$2.5bn in profits, ~35% profit margin
044
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Roland Pease @peaseroland.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
The numbers in here are huge, ~$2.5bn in profits (~35% profit margin) to 4 major academic publishing houses. How much lost research expenditure does that equate to?? Windfall tax, anyone?
0116
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Golareh Khalilpour @golareh.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
This is now canon.
043
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Stefanie Haustein @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca · 13/11/2025
Thank you for coming to my TED Talk 🎤 If you’ve read this far and still need convincing, please check out our preprint arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820 and this infographic: doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 10/10
The four-fold drain of scientific publishing: Money, Time, Trust, and Control.
46438
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Stefanie Haustein @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca · 13/11/2025
Over the past months (and at least 11 versions!), I was lucky to work with 11 amazing colleagues on a call to action to reform academic publishing. Not another declaration, but an appeal to our powerful friends, research funders & institutions, to Stop the Drain of Scientific Publishing. 1/n
16842
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Randy Ellis @randalljellis.bsky.social · 13/11/2025
For comparison, the profits of four publishers (2.64B) amount to 5.58% of the FY2024 NIH budget. Revenues (7.36B) are *15.52%*. I agree with the authors' perspective that funders, governments, and universities should lead efforts to change this. All journals should be diamond open-access.
021
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Gon García-Castro @gongcastro.bsky.social · 13/11/2025
A 30-40% profit margin for a company that mostly relies on unpaid labour from their own "clients" to barely do their job making science (which they did not produce) available is a good case for abolishing the whole industry.
1124
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Caroline Armitage @carolinearmitage.bsky.social · 13/11/2025
A really great set of 3 papers for anyone wanting to get to grips with systemic issues in scientific publishing in a concise and data-supported way!
076
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
David Harding @groupharding.bsky.social · 13/11/2025
There's no question that some degree of regulation is now needed to bring profits into line with other industries, especially as we are mostly publicly funded.
054
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
KaminskiMed @kaminskimed.bsky.social · 13/11/2025
time to end the exploitation! Researchers should get a part of the profits make on their publications. Reviewers should be paid for reviewing. Simple. #Pay4MyPapers #Pay4PeerReview
063
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Kira Hopkins @kirahopkins.bsky.social · 13/11/2025
This great article is - rightly - garnering a lot of responses from academics. Many voice outrage, a call for regulation of the market etc. But this is somewhat of an abrogation of duty! Both 'Strain' and 'Drain' cover the Big 5 - there is a wide, rich publishing ecosystem outside of them. 1/2
1134
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Jonny Coates @jacoates.bsky.social · 11/11/2025
Mark knocking it out of the park again!
042
Reposted by Pablo Gómez Barreiro
Artem Ilin @adc34.bsky.social · 11/11/2025
Extremely important effort and call for action for researchers everywhere! Bravo, Mark and co!
044