iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 1h

ADHD is disabling & esp so for us who can't take meds. On this, there's something a bit upsetting when people insist it's a superpower *just* because they are impressed by the output. Do they see us as a machine or a chatbot which has value because of the nature of the output? Feels dehumanising.

4618

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Ajuna Soerjadi 🌸 @ethicsofai.bsky.social · 28/09/2026

Will share more about the wonderful festival organized by @samiraibnelkaid.bsky.social 🩷 but for now, just sharing my drawing from the amazing workshop by @marentierra.bsky.social and @joostvossers.bsky.social to create situated and social depictions of AI to decolonize public representations ✨️✨️🙏

1107

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 25/09/2026

Thanks so much to my wonderful colleagues Marieke & @marentierra.bsky.social for setting up at @samiraibnelkaid.bsky.social's amazing festival: reject AI instead reclaim the future! 🫚 💞 💥 Posters are here: zenodo.org/records/1736... & you can read more here: olivia.science/ai about our work.

a photo of this poster: https://zenodo.org/records/17111928

photo of some cool orange lighting, a fluorescent green frame with this poster in it: https://zenodo.org/records/17367323

a very blue frame with a poster from here in it: https://zenodo.org/records/17367323 which says Have you considered not using AI?

a room with a black table and a blue frame with a poster that says AI is evil: https://zenodo.org/records/17367323

24416

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

Much enjoying @samiraibnelkaid.bsky.social 's Reclaiming Our Futures festival together w/ @marentierra.bsky.social @ethicsofai.bsky.social @markdingemanse.net @joostvossers.bsky.social and many more not on Bluesky reclaimingourfutures.org

The future is rhizomatic

(picture is a ginger root)

Reclaiming our futures

1152

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Ajuna Soerjadi 🌸 @ethicsofai.bsky.social · 23/09/2026

My representation of some of the discourse about @irisvanrooij.bsky.social her work 🤣🤣🤣

47314

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 01/09/2026

The same paper by @olivia.science, @marentierra.bsky.social et al. (2026): zenodo.org/records/2008... also explains how "Knowledge production is ... safeguarded by (inter)national codes of conduct for research integrity (ALLEA 2023; KNAW et al. 2018)." 🧵

Honesty implies that we do not secretly use AI technologies without disclosure, and that one does
not make unfounded claims about the presumed capabilities of AI technologies (this also follows
from Responsibility; see example from MIT Economics 2025, where perhaps too little too late was
done).
Scrupulousness demands, among other things, that scientists only use AI products whose functional-
ity is well-specified and validated for its specific scientific usage (cf. Kwisthout 2024; Kwisthout and
Renooij 2025). This includes terminological precision about what formalisms, models, and/or tech-
nologies are used (recall Figure 1) and rigorous argumentation to motivate why these technologies
are appropriate for the scientific purposes at hand.
Transparency requires that the AI technologies are open source and computationally reproducible.
Here we must recall the technology industry’s obfuscatory tactics: “the name of the current
producer of ChatGPT. ‘OpenAI’ sounds like it is engaged in open science, but as we have now
seen, ‘open’ never really means what you think it does.” (Mirowski 2023, p. 738; see also Dingemanse
2025; Hao 2025; Jackson 2024; Liesenfeld and Dingemanse 2024; Liesenfeld, Lopez, et al. 2023;
Maffulli 2023; Maris 2025; Nolan 2025; Solaiman 2023; Thorne 2009; Widder et al. 2024)
Independence means that scientists ensure that their research is unbiased by AI companies’ agendas,
and that any potential conflicts of interest are declared in publications and other public communi-
cations (this also follows from Honesty and Transparency; cf. Mohamed Abdalla and Moustafa
Abdalla 2021; Atkin 2025; Forbes and Guest 2025; Knoester et al. 2025).
Responsibility precludes scientists from using AI products whose use is irresponsible, e.g. harmful to
people, animals, and the environment, or otherwise in violation of legal guidelines (e.g. copyright,
data privacy, labour laws, Butterick 2025; Cole 2025; Rijo 2025; Tafani 2024a). Minimizing harm is ...

1348

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Timothy Babulski, PhD @tokenintellect.bsky.social · 31/08/2026

I've read plenty of great academic articles over the years. Many that have challenged my thinking. A few that had me nodding along. This is the first I've ever wanted to cosign.

1249

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Wiep Hamstra @wiep.bsky.social · 29/08/2026

This man needs to learn how to read. Basic skill. It doesn’t take weeks to read some articles. Besides, the summaries are already there.

1472

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 29/08/2026

Postscript: This thread is brought to you by someone who just learnt that a full professor of AI declares in a Dutch newspaper that it is A-Okay to not read 30 papers, but instead fine to ask CLAUDE for a "summary". 🧵 archive.is/VYIKn

Figure. (left) a desk with stack of books, papers, and a computer. Above it the words "2 hours". (right) icon depicting text produced by Claude. Above it the words "5 minutes".

Caption: Two hours searching, or five mintes reading a summary?

613618

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 29/08/2026

The conclusion is NOT "we need to debias LLMs" Besides that it's impossible, it also detracts from the point, which is: We shouldn't use machines to offload of the very cognition that is constitutive of the work to be done & supercharge existing inequities and injustices in the process. 🧵

544191

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 29/08/2026

Here is another example of *automated cryptogyny*: LLM removed my co-authors, *three of whom were women*. Instead, LLM states I published the paper with a *man* with whom I co-authored *other* papers. 🧵

5534211

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 29/08/2026

Using LLMs in science for “literature review” or “summarizing" is *automated cryptogyny* olivia.science/cryptogyny/ @olivia.science 🧵

olivia.science

Cryptogyny

On the systematic obfuscation of women's contributions.

3388167

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 16/08/2026

"my hands are tied" feels like a "this is what I say when I am caught just doing whatever the racist wanker wants because I am a loser too"

2174

Marcela Suarez @marentierra.bsky.social · 16/08/2026

puffffff “waiting for the revolution"

010

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Jed Brown @jedbrown.org · 16/08/2026

Journalists need to stop letting "our commitment hasn't changed" slide without context. Emissions continue growing, companies are getting worse at reporting and are increasingly building with (dirty, inefficient) behind-the-meter simple-cycle gas. The Target is a decoy irrelevant to decision-making.

“The world looks different now than when we co-founded the climate pledge,” said Margaret Callahan, an Amazon spokeswoman. Still, “our commitment hasn’t changed,” she said.

4-tile figure for Google, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft. Each pane shows MtCO2e versus year, with curves for Unadjusted, Adjusted, and Target. On each plot, the Target goes down while Unadjusted grows rapidly and Adjusted is in-between (mostly growing). Amazon is missing recent data.

Figure from: https://ketanjoshi.co/2026/02/17/big-tech-greenwashing-report/

02611

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 11/08/2026

And it also solidifies patriarchy and white supremacy within academic spaces going without critique or as @irisvanrooij.bsky.social and @marentierra.bsky.social say being white washed using critical language but 0 actions. It's a great strategy within such leftist (in name) spaces.

071

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 11/08/2026

Seeing group of men (philosophers, engineers, cognitive scientists) finding each other in their shared hate of women experts who work and think outside the(ir) mainstream. Patting each other on the back for mysogynist dunks & mischaracterisations, while thinking they are smart and doing noble work.

934657

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

This mf has visited Antalya Book Fair 2026 twice so far @fellowesin.eurosky.social · 10/08/2026

UPDATES ON THE COLORS: - Laborwashing (red) - Openwashing (orange) (Thanks @ethicsofai.bsky.social!!) - Memewashing (yellow) - Greenwashing - Accessibilitywashing (cyan) (Thanks again Soerjadi!) - Ethicswashing / Philosophywashing (blue) (Philosophywashing fellowesin.neocities.org/turing/criti...

fellowesin.neocities.org

The Critical Washing Rainbow - /turing - Esin's Neocities

241

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 04/08/2026

Open Letter: Stop the Uncritical Adoption of AI Technologies in Academia It's been a year & people tell me they've changed their mind, feel safer now to sign, etc. So I'm sharing it again for them. We're almost at 2k & anybody from anywhere can add their names. openletter.earth/open-letter-...

We call upon you to:

• Resist the introduction of AI in our own software systems, from Microsoft to OpenAI to Apple. It is not in our interests to let our processes be corrupted and give away our data to be used to train models that are not only useless to us, but also harmful.

• Ban AI use in the classroom for student assignments, in the same way we ban essay mills and other forms of plagiarism. Students must be protected from de-skilling and allowed space and time to perform their assignments themselves.

• Cease normalising the AI hype and the lies which are prevalent in the technology industry's framing of these technologies. The technologies do not have the advertised capacities and their adoption puts students and academics at risk of violating ethical, legal, scholarly, and scientific standards of reliability, sustainability, and safety.

• Fortify our academic freedom as university staff to enforce these principles and standards in our classrooms and our research as well as on the computer systems we are obliged to use as part of our work. We as academics have the right to our own spaces.

• Sustain critical thinking on AI and promote critical engagement with technology on a firm academic footing. Scholarly discussion must be free from the conflicts of interest caused by industry funding, and reasoned resistance must always be an option.

6312144

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 14/07/2026

Yup. I think this fits their trajectory, indeed. Part of a wider attempt at claiming that we should just find ways to use these "tools" through some pragmatic acceptance. See: doi.org/10.5281/zeno... bsky.app/profile/oliv...

0149

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 14/07/2026

For more thoughts on the role of 'critical thinking' see our CAILs framework, by @olivia.science, @marentierra.bsky.social and me. 📝 Full paper: zenodo.org/records/1778...

Figure 1: The important dimensions of CAILs across research and education; clockwise from 12 o’clock: Conceptual Clarity is the idea that terms should refer. Critical Thinking is deep engagement with the relationships between statements about the world. Decoloniality is the process of de-centring and addressing dominant
harmful views and practices. Respecting Expertise is the epistemic compact between professionals and society.
Slow Science is a disposition towards preferring psychologically, techno-socially, and epistemically healthy practices. The lines between dimensions represent how they are interwoven both directly and indirectly.

1176

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 10/07/2026

Please consider not saying that some AI models or some statistical models are good, useful, beneficial, whatever else positive, in science if it's not your research area. It's ok not to know things. It's ok not to both side things. It's ok to ask colleagues who are experts.

13421117

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 16/05/2026

On the other hand, I want to highlight my work that is about cognition, models, theory (see: olivia.science/theory/) & understanding how we think about them. Sometimes a good starting point is to zoom out: What Makes a Good Theory, and How Do We Make a Theory Good? doi.org/10.1007/s421... 4/

olivia.science

Theory

What is a cognitive scientific theory?

13211

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 16/05/2026

CAIL = prerequisite knowledge for a critical perspective, such as to tell apart nonsense hype from true theoretical computer scientific claims. For example, the idea that human-like systems are a sensible or possible goal is the result of circular reasoning and anthropomorphism.

olivia.science

Critical AI

Critical AI Literacy (CAIL) from my perspective.

718758

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 09/07/2026

We cannot scale up AI to human-level cognition, but we sure can scale up inhumane practices and harm

14217

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 30/06/2026

You may also enjoy this paper and/or talk bsky.app/profile/iris... (scroll down for full thread)

251

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 28/06/2026

“Computational thinking is a way humans solve problems; it is not trying to get humans to think like computers. Computers are dull and boring; humans are clever and imaginative.” — Jeannette M. Wing (2006) h/t @olivia.science dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/...

dl.acm.org

Computational thinking | Communications of the ACM

It represents a universally applicable attitude and skill set everyone, not just computer scientists, would be eager to learn and use.

711140

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 30/06/2026

So in other words, coming up with strategies, algorithms, programs etc. is the creative part (as we did in class w/ coming up with sorting strategies). Executing a program once specified is what a machine can do. But the, analysis, creativity and specification is our achievement, not the machine's.

1102

Marcela Suarez @marentierra.bsky.social · 01/07/2026

Quizá este documento también puede ser de interés: ec.europa.eu/info/funding...

ec.europa.eu

021

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Jose M. Casas 'two-' 🇦🇷 🏴‍☠️ @josemariacasas.bsky.social · 30/06/2026

El contrato estrella de la implementacion de AI utilizado por la @urv.cat es el que mantienen con MicroSlop, justificando cualquier problema de uso en que dicho contrato le garantiza que Copilot cumple normativa europea. Pero y las demas variables? www.nytimes.com/2026/01/27/t...

nytimes.com

Microsoft Pledged to Save Water. In the A.I. Era, It Expects Water Use to Soar.

141

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Jose M. Casas 'two-' 🇦🇷 🏴‍☠️ @josemariacasas.bsky.social · 30/06/2026

La adopcion a-critica de AI realizada por la @urv.cat la expone al incumplimiento absoluto de sus objetivos de sostenibilidad ambiental y la aleja de cumplir al menos 6 de los objetivos de la Agenda de Desarrollo Sostenible con los que se habia comprometido.

261

Marcela Suarez @marentierra.bsky.social · 29/06/2026

Thank you to all participants and team for collectively reclaiming critical thinking @olivia.science, @irisvanrooij.bsky.social, @altibel.bsky.social, @joostvossers.bsky.social

063

Marcela Suarez @marentierra.bsky.social · 29/06/2026

My heart is full of hope because teaching and learning critical AI literacy with participants was and is an act of resistance in this political context.

1216

Marcela Suarez @marentierra.bsky.social · 29/06/2026

Last week was both intense in teaching and full of hope. Participants of the Summer School: “Critical AI literacy for resisting and reclaiming” presented their group projects to resist and reclaim AI.

2175

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 26/06/2026

Not a small part Olivia!! 🥰 Honestly, we wouldn't have critical AI literacy at Radboud if it were not for you 🔥 Sorry you could not physically join ❤️‍🩹 We all learnt a lot from your keynote and all your CAIL materials 🙏 Your CAILs pentagram was a red thread through the week ✨

1104

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 26/06/2026

this looks so cool, wow

162

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 25/06/2026

☀️ 📚 In the evening of Day 3, we had a screening of the documentary film "Ghost in the Machine" 🎬 This event was co-organized with students from the School of AI. The audience was students from our BSc course Sustainable AI & MSc course Bias in AI, in addition to Summer School participants. 5/🧵

youtube.com

GHOST IN THE MACHINE (2026) OFFICIAL TRAILER

YouTube video by Ghost in the Machine

1175

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Andrea Reyes E (she/her) @altibel.bsky.social · 26/06/2026

I hate them so much. Wednesday I watched this at the Critical AI summer school organised by @irisvanrooij.bsky.social and @marentierra.bsky.social. I was "not a fan" of Altman but after seeing the movie... he really has a punchable face. bsky.app/profile/iris...

031

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Dr. Ethan Kutlu @ethankutlu.bsky.social · 26/06/2026

I have had the privilege and honor to attend the Critical AI Literacy Workshop offered at the Radboud Summer School. The workshop was organized by @irisvanrooij.bsky.social @marentierra.bsky.social @olivia.science along with @joostvossers.bsky.social and @altibel.bsky.social.

1225

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Dr. Ethan Kutlu @ethankutlu.bsky.social · 26/06/2026

I will have more thoughts to share but I am still processing the information. The #Radboud University is extremely lucky to have scholars who are leading this work and who are helping many scientists to achieve conceptual clarity about AI. Please read the OP by @irisvanrooij.bsky.social.

0115

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 25/06/2026

☀️ 📚 Day 2 of the Summer School, @marentierra.bsky.social lectured about critical intersectional perspectives on AI and I lectured about AI and cognitive science. Each of us bringing distinct but complementary frames for resistance. 3/🧵

1174

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 25/06/2026

☀️ 📚 Day 3 of the Summer School, after @marentierra.bsky.social’s eye opening lecture about unsustainability of AI and the global supply chain, @altibel.bsky.social gave an inspiring and heartwarming lecture on reclaiming our skills and the importance of reading and writing by ourselves. 4/🧵

1145

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 25/06/2026

☀️ 📚 Day 4, after restorative time, free-form discussions & reflections on the movie, we joined a session from @marentierra.bsky.social’s Sustainable AI course, where students presented vlogs 🎬 that they had created for their final projects. So impressed & proud by what our AI students made! 6/🧵

1175

Reposted by Marcela Suarez

Iris van Rooij 💭 @irisvanrooij.bsky.social · 16/06/2026

bsky.app/profile/iris...

084