Sign in

lukas-fock.bsky.social

@lukas-fock.bsky.social
38 followers 111 following 9 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Matthew Facciani @matthewfacciani.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
It’s not only algorithms that favor outspoken political content. People also expect social media to be a place for stronger, more outspoken views, which can make nuanced perspectives seem less fitting. www.emerald.com/oir/article-...
emerald.com
The limits of nuance: how social media undermine nuanced political communication
Purpose. This study investigates how social media environments shape evaluations of political information, focusing on whether nuanced viewpoints are devalued relative to more outspoken, radical expre...
053
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Matthew Facciani @matthewfacciani.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
A four-wave study in Sweden found that conspiracy thinking, use of right-wing alternative media, and social media reinforce each other over time. In contrast, mainstream news use was associated with lower levels of conspiracy thinking. www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
tandfonline.com
Breeding conspiracy thinking? Investigating the longitudinal relationship between media use and conspiracy mindset
Over the last decade, conspiracy theories and beliefs in them have become a more pressing social and political problem. Despite different media being the main channels through which conspiracy theo...
311564
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
André Bittermann @abitter.bsky.social · 15/09/2026
Reference limits can exacerbate biased citation behavior! In my current commentary article on the work of @kaileylawson.bsky.social, @brettmurpsych.bsky.social, et al. (2025), I provide empirical support for this thesis. Now published #OA @collabrapsychology.bsky.social 👉 doi.org/10.1525/coll...
31816
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Jay Van Bavel, PhD @jayvanbavel.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
Misinformed and polarized beliefs often persist despite repeated fact-checking efforts. Why? New research finds that updating our trust in sources is resistant to fact-checking and is undermined by partisan source cues and politically-incongruent fact-checks osf.io/preprints/ps...
0259
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Jay Van Bavel, PhD @jayvanbavel.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
Modern academic structures are constraining scientific creativity A new paper says research is structured around short funding cycles, productivity-based evaluation criteria, and risk-averse frameworks that favor predictable and non-transformative research outputs. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
03012
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau @rptu.bsky.social · 07/09/2026
Klicks für Konflikte: Digitale Kommunikation bringt unsere politische Kultur ins Wanken – oder? 📱 Antwort darauf geben der Medienpsychologe Stephan Winter und der Experte für politische #Kommunikation Christian von Sikorski im #Forschungsmagazin der RPTU. rptu.de/s/uohweb
076
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Jay Van Bavel, PhD @jayvanbavel.bsky.social · 06/09/2026
The combined support from scientific experts + social consensus is the most effective at mobilizing Americans’ actions on environmental, health, and technological challenges—even in cases where powerful actors like governments and companies vocally oppose taking action. www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
0126
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Saskia Scholten @saskiascholten.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
One year in: 225 patients in our university outpatient clinic have agreed to participate in the EMA-based Single Case Experimental Design #SCED, #N=1 infrastructure - only 11 declined 🙌. Here's how we set it up 👉 doi.org/10.1026/1616...
doi.org
Bringing Single-Case Experimental Designs Into Routine Care: A Stakeholder-Driven Business Model: Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie: Vol 0, No 0
1154
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Aidar Zinnatullin @zinnatullin.bsky.social · 26/08/2026
Super happy to see this work with @manuelkogel.bsky.social out! What drives affective polarization? A systematic literature review | European Political Science | Cambridge Core - www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
cambridge.org
What drives affective polarization? A systematic literature review | European Political Science | Cambridge Core
What drives affective polarization? A systematic literature review
153
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Jay Van Bavel, PhD @jayvanbavel.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
Social media discourse is driven by false #polarization We find that: 1) ideologues post opinions more than moderates 2) extreme attitudes are posted more than moderate one 3) This replicates in 40 countries 4) Opinions that users post are more hostile than the beliefs they keep to themselves
411363
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
cemas_io @cemas.io · 20/08/2026
Aktuell wird viel über die journalistische Berichterstattung zur AfD diskutiert. Wir haben bereits vor einiger Zeit Empfehlungen für den medialen Umgang erarbeitet:
cemas.io
Über Rechtsextreme reden?: Empfehlungen für die mediale Berichterstattung
Der Rechtsextremismus wird immer mehr zur Bedrohung für die Demokratie als Ganzes. Rechtsextreme Parteien wie die AfD haben sich in den letzten Jahren immer weiter radi­kalisiert, gleichzeitig erlebe...
22517
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Mark Rubin @markrubin.bsky.social · 08/08/2026
"Basically, it can come in two forms. Either it forces to correct an erroneous assumption, or it opens a new path to follow."
1102
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
mj @malthusjohn.bsky.social · 08/08/2026
"This often implies that what counts as knowledge today will reveal itself tomorrow as an error of the past." This latency keeps #science from acting like an individual. Overturning the status quo consensus is quite difficult, usually more difficult the longer those past errors were believed.
2155
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Anne Applebaum @anneapplebaum.wsocial.eu · 05/08/2026
What if Freud was right (at least some of the time)? A review, by @stossel.bsky.social www.theatlantic.com/magazine/202...
theatlantic.com
What if Freud Was Right?
A neuroscientist dares to argue that old-fashioned psychoanalysis holds the key to curing mental illness.
3226864
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Trends in Cognitive Sciences @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
Misinformation as strategy: Epistemic consequences and the undermining of shared truth Review by Ullrich Ecker (@ulliecker.bsky.social), Emily Spearing (@emilyspearing.bsky.social), Renee DiResta (@noupside.bsky.social), & Stephan Lewandowsky (@lewan.uk) tinyurl.com/yces8vpr
1208
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Lukas Otto @lukotto.bsky.social · 09/07/2026
Do people watch the news they do not trust? We tried to bring nuance to this question in a new paper (w Frank Mangold, Michaela Maier). Like others before us, we argue that “media distrust” comes in two flavors: skepticism and cynicism. journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10....
journals.sagepub.com
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
11910
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Claes de Vreese @claesdevreese.bsky.social · 25/06/2026
🚨 Important new publication just dropped: Resilience and Vulnerability to Misinformation and Disinformation in Political Information Environments From the International Panel on the Information Environment @esserfrank.bsky.social & co @sebavalenz.bsky.social www.ipie.info/research/tp2...
ipie.info
Resilience and Vulnerability to Misinformation and Disinformation in Political Information Environments: A Comparative Review of Ten Indexes
Technical Papers - Resilience and Vulnerability to Misinformation and Disinformation in Political Information Environments: A Comparative Review of Ten Indexes
0156
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Philosophical Psychology @journalphp.bsky.social · 03/06/2026
An open access review paper by Alex Worsnip, Devin Lane, Samuel Pratt, M. Giulia Napolitano, Kurt Gray & Jeffrey A. Greene examines the trade off between authority and autonomy and asks when we should defer to experts: doi.org/10.1080/0951... Enjoy! #philsky #philpsy
doi.org
Authority or autonomy? Philosophical and psychological perspectives on deference to experts
Several decades of work in both philosophy and psychology acutely highlights our limitations as individual inquirers. One way to recognize these limitations is to defer to experts: roughly, to form...
1145
lukas-fock.bsky.social @lukas-fock.bsky.social · 24/05/2026
"Theories can make more or less correct assumptions and can provide a more or less complete description of a phenomenon. [...] as scientists, our concern should not be whether or not we are under illusion, but to what extent our beliefs mismatch reality." Very interesting and concise pre-print!
072
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Mark Rubin @markrubin.bsky.social · 11/05/2026
"Researchers should not assume that every survey respondent who endorses a conspiracy theory *believes* that theory." #SocialPsyc #Methodology
183
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Igor Grossmann, PhD @igi.bsky.social · 05/05/2026
1/ We've been measuring intellectual humility wrong. Most scales ask "are you intellectually humble?" but the people least humble are the most miscalibrated about it. They overclaim. The #humilityparadox. Out today in Behavior Research Methods. Here's what we did instead. 🧵
32911
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Mark Rubin @markrubin.bsky.social · 16/04/2026
New study finds "social identification among male prisoners may simultaneously protect and threaten well-being, depending on the role of ingroup ties and identity centrality." BSky authors: @marc0marinucci.bsky.social @jolanda-jetten.bsky.social Open Access: doi.org/10.1111/bjso...
To be or not to be (a prisoner): Social identification as cure and curse via self- stigma and social exclusion

Research on social identification in marginalized populations has documented both social cure and social curse effects, suggesting that distinct identification dimensions may underlie opposite outcomes. This study integrated the Social Identity Approach to Health with stigma and social exclusion research to explore a dual pathway in which ingroup ties and identity centrality are respectively associated with greater or lower well-being among prisoners through their links with self-stigma and perceived social exclusion. A path analysis was conducted with a sample of 160 prisoners. Findings suggest that belonging and connectedness derived from identifying with fellow prisoners (i.e., ingroup ties) are associated with reduced psychological distress via lower perceived exclusion. In a context characterized by disconnection, social identification may provide a form of reconnection that supports well-being. Conversely, the personal importance attributed to the prisoner identity (i.e., identity centrality) was associated with greater self-stigma and perceived exclusion, with the latter mediating its negative association with well-being. Within a highly stigmatized group, the centrality of group identity may amplify feelings of exclusion, undermining well-being. Overall, the study advances understanding of the dual effects of social identification in marginalized groups and underscores the value of applying established psychosocial frameworks to hard-to-reach populations.
183
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Opinion Today @opiniontoday.bsky.social · 20/04/2026
Americans are more polarized in their trust in scientists than in virtually any other societal institution. — James N. Druckman. (@umisrcps.bsky.social) More, via Opinion Today: opiniontoday.substack.com/p/260420-top...
56724
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Prof. Nicole Holliday @mixedlinguist.bsky.social · 21/04/2026
Very, very important work about our perception of what “everyone” thinks is skewed by very few people online.
0309
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Jay Van Bavel, PhD @jayvanbavel.bsky.social · 16/04/2026
Open-mindedness was the strongest predictor of *rejecting* conspiracy theories in a sample of 46,745 participants in 68 nations In particular, participants who were threatened by people who disagree with them were the most likely to believe conspiracy theories. www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
421282
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Stephan Lewandowsky @lewan.uk · 09/04/2026
Launched today at the Cambridge Disinformation Summit. Read the full report 👇 sks.to/fractured Mario Scharfbillig Sacha Altay Philipp Lorenz-Spreen Sebastián Valenzuela Ullrich Ecker Michael E. Mann Naomi Oreskes 10/10
sks.to
Fractured reality
The report examines the evolving impact of digital technologies on European democracy. In an era of a global struggle to control the information space, this report offers critical insights into the fracturing of perceived realities, the rise of the ”fantasy-industrial complex,” and the systemic risks posed by the attention economy. It exposes how platforms algorithmically prioritise engagement over accuracy, reinforcing ideological echo chambers and amplifying mis- and disinformation that erode democratic resilience. The report highlights how structural incentives and foreign control of the most important players in the information space undermine information integrity, collective knowledge and civic discourse. In response, the report presents a number of recommendations from fostering alternative public spaces and crowd-sourced knowledge systems to reforming business models, restoring user agency, and advancing EU digital sovereignty through decentralised infrastructure.
26414
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Journal of Science Communication (JCOM) @jscicom.bsky.social · 07/04/2026
Trust in experts' comments about medical advances depends not just on what is said, but who says it & how confidently, suggesting paying attention to contextual & paraverbal cues in health communication. Find out more - doi.org/10.22323/150... - article by @lorenzo-ciccione.bsky.social & co-authors
doi.org
The impact of commentators' expertise and opinion in health communication
Different commentators are often invited in the media in order to discuss medical and health-related advances, such as the deployment of new vaccines or prevention tests. How do the expertise and opin...
032
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Lisa Oswald @lfoswaldo.bsky.social · 02/04/2026
New publication 📄 "Little change in a changing landscape: Tracking exposure to untrustworthy news in Germany from 2017 to 2024". So far, my shortest paper - and the first with @simonsaysnothin.bsky.social! Read our brief description of news web browsing @journalqd.bsky.social
journalqd.org
Little change in a changing landscape: Tracking exposure to untrustworthy news in Germany from 2017 to 2024. | Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media
0206
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Jay Van Bavel, PhD @jayvanbavel.bsky.social · 16/03/2026
In a large global study (N = 49,968, 68 countries) we found that the open-mindedness aspect of intellectual humility was the strongest predictor for rejecting conspiracy beliefs out of 17 potential individual difference measures. osf.io/preprints/ps...
56227
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Lena Frischlich @lenafrescamente.bsky.social · 12/03/2026
@jesperstromback.bsky.social 's talk starts with a look into "conspiracy thinking and the media - disentangling a complicated relationship"- arguing that there seems to be a link between social media & alternative news use and conspiracy beliefs - but we need to understand this link (much) better
121
Reposted by lukas-fock.bsky.social
Journal of Science Communication (JCOM) @jscicom.bsky.social · 06/02/2026
A study of German COVID-19 protest movements shows that science wasn’t rejected online but rather strategically used. Analysing Telegram data, the authors reveal how scientific claims were mobilised to challenge policy during moments of uncertainty = jcom.sissa.it/article/pubi...
jcom.sissa.it
Evidence in the service of dissent: strategic communication of science by German corona-protest movements
This study investigates how Germany’s anti-lockdown and anti-vaccine protest movement, led mainly by the Querdenken network, allied with conspiracist and far-right groups, utilized scientific authorit...
053
lukas-fock.bsky.social @lukas-fock.bsky.social · 15/01/2026
Pre-Print When are citizens able to discern plausible from implausible conspiracy theories? We @rolandimhoff.bsky.social @lpummerer.bsky.social @stephanwinter.bsky.social address this question in two large scale studies (in Germany and the UK). Blinded by the Lies or Lifting the Blinds osf.io/daz2q
osf.io
OSF
533