Sign in

Liz Tenney

@liztenney.bsky.social
120 followers 175 following 16 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Liz Tenney @liztenney.bsky.social · 05/08/2026
A meme @cocoliu and I exchange before diving into a new replication.
Anakin and Padme meme about replications. He says “We can replicate this study” and she says “That sounds so fun” and then it’s like, wait, there’s more to it than that.
010
Reposted by Liz Tenney
Lukas Röseler @aufdroeseler.bsky.social · 30/04/2026
Introducing the #ReplicationAtlas: The FLoRA (FORRT Library of Reproduction and Replication Attempts) lets you browser over two thousand (!) pairs of original and replication studies. Search by DOIs/keywords and find out about replications from your field, maybe even replications of your own work.
35634
Reposted by Liz Tenney
Ted Kinnaman @tkinnama.bsky.social · 19/02/2026
It's annoying that nonacademics hold this "deadweight" idea, and even more when I hear it from administrators, as I occasionally have. I went in to academia because I wanted to teach and write. Why would I quit just because I got tenure?
4561
Reposted by Liz Tenney
kati-harper.bsky.social @kati-harper.bsky.social · 18/02/2026
Still buzzing from Perspectives on Scientific Error 💡🌱 The smaller, one-stream format worked so well to create the feeling of a continuous, shared conversation across sessions (pictured: me making a cameo in @liztenney.bsky.social's slides!) #PSE8
071
Reposted by Liz Tenney
Marie Hennecke @mhennecke.bsky.social · 10/02/2026
Collaborating on this was fun - and it shows that research stays - in addition to their immediate impact- can still promote collaboration and productivity 15 years later! Thank you @liztenney.bsky.social for asking me to join the team!
021
Reposted by Liz Tenney
Sanjay Srivastava @sanjaysrivastava.com · 06/11/2025
Prediction: Social psychologists will still insist that the book's thesis is valid, thereby ironically validating its thesis
3293
Reposted by Liz Tenney
Kathryn Paige Harden @kph3k.bsky.social · 21/10/2025
Did you just injure your knee? Here is your comprehensive, empirically-supported, insurance-covered, twice-weekly PT to make sure you fully recover your ability to ski. Did you just have a 9-pound baby cut out of your midsection? Here is your baby.
2165
Liz Tenney @liztenney.bsky.social · 05/07/2025
Interesting! I can’t get past the EIC of Nature coming out to Final Countdown. The playlist does get better from there.
010
Liz Tenney @liztenney.bsky.social · 01/05/2025
“I’m not complaining, and I don’t expect you to feel sorry for me. I chose to be shaken in this bag of rats. At any point, we could all have done nothing.” and other amazing metaphors in this worthwhile substack describing woes of cleaning up bad science by @jamesheathers.bsky.social
100
Liz Tenney @liztenney.bsky.social · 21/02/2025
Replications are just as valuable as “original” research. Is this a hot take? If you disagree, have you actually read one or tried to do one?
000
Liz Tenney @liztenney.bsky.social · 21/01/2025
In case people needed another reason not to be a jerk to their coworkers… hbr.org/2025/01/rese...
hbr.org
Research: Incivility at Work Silences Everyone, But Especially Women
Incivility at work isn’t good for anyone. But while both men and women are less likely to speak up in uncivil environments, women are more likely to withhold their ideas due to concerns about gender b...
000
Liz Tenney @liztenney.bsky.social · 29/07/2024
New recording by Salt Lake City band Hoofless “Get In”. This song is so good open.spotify.com/track/6DbLgT...
open.spotify.com
Get In
Listen to Get In on Spotify. Song · Hoofless · 2024
010
Liz Tenney @liztenney.bsky.social · 07/06/2024
If scientists disagree about conclusions or analyses while doing research and writing a paper, should they hide it to tell a better story to the public? No… www.science.org/doi/10.1126/... @nicholascoles.bsky.social @jasonchin.bsky.social @roseodea.bsky.social @jackfriedrich @alexh.bsky.social
science.org
Team scientists should normalize disagreement
042
Liz Tenney @liztenney.bsky.social · 23/05/2024
If the field moves more to open or transparent peer review, certain groups may systematically receive harsher reviews, or biased and embarrassing comments from reviewers, and public seeing that uncritically is problematic. Along with openness we need metascience, post pub convo, and accountability
030
Liz Tenney @liztenney.bsky.social · 19/04/2024
“I don’t want to move to Toronto” 🎵🎶🎤 sing it @mattarbogast open.spotify.com/track/65fpaJ...
open.spotify.com
Toronto
Loose Collars · Song · 2024
000
Liz Tenney @liztenney.bsky.social · 18/03/2024
The 3Ps: The 1st P in deciding which project to work on is People. Work with people you like who use good research practices. The 2nd is passion. The topic should be worthwhile. The 3rd is publishable (used to be p-value). Work on projects with solid data/results. www.nature.com/articles/d41...
nature.com
People, passion, publishable: an early-career researcher’s checklist for prioritizing projects
Stuck between several lines of research? Here’s how we decide which ones to pursue, say Elizabeth Tenney, Jacqueline Chen and McKenzie Preston. Stuck between several lines of research? Here’s how we d...
152
Liz Tenney @liztenney.bsky.social · 01/03/2024
Voice-to-text message from my youngest. He’s really got the hang of it.
A photo saying “blah blah blah” on repeat
020
Reposted by Liz Tenney
simine vazire @simine.com · 15/12/2023
I’m a fan of trying to quantify how often reviewers & editors check authors’ preregistrations (eg, by @syeducation.bsky.social), but also we should not forget that reviewers fail to check for deviations from a priori plans in 100% of unpreregistered studies. Because they can’t.
210633
Liz Tenney @liztenney.bsky.social · 17/12/2023
Was trying to tell a friend about Bluesky, said what do you do that’s cool we can look it up. He said golf. No results found for #tigerwoods. How does this thing work? Is this the first discussion about Tiger?
000
Reposted by Liz Tenney
PsyArXivBot @psyarxivbot.bsky.social · 08/12/2023
Some Data Indicating that Editors and Reviewers Do Not Check Preregistrations during the Review Process: osf.io/nh7qw
064
Liz Tenney @liztenney.bsky.social · 15/12/2023
Had a manuscript rejected at #AMJ. Boilerplate language in letter “encourages” open science practices like posting data & preregistration. No acknowledgement we did these. If AMJ cares about “transparency and rigor” Editorial team should get training on how to weight it, or #OS should be required.
060