Sign in

Laura Scherer

@ldscherer.bsky.social
235 followers 302 following 43 posts

Associate prof in Colorado. Research spans shared decision making, risk communication, health misinformation and science skepticism. Open science advocate

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Jolyn Hersch PhD @jolynhersch.bsky.social · 12/03/2026
Women’s screening preferences shift after being informed about the 2024 USPSTF breast cancer screening guideline - new paper by @tamarparmet.bsky.social @ldscherer.bsky.social @kirstenmccaffery.bsky.social me & others www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073839912600114X?dgcid=coauthor
sciencedirect.com
Women’s screening preferences shift after being informed about the 2024 USPSTF breast cancer screening guideline
In 2024 the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) revised its breast cancer screening (BCS) guidelines to recommend that all women scr…
134
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Jolyn Hersch PhD @jolynhersch.bsky.social · 15/07/2025
Letters www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/... re our 2024 paper on Mammography Screening Preferences Among Women in Their 40s www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/... @ldscherer.bsky.social Reducing barriers to desired care while respecting patient autonomy to make informed decisions should be dual goals.
011
Reposted by Laura Scherer
ReproducibiliTea @reproducibilitea.org · 18/06/2025
📚 A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com
A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review - Research Integrity and Peer Review
Background The amount and value of researchers’ peer review work is critical for academia and journal publishing. However, this labor is under-recognized, its magnitude is unknown, and alternative way...
094
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Gordon Pennycook @gordpennycook.bsky.social · 05/06/2025
Psychological inoculation is a very popular intervention against online misinfo, but it hasn't been tested using real-world outcomes in realistic scenarios. In a new paper just published in PNAS Nexus, this is what we did: academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/ar... Short version: It didn't really work.
520068
Reposted by Laura Scherer
David Armstrong @davidarmstrongx.bsky.social · 08/05/2025
I have written many healthcare stories, but never before have I written about my own health. I decided to do so after learning one of my drugs costs nearly $1,000 a pill and just 25 cents to make. What I found was an incredible story of discovery and exploitation. www.propublica.org/article/revl...
propublica.org
The Price of Remission
When I was diagnosed with cancer, I set out to understand why a single pill of Revlimid cost the same as a new iPhone. I’ve covered high drug prices as a reporter for years. What I discovered shocked ...
821608687
Laura Scherer @ldscherer.bsky.social · 02/05/2025
In a faculty meeting yesterday I learned that the cost of hospital materials has already gone up due to Trump China tariffs.
020
Reposted by Laura Scherer
American Association for the Advancement of Science @aaas.org · 30/04/2025
Earlier today, AAAS CEO Sudip Parikh testified as a bipartisan witness before the U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee, warning that without immediate action, the U.S. runs the risk of losing its position as a global leader in biomedical research and innovation.
19465169
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Pam Herd @pamherd.bsky.social · 01/05/2025
Francis Collins: “Reckless decisions will disrupt a noble institution with a stunningly positive track record, drive young scientists to leave the country, and damage the future health of the nation." www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
NIH insiders: Trump is ‘dismantling and destroying everything’
After just 100 days, agency scientists say U.S. health institutes are demoralized and have lost essential staff and funding
5440183
Reposted by Laura Scherer
John Holbein @johnholbein1.bsky.social · 27/04/2025
Here's some good news! The file drawer problem may have diminished in recent years, at least in social science survey experiments "This suggests increased recognition of the importance of null results." www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
17414
Laura Scherer @ldscherer.bsky.social · 29/04/2025
This was an educational read on what’s being planned for NIH cuts and our chance to stop it
020
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Lisa Fazio @lkfazio.bsky.social · 18/04/2025
Can confirm that my NSF grant "How False Beliefs Form & How to Correct Them" was cancelled today because it is "not in alignment with current NSF priorities" Shocking that understanding how people are misled by false information is now a forbidden topic. Our work will continue but at a smaller scale
14230681363
Laura Scherer @ldscherer.bsky.social · 06/04/2025
This was a super fun conversation about health misinformation and trust in science. We only touched the tip of the iceberg, but give it a listen and tell me what you think! news.cuanschutz.edu/news-stories...
news.cuanschutz.edu
How Do We ‘Trust the Science’ in an Age of Misinformation?
Health Science Radio episode features experts weighing in on the spread of misinformation about science and possible strategies for addressing the problem.
020
Laura Scherer @ldscherer.bsky.social · 04/04/2025
I'm personally really sad to see AHRQ go. They had a small but mighty team trying to improve shared decision making in medicine, and now all those people are gone. kffhealthnews.org/news/article...
kffhealthnews.org
What’s Lost: Trump Whacks Tiny Agency That Works To Make the Nation's Health Care Safer - KFF Health News
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has helped improve health care safety in a country where thousands die of medical errors each year. It was effectively dissolved Tuesday.
131
Laura Scherer @ldscherer.bsky.social · 04/04/2025
Our latest study in BMJ Open examined how women react to learning about overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening. We found that preexisting beliefs about cancer made it hard for some women to comprehend and accept overdiagnosis bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/3/e087997
bmjopen.bmj.com
Evaluation of how US women react to a decision aid informing them of the harms and benefits of mammography: a qualitative study
Objectives To evaluate how women react to a decision aid (DA) informing them of the harms and benefits of mammography, including overdiagnosis. Background Breast cancer is the most common cancer affe...
122
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Sherry Pagoto, PhD @drsherrypagoto.bsky.social · 31/03/2025
Economists are baffled as to why the US is gutting its unmatched scientific enterprise: “This is really killing the goose that lays the golden egg.” “It’s (science) like a machine, you put a dollar in and you get $5 back.” www.nytimes.com/2025/03/31/b...
nytimes.com
Trump Science Funding Cuts May Hurt Economy, Experts Say
Since World War II, U.S. research funding has led to discoveries that fueled economic gains. Now cutbacks are seen as putting that legacy in jeopardy.
43512
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Eric Topol @erictopol.bsky.social · 29/03/2025
The first randomized trial comparing fecal occult blood testing (every other year) testing and (one-time) colonoscopy. No significant difference in colon cancer mortality among >56,000 participants www.thelancet.com/journals/lan... @thelancet.bsky.social
45665108
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Elizabeth Jacobs, PhD @elizabethjacobs.bsky.social · 28/03/2025
Earlier this week, The Regime suddenly axed grants related to LongCOVID. Massive backlash from advocates ensued. And today, the NIH reversed course and reinstated at least some of this grant funding. Keep making noise. Keep taking up space. Keep shouting the truth. thesicktimes.org/2025/03/28/u...
thesicktimes.org
UPDATE: RECOVER Long COVID pathobiology grants restored - The Sick Times
Long COVID research grants from the National Institutes of Health’s RECOVER program will be restored following news stories about their abrupt cancellations and advocacy to restore the funding, accord...
433990
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Ellen Peters @ellenpeters.bsky.social · 28/03/2025
Across the US, cuts to federal funding for health research are projected to cause losses of $16 billion and 68,500 jobs. How will YOUR county and State be affected? See scienceimpacts.org
scienceimpacts.org
SCiMaP
0158
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Gregg Gonsalves @gregggonsalves.bsky.social · 24/03/2025
This is what breaks my heart. These young people who are so eager and full of promise and who are the next generation of Nobel Prize winners, scientists inventors, teachers. #Trump and #Musk have destroyed it all. www.wired.com/story/the-ch...
wired.com
The Chaos of NIH Cuts Has Left Early-Career Scientists Scrambling
As graduate programs lose spots and labs face shutdowns following Trump administration cuts to science funding, the path to a science career for students and researchers just got a whole lot harder.
13383125
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Mark Cuban @mcuban.bsky.social · 22/03/2025
From 2010 to 2016 (latest data I have ), NIH research contributed to EVERY drug approved by the FDA
708319768473
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Jolyn Hersch PhD @jolynhersch.bsky.social · 20/03/2025
New paper Evaluation of how US women react to a decision aid informing them of the harms and benefits of mammography: a qualitative study by Brad Morse, @ldscherer.bsky.social, @kirstenmccaffery.bsky.social, me and an illustrious co-author team! Just out in BMJ Open bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/3...
bmjopen.bmj.com
Evaluation of how US women react to a decision aid informing them of the harms and benefits of mammography: a qualitative study
Objectives To evaluate how women react to a decision aid (DA) informing them of the harms and benefits of mammography, including overdiagnosis. Background Breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting women. In efforts to reduce mortality, mammography has been widely accepted as an effective method of early detection. However, there is a balance between the known harms and benefits of breast cancer screening. Overdiagnosis is the detection of a cancer that would never cause harm over the lifetime. Comprehension and acceptance of overdiagnosis can be difficult for some people. Design Qualitative study using a semistructured interview protocol. Data were analysed in Atlas.Ti and the framework method was used to identify themes. Setting Telephone interviews with participants living in the USA. Participants 30 female individuals aged 39–49, selected from a nationally representative US sample of individuals who had completed a survey <2 weeks prior, during which they viewed a DA describing the main harms and benefits of breast cancer screening. Results Six major themes were identified: (1) overdiagnosis and false positives were often conflated, (2) previous experience and the influence of doctors and family supersedes new information, (3) beliefs about cancer dominate acceptance and comprehension of overdiagnosis, (4) emotional reactions to the novelty of overdiagnosis, (5) reactions to screening benefits—“I’ll be the one”, and (6) people reported the DA is credible, but they remained sceptical and performed their own research. Conclusion This study provides insights into the challenges of communicating about the harms of breast cancer screening, particularly overdiagnosis. While it is critical to honestly communicate with patients about the harms of breast cancer screening, it is also important to consider the emotional impact of conveying such information. Data are available in a public, open access repository. Data are available on the Open Science Framework, [dataset] Scherer L, Suresh K, Mosley B, Frempong J. Data from: R37 Ipsos breast cancer screening survey and qualitative interviews. Open Science Framework, March 4, 2022. <https://osf.io/y8stc/>
054
Laura Scherer @ldscherer.bsky.social · 17/03/2025
This, if true, is the exact opposite of efficiency.
040
Reposted by Laura Scherer
ACLU @aclu.org · 15/03/2025
If you’re protesting this weekend, know your rights.
Black graphic with text
“You don't need a permit to protest in response to breaking news and you don't need a permit to march in the streets or along sidewalks, as long as you're not obstructing traffic or access to buildings.
When you are lawfully present in any public space, you have the right to photograph anything in plain view, including federal buildings and the police.If you believe your rights have been violated, when you can, write down everything you remember, get contact information for witnesses, and take photographs of any injuries.If you get stopped by the police, ask if you're free to go. If they say yes, calmly walk away.If you get arrested, you have a right to ask why. Otherwise, say you wish to remain silent and ask for a lawyer immediately. Don't sign, say or agree to anything without a lawyer present.If you get stopped by a member of the military or any law enforcement office at a protest, you have the right to remain silent or to tell them that you’ll only answer questions in the presence of an attorney — no matter your citizenship or immigration status.”
5963523883
Laura Scherer @ldscherer.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
NIH is axing research on mRNA vaccines. But on Jan 22 Trump announced a huge investment with Larry Ellison to develop mRNA cancer vaccines. So mRNA for cancer=good, mRNA for infectious disease=bad. Totally makes sense... www.science.org/content/arti... www.foxbusiness.com/markets/trum...
science.org
NIH to ax grants on vaccine hesitancy, mRNA vaccines
Move reflects vaccine skepticism of health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
020
Laura Scherer @ldscherer.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
This is an important article. Far more money and resources goes to specialists than primary care. But when you think about your doctor, the medical expert you trust and see the most, they’re probably a primary care doc.
010
Laura Scherer @ldscherer.bsky.social · 06/03/2025
Lol
020
Reposted by Laura Scherer
John Skiles Skinner @skiles.blue · 01/03/2025
I got laid off today, with the rest of 18F. 18F was an elite federal software shop. We made gov't websites work better, more efficiently for the American people. We saved taxpayers from getting screwed over by contractors. And were fired for it. We made this website to tell our story: 18f.org
18f.org
We're not done yet | 18F
31689271630858
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Lisa Fazio @lkfazio.bsky.social · 20/02/2025
Here we go! 3rd installment of the misinformation and belief science preconference at #SPSP2025. First up is Jeff Hancock talking about the truth-default theory of deception detection. We are all truth-biased, expect ppl to be honest and most are but we can shift out of that mindset when cued. 1/
Misinformation circa 2025

Jeff Hancock & Ryan Moore
16410
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 17/02/2025
Trust in science, and the status of science as a public good, has relied on public institutions as a foundation for providing resources and infrastructure and for adopting policies that promote research integrity. The last few weeks suggest that we could lose some of that foundation in the US. 1/
14010
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Cory Booker @corybooker.com · 14/02/2025
Trump is breaking the law to block federal funding for medical research. It's already slowing down our fight against diseases like opioid addiction, Parkinson's, and cancer. Doctors and researchers are sounding the alarm—hear it directly from them in their own words🧵⤵️
62663167
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Judd Legum @juddlegum.bsky.social · 12/02/2025
BREAKING On Monday, Popular Information broke the news that the NIH had frozen virtually all grant funding in violation of 2 federal court orders On Wednesday, NIH leadership distributed a memo, acknowledging that its funding freeze was illegal and directing staff to resume issuing grants.
popular.info
BREAKING: NIH admits funding freeze is illegal, will resume issuing grants
An internal memo issued February 12 was obtained by Popular Information.
361261067730
Laura Scherer @ldscherer.bsky.social · 12/02/2025
The thing about foundation grants only allowing a 10-15% indirect rate is that universities lose $$ supporting those grants. How can universities afford to do that? I don't do the budgets, but I imagine it's supported primarily by NIH indirects. www.npr.org/2025/02/12/n...
npr.org
What National Institutes of Health funding cuts could mean for U.S. universities
What do National Institutes of Health funding cuts mean for universities? We ask Holden Thorp, editor-in-chief of the journal Science and former University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill chancellor.
000
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Stephan Lewandowsky @lewan.uk · 12/02/2025
We at SciBeh are organizing an online workshop, entitled "Safeguarding Scholarship and Research in (Emerging) Autocracies", which will be held on 25 February 15:00-18:00 UK time (16:00-19:00 CET, 10 am - 1pm EST, 7 am - 10 am PST). www.scibeh.org/events/works... 2/n
scibeh.org
Safeguarding Scholarship and Research in (Emerging) Autocracies | SciBeh
Description In light of rapidly developing events SciBeh is organising an online workshop to support scholars affected by threats to research and academic work in (emerging) autocracies. Our goal for ...
14536
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Dorothy Bishop @deevybee.bsky.social · 12/02/2025
Latest blogpost on Musk/Royal Society debacle: deevybee.blogspot.com/2025/02/seve... I look at the reasons that have been given for inaction, and find them wanting. @royalsociety.org
deevybee.blogspot.com
Seven reasons for keeping Elon Musk as a Fellow of the Royal Society
Last November, I wrote a blogpost explaining why I had resigned as a Fellow of the Royal Society (FRS). In brief, over the summer a group ...
26455223
Reposted by Laura Scherer
The BMJ @bmj.com · 12/02/2025
Enthusiasm is growing for lung cancer screening for people who have never smoked. Experience in East Asia has made the harms obvious: more surgery, more complications, and more overdiagnosis and overtreatment, argue Wayne Gao and colleagues www.bmj.com/content/388/...
Lung cancer screening in China
01512
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Dave Levitan @davelevitan.bsky.social · 11/02/2025
In a message sent today from University of Kentucky president Eli Capilouto, to the UK community: “If this policy change is enacted, it will impact the way we do research at the University of Kentucky. It will cost UK tens of millions of dollars annually and will hit our local and state economies.”
1623362
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Dave Levitan @davelevitan.bsky.social · 10/02/2025
NIH funding recipients in red states are still struggling to organize a response, it seems. I've been shown an email from leadership of a large medical center in a red state that says they are "exploring all avenues for communicating of this reduction on the vitality of biomedical research."
511635
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Dr. Lucky Tran @luckytran.com · 10/02/2025
22 states are suing to block the Trump administration's illegal cuts to NIH research funding. The lawsuit asks the court to declare the policy illegal and issue a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction preventing federal agencies from implementing the policy in the 22 states.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
COMMONWEALTH OF
MASSACHUSETTS, ATTORNEY
GENERAL DANA NESSEL ON BEHALF
OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
MICHIGAN, STATE OF ILLINOIS,
STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, STATE OF
CONNECTICUT, STATE OF
COLORADO, STATE OF DELAWARE,
STATE OF HAWAI’I, STATE OF
MAINE, STATE OF MARYLAND,
STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF
NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW YORK,
STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF NEW
MEXICO, STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA, STATE OF OREGON,
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF
VERMONT, STATE OF WASHINGTON,
and STATE OF WISCONSIN,
Plaintiffs,
Case No.
_______________________
v.
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH;
MATTHEW MEMOLI, M.D., M.S., in his
official capacity as Acting Director of the
National Institutes of Health; U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES; and DOROTHY
FINK, in her official capacity as Acting
Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services,
Defendants.
636580
Laura Scherer @ldscherer.bsky.social · 10/02/2025
NIH is the largest funding source for independent biomedical science in the world. I've noticed some folks seem to think this is cutting funding to "Big Pharma". No, this change is directly attacking your only ALTERNATIVE to big pharma.
000
Laura Scherer @ldscherer.bsky.social · 10/02/2025
My thoughts exactly 👇
020
Laura Scherer @ldscherer.bsky.social · 10/02/2025
Flying eyebrows AND flying mustaches?
110
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Matt Shipman (he/him) @shiplives.bsky.social · 08/02/2025
The U.S. has had probably the best university system in the world since the late 1940s; government investments (state and federal) drove that success. That may have changed overnight. 🧵🧪
washingtonpost.com
NIH cuts billions of dollars in biomedical funding, effective immediately
The move halts a large slice of money for most universities and research institutions virtually overnight, imperiling vital research in everything from cancer to heart disease.
40862223
Laura Scherer @ldscherer.bsky.social · 08/02/2025
On the attempt to slash and burn NIH funding
011
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Greg Pak @gregpak.net · 08/02/2025
Call your R reps. If you have a regional accent, make the most of it. Tell them you didn't vote for CANCER and ask them what the hell they're gonna do to stop Musk and Trump. reps.fyi
6441291873
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Greg Pak @gregpak.net · 08/02/2025
A very simple script. Feel free to adjust for your needs. "I JUST READ THAT MUSK AND TRUMP ARE CUTTING BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN CANCER AND ALZHEIMER RESEARCH MONEY. I DIDN'T VOTE FOR CANCER. ARE YOU SUPPORTING THIS? WHAT ARE YOU DOING TO STOP THEM?" reps.fyi
512330710
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Mike Wagner @prowag.bsky.social · 08/02/2025
We are not far away from your spouse’s cancer trial stopping, your parent’s Alzheimer’s clinical trial evaporating, your teen’s mental health intervention disappearing. It’s easy to attack universities, but the recent actions from the White House will stop cutting edge medical research very quickly.
261620461
Reposted by Laura Scherer
Tim Mosca (he/him) @drosophilosophy.bsky.social · 07/02/2025
Oh. My. God. grants.nih.gov/grants/guide...
grants.nih.gov
NOT-OD-25-068: Supplemental Guidance to the 2024 NIH Grants Policy Statement: Indirect Cost Rates
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts: Supplemental Guidance to the 2024 NIH Grants Policy Statement: Indirect Cost Rates NOT-OD-25-068. OD
1918273
Laura Scherer @ldscherer.bsky.social · 07/02/2025
Key finding here is that reduced trust was associated with perceiving conflict between the evidence and past screening messages. Implication is that we should engage *more consistent evidence based messaging*
001