Sign in

Kozzy Voudouris

@kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social
40 followers 54 following 33 posts

AI | Cognitive Science | Linguistics

PostsRepliesMedia
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 03/11/2025
A great opportunity to work at the cutting edge of AI and cognitive science!
021 2
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
Franziska Brändle @frabraendle.bsky.social · 02/10/2025
What influences whether people have fun with a task? Our paper “Leveling up fun: learning progress, expectations and success influence enjoyment in video games” with @thecharleywu.bsky.social and @ericschulz.bsky.social now in Scientific Reports! rdcu.be/eI069 Paper summary below 1/4
rdcu.be
Leveling up fun: learning progress, expectations, and success influence enjoyment in video games
Scientific Reports - Leveling up fun: learning progress, expectations, and success influence enjoyment in video games
15917 59
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
Milena Rmus @milenamr7.bsky.social · 22/09/2025
Happy to announce our paper got accepted to #NeurIPS! @akjagadish.bsky.social @marvinmathony.bsky.social @ericschulz.bsky.social & Tobi Ludwig arxiv.org/abs/2502.00879
arxiv.org
Generating Computational Cognitive Models using Large Language Models
Computational cognitive models, which formalize theories of cognition, enable researchers to quantify cognitive processes and arbitrate between competing theories by fitting models to behavioral data....
1235 23
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
Matishalin @matishalin.bsky.social · 18/09/2025
Excited for this paper to be out, literal years of hard work by Kozzy. Excitingly, my first last author paper! This work came from joining the Kinds of Intelligence group at Cambridge and being given time by @martahalina.bsky.social to explore and cross disciplines. Hard work but very fun! 🧪 🤖🧠
063 6
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 18/09/2025
@matishalin.bsky.social @martahalina.bsky.social
000 0
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 18/09/2025
We find that recurrence confers a significant advantage for learning more complex grammars, but lamination does not. This work would not have been possible without Matishalin Patel, Colin Klein, Marta Halina, and Andrew Barron. You can check out our preprint here: arxiv.org/abs/2509.13968.
arxiv.org
Exploring Major Transitions in the Evolution of Biological Cognition With Artificial Neural Networks
Transitional accounts of evolution emphasise a few changes that shape what is evolvable, with dramatic consequences for derived lineages. More recently it has been proposed that cognition might also h...
140 4
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 18/09/2025
2) The evolution of lamination, in which information is processed by independent sub-components. We test these networks on artificial grammar learning tasks, for which the complexity of the problem can be precisely stated.
120 2
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 18/09/2025
We focus on two transitions 1) The evolution of recurrent systems, in which information feeds back to earlier parts of the network.
120 2
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 18/09/2025
In a new preprint, we explore this hypothesis with a computational approach. By systematically evolving neural nets with different structures, we measure whether key structural transitions improve performance on more complex problems, while controlling for the resources available to the network.
120 2
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 18/09/2025
The arrangement of neurons is adjusted, using similar resources but opening up the possibility for more complex behaviour. This helps to explain the huge diversity of cognition we see across our planet: from nematodes 🪱 and box jellyfish 🪼 , to bees 🐝 , octopus 🐙 , chimpanzees 🐵 , and us 🙋 .
120 2
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 18/09/2025
What if the same is true for the evolution of cognition? It has recently been argued that the evolution of brains across the animal kingdom can be characterised in terms of just a few major structural changes.
130 3
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 18/09/2025
A prominent idea in biology tells us that evolution is not always incremental, but often involves a few important structural changes that open up phylogenetic possibility. Think: single cells ➡️ multicellular life. Solitary individuals ➡️ eusocial colonies.
131 3
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 03/09/2025
That's certainly a hard part too, I can't deny that!
000 0
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
Thanks @dmoralesp.bsky.social, I'm interested to hear your thoughts!
000 0
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
You can check out the published article here (doi.org/10.1007/s105...) and a pre-print here (philsci-archive.pitt.edu/26165/).
030 3
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
This gives rise to an apparent, but ineffable, distinction between hypotheses. Crucially, this apparent distinction does not necessarily imply a distinction at the level of behavioural processes.
131 3
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
For decades, this distinction has been tacitly assumed but impossible to accurately define. I argue that the apparent distinction is actually an artefact of widespread analogical reasoning based on theories in human psychology and classic behaviourist associative learning theory.
141 4
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
I suggest that the widespread use of analogies explains away one of the most controversial debates in this field: whether associative learning and cognition are distinct behavioural processes.
141 4
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
In my latest thriller, published today in Biology and Philosophy, I argue that one useful hypothesis generation strategy in comparative psychology is analogical reasoning.
131 3
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
The hypothesis space is so large and it requires us to eschew our human-centred expectations about behaviour and cognition.
121 2
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
Doing cognitive science on non-human systems like animals or artificial intelligence, brings inherent challenges. One of them is generating plausible alternative explanations for behaviour that can be tested empirically.
2153 15
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
lucaschubu.bsky.social @lucaschubu.bsky.social · 02/06/2025
Excited to say our paper got accepted to ICML! We added new findings including this: models fine-tuned on a visual counterfactual reasoning task do not generalize to the underlying factual physical reasoning task, even with test images matched to the fine-tuning data set.
161 6
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 23/05/2025
Many thanks to my coauthors @martahalina.bsky.social , @lucycheke.bsky.social, and Ben Farrar for working with me on this project.
011 1
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 23/05/2025
You can check out the open-access paper here: psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...
psycnet.apa.org
APA PsycNet
121 2
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 23/05/2025
We found that comparative psychologists have incredibly diverse attitudes to these methodological challenges. This suggests that there is still a lot of work for both psychologists and philosophers of science to do to clarify fundamental debates at the heart of comparative psychology research.
111 1
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 23/05/2025
First, the apparent distinction between associative learning and cognition, and second, the question of whether some explanations of animal behaviour are simpler than others (often discussed with reference to Morgan's Canon).
111 1
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 23/05/2025
We surveyed 220 practicing comparative psychologists, asking them questions about two key methodological challenges that define their science...
111 1
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 23/05/2025
I am very pleased to announce that my paper "Morgan's Canon and the Associative-Cognitive Distinction Today: A Survey of Practitioners" was published this week in the Journal of Comparative Psychology.
131 3
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
Nature Reviews Psychology @natrevpsychol.nature.com · 13/05/2025
Bringing comparative cognition approaches to AI systems Comment by Konstantinos Voudouris (@kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social), Lucy Cheke (@lucycheke.bsky.social) & Eric Schulz (@ericschulz.bsky.social) go.nature.com/43djJlv
0103 10
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 01/03/2025
Tired but happy to say this is out w @andreaeyleen.bsky.social: Are Neurocognitive Representations 'Small Cakes'? philsci-archive.pitt.edu/24834/ We analyse cog neuro theories showing how vicious regress, e.g. the homunculus fallacy, is (sadly) alive and well — and importantly how to avoid it. 1/
In order to understand cognition, we often recruit analogies as building blocks of theories to aid us in this quest. One such attempt, originating in folklore and alchemy, is the homunculus: a miniature human who resides in the skull and performs cognition. Perhaps surprisingly, this appears indistinguishable from the implicit proposal of many neurocognitive theories, including that of the 'cognitive map,' which proposes a representational substrate for episodic memories and navigational capacities. In such 'small cakes' cases, neurocognitive representations are assumed to be meaningful and about the world, though it is wholly unclear who is reading them, how they are interpreted, and how they come to mean what they do. We analyze the 'small cakes' problem in neurocognitive theories (including, but not limited to, the cognitive map) and find that such an approach a) causes infinite regress in the explanatory chain, requiring a human-in-the-loop to resolve, and b) results in a computationally inert account of representation, providing neither a function nor a mechanism. We caution against a 'small cakes' theoretical practice across computational cognitive modelling, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence, wherein the scientist inserts their (or other humans') cognition into models because otherwise the models neither perform as advertised, nor mean what they are purported to, without said 'cake insertion.' We argue that the solution is to tease apart explanandum and explanans for a given scientific investigation, with an eye towards avoiding van Rooij's (formal) or Ryle's (informal) infinite regresses.

Figure 1 in https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/24834/Box 1 in https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/24834/Box 2 in https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/24834/
2526080 260
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 01/03/2025
And I forgot to credit Ben Beyret too, who built the original version of Animal-AI from scratch! Thanks for the bump, Matt McGill!
000 0
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 01/03/2025
You can read the full paper here: rdcu.be/ebLb3 and you can learn how to use Animal-AI here: github.com/Kinds-of-Int...
github.com
GitHub - Kinds-of-Intelligence-CFI/animal-ai: Animal-AI supports interdisciplinary research to help better understand human, animal, and artificial cognition.
Animal-AI supports interdisciplinary research to help better understand human, animal, and artificial cognition. - GitHub - Kinds-of-Intelligence-CFI/animal-ai: Animal-AI supports interdisciplinar...
131 3
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 01/03/2025
Murray Shanahan, Joel Holmes, Ibrahim Alhas, Ben Slater, Matteo Mecattaf, Wout Schellaert, John Burden, Mati Patel, Niha Chaubey, Niall Donnelly, and many more! We continue to develop the platform and the community, and would love to get your feedback!
111 1
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 01/03/2025
The Animal-AI Environment is the product of a 7-year research effort and would not have been possible without @lucycheke.bsky.social, @martahalina.bsky.social, Matt McGill, José Hernández-Orallo,
121 2
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 01/03/2025
You can also use AAI to run tests with humans, through a straightforward game-playing interface. This allows for direct comparison between human and model performance! With AAI, we can accelerate our understanding of both artificial and natural intelligences.
The virtuous cycle of progress facilitated by Animal-AI.
131 3
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 01/03/2025
AAI has all the tools to replicate tests from comparative cognition, including blocks, ramps, tunnels, buttons, dispensers, and more! We also integrate reinforcement learning libraries so you can test agentic systems like DQN, PPO, and Dreamer-v3, and easily develop your own!
131 3
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 01/03/2025
AAI was first introduced in 2019, along with the Animal-AI Olympics competition. Since then, we have introduced loads of new features to make AAI faster, more robust, and more useful for interdisciplinary research.
111 1
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 01/03/2025
In this paper, published online today in Behavior Research Methods, we present the latest version of Animal-AI (AAI). AAI is a virtual 3D environment designed specifically for replicating experimental designs from comparative cognition for use with embodied AI systems. Link: doi.org/10.3758/s134...
rdcu.be
The Animal-AI Environment: A virtual laboratory for comparative cognition and artificial intelligence research
131 3
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 01/03/2025
How can we rigorously investigate the common-sense capabilities of agentic AI systems? How can we build better models of non-human animal cognition? (Re-)introducing the Animal-AI Environment: A virtual laboratory for comparative cognition and artificial intelligence research!
194 9
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 28/02/2025
New preprint! In arxiv.org/abs/2502.20349 “Naturalistic Computational Cognitive Science: Towards generalizable models and theories that capture the full range of natural behavior” we synthesize AI & cognitive science works to a perspective on seeking generalizable understanding of cognition. Thread:
arxiv.org
Naturalistic Computational Cognitive Science: Towards generalizable models and theories that capture the full range of natural behavior
Artificial Intelligence increasingly pursues large, complex models that perform many tasks within increasingly realistic domains. How, if at all, should these developments in AI influence cognitive sc...
17820 78
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
Mirko Thalmann @mirkothm.bsky.social · 28/02/2025
Every experience is unique 🌟 light shifts, angles change, yet we recognize objects effortlessly. How do our minds do this? And (how) do they differ from machines? In our new preprint with @ericschulz.bsky.social, we review human generalization and compare it to machine generalization: osf.io/k6ect
087 8
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
Milena Rmus @milenamr7.bsky.social · 26/02/2025
About a month late posting this, but here's a new project with @ericschulz.bsky.social, @akjagadish.bsky.social, @marvinmathony.bsky.social and Tobias Ludwig We are using LLMs to propose cognitive models in learning and decision making data. Presenting this work at RLDM! arxiv.org/abs/2502.00879
arxiv.org
Towards Automation of Cognitive Modeling using Large Language Models
Computational cognitive models, which formalize theories of cognition, enable researchers to quantify cognitive processes and arbitrate between competing theories by fitting models to behavioral data....
0218 21
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
lucaschubu.bsky.social @lucaschubu.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
In previous work we found that VLMs fall short of human visual cognition. To make them better, we fine-tuned them on visual cognition tasks. We find that while this improves performance on the fine-tuning task, it does not lead to models that generalize to other related tasks:
195 9