Sign in

Kozzy Voudouris

@kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social
41 followers 54 following 33 posts

AI | Cognitive Science | Linguistics

PostsRepliesMedia
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 03/11/2025
A great opportunity to work at the cutting edge of AI and cognitive science!
021
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
Franziska Brändle @frabraendle.bsky.social · 02/10/2025
What influences whether people have fun with a task? Our paper “Leveling up fun: learning progress, expectations and success influence enjoyment in video games” with @thecharleywu.bsky.social and @ericschulz.bsky.social now in Scientific Reports! rdcu.be/eI069 Paper summary below 1/4
rdcu.be
Leveling up fun: learning progress, expectations, and success influence enjoyment in video games
Scientific Reports - Leveling up fun: learning progress, expectations, and success influence enjoyment in video games
15917
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
Milena Rmus @milenamr7.bsky.social · 22/09/2025
Happy to announce our paper got accepted to #NeurIPS! @akjagadish.bsky.social @marvinmathony.bsky.social @ericschulz.bsky.social & Tobi Ludwig arxiv.org/abs/2502.00879
arxiv.org
Generating Computational Cognitive Models using Large Language Models
Computational cognitive models, which formalize theories of cognition, enable researchers to quantify cognitive processes and arbitrate between competing theories by fitting models to behavioral data....
1235
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
Matishalin @matishalin.bsky.social · 18/09/2025
Excited for this paper to be out, literal years of hard work by Kozzy. Excitingly, my first last author paper! This work came from joining the Kinds of Intelligence group at Cambridge and being given time by @martahalina.bsky.social to explore and cross disciplines. Hard work but very fun! 🧪 🤖🧠
063
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 18/09/2025
A prominent idea in biology tells us that evolution is not always incremental, but often involves a few important structural changes that open up phylogenetic possibility. Think: single cells ➡️ multicellular life. Solitary individuals ➡️ eusocial colonies.
131
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
Doing cognitive science on non-human systems like animals or artificial intelligence, brings inherent challenges. One of them is generating plausible alternative explanations for behaviour that can be tested empirically.
2153
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
lucaschubu.bsky.social @lucaschubu.bsky.social · 02/06/2025
Excited to say our paper got accepted to ICML! We added new findings including this: models fine-tuned on a visual counterfactual reasoning task do not generalize to the underlying factual physical reasoning task, even with test images matched to the fine-tuning data set.
161
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 23/05/2025
I am very pleased to announce that my paper "Morgan's Canon and the Associative-Cognitive Distinction Today: A Survey of Practitioners" was published this week in the Journal of Comparative Psychology.
131
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
Nature Reviews Psychology @natrevpsychol.nature.com · 13/05/2025
Bringing comparative cognition approaches to AI systems Comment by Konstantinos Voudouris (@kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social), Lucy Cheke (@lucycheke.bsky.social) & Eric Schulz (@ericschulz.bsky.social) go.nature.com/43djJlv
0103
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 01/03/2025
Tired but happy to say this is out w @andreaeyleen.bsky.social: Are Neurocognitive Representations 'Small Cakes'? philsci-archive.pitt.edu/24834/ We analyse cog neuro theories showing how vicious regress, e.g. the homunculus fallacy, is (sadly) alive and well — and importantly how to avoid it. 1/
In order to understand cognition, we often recruit analogies as building blocks of theories to aid us in this quest. One such attempt, originating in folklore and alchemy, is the homunculus: a miniature human who resides in the skull and performs cognition. Perhaps surprisingly, this appears indistinguishable from the implicit proposal of many neurocognitive theories, including that of the 'cognitive map,' which proposes a representational substrate for episodic memories and navigational capacities. In such 'small cakes' cases, neurocognitive representations are assumed to be meaningful and about the world, though it is wholly unclear who is reading them, how they are interpreted, and how they come to mean what they do. We analyze the 'small cakes' problem in neurocognitive theories (including, but not limited to, the cognitive map) and find that such an approach a) causes infinite regress in the explanatory chain, requiring a human-in-the-loop to resolve, and b) results in a computationally inert account of representation, providing neither a function nor a mechanism. We caution against a 'small cakes' theoretical practice across computational cognitive modelling, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence, wherein the scientist inserts their (or other humans') cognition into models because otherwise the models neither perform as advertised, nor mean what they are purported to, without said 'cake insertion.' We argue that the solution is to tease apart explanandum and explanans for a given scientific investigation, with an eye towards avoiding van Rooij's (formal) or Ryle's (informal) infinite regresses.

Figure 1 in https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/24834/Box 1 in https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/24834/Box 2 in https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/24834/
2526080
Kozzy Voudouris @kozzyvoudouris.bsky.social · 01/03/2025
How can we rigorously investigate the common-sense capabilities of agentic AI systems? How can we build better models of non-human animal cognition? (Re-)introducing the Animal-AI Environment: A virtual laboratory for comparative cognition and artificial intelligence research!
194
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
Andrew Lampinen @lampinen.bsky.social · 28/02/2025
New preprint! In arxiv.org/abs/2502.20349 “Naturalistic Computational Cognitive Science: Towards generalizable models and theories that capture the full range of natural behavior” we synthesize AI & cognitive science works to a perspective on seeking generalizable understanding of cognition. Thread:
arxiv.org
Naturalistic Computational Cognitive Science: Towards generalizable models and theories that capture the full range of natural behavior
Artificial Intelligence increasingly pursues large, complex models that perform many tasks within increasingly realistic domains. How, if at all, should these developments in AI influence cognitive sc...
17820
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
Mirko Thalmann @mirkothm.bsky.social · 28/02/2025
Every experience is unique 🌟 light shifts, angles change, yet we recognize objects effortlessly. How do our minds do this? And (how) do they differ from machines? In our new preprint with @ericschulz.bsky.social, we review human generalization and compare it to machine generalization: osf.io/k6ect
087
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
Milena Rmus @milenamr7.bsky.social · 26/02/2025
About a month late posting this, but here's a new project with @ericschulz.bsky.social, @akjagadish.bsky.social, @marvinmathony.bsky.social and Tobias Ludwig We are using LLMs to propose cognitive models in learning and decision making data. Presenting this work at RLDM! arxiv.org/abs/2502.00879
arxiv.org
Towards Automation of Cognitive Modeling using Large Language Models
Computational cognitive models, which formalize theories of cognition, enable researchers to quantify cognitive processes and arbitrate between competing theories by fitting models to behavioral data....
0218
Reposted by Kozzy Voudouris
lucaschubu.bsky.social @lucaschubu.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
In previous work we found that VLMs fall short of human visual cognition. To make them better, we fine-tuned them on visual cognition tasks. We find that while this improves performance on the fine-tuning task, it does not lead to models that generalize to other related tasks:
195