Sign in

Fair Rep LA

@fairrepla.bsky.social
324 followers 303 following 370 posts

Angelenos deserve better representation. We're organizing for City Council expansion and City Charter reform that delivers more accessible, accountable, and ethical government in LA. Learn more at: FairRepLA.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
According to @robertlgreene.bsky.social's latest piece on Charter reform, Charter Review Committee chair Tim McOsker expects 12 months of hearings prior to more Charter amendments going to the ballot in 2028. Link to the full article: www.losangelesrules.com/los-angeles-...
I asked McOsker what problem he believes the charter reform process is meant to solve.

“The problem continues to be distrust in government,” he said. “The belief that we’re not open and public.”

Doesn’t the council’s killing of the commission’s package exacerbate that problem?

“The work that everyone did [in the commission] was disadvantaged by the process,” he said. “I want to go around the city. I want to get input from the folks who are totally and completely pissed off.”

McOsker said he expected 12 months of hearings and deliberations, followed by a package of charter reforms to go to the ballot in 2028.
022
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
The Charter Review Committee's Sept. 30th meeting will also re-review Recommendation #67: lowering the voting age to 16 for citywide and LAUSD Board elections. Lowering the voting age has a long history in LA -- check out our research memo on it to learn more at: bit.ly/FRLAVOTE16
100
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
The LA Charter Review Committee's Sept 30th meeting agenda includes some previous Charter reform recommendations, including: Rec #15: making the City Administrative Officer the Chief Financial Officer; #22 & 23: re: LAPD accountability; #28-30 & 37-38: personnel reforms.
100
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
LA Charter reform's next chapter is kicking off this Wednesday, 9/30, at 8:30 AM at LA City Hall, Room 340! The Charter Review Committee's first meeting will open with a presentation by 1999 Charter Reform Commission chair Raphe Sonenshine. Link to agenda: lacity.primegov.com/Portal/Meeti...
120
Reposted by Fair Rep LA
Ross Weistroffer @libraryofbabble.bsky.social · 20/09/2026
LA's Congress of Neighborhoods is a great example of how hyperlocal democracy can create incredible intra-city coalitions -- and Alex Levy's and @publicdemocracyla.bsky.social's work shows how deliberative democracy fits into and builds on those coalitions. Angelenos, attend if you can!
173
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 02/09/2026
You can subscribe to this motion's new Council File by clicking the email icon at the following link, and confirming your subscription in the email that follows. Click "Subscribe to all supplements" to be automatically updated on future related files! Link: cityclerk.lacity.org/lacityclerkc...
Screenshot of Council File 26-1238 page.
000
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 02/09/2026
How is LA's new Charter Review Committee planning to move reforms forward? Committee Chair McOsker's new motion asks for timelines for action and a clear, public-facing way to track different reforms to hopefully help clear things up. Link: cityclerk.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2...
Click the link for the full text of this motion. Click the link for the full text of this motion.
110
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 12/08/2026
LA’s next steps on charter reform will be taken up by the newly named members of City Council’s Ad Hoc Charter Review Committee: - Tim McOsker (CD15) - Chair - Heather Hutt (CD10) - Vice Chair - Eunisses Hernandez (CD1) - Nithya Raman (CD4) - Katy Yaroslavsky (CD5)
010
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 16/06/2026
Hearing from @unrigla.bsky.social that LA City Council is continuing discussion of Measure ULA items from today's meeting to Wednesday, limiting Council's time to discuss Charter reform. Attendance will be EXTREMELY high: SHOW UP BY *9 AM* TO BE ABLE TO ATTEND AND GIVE COMMENT AT THIS MEETING!
051
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 16/06/2026
On CRC 58 (below): the Rules Committee moves the item forward to the full City Council without a recommendation in favor or against, pending the formal declaration of an impasse between the City and the LAPL union.
CRC 58: Includes language that requires the Chief of Police to ensure that the Police Department supports and protects the constitutional rights of all persons,specifically their rights to assemble and protest; includes a provision that states that the Chief of Police can directly remove officers if they have engaged in misconductThe Committee requested that this recommendation bepresented to Council forconsideration, and instructed the CLA to report on the need to Meet and Confer with labor on this matter.The Committee noted and filed this item without discussion.Currently, there is no veto process for Board of Rights (BOR) decisions. Once a BOR has made a decision in apersonnel matter, the Chief may uphold the decision of the BOR, or impose a lesser penalty.Charter Section 1070(f) allows an officer removed from the Department as a result of a BOR to file a request with the Chief of Police to have the matter reheard or to be heard on the cause of the member’s removal, together with a supporting affidavit setting forth in clear and concise language the reasons or grounds for a hearing or rehearing. If the Chief determines there is good cause for a rehearing, the matter will be referred to a new BOR.

Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact associated with the addition of language to the Administrative Code on constitutional protections. There may be a Fiscal Impact associated with the Chief’s ability to fire officers, depending on what appeals process the City would implement for terminated officers. Further study is required.CRC 58 - Require the Chief of Police to Protect Constitutional Rights and Strengthening the Chief’s authority to Directly Remove Officers.Amends Charter Section 574 and 1070This proposal has two parts. The first part would update the responsibilities outlined in the Charter for the Police Chief to include a requirement that the Chief “shall ensure that the Police Department supports and protects the constitutional rights of all persons, regardless of immigration status, to peacefully assemble and protest, and of duly authorized representatives of any news service, online news service, newspaper, or radio or television station or network to report on such assemblies and protests. Peaceful protest is not the same as violence or rioting, and the Chief shall ensure that the Police Department avoids using violent means to manage peaceful crowds.” The second component would give the Chief the authority to “directly remove officers from employment if those officers have caused, engaged in, are causing harm, or engaging in any misconduct.”The proposed language on the protections of constitutional rights could be added through an ordinance to amend the Administrative Code. No Charter Amendment is required. It should be noted that all peace officers in the state of California are already obligated to protect an individual’s constitutional rights, and violators can be held to account, as outlined in the Bane Act, (California Civil Code Section 52.1).A Charter Amendment would be required to amend Charter Section 1070 to authorize the Chief to remove officers from employment. However, the proposed new language does not address an appeals process for these cases. An appeals process is required under the California Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act. One potential interpretation is that the Board of Rights process detailed in Charter Section 1070 would still apply, but would take place after the dismissal.The proposed language is in conflict with the provisions o… on such assemblies and protests. Peaceful protest is not the same as violence or rioting, and the Chief shall ensure that the Police Department avoids using violent means to manage peaceful crowds.”2. Instruct the Chief Legislative Analyst, Police Department, and CityAdministrative Officer, with the assistance of the City Attorney to report onproposed changes to Charter Section 1070 that could be proposed to the voters at a later date which would enable the Chief of Police to remove officers fromservice. This report should include proposals for an appeals process and anoverview from the CAO on any need to Meet and Confer with the City’s laborpartners on any changes to the disciplinary process.
010
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 16/06/2026
@cd13.lacity.gov responds to the discovery that LAPL unions have been completely unresponsive to City requests to meet-and-confer, or as he puts it, "been left on read". "It is crazy that they haven't responded, and that we haven't done anything."
120
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 16/06/2026
Discussion of CRC 58 (see below), a recommendation to give the Chief of Police the explicit power to directly remove officers who have engaged in misconduct, uncovers that while the City has repeatedly invited the police union to bargain, they've been completely unresponsive.
CRC 58: Includes language that requires the Chief of Police to ensure that the Police Department supports and protects the constitutional rights of all persons,specifically their rights to assemble and protest; includes a provision that states that the Chief of Police can directly remove officers if they have engaged in misconductThe Committee requested that this recommendation bepresented to Council forconsideration, and instructed the CLA to report on the need to Meet and Confer with labor on this matter.The Committee noted and filed this item without discussion.Currently, there is no veto process for Board of Rights (BOR) decisions. Once a BOR has made a decision in apersonnel matter, the Chief may uphold the decision of the BOR, or impose a lesser penalty.Charter Section 1070(f) allows an officer removed from the Department as a result of a BOR to file a request with the Chief of Police to have the matter reheard or to be heard on the cause of the member’s removal, together with a supporting affidavit setting forth in clear and concise language the reasons or grounds for a hearing or rehearing. If the Chief determines there is good cause for a rehearing, the matter will be referred to a new BOR.

Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact associated with the addition of language to the Administrative Code on constitutional protections. There may be a Fiscal Impact associated with the Chief’s ability to fire officers, depending on what appeals process the City would implement for terminated officers. Further study is required.CRC 58 - Require the Chief of Police to Protect Constitutional Rights and Strengthening the Chief’s authority to Directly Remove Officers.Amends Charter Section 574 and 1070This proposal has two parts. The first part would update the responsibilities outlined in the Charter for the Police Chief to include a requirement that the Chief “shall ensure that the Police Department supports and protects the constitutional rights of all persons, regardless of immigration status, to peacefully assemble and protest, and of duly authorized representatives of any news service, online news service, newspaper, or radio or television station or network to report on such assemblies and protests. Peaceful protest is not the same as violence or rioting, and the Chief shall ensure that the Police Department avoids using violent means to manage peaceful crowds.” The second component would give the Chief the authority to “directly remove officers from employment if those officers have caused, engaged in, are causing harm, or engaging in any misconduct.”The proposed language on the protections of constitutional rights could be added through an ordinance to amend the Administrative Code. No Charter Amendment is required. It should be noted that all peace officers in the state of California are already obligated to protect an individual’s constitutional rights, and violators can be held to account, as outlined in the Bane Act, (California Civil Code Section 52.1).A Charter Amendment would be required to amend Charter Section 1070 to authorize the Chief to remove officers from employment. However, the proposed new language does not address an appeals process for these cases. An appeals process is required under the California Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act. One potential interpretation is that the Board of Rights process detailed in Charter Section 1070 would still apply, but would take place after the dismissal.The proposed language is in conflict with the provisions o… on such assemblies and protests. Peaceful protest is not the same as violence or rioting, and the Chief shall ensure that the Police Department avoids using violent means to manage peaceful crowds.”2. Instruct the Chief Legislative Analyst, Police Department, and CityAdministrative Officer, with the assistance of the City Attorney to report onproposed changes to Charter Section 1070 that could be proposed to the voters at a later date which would enable the Chief of Police to remove officers fromservice. This report should include proposals for an appeals process and anoverview from the CAO on any need to Meet and Confer with the City’s laborpartners on any changes to the disciplinary process.
100
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 16/06/2026
On CRC 57 (see table), proposing Council have the ability to veto/remand decisions of the Board of Rights, the Rules Committee moves to note and file the recommendation.
CRC 57: Includes a provision inSection 1070 (Rights and Due Process Procedures) thatallows the Council to consider a personnel determinationmade by the Police Board of Rights and have the ability to veto and remand the matter back to the Board of Rights for reconsideration; the Board of Rights shall have 30 days to reconsider the action anddetermine whether to override the Council; if the Council action is overridden, theCouncil shall consider the override and shall have the same authority to act on the matter as that originally held by the Board of Rights.The Committee noted and filed this item without discussion.Currently, there is no veto process for Board of Rights (BOR) decisions. Once a BOR has made a decision in apersonnel matter, the Chief may uphold the decision of the BOR, or impose a lesser penalty.Charter Section 1070(f) allows an officer removed from the Department as a result of a BOR to file a request with the Chief of Police to have the matter reheard or to be heard on the cause of the member’s removal, together with a supporting affidavit setting forth in clear and concise language the reasons or grounds for a hearing or rehearing. If the Chief determines there is good cause for a rehearing, the matter will be referred to a new BOR.Note and File.
100
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 15/06/2026
After substantial back-and-forth on language: an additional motion has passed on CRC 56 (see table) to grant Council power to veto and take action over the Board of Police Commissioners, using the language below. Motion passes 4-1 (only Councilmember Lee opposed).
Present to voters in November 2026 a Charter amendment consistent with CRC 56 to sustain the Council's veto action specific to policies, regulations, procedures, and programs. This should not include personnel decisions, or reduce current Council authorities, disciplinary actions, contracts, or any quasi-judicial determinations. Expands Council's authority to amend, modify, or substitute an action taken by the Board. The Charter amendment should include language that gives the Council independent authority if the Board of Police Commissioners has not acted on a policy within 60 days.CRC 56: Includes a new section in Charter Section 245 that allows the Council veto actions of the Board of Police Commissioners; Vetos will be sent back to the Board of Police Commissioners for their consideration, and may concur with the Council, override the Council's veto, or modify the Board's original action; If the Board overrides the Council's action, the action shall be transmitted to the Council and the Council shall have the same authority to act on a matter as that originally held by the Board.
 The Committee indicated it supported this recommendation, and instructed the CLA, in coordination with the CAO, to report on the Council’s existing authority under Section 245 and any further ways to enhance it.
 Fiscal Impact: This will have no fiscal impact.
 Further study is
 required.
120
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 15/06/2026
@cd13.lacity.gov's proposal for giving Council final authority over the Board of Police Commissioners has passed 3-2 (Soto-Martinez, Raman, Yaroslavsky in favor; Harris-Dawson, Lee opposed), with the amendment below captured by @reporterliz.bsky.social: bsky.app/profile/repo...
110
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 15/06/2026
Moving to LAPD reform, and @cd13.lacity.gov's proposal for giving Council final say over LAPD policy: @mhdcd8.bsky.social notes that he "agrees with the principle...but also think we need time to think about all the implications;" CM John Lee also calls for additional study.
100
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 15/06/2026
Link to full CAO's report on Parks funding: cityclerk.lacity.org/onlinedocs/2... @katyyaroslavsky.bsky.social noted that it does not contain details about the full projected long-term ramp up in funding to 0.085% of assessed value of property.
100
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 15/06/2026
@katyyaroslavsky.bsky.social weighs in on the CAO's report on her proposal for an additional $175 million Parks Dept funding phased in over 4 years. Given future cost of Convention Center expansion & Olympics, she requested more info on ways to phase in funding over 5 and 6 years.
100
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 15/06/2026
🚨 This ACTUALLY final meeting of the Rules Committee on Charter reform is about to begin. 🧵/ We'll be providing full coverage here, but you can also watch live at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Bnk...
youtube.com
Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee - 6/15/26
YouTube video by LACityClerk
142
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 15/06/2026
WEDNESDAY (6/17), 10 AM, City Hall: The FULL Los Angeles City Council meets to decide: which Charter reforms will go to the November ballot? This is your LAST CHANCE to call for fair representation, and Council expansion ASAP! Meeting info: bit.ly/FRLA26
077
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 14/06/2026
MONDAY @ 1 PM: LA Charter reform is going into overtime at the Rules Committee, with one more meeting to discuss reforms for: - LAPD accountability; - non-citizen voting; & - personnel reforms. More meeting info: bit.ly/FRLA26 Email to support LAPD reform: tinyurl.com/CRPolice
044
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 14/06/2026
A Charter change to increase penalties for ethics violations has also been moved forward (CRC 32), although CM John Lee has requested the Council not move forward with the prohibition on using campaign funds to pay penalties. (Lee himself was fined $138,124 this past December for ethics violations.)
000
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 14/06/2026
While @cd4losangeles.bsky.social made one last attempt to bring up the Charter Reform Commission's recommendation to lower the number of signatures required to run for office from 500 to 350, no other present members of the Rules Committee were in support (@cd13.lacity.gov was absent).
111
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 14/06/2026
As of Friday, City Council expansion will not be part of the Committee's package of recommendations full Council will be voting upon on Wednesday, June 17th. However, all reform issues and motions may be pulled anew by any Councilmember at that meeting.
100
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 14/06/2026
@cd4losangeles.bsky.social calls for full consideration of moving Council expansion to the Nov. 2026 ballot; @katyyaroslavsky.bsky.social & @mhdcd8.bsky.social support in theory but want additional study on cost and implementation.
110
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 14/06/2026
Multiple planning-related Charter reforms have been moved forward, including setting a time limits on City Council’s ability to remand planning items to appeals bodies and the Planning Dept’s quasi-judicial decision-making processes.
100
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 14/06/2026
An additional report from the Chief Legislative Analyst on @katyyaroslavsky.bsky.social’s proposal for additional Parks Dept funding will be ready for discussion at the next Rules Committee meeting on Monday, 6/15, at 1 PM.
100
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
In response to the Charter Reform Commission recommendation to double Charter-mandated minimum budget for the Parks Dept, @katyyaroslavsky.bsky.social has initially proposed a ramp up in park funding to $175 million over the next four years (roughly 50% of the rec).
100
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
With @cd13.lacity.gov not present, non-citizen voting, LAPD accountability reforms, and all personnel-related reforms have been continued to a future meeting of the Rules Committee to be held on Monday, June 15th.
100
Reposted by Fair Rep LA
Elizabeth Chou @reporterliz.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
There is a full house today with more than a 100 people signed up to speak at the charter reform hearing. CM Eunisses Hernandez, who is pressing for police reforms, and CM Tim McOsker are here to present comments to their colleagues.
1176
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
With over 118 names signed up for public comment, a line out the door, and a packed house, engagement on reforming our City Charter is at a record high. We'll be starting the meeting with public comment for the next hour.
Line out the door at LA City HallFull LA City Council chambers
111
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
🚨 This final meeting of the Rules Committee on Charter reform is about to begin. 🧵/ We'll be providing full coverage here, but you can also watch live: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rmoc...
youtube.com
Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee - 6/12/26
YouTube video by LACityClerk
111
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
Not sure what to say? Use a script to start, and add in other reforms you support! 😁 From @laforward.bsky.social's Charter advocacy toolkit at: tinyurl.com/CharterAction612 & our lowering the voting age toolkit at: tinyurl.com/VOTE16LATK
Hi, my name is ______________. (If you’re a constituent, say: “and I am a constituent of yours in X neighbor.”)

I’m calling to make sure that – in your work on the Rules Committee – you DO NOT DELAY on the expansion of the City Council (CRC 12); enabling Council to have the power to make LAPD policy (CRC 54); and allowing the Police Chief to remove officers with histories of harm (CRC 58). 

As you’ve heard from other constituents, including those from LA Forward, these items are overdue for passage onto the ballot, and would all help to strengthen representation and build trust in local government. Don’t let us down: DO NOT DELAY on expansion, Council power to make LAPD policy, and Police Chief power to remove bad officers. Move these to full council now, and then to the ballot.

Thank you, have a nice day.
Not sure what to say? Use our script:

Hi there, I’m [                           ]. (If they’re your Councilmember, say: “and I’m a constituent, living in [ NEIGHBORHOOD ].”) 

I’m calling to ask that you, as a member of the Rules Committee, vote to advance lowering the voting age to the full City Council.  No further study is required to allow City Council to lower the voting age: we need to let the voters decide. 

Thank you for your time.

Feel free to add your own favorite reasons for lowering the voting age!
030
Reposted by Fair Rep LA
Nick Andert @nickandert.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
I called Katy's office this morning to ask for all three!
1244
Reposted by Fair Rep LA
Nick Andert @nickandert.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
LA folks, if you have a minute this morning, I encourage you to call your councilmember's office to encourage them to vote to advance ranked choice voting, an expanded city council, and police oversight reform to the november ballot! A critical vote is happening this afternoon and it needs help!
36817
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
Our coalition members are also sharing the following links to instantly send their offices an email: - support City Council expansion: tinyurl.com/SaveExpansion - support LAPD accountability reforms: tinyurl.com/CRPolice - support lowering the voting age at: tinyurl.com/VOTE16LAEMAIL
tinyurl.com
030
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
If you have time today, we advise also calling the offices of the members of City Council's Rules Committee to tell them which reforms you want on the November ballot (*especially* Council expansion, RCV, and LAPD accountability!) Phone numbers below & in alt text:
IF YOU ONLY HAVE TIME FOR ONE CALL, PLEASE CALL:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT MARQUEECE HARRIS-DAWSON’S OFFICE

Marqueece Harris-Dawson, Council President, Council District 8:
213-473-7008
Nithya Raman, Council District 4: 213-473-7004
Katy Yaroslavsky, Council District 5: 213–473-7005
John Lee, Council District 12: 213-473-7012
Hugo Soto-Martinez, Council District 13: 213-473-7013
271
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
Tell LA City Council to put Charter reforms on the November ballot NOW: - support City Council expansion: tinyurl.com/SaveExpansion - support LAPD accountability reforms: tinyurl.com/CRPolice - support lowering the voting age at: tinyurl.com/VOTE16LAEMAIL
tinyurl.com
011
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
🚨 FRIDAY 6/12 @ 1 PM: LA City Council's Rules Committee meets to discuss Charter reform one last time — just as the Chief Legislative Analyst says “further study is required” on almost all major reforms. Tell Council: No more “study", and no more stalling! Info + talking points: bit.ly/FRLA26
123
Reposted by Fair Rep LA
Faizah Malik (she/her) @faizahforla.bsky.social · 11/06/2026
If you are mad about how broken LA feels, confused why no one seems to be in charge, and brokenhearted that I lost my election to an anti-housing MAGA funded incumbent, let me direct your energy toward the LA City Charter, which is going through a big rewrite. 🧵cc @fairrepla.bsky.social
14816
Reposted by Fair Rep LA
Elizabeth Chou @reporterliz.bsky.social · 08/06/2026
Want a tee-up to the charter reform discussion at LA city hall? I spoke to Raphe Sonenshein, ED of one of the 1990s commissions, about the scandals that prompted the latest reform effort, some headline issues like city services/policing, and more. governancematterspodcast.podbean.com/e/ep-03-reth...
governancematterspodcast.podbean.com
Governance Matters | The Haynes Foundation
<em>Governance Matters</em> spotlights the people and ideas making a difference in our democracy in Los Angeles – with the goal of creating a more responsive, more accountable, and more effective gove...
144
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 30/05/2026
LA VOTERS: want to know where mayoral candidate Andrej A. Selivra stands on reforming City Hall? See what they had to say about Council size, ranked choice voting, and other Charter reform proposals, at: fairrepla.com/2026
000
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 30/05/2026
LA VOTERS: want to know where mayoral candidate @nithyaforthecity.bsky.social stands on reforming City Hall? See what they had to say about Council size, ranked choice voting, and other Charter reform proposals, at: fairrepla.com/2026
031
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 30/05/2026
LA VOTERS: want to know where mayoral candidate Adam Miller stands on reforming City Hall? See what they had to say about Council size, ranked choice voting, and other Charter reform proposals, at: fairrepla.com/2026
000
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 30/05/2026
LA VOTERS: want to know where mayoral candidate Andrew K. Kim stands on reforming City Hall? See what they had to say about Council size, ranked choice voting, and other Charter reform proposals, at: fairrepla.com/2026
000
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 30/05/2026
LA VOTERS: want to know where mayoral candidate Tish Hyman stands on reforming City Hall? See what they had to say about Council size, ranked choice voting, and other Charter reform proposals, at: fairrepla.com/2026
000
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 30/05/2026
LA VOTERS: want to know where mayoral candidate @raeforla.com stands on reforming City Hall? See what they had to say about Council size, ranked choice voting, and other Charter reform proposals, at: fairrepla.com/2026
000
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 30/05/2026
LA VOTERS: want to know where mayoral candidate Nelson Cheng stands on reforming City Hall? See what they had to say about Council size, ranked choice voting, and other Charter reform proposals, at: fairrepla.com/2026
000
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 30/05/2026
LA VOTERS: want to know where mayoral candidate Asaad Alnajjar stands on reforming City Hall? See what they had to say about Council size, ranked choice voting, and other Charter reform proposals, at: fairrepla.com/2026
000
Fair Rep LA @fairrepla.bsky.social · 30/05/2026
LA VOTERS: want to know where mayoral candidate Bryant Acosta stands on reforming City Hall? See what they had to say about Council size, ranked choice voting, and other Charter reform proposals, at: fairrepla.com/2026
000