Reposted by Declan
fuck Adam Tickell, the OU proves that to be bullshit (and reminder the OU offers a pay as you go payment plan through their own student finance arm, its not as generous as SFE but it does make study affordable)
Declan
@dskews.bsky.social
991 followers 7.8K following 38 posts
Science and maths, finance, politics, and I will like/share art until my fingers fall off. Sometimes obsess about weird bits of regulation. The RNLI are amongst the best of us. Would you like some solar panels? I know a guy. Opinions my own etc.
![[source NSSM169 response study]
(3) Soviet Doctrine and Capabilities. “Soviet military doctrine has traditionally rejected the notion of the limited use of nuclear weapons Soviet commentaries on past proposals by Western writers for the demonstrative use of nuclear weapons have characterized suéh use ag adventuristic and dangerous, with significant danger of escalation. Soviet declarations stress that acceptance of a policy of limited nuclear options in Europe would make nuclear war more likely. The theme that deterrence of nuclear war would be weakened, if rules and limitations were established beforehand, has been evident over the past decade in Soviet commentary on-U.S, discussions of "limited Wer" and NATO's strategy of flexible response. Further, there is nothing in available Soviet strategic writings reflecting military planning which anticipates Limited or multistage nuclear attacks of the United States. There is virtually no indication that the Soviets accept the notion that SENSITIVE vieAm pag limited strategic war is feasible or that nuclear weapons could be used in some escalatory manner to create circumstances for negotiations or. bargaining; the Soviets apparently reject ‘the possibility that the US: and the USSR could exercise restraint, once nuclear weapons had been employed against their respective homelands;](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:d7cxynfva4ff62b3ia7mclwn/bafkreicqd7gcbby6mggge6s7hdxb7harx5pao56ezxcabr2gx2emzu7agi)